ABC Story Ignores Reason That Canadian Mother Fled Country to Give Birth

Photo of Scott Whitlock.
  • Bookmark and Share

On Wednesday’s "Good Morning America," anchor Chris Cuomo completely glossed over the health care implications of a Canadian mother giving birth to quadruplets in America and not her home country. According to Cuomo, Karen Jepp and her husband, the new parents of identical quadruplets, had to be flown 300 miles from Calgary to Montana on August 16, because "every neo-natal unit in their country was too crowded to handle four preemie births."

Apparently, it didn’t occur to Mr. Cuomo to wonder why all the hospitals in Canada, a nation with universal health care, were full. During a subsequent interview with Jepp and her husband J.P., the co-host continued with this unquestioning explanation. He elaborated, "...Towards the very end, it gets even more complicated....You know, they're not ready for them at the hospital. Your doctors have to make calls. You have to fly 300 miles to have [the children]." Considering that back in June, "Good Morning America" co-anchor Diane Sawyer announced "a commitment to take a hard look at the health insurance industry," it seems odd that unusual circumstances, which forced a very pregnant mother to fly to another country and give birth, would be of such little interest to Mr. Cuomo.

Story Continues Below Ad ↓

It should be noted that an AP article on the family also buried the reason that the birth took place in America and not Canada.

Overcrowding and long waits may not interest "Good Morning America," but the program does seem to take advantage of any opportunity to make the U.S. medical system look bad. In June, GMA reporter John Berman wondered if crooks who rip off hospitals were doing so because they’re "fed up" with the American health care.

A partial transcript of the August 22 segment, which aired at 8:07am, follows:

Chris Cuomo: "Okay. We all know that a child is an overwhelming blessing for any parent. But imagine quadruplets, identical quadruplets. That's a one-in-15-million blessing and that's what the Jepp family now has. Talk about a difficult delivery. This one took three plane trips and two countries. Here's the story. It took just four minutes on a Sunday afternoon to change the life of the Jepp family forever. These four, tiny miracle babies are identical quadruplets, one of just 50 sets of identical quads in the world. And these little girls, Autumn, Brooke, Calissa and Dahlia, were conceived without the help of fertility drugs. In Karen Jepp's case, one egg split three times to produce four babies. Typically, there are four placentas. But in this rare case, there was just one."

James Grifo (NYU medical center): "This is incredibly rare. You're talking about a one in 11, to one in 15 million event."

Cuomo: "But there was yet another rare event for this Canadian couple. Shortly after she went into labor, the Jepps discovered that every neo-natal unit in their country was too crowded to handle four preemie births. After an hour of frantic phone calls from their doctors, they were jetted off to a hospital in Montana."

Karen Jepp: "The nurses have been wonderful and really helped us out because we're, we have no idea what we're doing."

8:10

Cuomo: "Now, so interesting that on top of all the stress you must have been feeling to deal with the fact that quads were coming, towards the very end, it gets even more complicated. You can't-- You know, they're not ready for them at the hospital. Your doctors have to make calls. You have to fly 300 miles to have them. How did you cope with all of that?"

J.P. Jepp: "Well, you do what you've got to do. And the most important thing is the health of Karen and the health of the babies. It was the right decision to send us where the, the resources were at that moment in time. The staff at the Benefits Hospital in Great Falls, Montana, were absolutely amazing, took care of us medically and then took care of us as people and it turns out to be a blessing in disguise that we made the trip down there and we thank them for all their help."

—Scott Whitlock is a news analyst for the Media Research Center.


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Does this mean there are

Does this mean there are four more anchor babies?

"Fighters are fun but bombers make policy"

Good question BuffNBone

I also want to know if the Canadian Government is paying the US Hospital for all the costs, and when.

Absolutely 4 more anchor

Absolutely 4 more anchor babies.

And you, & me, on the hook for their medical care as taxpayers.

Charming.

I think I may just have to follow this story.  If our governmental agencies don't follow up, and demand repayment, I want to know why not.

David Gregory, do you know which damn network you lie for? ~ Uncle Jimbo, @Blackfive

 

This should have been

This should have been obvious to the newsies. 

Who would travel to Bozemen, Helena, or Great Falls to have a baby if there was a decent hospital in Calgary, Edmonton, or even Winnepeg.

It was obvious to the

It was obvious to the newsies - that's why they glossed over it - not suitable for public reminder - does not fit agenda - please refer to DNC talking point fax...

Simple question

Why not Cuba? According to Mikey it is superior to our health care.

Is there any other

Is there any other explanation for the hospital being too crowded other than Canadian healthcare stinks?

The Canadian

The Canadian hospitals were crowded because too many Americans were fleeing to Canada to benefit from their healthcare system, Balboa? Maybe it was the Canadian National Have a Baby Day? Oh, you. You never let us down... 

The dogs bark, but the caravan moves on.

- Arabian Proverb

Balboa couldn't think of any other reason

so as usual, his mindless query stands "as" total refutation of any problem with socialism healthcare.

 I say don't help mothballbrain out.

 From everything I have ever heard waiting in a long, long line, or even "not available here" are the two main problems with lib healthcare. I certainly see how "not available" is likely in this case (4 units of everything needed instead of one), and the cover story is " long line ". One of the fruits of "government supply" is "never enough", alongside of "too much of what isn't ever needed".

ps- It just occurred to me, that as soon as the libs, if ever, get their national socialism healthcare implemented, the loons will have another wacked out psychotic fest screaming the CIA is running this or that secret hospital experiment and torture death mutilate ward somewhere just discovered by the area51 lib pros. Oh it's going to be so wonderful listening to them whine forever.  Then they'ell have some Halliburton styled ragefest going on over pharmaceuticals that implement drugs in "federally controlled hospitals", where some dark evil collusion is no doubt, the call of the lib rage.

 

I was wondering if anyone

I was wondering if anyone asked the Canadian hospital if this was irregular, them not being able to handle the birth, if it was a "freak" occurrence. 

Ahahahaha bably

rofl - Yes, of course the social healthcare system of our cold hoser northern friends was merely "stressed beyond normal conditions" - of course babbly, of course, no need to cry.

I mean come on think, think o libby. 9 months ago was November, and all the canuckian humpers were still snowstruck inside fearfully awaiting the global warming nightmare, what else were they to do ?

Scott - flown or drove?

Hey Scott. What a story, but something here leaves this reader with a question, or ten. Ha!

The AP story says, "The Jepps drove 325 miles to Great Falls for the births because hospitals in Calgary were at capacity..." The words, fly, flown, jet or plane seem to be missing.

But in the GMA story, "they were jetted off to a hospital in Montana." The words car, drive, driven or taxi seem to be missing.

There is also a reference in the GMA story of, "three plane trips."  Not mentioned in the AP wire story.

Begs the questions:

Did they fly, or did they drive?

Did they fly 3 times and drive once? Or, did they also have to drive back, once, while flying (or being flown, 3 times)?

Or, were they "flown?" Now, that is an interesting question. GMA worded it such that it sounds like they were flown. Does "they were jetted off" imply that a government worker in the Canadian healthcare system actually pick up the phone and find them a jet, on which they would be flown on?

If they actually did flew, did the Canadian government pay for the cost of the flight and ground transportation? And if there were 3 flights, where they flown, or jetted, all three times, or just one or two of the times, while being forced to fly themselves the other times.
After all, were those doctors actually able to book three flights for them, in only "an  hour of frantic phone calls?"

Or, did they drive? If they drove, did the Canadian government reimburse them for gasoline and travel expenses?

Which brings me to my last bit of curiosity? Is the Canadian government picking up the tab for hospital costs in Montana, or, are the parents paying for it, or, are the US taxpayers picking up the tab.

I have no questions regarding what Chris Cuomo wants us to believe.

Gosh Gary

if they ever were astute enough to get the very basics correct and easily explained, they wouldn't be msm reporters now, would they.

 I think their emotionalistic response on air and their awestruck wonderment and fawning and their "immensely intelligent singlular one in 15 million factiod" research gleaning is really what the news viewers want. I guess the proper questions are " How will you heat 4 bottles of Efamil at once ? " - after of course the salacious query of a possible breast feeding issue. Next would be the cost of diapers, of course, with plenty of omg's and gollies included from the lib spew artist newser. Then there's the baby clothes costs for them to whine over.

 Facts are the last thing they ever want to tell us.

US - saving lives

What a blessing that they can come to the US and the lives of their babies, and perhaps of the mother can be saved - that should be the story here.

 

Back when the Dionne

Back when the Dionne quintuplets were all the rage, a woman said "I hear it happens only every ten million times." The other woman responded, "How does she ever get any housework done?"

Or,Shortly after she

Or,

Shortly after she went into labor, the Jepps discovered that every neo-natal unit in their country was too crowded

 

How long was she in labor, was there medical personal traving with them? Why not? I personally dont mind picking up the tab, if the conversation is directed correctly.

And the final question, what

And the final question, what is the citizenship status of the babies? 

As far as costs go, as the father of a premie, I can tell you it isn't going to be cheap! Those neonatal intensive care unit costs can be astronomical (yet worth every penny).

they must choose at age 18 -

they must choose at age 18 - according to the US anyway - canada could probably care less - like the rest of the world

Quadruplets

Are the newborn quadruplets now American Citizens?

They are if they want to be.

They are if they want to be. If that's the rule if you are from south of the border, it must be the rule if you are from north of the border...eh

"Some of us are wise, some of us are otherwise"  Mark Levin

From a medical perspective,

From a medical perspective, this debacle with a silver lining (good outcome from a horrendous situation) illustrates the Charlie Foxtrot of the Candian socialized medical system.  It also painfully points out the embarrasing malfeasance of both the Canadian government and the medical team/hospital assigned to this high risk pregnancy.

The woman had a 2 year old child already.  While any delivery can take on a life of its own different from any others before, typically each succeeding labor and delivery occurs more quickly than preceeding L&D's.  It is also well known that multiparous pregnancy do not go to term, especially if it's quads.  It is unknown if she had a Cesarian Section previously, though statistically at this stage in her pregnancy (31 weeks 3 days at delivery) should not have significantly increased risk for complications.  It is unknown if she had any previous abortions, which can increase risk in a pregnancy.  For the statisticians in the crowd, the woman is currently a G2P5Ab0 as far as has been reported.

The woman goes into labor, presumably confirmed by someone in Canada, hopefully a doctor by training, and then the slapstick Canadian version of the Key Stone Cops ensues.  Because of socialized medicine's rationing, not enough Neonatal Intensive Care Unit equipment is available to care for the babies in all of Canada, or is it just in Calgary?  Instead of flying in the needed equipment from somewhere else, like Great Falls Hospital in Montana!! for instance, those crazy Canucks have little miss preggers IN LABOR be driven 325 miles to Great Falls Hospital in Montana or flown as the ABC report says.  (I'm betting on the airplane over an ambulance, but you never know with those bean counting Canadians and their socialized medicine.)  Anyone else see the crazy logic here?

Now catching babies is easy... as long as everything goes to plan, even in the back of a cab (though I'd want a little more space and sterile environment).  Catching FOUR babies from one uterus is NOT for the faint of heart driving down the road in the middle of nowhere even in a well stocked ambulance.  I mean, if the ambulance had everything you needed for the delivery, then why leave Canada in the first place?  Why not let her deliver in the hospital parking lot in Calgary or the driveway of her home for that matter.  Ditto if a plane was involved.

Well, the neonates are delivered by C-Section in Montana and are doing fine.  Maybe the Canadian health care system had reached their quotas of C-sections this month and she would have had to wait another month before that nice Minister of Health (whatever he's called) allowed more.  Maybe all the ventilators, preemie incubators and biliblankets were in use in all of Canada.  Who knew one woman could screw the pooch that is known as medical care in Canada.

The four little tater tots will be flown home within 5 days of birth if their conditions remain "favorable", but will remain hospitalized in Canada (now they have room?) for 4-6 weeks.  I wonder who was the major motivation to move the babies 5 days out?  Was it an American system used to booting mother and child out within 48 hours, or, was it a Canadian system so stingy they can't even prepare properly for this woman's delivery?

Congratulations to mom and dad.  God bless you and your family.

A big raspberry to the Canadian health care system.  Shame on you.

Killing them with kindness isn't working.  Time to get scrappy with the Donkeys.

Worth the wait?

Our friends at the <a href="http://www.fraserinstitute.ca/admin/books/chapterfiles/wyt2005.pdf">Frasier Institute (PDF)</a> thoughtlessly failed to include maternal wait times.  I guess even socialism cant stop them mommas having babies.  Still the median wait for Gynecological specialists is 7.7 weeks.  Oh, and the the median wait for *treatment* after the specialist appointment is 7.1 weeks. 

When I think about how little I have to wait here and that my son went to NICU (a trip of 60 feet) to a waiting bed.  I thank God and vote conservative.