How about a true Conservative forum, moderated by Rush Limbaugh?  Yeah, I didn't think so.  that would be 'pandering'.  As long as the dems do it, it's ok.  They don't pander.  they "reach out"

BARF

The American Revolution Continued

Would Stephanopoulos spin a GOP debate on defending the Second Amendment as something the Democrats wouldn’t be interested in, at least not yet?

Of course not. Stephanopoulos sees debating "gay issues" as a perfectly natural and desirable progression in poltical evolution... 

The dogs bark, but the caravan moves on.

- Arabian Proverb

Does that mean that George Stephalphabet thinks that Melissa Etheridge looks like Alfred E. Newman?

And there's a good reason why ...

I agree with those who find it absurd that these Democratic candidates proclaim how they would never be tied down to lobbyists and special interests ... and yet, they'll pander to a special interest debate at the drop of a hat. They won't take contributions, (so they say) but when these interest groups summon the candidates and demand that the Democrats obey their dictates, the Democrats can't bow fast enough.

Jeez, if you're going to obey the groups anyway, you might as well take the money ...

When is Steffi going to get a big boy haircut? 

Shouldn't he be wearing long pants?

Isn't it against the child labor laws to hire someone so young?

Stayed tuned to the "Good Morning Liberals" show tomorrow for the answer to these questions and more . . .   

Snuffaluffogus has no credibility.  He's a Clinton administration agent working in the media to push the Clinton agenda. <period> I disregard everything he says. All non-Clintons should do the same.

P.S.  Frankly, I'm glad the GOP doesn't court the "gay" vote.  The GOP is not (or should not be) a party of fragmented special interest groups*, it is for anyone and everyone who cares about freedom, security and prosperity. 

*This is the defining characteristic of fascism. The word fascism comes from the Latin "fascio" which means group.  The fascists of the 20's and 30's separated people into groups - ethnic, racial, religious, etc.  That's what Democrats also do...interestingly enough.

The judges would have also accepted "Melissa Etheridge is the New, More Masculine Ted Koppel!".

What does Teddy think about the comparison??

Think it makes him happy?

Not that I care. Comparing lesbians to the elite media is really funny.

Geez, I'm glad I missed YET ANOTHER Democrapic debat.  The last one had some low ratings, and this one will turn off even more Watchers.   They're gonna eventually have only the Minority Audience....the Audience no one wants to reach.   If you try for the Swing vote, the 40% always votes Dem, the 40% always vote Republican, then the swing vote is the final number to push you to 50%...unless your 40% or part thereof turns on you because you're catering to the fringe, and it doesn't turn you on to vote for your party. 

I hope at least, this debate wasn't geared to the "Core Democrats".......because they may start missing the Debates if this crap keeps up.         

What good is a Free Press, if it is a False Press ?   David Foote  GoE

Melissa's got a better toupee than Koppel.

I'd prefer a debate between the candidates where they ask each other questions.  Why do we need any moderator?

Since government is coercion, politics is largely the exercise of deception regarding the intended use of coercion - George Orwell

First let me say that I know many homo/lesbos and that are far superior to me as human beings.  That said, their sexual practices are disgusting, freaks of nature and devient.  They are only 5% of the population and have influence due to the media far beyond their numbers.  When they do a poll of the military where our soilders say they don't care then I say give them the same rights /obligations as anyone else in the military.  As far as giving them rights to marry that is absurd.  Marriage and the relating beneifts provided by the state to married couples were designed  to foster famlies.  Homo/lesbos can't reproduce naturally.  They are not entitled to those benefits.  There are not other needs they have.  They can inherit from their partners, they can contract with regards to all rights and responsibilities that married couples have. 

 The worst thing about homo/lesbo's are their extremists like Etheridge, Rosie and others.  They should have stayed in the closet.  If I like sex with sheep and if I go ranting about how I like it I should not expect people to look at me like I am normal.  Keep your sexual practics to yourself.

The liberals will do anything to get votes and money.  This is just another group of nuts that vote as a bloc they dems want to keep on the plantation.

As the saying goes: “Those who do not learn for history are doomed to repeat it.”

During their ‘enlightened period’, the Greeks and Roman practiced homosexuality with  great exuberance. Then, because of their escalating militancy, came the ‘great backlash period’ when the Greeks and Romans said enough is enough and began to persecute them and, in some cases, kill them. At that point, ‘the closet’ came into being where, for centuries, they reposed un-noticed. And don’t forget that little incident at Sodom and Gomorrah.

Today, homosexuals, not having learned from history, are beginning to repeat it as they prance out the ‘closet’ door attempting to impose their lifestyle on others. However,  after a period of time when their escalating militancy becomes an intrusion on the general population, the red flag of ‘enough is enough’ will be raised and ‘the closet’ will, once again, be their destination.

What is it about homosexuals in that they appear incapable of learning?