Filmmakers, do you want to impress critics at The New York Times, Newsweek and Time Magazine, while alienating vast legions of moviegoers? Then "Humpday" has the formula for you!
Have your two “straight” male leads have sex with each other in a video for an “experimental homemade pornography” film festival. Oh, and in order to impress those writers (whom you may run into at a Manhattan cocktail party) make sure to stress that it’s not gay and it’s not porn either. It’s art masquerading as “bromance” comedy. Don’t worry, they’ll understand that you’re critiquing straight men or straight society or our uptight Puritanical culture or something. After all, they’re smart like you.
Starring Mark Duplass and Joshua Leonard, “Humpday” is about two college friends who reconnect. Ben (Duplass) has settled down with a wife. Andrew (Leonard), on the other hand, has not and has been traveling as an artist. After a night of partying, they dare each other “to enter an amateur porn contest together.” Even if two straight men would ever broach such a subject, they presumably would sober up in time and let the thing die in embarrassed silence.
But it’s entirely plausible to the kind of critics that think “Humpday” is somehow important.
Mary Pols, of Time, wrote, “Ben and Andrew are like a pair of little boys, pummeling each other constantly to make contact. Watching them in an angry wrestling match after a competitive basketball game, you start to think that maybe they should make out, crazy as it seems. That's the power of this subversive movie; it challenges us as much as it challenges its own characters. ‘Humpday’ makes you squirm and think, in the best possible way.”
Squirm indeed.
Pols mused, “Ostensibly, Ben and Andrew's conversations are about sexual boundaries and the ways in which straight men, even enlightened ones, recoil at the thought of gay sex (male, that is), but they are just as much about the limits of adult friendships and the boxes we often put our oldest friends in.” Here’s a thought: straight men, even the “enlightened ones” (ie. the ones Pols would be caught eating arugula with), do not want to have gay sex. If they wanted to have gay sex, they would not be straight.
In article about other bromance movies of the summer, Newsweek’s Ramin Setoodeh quoted “Humpday” director Lynn Shelton saying, “straight men are really invested in being assured they're straight. There seems to be anxiety about that. But I've seen these relationships in my life, men in love with each other, these man crushes. What does that mean?” Setoodeh answered Shelton’s question, “It means that as long as you keep laughing, Hollywood is the new city of brotherly love.”
Here’s another answer: in the bizarro world of popular culture, where every thought is punctuated with “not that there’s anything wrong with that,” being unambiguously straight is the orientation that dare not speak its name. It’s guys who like women – and just women – that are the unhealthy ones.
The New York Times’ Stephen Holden wrote, “To guys everywhere: ‘Humpday’ has your number. With X-ray vision, this serious indie comedy, written and directed by Lynn Shelton, sees through its male characters’ macho pretensions to contemplate the underlying forces hard-wired into men’s psyches in a homophobic culture. Think of it as a Judd Apatow or Kevin Smith buddy film turned inside out.”
Ah, hard-wired homophobia! Of course.
With “Bruno” and “Humpday” both being released this summer, a whole lot of benighted, homophobic men will indulge their “macho pretensions” and stay in their caves. And that’s good news; movie critics hate long lines for popcorn.



















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
Hurl alert
July 20, 2009 - 15:29 ET by jdlybrandYuck! This is what passes as entertainment? I wish my Dad was still around, but I'm also glad he's not here to witness the excrement that's put on movie screens nowadays.
"What a revoltin' development this is!"
Chester Riley
vommeter
July 21, 2009 - 04:27 ET by m1xramMy vommeter is pegged at 3gal/min. It's like Mr Creosote all over again.
He has already failed... his country.
"It’s art masquerading as
July 20, 2009 - 15:37 ET by Chris Norman"It’s art masquerading as “bromance” comedy."
"Bromance"? Yikes. Gee, I must remember to run this concept by my buddies some time. Yeah, and see how long it takes to get beaten up....
The "Mainstream" Media: By liberals. For liberals.
→ Stool Pigeons
July 20, 2009 - 15:41 ET by Cool ArrowYeah! That'll get 'em into the theaters.
So, did Fumbledork and Harry Potter get it on in the latest witch movie?
Was it a "My wand's bigger than your wand confrontation"?
CA,It is kind of funny
July 20, 2009 - 15:54 ET by Chris NormanCA,
It is kind of funny when you hear about gay groups trying to find some kind of gay subtext in famous male friends or characters in movies etc. They're so desperate for validation that they'll go to any - er - lengths - to find it.
The "Mainstream" Media: By liberals. For liberals.
→ Tru dat
July 20, 2009 - 15:57 ET by Cool ArrowThey're trying to get a plug in every chance they get.
Never understood the Liza Minelli thing, though.
I think she's probably
July 20, 2009 - 16:33 ET by Chris NormanI think she's probably popular with them because she's easy to impersonate. Probably ditto for Megan McCain.
The "Mainstream" Media: By liberals. For liberals.
I wish there was an I.Q
July 20, 2009 - 15:45 ET by MightyMouthI wish there was an I.Q meter they could put at the theater door. I be it would never peg 80.
"There are two types of people in this country; those who provide freedom and those who enjoy it." MM says...
Mighty... LOL...Not even
July 20, 2009 - 15:51 ET by bigtimerMighty...
LOL...Not even close!
Doubling down on stupid is not a particularly good idea. ~Andrew Breitbart
well BT at least they have pillows covering up the panties!
July 20, 2009 - 16:26 ET by MightyMouth"There are two types of people in this country; those who provide freedom and those who enjoy it." MM says...
You have got to be
July 20, 2009 - 15:49 ET by bigtimerYou have got to be kidding.
I'm just shaking my head...I cannot believe people pay $$$ to see filthy junk like this.
Doubling down on stupid is not a particularly good idea. ~Andrew Breitbart
The left and their
July 20, 2009 - 16:27 ET by MrSnugglesThe left and their homoerotic fantasies...
MrSnuggles - do you remember seeing the writers on strike a
July 20, 2009 - 22:12 ET by Cape Conservativefew years ago???? How much are you willing to bet 98% of them hate straight men and women? Why else would they continue to shove their 'bromantic' themes at us? Hollywood isn't referred to as Hollyweird for nothing! But guess what, it AIN'T working! They continue to lose $$$$ left and right and I say good for them, they're getting what they deserve!
Just one more reason to save a few bucks - we don't go to the movies but maybe once every year or so...IF there is a good children's movie to take the grandkids to ;-)
This comment comes from a proud Tea Party attendee, otherwise designated by Homeland Security as a Domestic Right Wing Terrorist! It is no dishonor to be in a minority in the cause of liberty and virtue ~ Sam Adams
Turning an x-ray on society
July 20, 2009 - 16:57 ET by snaggletoothieTurning an x-ray on society has nothing to do with art. All these writers that so love this movie are anti-x-ray. If they weren't they'd be all up in Obama's business. And that's not going to happen.
Nope
July 20, 2009 - 16:57 ET by Paragrouper“Straight men are really invested in being assured they're straight."
I'm not buying--neither the premise or the tickets for the movie.
"Beware the fury of the patient man." - John Dryden
Paragrouper
July 20, 2009 - 20:43 ET by NorthCoasterI'm not buying it either. My take on the whole premise, is that the homoerotics are totally invested in getting assurance that their lifestyle choices are accepted. The ultimate goal, is to gain acceptance from society (Daddy and Mommy) thereby validating their choices.
Yep
July 20, 2009 - 17:11 ET by MES41067(Manhattan cocktail party)Enough said!!!!!!!!!!!
(Lenin called them "useful idiots" I for one have no use for them.)
Movie critics are notorious
July 20, 2009 - 17:40 ET by balboaMovie critics are notorious for over-thinking reviews for movies that are not easily pegged.
Stupid.
July 20, 2009 - 19:50 ET by GregEStupid.
The MSM continue to alienate
July 20, 2009 - 21:51 ET by nadadhimmiThe MSM continue to alienate the majority of the population with crap like this and then wonder why their ratings, ad revenues, businesses and carreers are in the dumper. Keep it up, you are self destructing at a accelerating rate. Is the ass kissing adulation you receive at DC and Manhatten cocktail parties worth the loss of your jobs and industry??
Well said, nada!!!
July 20, 2009 - 22:13 ET by Cape ConservativeThis comment comes from a proud Tea Party attendee, otherwise designated by Homeland Security as a Domestic Right Wing Terrorist! It is no dishonor to be in a minority in the cause of liberty and virtue ~ Sam Adams