ABC Global Warming Special Makes Up Future, But It’s Not ‘Sci-Fi’

  • Bookmark and Share


The world is about to end, or at least that’s according to ABC’s “Good Morning America.” The June 2 segment promoted a new special called “Earth 2100.” The program follows Lucy, a girl born in 2009, and her dramatic story about how if we don’t take drastic measures immediately climate change will cause droughts, floods, mass migration, and starvation.

This may sound straight from a science-fiction movie, but “Good Morning America” went to great lengths to assure viewers this wasn’t science fiction and that by airing this series they were changing journalism. Bob Woodruff, host of the special, called making up what will happen in the future “a different kind of journalism.” The segment quoted him saying, “not a prediction of what will happen, but what might happen.”

The clips shown from the “Earth 2100” premiere painted a devastating picture that resembled the science-fiction movie “The Day After Tomorrow.” The cartoon of Lucy and her family showed an invasion of dragon flies, people migrating away from climate-ravaged areas for a better life, and, of course, New York City flooding. Clips from previous natural disasters were shown as well.

After the preview, “Good Morning America’s” Diane Sawyer responded and tried to pretend the whole program had some news value. “Amazing someone born into 2009. We’re not talking about sci-fi here and to come up with a human voice for it, a family voice, for it.” ABC left out the necessary crystal ball from the segment, so the audience was left to guess how they could predict 2100 so accurately.

Story Continues Below Ad ↓

Woodruff did attempt to establish some credibility for the project. “The idea that within this century a civilization can lie in ruins is unbelievable. But according to some of the world’s leading minds it’s a real possibility.” He never did mention exactly who these so-called “world’s leading minds” were or how ABC chose its experts.

Van Jones, White House adviser for Green Jobs, was one of only two sources in the segment – apparently a “leading mind.” ABC mostly used “fictional character” Lucy for it’s supposedly fact-based piece. Lucy’s family escaped to New York from Florida. Jones backed up the cartoon fictional series’ future predictions. “You’re going to see greenhouses, multi-story greenhouses and each floor will be growing, you know, carrots and potatoes, etcetera and that’ll just be considered normal.” Jones’ rosy picture of the greener future forgot to mention who exactly was going to mandate people growing potatoes from their greenhouses and how New York suddenly transformed to an eco-paradise complete with blimps in the sky in just a few decades.

Woodruff’s green predictions turn black by 2070 when sea levels rise and flood New York – “the streets were filling with water.” Stanley Feder, a former CIA analyst, described it as: “When New York begins to flood, it will be total chaos.”

What “Good Morning America” failed to show was the other side of the picture of their far-cast “Earth 2100.” By creating a series used to scare people about the future of the planet, it failed to show that this might not happen. The segment even closed with Woodruff discussing how if we do nothing this is how the Earth will end up like; we must act quickly.  

Yet, “Good Morning America” was clearly pleased with not only the series, but themselves. Woodruff stated, “This is also, I have to say, this a different kind of journalism. In the past we’ve always looked at those that have already happened in the past, and those happening in the present, but what about the future?”

This is a different kind of journalism, and a complete rewrite from ABC’s original plans for “Earth 2100.” Working with left-wing activists in June 2008, the network warned viewers that civilization was poised to go the way of the Roman Empire and the Mayan civilization. The Web site promo for “Earth 2100” discussed “100 years from now when New York is abandoned.” Now that part of the Web site is down and it simply promotes the new version of the special.

As “Good Morning America” co-anchor Chris Cuomo put it on June 12, 2008: “We’re asking you to create a story that has yet to unfold – what our world will look like in 100 years if we don’t save our troubled planet.” The network invited viewers to turn into prophets and “report back” about what life is like in the year 2100.
 
The call went out for user-generated content depicting what life would be like in the future. According to the story, ABC was seeking video submissions. “We are asking you to use your imagination to create short videos about what it would be like to live through the next century if we stay on our current path. Using predictions from top experts, we will brief participants on global conditions in the years 2015, 2050, 2070 and 2100 – and we want you to describe the dangers that are unfolding before your eyes. “

The Media Research Center submitted a video and will post its submission on June 3.


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

I have often wondered

How New Yorkers would live under 2000 feet of ice.

2000 feet of ice? Get it

2000 feet of ice?

Get it right.  5,000 feet of ice.

The very definition of

The very definition of SCIFI is science as fiction usually translated into future senarios where one can speculate on how people and science interact.  I would say that any film that speculates future events is fiction, whether based on facts of not, and this film is science fiction.

New speak at its finest. 

Sounds more like

Sounds more like science-fantasy to me...

Nah - pure fantasy. There's

Nah - pure fantasy. There's no science involved.

Fantasy??

Science, Schmience.  Will there be unicorns??

"Enquiring minds are wasted."

June 2 nd. Snow closes roads in Colorado

Tail Ridge road closedToday.

Oh If i comment on a facebook that it's global cooling, I get replies like "we are all full up on crazy" 

Science is going into the ash can of history.

Reagan VS Carter and 0bama

UCW

Yesterday my wife and I walked into the Wal-Mart right after passing a bank sign that said it was 83°.

When we came out after a short time shopping (30 minutes, tops) it was 60°.  The news said it was the largest drop in temperature in a half hour's time ever for our area.

I, of course, started burning books and waiting for Dennis Quade to come and save us.

Just keep in mind

The vast percentage of these bogus "predictions based on science" turn out to be totally erroneous.

Remember the nuclear winter, the silent spring, the global population bomb, not to mention the currently fashionable "climate change".

All wrong except for climate change because, of course,  the climate is always changing.

But that won't stop these bozos who will put out these theories for any number of reasons, whether it is to get grant money, gain prestige among other like minded nitwits, racism, elitism, or to promote their own future vision of a pristine earth, devoid of humankind.

People will give you a catastrophic vision of tomorrow as a means of gaining control of today. Be afraid, be very afraid.

Besides there's no need to write a story, "1984" has already been written. 

Wow, We will all be saved ! Only If we, save the planet.

And the moslems are on board with this?

Reagan VS Carter and 0bama

Of course they will be.....

Just as they, like Western cultures, are worried about overpopulation destroying the planet.

Birthrate in Western Europe: 1.8

Birthrate in the Muslim world: 8.1

BTW...Diane Sawyer must have taken lessons from Tom Daschle. She's really got that serious, concerned look down pat.

I didn't think it was physically possible, but this both sucks and blows.  -Bart Simpson

 

Where did you get Muslims in

Where did you get Muslims in all of this?  Stick to the topic.

Where did you get Muslims

Where did you get Muslims in all of this

We are sticking to teh topic of SciFi AGW.  The muslim community ie those in teh ME dont give a rats ass about AGW.  If they did they would give up their oil wasting ways and find more sustainable methods using the solar/wind/water power available to them.

Dont get ur scarf in a wad camel.

Why don't you include

Why don't you include the non-Muslim countries that produce oil to, including the US (Alaska, anyone?).  Please, you use the oil, don't you?  If the US (the largest consumer of oil) didn't use oil, a lot less would be drilled.  Use your brain.

Camel it wasnt my comment,

Camel it wasnt my comment, you asked why pick on Muslims and I gave a plausable explanation.  I dont think that AGW is a big problem in the first place.  I merely was irked at your comment so came up with some crap.

And "Use your brain", I dont think drilling my brain would produce much oil.

My apologies.

Sorry about that.  Obviously my comment was misdirected.

→ Camel

Although Alaska does produce oil, it's not a country.

"The only reason Clarence Thomas is on the court is because he's black". - Joe Biden

I said the US and then put

I said the US and then put Alaska in parenthesis, specifying a location within the US.

Why don't we talk about

Why don't we talk about what's REALLY going to happen.  Climate's going to... stay the same.  Meanwhile, the United States will cease to exist as a country because trillions of dollars in debt handed out by Obama caused a pure economic meltdown.

At this link:

At this link: http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2009/29may_noaaprediction.htm find NASA's recently published Solar Cycle Prediction.  Note how it is circumspect regarding the accuracy of their predictions.  The final sentences in the article read, "Meanwhile,
the sun pays little heed to human committees. There could
be more surprises, panelists acknowledge, and more revisions
to the forecast.

"Go
ahead and mark your calendar for May 2013," says Pesnell.
"But use a pencil."

No such wobbling when it comes to globabl warming.  When it comes to that topic, NASA included, they are absolutely sure of their predictions. 

So, as the NASA article on Solar Cycles concludes, I will "use a pencil" when it comes to predictions from the global warming crowd.  

As far as ABC goes, they are full of crap, as usual . . .

Gullible warming

I will lay out just a little internal contradiction the fools can't seem to recognize.  If the planet warms by 2 degrees.  If we calculate the surface mass and notice it is mostly water, the amount of water on the surface going up by only 2 degrees is so incredibly much in terms of BTU's and evaporation.  They assume it will warm but evaporation will not change.  wrong.  A hurricane is both warming and evaporation.  The evaporation alone will wipe out the drought they claim wilkl be every where.  Of course if water evaporation increases, we have more cloudy days also which inturn disrupts sunshine and warming.

ABC may as well have shown

ABC may as well have shown an old episode of The Jetsons...

The "Mainstream" Media: By liberals. For liberals.

Fix that sig, Chris

The "Mainstream" Media: By idiots. For idiots.

Yes, but I thought that was

Yes, but I thought that was implied. 

The "Mainstream" Media: By liberals. Fr liberals.

Crichton: the man who knew too much

Oliver "Dumb As A Rock" Stone should make a conspiracy movie on the mysterious, early death of one of the most articulate, respected, educated and accomplished "climate change" critics, Michael Crichton who succumbed to cancer rather quickly despite his medical training and degree as a doctor.

It just reminds me of Russians recently killing a critic by exposing him to radiation. Or how Joe McCarthy's early death was explained away by Democrats (and therefore in our "history" books) using the stereotype of an Irish drunkard.

McCarthy wasn't a

McCarthy wasn't a stereotypical Irish drunkard.  He was simply your standard alchoholic who consumed copious amounts of booze.

By the way, how do the Republicans explain away his death, if differently from the Democrats?

Jer

so you knew McCarthy, did you?

Educate yourself. Ignorance is no excuse. Don't just dismiss McCarthy's death so reflexively and superficially just because you've been led to believe such.

And his death is more of a Marxist v. West issue, not Republican, another rote citing you make. One of his key witnesses died the night before testifying ... allegedly commiting suicide by jumping in front of a truck. Shades of Vince Foster and many others who oppose Marxists.

Wait, so McCarthy was

Wait, so McCarthy was assassinated? And so was Crichton?

 

Know McCarthy? Probably better than you.

Excuse my ignorance and lack of education, j17ghs.  I guess neither the two full biograghies of McCarthy and the biography of his associate Roy Cohn which I have read, nor my American History degree with special emphasis on the early Cold War era sufficiently qualify me to post my earlier comment about Joe McCarthy.

But, I will try to educate myself a little further on the topic so that I might keep up with you.

Jer

Jer, it might take a while

Jer, it might take a while for you.

Right bretzy...

I calcuclate about ten seconds to run complete circles around you and j17ghs combined.

Jer

You mean like Ted Kennedy?

"He was simply your standard alchoholic who consumed copious amounts of booze."

You mean like Ted Kennedy, whose consumption of "copious amounts of booze" actually caused the death of an innocent woman?

The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States.
The US Constitution

Unless you're a fetus.
The US Supreme Court

Pretty much, although Teddy

Pretty much, although Teddy stopped drinking some time ago, did he not.  Not sure.

Jer

This truly beggars belief

I have to wonder: do these people even realize what they're saying and doing anymore? Did none of them ever have a clue, or have they all been taken over by the pod people? How can a supposed news outlet sink to this (Soviet era) Pravda-like level of fantasy and indoctrination and be so seemingly oblivious to it?

→ Stop it danebramage

That's an insult to Pravda.

Looks like maybe Pravda has a better take on America than the MSM.

It's a very good article.

"The only reason Clarence Thomas is on the court is because he's black". - Joe Biden

I know, CA

That's why I said Soviet-era Pravda. I think our crowd has even them beat, and they used to be the gold standard for Party-controlled propaganda.

Once Again -

I know I have mentioned this a few times but since these kooky, creative asshats are going to inundate us on a continual basis I figure it's 'cool' for me to reply with a bit of reality.

FOR YEARS the medias have made up stories, history, futures, and present situations to prove their totally erroneous points. That is the ONLY way they can corroborate an 'issue' or prove their 'points'. And the movie ''The Day After Tomorrow'' is the best example I can think of.

Can you imagine what their world will be like once grass is legal?

The good part DoK

The good part DoK is that here in California they actually want to legalize it and then tax it!

Taxing a weed that even the simplist mind can figure out how to grow! All you do is toss a few seeds on the ground sprinkle a little water around and then get out of the way! Unless you're looking for some gourmet pot, but you can still grow plenty with next to no effort.

I'm guessing that they'll get about $6.27 in tax revenue.  

"droughts, floods, mass

"droughts, floods, mass migration, and starvation." were all fictional events which have never happened in history until Al proved they exist, right before he invented the internet.

Oh and the real nut cases.

They mock people and call them deniers.  How dare people deny reality.  Then we find out their definition of reality is imagination. 

The more i study this phenomena, the more I see mysticism and old behaviors just like witch doctors worked up.

I watched parts of it.  My

I watched parts of it.  My primary thought was that we have a supposed news network that can't get current news right, and now they're making up future news...  What's incredible to me is that they expect to be taken seriously, and sadly enough, by some they probably will be.

What liberals are doing is

What liberals are doing is nothing more than child abuse. They are feeding kids the idea that we're all doomed to drown, or burn from global warming. Kids don't need to be fed a diet of unsubstantiated stupidity.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.