President Obama and other liberals have frequently criticized the previous administration for a lack of transparency. But now it seems the Obama White House is practicing the same things liberals criticized President Bush and Vice President Cheney for.
So on the July 22 edition of “Fox and Friends,” anchor Brian Kilmeade brought to viewer’s attention the Obama administration’s hypocrisy on their usage of the “Presidential Communication Privilege.”
Kilmeade recalled the “outrage” that erupted during the two terms of President Bush when energy executives met in secret with Vice President Dick Cheney and the public questioned their influence on the President’s energy plan. The administration claimed “Presidential Communication Privilege,” and never released the names. Subsequently, “Bush was vilified because of that.”
Hypocritically, President Obama has done the exact same thing with his health care plan. Fourteen different executives involved with the drug, medical, and hospital industries, have gone to the White House to advise the President on the health care reform bill.
The left-leaning watchdog group, Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, is suing the White House today over their refusal to release the names. Is it not a legitimate request to ask how much influence these captains of industry are yielding over a piece of landmark legislation that will assuredly “revolutionize our lives? So far it appears that among the mainstream media, only Fox News thinks so.
The following exchange was aired on the July 22 edition of "Fox and Friends":
BRIAN KILMEADE, co-host, "Fox and Friends": But the other thing I would like to bring up is, do you remember the outrage? I still remember, it lasted basically through all both Bush terms. Who were those energy executives that went to meet in secret with Dick Cheney? Why are these guys meeting with Dick Cheney and what influence do they have over the President’s energy plan. Well, they never found out who went in.
And Bush was vilified because of that. Well guess who did the same thing? Barack Obama. When it came to special interest, this watchdog group says, “do me a favor, we have here that 14 different executives have come to see you involved with the drug industry and the medical, hospital industry. Could you just give me their names so we can see their role in the final product that we are all going to be signing on to that is going to revolutionize our lives?”
And basically the White House says, I don’t think so, they are not going to release the names!
ALISYN CAMEROTA, co-host: The Secret Service cited something called “Presidential Communication Privilege” for their decision not to disclose this list. I hope the list include doctors by the way.
STEVE DOOCY, co-host: Somebody from the AMA and also somebody from Johnson & Johnson. They have a list of 14 people and said when did these people come in? Actually one of the people talked to us, Billy Tauzin talked with someone and said actually the stuff that really got done was over in the senate.
CAMEROTA: But they are trying to figure out just how much influence these heads of pharmaceutical companies and insurers are exerting over the policy and over the White House. It's a fair question. It's a good thing that this watchdog group is looking into it they are going to sue the White House today to try to get that list.
DOOCY: And to Brian's point, you know everybody was screaming to high heaven during the Bush years about that but do you hear from any of the other channels? I don't think so.



















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
Transparency...
July 22, 2009 - 13:16 ET by onewiseguy...in this administration is like "the most ethical Congress" claim of Pelosi......pure, unadulterated horse hooey.
HMMMMM
July 22, 2009 - 13:19 ET by rick007Communist goverments are never open
LOL
July 22, 2009 - 14:09 ET by 10ksnooker.... and the axiom, Communist always lie, about everything.
Are these goobers still on
July 22, 2009 - 13:20 ET by balboaAre these goobers still on TV? How is that possible?
bal
July 22, 2009 - 13:30 ET by larry on LIfox keeps them on just for people like you.
Do you admit that Obama has
July 22, 2009 - 13:54 ET by Scuba DudeDo you admit that Obama has reneged on his promise of a "transparent" Administration? Because it appears you would rather deflect criticism and comment on the people on Fox and Friends" instead of commenting that his Administration is about as transparent as a block of granite.
The Obama Administration: THE most fiscally irresponsible Administration EVER
Don't hold your breath for a reply
July 22, 2009 - 14:16 ET by Chris NormanBalboa's interest is geared more towards light media, movies, television, and pop culture in general. He doesn't usually address political policy or practices.
The "Mainstream" Media: By liberals. For liberals.
Ratings
July 22, 2009 - 14:49 ET by UtherpendThat is the answer Balboa, they have BETTER ratings than all the other hack news channels that only put out what they are allowed to by the white house. But I guess numbers only matter when they are pro PEBO.
"For a people who are free, and who mean to remain so, a well-organized and armed militia is their best security."
I think you are right
July 22, 2009 - 14:53 ET by Scuba DudeI think you are right Chris.
This will most likely be his reply.
His comments tend to try and excuse anything the Dims/Libtards do by saying a Republican/Conservative did the same thing.
The Obama Administration: THE most fiscally irresponsible Administration EVER
Sure I'll admit that. Even
July 22, 2009 - 15:51 ET by balboaSure I'll admit that. Even Fox & Friends stumbles upon a sensible opinion, every now and then.
And their the only ones.
July 23, 2009 - 09:38 ET by CobraManToo bad none of the rest of the MSM has "stumbled" onto this as well. Where's CNN, MSNBC, and the rest on this obvious hypocrisy by the Obama administration?
The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States.
The US Constitution
Unless you're a fetus.
The US Supreme Court
Truth Hurt???
July 22, 2009 - 14:00 ET by flyingmonkeySimple question Balboa. Is the story accurate?
I like Goobers. Raisinettes too!!!
LOL Now even Fox and Freinds is scooping the MSM
July 22, 2009 - 13:53 ET by c5thenIt's no wonder that their ratings are more than the combined morning shows of the broadcast networks.
Throw 'da bums out!
no one re-elected who voted for socialism or debt
www.loyaltoliberty.com
Hypocrisy
July 22, 2009 - 13:59 ET by slickwillie2001The Bamster's hypocrisy on signing statements is just as thick, and during the campaign he criticized President George W. Bush for the same thing. I don't expect the liberal media to take notice.
I can't see
July 22, 2009 - 14:47 ET by Airforce_5_ONo literally I can't see anything this administration is doing. They have been about as transparent as mud, and I think I am giving them credit there!
"Obama lied, transparency died!" Michelle Malkin
I really enjoy watching F&F
July 22, 2009 - 15:02 ET by pitter43I really enjoy watching F&F but you hardly need them to see that Barry Sotero is lying every time he opens his mouth. The democrat/liberals just won't admit it even they have to see it. They're not all that bright but they are alive, I think.
Transparency Is Happening
July 22, 2009 - 15:03 ET by sic721As every day goes by, more and more people are seeing right through him!!!
"The human race divides itself politically into those who want to be controlled, and those who have no such desire."-Robert A. Heinlein
Handshake Snub
July 22, 2009 - 15:17 ET by BigSpoon65Anyone else see the mpeg circulating of Obama moving down a receiving line in Russia with president Medvedev and 4 times in a row Obama extends his hand and is snubbed? Probably not! Next question. When the Iraqi man threw his shoe at president Bush, which main stream media channel did not loop the feed and replay it all day? Despite my rebuke of everything Obama is and stands for, I am not happy about this blatant snubbing of our leader.
Winston Churchill ~ "Socialism is the philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy."
→ I saw it Spoon
July 22, 2009 - 15:22 ET by Cool ArrowThe video reveals Obama was obviously making an introduction rather than reaching for a handshake.
In my mind, it's one thing, but it's being presented as something else entirely.
Remember...
July 22, 2009 - 18:01 ET by retroconto a "ruler," as Obama's own people have described him, the concept of "transparency" is EXACTLY VAT VE TELL YOU IT EEZ!
So, if we're holding back the names of people with whom we consult, that's "priviledge." If the previous admin is doing it, that's "closed doors and smoke filled room politics."
If the current people in power are letting policy be set behind closed doors, and by non-constitutional, non-congressionally appointed "czars" instead of cabinet leaders in official dicussions, that's just a detail. But if there's a tidbit in an old memo by the previous VP that will make the last administration, and hence, the other party, look bad, then it's "necessary for transparency reasons, to release those documents."
If the previous VP has a private meeting with the head of the CIA during a time of war, it's "inappropriate and possibly undo influencing." But if the current President "summons" the head of the CBO, right after the CBO critisizes his health care programs costs (as the CBO should, being the primary point of oversight to the executive branch), and they meet behind closed doors, well then, that's just an information sharing opportunity, i guess.
Knock, knock. Who’s there? Obama’s not telling
July 22, 2009 - 19:23 ET by StewartIIIKnock, knock. Who’s there? Obama’s not telling
http://michellemalki...