Today’s version of our exercise, in which we dissect the media’s attempts at interjecting bias into a simple headline, may stun some of you.
The shocking aspect? The Washington Post didn’t partake in the liberal doctoring of the headline. Let’s take a look…
The Pentagon just released a report entitled ‘Measuring Stability and Security in Iraq,’ which highlights a decline in violence in the country in 2008.
Surprisingly enough, the WaPo ran this headline:
Violence Declines Further in Iraq
While positive news in a Post headline is a bit hard to believe, they did include the following sub-headline, managing to interject that ol’ liberal pessimism we’re more accustomed to:
Pentagon Report Cites Factors That Could Rekindle Attacks
That said, we have to give them some credit for combining the positive and negative into one headline, making it less biased than their competitors. Observe…
Agence France-Presse took this out of the report, demonstrating that most glasses in the AFP break room are probably half-empty:
Iraq still locked in 'communal struggle:' Pentagon report
Our good friends at the San Francisco Chronicle crank it up a notch, making one wonder if they even have glasses, by completely ignoring the positive aspect of the Pentagon report:
Deaths increase for Iraqi forces, fall for GIs
ABC News used the AP headline which echoed that same theme:
Iraq Forces Gain More Control, but Lose More Lives
What made the AP article interesting is that they derived their headline by comparing September deaths from this year, with September deaths from the previous year, focusing on Iraqi security forces – thus the increase.
Contrasting that, Reuters ran a similar article about the death toll of civilians in September, noting that the number has been halved in comparison to the previous year.
It’s all in the eye of the beholder and unfortunately, most of the media turns a blind eye to good news. For example…
The Houston Chronicle took the same AP article and interjected their own headline:
Baghdad fighters' deaths up over '07
What exactly constitutes a ‘Baghdad fighter’ is debatable. That term could encompass both Iraqi security forces and U.S. forces. Maybe they also include local boxers? You can only wonder where the Chronicle cherry picks their loose facts.
Regardless, it really is stunning that in a sea of liberal media bias, it took the Washington Post to look on the bright side of things.
As always, feel free to provide your own versions of potential biased headlines…
Photo Credit: Reuters/Erik de Castro



















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
Iraqi Forces Struggle to Contain Outbreaks
October 1, 2008 - 10:11 ET by HockeyKid(of rejoicing in the streets...)
Stadiums in Iraq now being
October 1, 2008 - 10:22 ET by SickofLibsStadiums in Iraq now being used for sports, not public beheadings.
Just saw a story about the Iraqi national soccer team openly practicing in a Baghdad stadium. Demonstrates just a "slight decline in violence."
Struggle for Control
October 1, 2008 - 10:33 ET by PSPCplIRAQI SECURITY FORCES STRUGGLE FOR CONTROL
"Dude, I gotta go."
Oh ho!
October 1, 2008 - 10:39 ET by BlondeI did a double take and then burst out laughing!
David Gregory, do you know which damn network you lie for? ~ Uncle Jimbo, @Blackfive
Factors That Could Rekindle Attacks
October 1, 2008 - 10:40 ET by Fist of EtiquetteOne factor? That members of a certain political party here in America have a stake in failure and will say and do whatever they can to make sure any United States success is reversed.
This morning (I'm in the DC area) I heard an Obama radio ad...
October 1, 2008 - 11:08 ET by Prester John....that was complaining about the Iraqis having the gall to build a giant Ferris wheel in Baghdad instead of giving the US the money to help rebuild America.
Now the ad was complaining about the $10 billion/month the Bush/McCain regime is supposedly spending in Iraq (instead of using it to "rebuild" America), but it also just happened to leave out the fact that it is a Democrat controlled Congress that continues to appropriate the $10 billion/month for operations in Iraq.
Oh well.
I'm confused, I seem to
October 1, 2008 - 11:17 ET by Dan The Man 2I'm confused, I seem to remember that the left wanted our troops to leave and let the Iraqi troops be the ones to keep the peace. Now it is happening and they still aren't happy? Well, there they go again.
Nuke em til they glow then shoot em in the dark.
The SF Chronicle "completely
October 1, 2008 - 15:59 ET by Morgan WickThe SF Chronicle "completely ignored the positive aspect of the Pentagon report" by running a headline reading "Deaths... fall for GIs"?
Chronicle
October 1, 2008 - 18:00 ET by Rusty WeissThe Chronicle headline was meant to focus on the rise in deaths, and mention the falling numbers for GI's as an afterthought. In retrospect, perhaps completely wasn't the best choice, though I do think it completely skips the fact that violence in general is down.
Rusty
Headlines
October 1, 2008 - 16:22 ET by jaywlNO LIBERAL DOCTORING IN POST NEWSBUSTERS REPORTS
or
NEWS WATCHDOG GIVES CREDIT TO POST LESS BIAS SAYS NEWSBUSTERS
All accurate, "but is it true?"
You know the famous story,
October 1, 2008 - 16:28 ET by GrannyGrump42You know the famous story, do you not, of the footrace between the American and the Russian? The American won handily.
The next day, the Pravda headline ran:
"Russian finishes second in race, American next to last"