When we discover a "Liberal Gene", one which makes the holder more likely to gut the military, increase taxation, and widen welfare programs to the point of socialism - will we be correct in aborting them?  Just asking.....

I came across this headline and read teh article.  I thank God taht the goverbnment does not control health care.  Can you imagine this ingrate making the life and death decisions for a national healthcare system?  Ever see THX, this reminds me of teh government controlled sitiation. 

Nuke em til they glow then shoot em in the dark.

If this dim bulb understood capitalism he'd realize that the only way a financial burden could be transferred involuntarily from one person to another is in an Anti-Capitalist system. 

Therefore, this guy is an idiot - he's an intellectual burden on society and should retroactively aborted. 

"they are essentially stranding the cost of their child's life upon others."

Who are these "others" this mad man refers to? Not I, not anyone here at NB, not in my state of North Carolina or the east coast for that matter. Obviously Sarah Palin and her family have the finance to care for their child and even if they didn't what business is it of his or ours!

So once more let me grab my stick and beat this dead horse ONE...MORE...TIME.

STICK TO THE ISSUES!!

"9 out of 10 doctors agree that flag burning is the number one killer of liberals."

This is one of the ugliest, most disgusting things I've seen written so far this election cycle.  What will this writer do when suddenly the society around him deems his own life 'a financial burden' and orders him exterminated?  How much further until the same argument is used to exterminate other 'unproductive' members of society?  The elderly, the injured, or the sick?

The "pro-choice" crowd has become completely disgusting.  Those on the pro-life side of this argument have been warning us for quite a while that this level of thinking would be the result of a society that doesn't respect the life of others.  Sadly, too many didn't listen, or didn't care.

gotta have more cowbell baby!

I think it is time to perform a retro-active abortion on mr. Provenzo since it seems he has become marginally productive to this society.

This so called 'writer' hit a nerve I didn't think anyone could hit.

To think that a child should be killed just because he or she doesn't fit our view of what a perfect child should be or because they may be a burden to other people is a hideous thought.

Just who bears the burden here? I think it's the parents, not society. However, since liberals want a socialist health care system where we all pay the bill, then I guess it's only natural for them to decide who lives and who dies...all so they can save money.

I thought Dems wanted healthcare for all...I guess it's only those who fit their idea of a perfect child.

This article smacks of, dare I say it, Naziism.  I've studied the Nazi Party in depth from it's birth to its downfall. I wasn't born then and have no first hand accounts of what they did, but I've interviewed both the victims and perpetrators.  My grandparents were interned by them.

In the book The Nazi Doctors, there was a term coined by Hitler to justify the killing (euthanasia) of the mentally retarded, insane, deformed and gypsies for the better of the State.  These people were labeled as "Life unworthy of life".

Bear with me, I'll shut up soon. We conservatives are labeled as Nazis by libs.  Some points to ponder: 

Nazis required all citizens to register their weapons and later confiscated them. The Dems want all guns banned.

The Nazi Party kept records of all German citizens who had "unnatural births" to keep tabs on them and prevent future births so as not to burdon to the State. A friend of mine had a d Down's child and he had to register the child with the county he lived in. Why?

 The Nazi Party used the idea of establishing a perfect race to justify the killing of a baby that may be born 'different'. This writer calls for the same.

The Nazi Party quelched all opposition to its ideals. The Dems want the Fairness Doctrine.

Just who is it that are Nazi-like?

To loving parents, and to God, all children are perfect.  

Sorry for the rant.  Now I must do my relaxation excercises...Ummmmm. Ummmmm.

To use presumed future economic status as a reason for killing a baby that MAY have a birth defect and/or learning disability!!!????

That is on the extreme side of eugenics and the types of ideas that even the Nazi's had. It's absolutely disgusting and I would go so far as to say evil.

Using this illogic, anyone who applies for any type of disability should be killed because they are no longer as 'productive' as they once were.

You want change? Give me a dollar.

This is no "argument", this is the writing of a mad man....

dems, the party of compasion, my a$$!  this guy is dispicable!no surprise he has ties to bill maher, another summers eve disposible d......

My wife and I had six children, four heathy and two severely disabled. We also have two disabled foster children in our home right now. Due to medical bills, we lost our home, our cars and suffered through a bankruptcy. We'd do it all again. What makes me furious is this whole "abort for the benefit of the child" clap-trap. These parents don't want to lose their free time, their shiny cars and their fifteen credit cards. America used to be a nation of selfless patriots, willing to do the right thing in spite of the consequences. This next generation places themselves above all else and everyone else. If imperfect babies deserve to be aborted, then the homeless and those with Aids deserve to die. Funny, when you put it in a different perspective, the whole concept sounds pretty horrific, doesn't it??

Even though the media will continue to do a stellar job covering it up, anyone with half a brain must now see all pretense of liberals being gentle, caring people is gone.   Cruel and heartless is now openly embraced and actually praised.  To them, "the end justifes the means".  

The word feminism has finally been correctly defined as a far-left liberal female.  It has nothing to do with equal rights and never has. You're not a feminist unless you've had at least one abortion says one "feminist".  And that's among the less cruel remarks made about Down's Syndrome children and most everything else a caring, feeling, compassionate person would never say, much less think.  They are FINALLY speaking their minds while the media frantically races from fire to fire trying to cover up the true beliefs of the left as they rant in their raw anger.  

With the nomination of Sarah Palin, the gloves came off for the first time in 60 years.   Finally!  If the Democrats still win now, it will expose yet another country that has become morally bankrupt and in its final days.  Are we?  Many say so.  We'll soon find out. After us, who will remain?     No one.  The entire world will have become morally bankrupt.  

I want Republicans in congress and the senate to put forth a bill to deny all left-wing extremists, democrats [redundant, right?] ,illegal immigrants, and environmental whackos all the rights denied to unborn babies. Specifically the right to life, liberty, pursuit of happiness, self defense and equal protection under the law. For too long these left-wing whackos have reserved these rights for themselves and denied them to others.