If you think media bias is only a problem at the Katie Couric level, a recent trial in Worcester, Massachusetts shows that journalism can be slanted at the local level, too. A reporter for the Worcester [Mass.] Telegram & Gazette reported and testified that a pro-family activist had viciously assaulted a leftwing demonstrator at a rally. But no credible witnesses agreed, and a jury dismissed the charges.
The paper has refused to issue a clarification, apology or retraction, despite the extreme variance of the reporter’s account with that of people directly on the scene. The Telegram reported last December that a pro-family, Catholic activist, Larry Cirignano, had assaulted protester Sarah Loy at a pro-marriage rally at city hall. Reporter Richard Nangle not only reported the “assault,” but became a star witness for the prosecution. Witnesses who actually saw the incident up close refuted Nangle’s account, and a jury on Oct. 22 unanimously threw out the charges.
Cirignano had, with one arm on her back, escorted a sign-waving ACLU officer, Sarah Loy, from near the podium and into the crowd. After he turned and left, she tripped over a girl’s foot, eyewitnesses testified. But check out this lead in the original story on Dec. 17, the day after the rally:
WORCESTER – Tempers boiled over at an anti-gay marriage rally yesterday when the executive director of the Boston-based Catholic Citizenship emerged from behind a lectern outside City Hall, rushed toward a female counter-demonstrator, and pushed her to the ground.
Sarah Loy, 27, of Worcester, was holding a sign in defense of same-sex marriage amid a sea of green “Let the People Vote” signs when Larry Cirignano of Canton, who heads the Catholic Citizenship group, ran into the crowd, grabbed her by both shoulders and told her, “You need to get out. You need to get out of here right now.” Mr. Cirignano then pushed her to the ground, her head slamming against the concrete sidewalk.
Loy, who sought no medical treatment, began yelling, “This is what hate does! This is what hate does!”
Well, yes. Leveling trumped up criminal charges is a pretty hateful thing to do. For a more detailed account, see the article at www.cultureandmedia.com. Also of interest, a video taken by the pro-marriage group MassResistance moments after the incident indicates no disturbance.















Editor at Large

Comments Policy
Noooo. A liberal lied?
November 2, 2007 - 13:31 ET by Sonny LykosNoooo. A liberal lied? I simply can't beleive it.
Is It?
November 2, 2007 - 14:04 ET by okiehawk44Is this liberal lie on video? It is! Then the video has been altered.
and...
November 2, 2007 - 21:00 ET by Cape Conservativein Massachusetts at that!!!! Oh me oh my!!! Shock / Horror <sarc off
This is how satan works...
November 2, 2007 - 14:05 ET by rbchaffeOne lie at a time.
Action should be taken against Loy and the paper
November 2, 2007 - 14:25 ET by Mark_for_SenateLegal action (defamation of character) needs to be taken against Loy and the paper for a large some of money (500,000 or more). What is one's character worth? The current media needs to be fixed, and if not fixed naturally, then they must be sued into unrecoverable bankruptcy for negligence. These sorts of asassinations are occuring way to often.
To know and not do, is to not yet know
No laughing matter..............
November 2, 2007 - 14:32 ET by BrillianceAn informed populace is one cornerstone to a free society - So it stands to reason that an uninformed population can lead to a nations downfall.
Deadly serious stuff.
Journalists who purposely fabricate "facts", with the demonstrable (in this case: video to the contrary) intent of mis-informing the public, should receive a MANDATORY life sentence.
Sound harsh? The importance of this issue warrants that it's NOT too harsh.
Until there is
November 2, 2007 - 14:33 ET by bigtimerUntil there is accountability and a financial cost plus maybe some jail time...nothing will be done with the intentional false reporting of all venues.
so sad
November 2, 2007 - 14:55 ET by candanceLemme see if I got this...
One guy (head of the Catholic thing - we need to mention that twice!) attacks a helpless woman by slamming her head onto the concrete, after which the woman screams in terror about a hate crime, and then....
there's no police report. there's no outcry from witnesses. the woman feels no need to see a doctor for her terrible hurt. for all intents and purposes, there's no there there.
but a news reporter makes up a story and prints it as fact, then conveniently has to back up his story as being his own source, only to have people prove he didn't see anything.
Cirignano should sue the paper.
card holding member of the vast right-wing conspiracy
I'm not surprised...
November 2, 2007 - 15:17 ET by GoldAngelAs a resident of Worcester, MA it's common knowledge that the Telegram/Gazette is affiliated with that venerable (?) liberal rag New York Times (AKA America's Pravda) and is completely unreadable and totally unbelievable.
Back in the winter I contacted the features editor concerning the press release sent by PublishAmerica for my book and when I mentioned it was the first in an anime-style Tribulation series she very condscendingly replied that they do not promote books published by "vanity" publishers. If it gains in sales and popularity and they call me for an interview I'll very graciously decline stating the reason why.
Also a few year ago the church I was attending was infiltrated by one of their reporters regarding the distribution of voters guides to try to drum up a case for illegal political stumping to take away its tax-exempt status. After the church was found innocent the paper did nothing to retract except to make a brief mention in a small ad.
They are slime pesonified.