The press loves to headline celebrities who speak out against President Bush, the war against Islamic fundamentalism and anything else that falls in with the media's favorite storylines. How will they report it when a celebrity does not hew to the accepted partyline? Bono, frontman of the music group U2, is about to find out. Bono is one of the few celebrities for whom I confess to some admiration. His efforts for Africa, unlike many other celebrities, appear to be honest and he has shown himself to be unconcerned with who helps him, as shown by his workings together with President Bush- a state of affairs that would be anathema to most of his fellow celebrities. Now comes evidence that Bono also understands the threat posed by Islamic fundamentalists such as al-Qaeda, and his courage to call evil by it's name. In an interview with Rolling Stone magazine, Bono said of the Islamic fundamentalists:
I want to be very, very clear, however: I understand and agree with the analysis of the problem. There is an imminent threat. It manifested itself on 9/11. It's real and grave. It is as serious a threat as Stalinism and National Socialism were. Let's not pretend it isn't.
Bono goes on to show that he does not engage in Bush Derangement Syndrome, despite the urgings of the Rolling Stone's anti-Bush reporter. In response to the reporter's statement that "But this Administration destroyed that." when they discussed the outpouring of support for the United States immediately following the attacks of Spetember 11, Bono says of President Bush,
There was a plan there, you know. I think the president genuinely felt that if we could prove a model of democracy and broad prosperity in the Middle East, it might defuse the situation.
The Rolling Stone reporter, one Anthony DeCurtis, clearly has no understanding of diplomacy, and certainly not of national security. He has only a vague idea that Bush Is Bad. Pity, but considering the source, unsurprising. Bono, despite his liberalism, is someone I can respect, because he understands that the threat is a real one and it is not one that can be defused by talking. In this, as in his statement that "I try to stick to my pitch, and it's an abuse of my access for me to switch subjects.", he is worthy of respect, even though one may not agree with him. Bono is mainly interested in his efforts for Africa, he knows that this is something that gets him access and he did not want to abuse it. And for that also, I respect him. Now, since Bono has not hewed to the party line on the Evil of Bush, what are the bets as to whether Bono's understanding will receive any space in the mainstream media? I for one am not optimistic. Hat tip to Tim Blair. Cross-posted on StoneHeads.















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
I must confess a growing
November 6, 2007 - 14:51 ET by Hero SquadI must confess a growing admiration for Bono, despite my general dislike of U2. His politics seem inconsequential in the activism he pursues (judging by his willingness to work side-by-side with conservatives like Jesse Helms). He gets that you don't burn a bridge because you might be on different sides of the political spectrum.
**My Daughter at the WWII Memorial
Bono is now black-listed
November 6, 2007 - 15:08 ET by planetrepublicanThe MSM will tag Bono as untrustworthy and you will not see this article anywhere else besides this mag, and I will bet you will not see another interview like it there either. Of course Bono understands the truth, he reads and listens and has some intelligence. There are other celebs that are just as smart but this kind of talk will get them in the non-working category right quick; just ask Tom Selleck (Tom who?).
A similar shunning occurred
November 6, 2007 - 18:00 ET by stratmanA similar shunning occurred with the actor Ron Silver. When Silver let his support of Bush and the war on terror be known, including the invasion of Iraq, and particularly when he did not acquiesce to Hollywood's Liberal dogma, Silver lost out on a few jobs. A perfect example of how the Left punishes those that do not behave according to Master Mao.
Killing them with kindness isn't working. Time to get scrappy with the Donkeys.
Holy crap!
November 6, 2007 - 15:08 ET by SFCMACA sane, realistic member of the entertainment industry? I am not a big fan of U2, but Bono's comments on Islamofascism are a breath of fresh air.
"On the Eighth Day God Created the United States Army and the Devil Stood at Attention"
how fantastically
November 6, 2007 - 15:35 ET by TruthMongerhow fantastically refreshing it is indeed...
religious-based terrorism is a problem that won't fix itself...we must confront it - he knows this well via U2's confrontations with the IRA...
http://saoirse32.blogsome.com/2005/04/12/bono-and-the-ira/
Bravo Bono
Partner with Islam and the NB respect police:)
Except truthmonger the IRA wasn't "religious based"
November 8, 2007 - 03:32 ET by mastersofdeceitHal Lindsey (I'm sure you've heard of him) has a great article on the difference.
Bono gets it
November 6, 2007 - 15:29 ET by greenfairieBono may be liberal, but he is not an idiotarian.
Bono said that? Really?
November 6, 2007 - 15:33 ET by Six String SpiffBono said that? Really? No way... Really. Hmm
Speaking of U2, their old stuff was SO much better than this new stuff. Maybe Bono is watching Angelina do what he did for a while and asked himself if he looked that stupid...
Islamic Religious Services Will Be Held at the Firing Range At 0800 Daily.
Their new stuff is still
November 7, 2007 - 10:42 ET by kathleenirishTheir new stuff is still better than everyone else's has been in rock for some time now. Let's see: How about The Rolling Stones? The Eagles? Never-more-than-mediocre Green Day? Fill in the blank? U2 has been amazing for almost 30 years now, Their live shows are untouchable-fantastic. The standard is so different for U2 than for others, let's be honest. What 'old' stuff do you mean, 1982's? 1987's? 1992's? All great, but representative of very different stages of musical expression. Personally, my favorite period of U2 is around the EP 'Wide Awake in America'. Should they keep doing a different version of 'Sunday Bloody Sunday' over and over, or try and create different and new music? It's a tall order to please old fans of any band, that's for sure. But, I always laugh whenever I hear the 'their old stuff is SO much better' . Yeah, they are such letdowns. You're old stuff was probably better, too; I know mine sure was!
Bob Geldof said that Bush did more for Africa than B. J. Clinton ever did BY FAR, but that wasn't really something we'd want to repeat or report on accurately, now, would we, MSM? Especially since you've been on that Bush-is-Evil campaign, and he'd probably eat African babies for breakfast, with Dick Cheney of course, if given half the chance, huh? Islamofascism and terrorism are the men behind the curtain to the MSM...it's global warming and Britney Spears' partying that are the real threats to humanity, if you listen to them!
Anyone who says they support the troops but not the mission is a liar.
I wonder if this is the
November 6, 2007 - 15:34 ET by ckc1227I wonder if this is the outpouring of support the writer was talking about?
"Or consider what Elisabetta Burba, an Italian journalist, reported
for The Wall Street Journal from Beirut. She saw suited, coiffed
professionals cheering in the streets. Then she went into a fashionable
cafe. "The cafe's sophisticated clientele was celebrating, laughing,
cheering and making jokes, as waiters served hamburgers and Diet Pepsi.
Nobody looked shocked or moved. They were excited, very excited," she
writes.
"Ninety per cent of the Arab world believes that
America got what it deserved," she is told. "An exaggeration?" she
comments. "Rather an understatement."
I apologize to Bono
November 6, 2007 - 16:21 ET by Lame CherryI dislike activist entainers of all kinds and have watched Bono drain billions of tax dollars for Africa aids work which is pouring money down a dry hole........
In stating that, I have watched Bono and realized he was a very political man in getting things done no matter if it is Bush or Clinton in office. He is issue oriented and does not care who he deals with. That is always impressive.
In his remarks today, I am moved to aplogize to Bono .....knowing very well tomorrow he will no doubt be without logic expressing some leftist bilge........but I apologize as he does get this right at least in naming Islam a huge problem...........although he does not get that communism and nazism are what is driving Islam now.
The apology is considering him a worthless person on issues doing more harm than good.
For the facts, aids should not have one dime spent on it as the law of averages indicates that the disease will die out as people who stick things without marriage where they should be stuck spread disease into like minded people.....and in a 50 year period all the comrades are toast just like in the Soviet Union with only a few infected communists left to make the world nuclear miserable.
Islam will be the same issue unless it is bled now. I have maintained while others called Iraq a disaster that Bush 43 let Iraq under Rumsfeld become a killing zone luring terrorists to their deaths. Now though that Iraq is stablizing the terrorism will spread.....which means a new round of wars will be necessary to kill approximately 1 to 30 million angry Muslim males.
(This same scenario will be followed by the need by China to kill off by starting a war the 200 million angry males they have there as they aborted all the wives 20 years ago and are still aborting girls.)
This is what liberalism has gotten us........and perhaps Bono should return the apology to me as where was he in supporting the war effort? Now in his silence a new round of war will come in the necessary nuclear decapitation of the Persian regime.
This all could have handled with approximately 250,000 extremist Muslims slaughtered in Iraq over a decade period with the remaining 30 million deciding naps were much better as reforms took over........now though they will have to killed as they will foment revolution into a billion angry nuclear armed Muslims from Libya to Indonesia.
In all honesty from a tactical standpoint, as Japan and England would remain untouched, I could not be that concerned if these 3 billion Eurasians started blowing each other up........the problem is it will eventually pull the US in as those French/German/Italians always do.......writing sob letters for help and the relatives in the media demanding America must do something.
So welcome Bono, but get it completely correct mate as this is going to be a bloody decade until Jesus irons it out.
*HIC IACET ARTORIVS REX QVONDAM REXQVE FVTVRVS
Bravo! Lame Cherry, Great Commentary!
November 6, 2007 - 19:32 ET by planetrepublicanI have been thinking about the things you outlined and I agree with you. I actually think it will get very bad, very soon. These Islamo's know that Bush will kill them dead ASAP but they don't know any such thing about Clinton. In fact, if I were them, I would wait until (God forbid!) a Demo is in the White House; then I would escalate the tensions a hundred times. I predict that the Dems will fail miserably at fighting the war on terror (what war? what ME worry? War on what? Global warming!!!???). If they do get in, it will be up the next president after they vacate to take these bozos on. In the meantime expect a lot of "Neville Chamberlains" running around claiming peace-at-any-cost while thousand, if not millions are killed. This will wear very thin, very fast on Americans, especially if their kids start getting killed. Just remember, Jimmie Carter in all his boloney gave rise to Ronald Reagan.
DeCurtis = English Teacher
November 6, 2007 - 16:39 ET by Del DolemonteAnthony DeCurtis is basically an English professor. That would explain his lack of knowledge on issues more important, like national security or diplomacy.
As for Bono, I loved U2's earlier stuff but have basically not listened to them since, oh, around 1996.
And I've always called him "Sonny".
Having slammed celebrities
November 6, 2007 - 16:41 ET by drillanwrHaving slammed celebrities for their "anti" this and "anti" that, and their arrogance in thinking we give two craps what they think, I don't want to seem to be now giving more than enough weight to Bono (and I do have my suspicions that there ARE many celebrities who also know and understand ... and perhaps even support our President and this country, but are deathly afraid for their careers should they voice anything but contempt ...) in this situation. I am encouraged at his intelligence in recognizing and understanding the danger the world is now facing as we trek into the 21st Century.
I also echo the voices here who recognize the man's genuine commitments to the plights of Africa (and hopefully he also understands the "evil" he's addressed in this particular RS interview is hugely responsible for many many of Africa's troubles) ...
Now, if he would just start singing the praises of DDT he might help a lot of other concerns he has for Africa.
And NO ... The neoPRAVDA will not even mention this. FNC might give it a nod in another day or two ...
I have been a fan of U2 for
November 6, 2007 - 16:44 ET by NCConservativeI have been a fan of U2 for quite some time, and I must admit I have a lot of respect for Bono (this has caused my conservative friends to tease me relentlessly). I, too, believe what he does comes from a sincere place, and he seems to put forth an effort to learn and understand what he is talking about.
Although he and I would definitely disagree on countless political issues, I have always thought highly of his ability to bridge the gap and work for what he thinks is the "common good." I have said for years now that I will lose any respect for him the moment I hear him badmouthing conservatives or those that might disagree with him. So far I haven't seen this happen, so he still has my respect.
It was refreshing to see that even with his idealistic vision for the world, Bono still recognizes the very real threats to that vision. I wonder what it will take for the liberals with their heads in the sand to come to that same conclusion.
If the MSM covers this at all, it will be to paint the "do-gooder" Bono as some type of hate-mongering hypocrite.
Bono cares more about his cause then he does his ego
November 6, 2007 - 18:09 ET by Dee BunkBono cares more about his cause then he does his ego unlike most of the Hollywood bunch and Al Gore. He tries to remain non political so that he can get both sides on board to help. That is the way to do it if you really care. He's obviously a liberal and I don't think he'll make much of a difference in Africa no matter how much money he raises, but at least he isn't political or hypocritical about it.
Man, I hate these
November 6, 2007 - 18:41 ET by balboaMan, I hate these entertainers and their stupid causes! Why can't they just shut up and sing!? These self-important los--
...Oh, are we, are we not doing that this time around? Was that wrong? Whoops. My bad.
(p.s. The Joshua Tree...last good album.)
Unlike the has-beens and
November 7, 2007 - 00:04 ET by fitzfongUnlike the has-beens and never-weres who need to bash the United States and the Administration through the Jann Wenner propaganda machine in order to get some favorable promotion for their flagging careers, Bono and U2 need no such attention. As such, they are free agents. Ivory tower blowhards like Natalie Maines, Don Henley, David Crosby and Graham Nash need to get on a left wing political soap box because they have nothing decent to offer musically...and they need to occupy their time between bong hits. They won't shut up because they can't sing.
I think you're the first
November 7, 2007 - 00:19 ET by balboaI think you're the first ever to use "ivory tower" and "Natalie Maines" in the same sentence. :-)
I'm also sure that if Bono said something most here disagreed with, they'd put him in the same category as Henley, Crosby, Nash, et al.
"I'm also sure that if Bono
November 7, 2007 - 10:05 ET by NCConservative"I'm also sure that if Bono said something most here disagreed with, they'd put him in the same category as Henley, Crosby, Nash, et al"
This is not true for me, personally. In fact, I disagree with a lot of what Bono says and I still have a lot of respect for him. And I respect him because he can make his case intelligently and without throwing around personal insults.
People like Natalie Maines and Sean Penn sound like elementary school children with the name-calling and "clever" insults. If that's the best they can do, what's the point in taking anything else they say seriously?
Well put.
November 7, 2007 - 14:02 ET by sunandsteelBono seems to say and do a lot based on his actual beliefs, not what is trendy or popular.
Maines, Penn, and all the rest, IMHO, would be silent if a dem were president and the exact same course were taken since 9-11.
Texas has a population of nearly 21 million people, all of whom are ashamed to be from the same state as the Dixie Chicks. (IMAO.us)
Natalie Maines
November 7, 2007 - 13:47 ET by fitzfongOK, bal. Ivory trailer it is, then.
And, yes, if Bono said something moronic like that used-up junkie David Crosby says routinely, we'd call him on what he said. You don't get put "in the same category" unless you have a history of being an ignorant partisan (you know...Sean Penn, Rob Reiner, Ben Affleck, John "Julia Roberts" Bon Jovi, Barbra Streisand, Ed Asner, Robert Redford, etc.).
Didn't I hear a while back
November 6, 2007 - 18:47 ET by BubbaJDidn't I hear a while back that before one of Bono's charity concerts that he forbid BDS ranting by any of the entertainers during the concert?