Both Bill and Hillary Clinton have a history of fund-raising from shadowy Asian donors. Bill was connected with such donors in a scandal that was never fully investigated due to most of the targets fleeing to their native countries. Now the Los Angeles Times is reporting that Hillary also is gaining money from Asian sources that would seem to merit some investigation. The question is- will the rest of the mainstream media actually follow up and report it? Other than the LA Times and a story in the Washington Times, I have yet to find any mention of this in other media outlets. According to the Times story,
The Times examined the cases of more than 150 donors who provided checks to Clinton after fundraising events geared to the Chinese community. One-third of those donors could not be found using property, telephone or business records. Most have not registered to vote, according to public records.
And several dozen were described in financial reports as holding jobs -- including dishwasher, server or chef -- that would normally make it difficult to donate amounts ranging from $500 to the legal maximum of $2,300 per election.
Of 74 residents of New York's Chinatown, Flushing, the Bronx or Brooklyn that The Times called or visited, only 24 could be reached for comment.
Many said they gave to Clinton because they were instructed to do so by local association leaders. Some said they wanted help on immigration concerns. And several spoke of the pride they felt by being associated with a powerful figure such as Clinton.
This would seem to be an area where the FBI should be investigating if the donors actually gave of their free will, or if their contributions were 'bundled' and they were later illegally reimbursed. The story continues by saying, that at least some donors' existence could not even be confirmed. The Times wrote,
The tenement at 44 Henry St. was listed in Clinton's campaign reports as the home of Shu Fang Li, who reportedly gave $1,000.
In a recent visit, a man, apparently drunk, was asleep near the entrance to the neighboring beauty parlor, the Nice Hair Salon.
A tenant living in the apartment listed as Li's address said through a translator that she had not heard of him, although she had lived there for the last 10 years.
A man named Liang Zheng was listed as having contributed $1,000. The address given was a large apartment building on East 194th Street in the Bronx, but no one by that name could be located there.
If Hillary is gaining illegal contributions that may be coming from foreign sources, or if her campaign is using asssociations to force residents to contribute, then they are breaking the law, and should be investigated and prosecuted. The LA Times admits that it was not able to confirm the existence of some of these listed donors. The question now is, will the media actually spend any effort in investigating these shadowy donors? Based on past experience, I'm not holding my breath. Cross-posted on StoneHeads.



















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
"in a scandal that was
October 19, 2007 - 16:31 ET by Chris Norman"in a scandal that was never fully investigated due to most of the targets fleeing to their native countries."
Would it have been investigated by the MSM even if they had stayed put?
Investigate? Investigate
October 19, 2007 - 16:40 ET by motherbeltInvestigate? Investigate what????
<sarc off>
}}---> Here's what
October 19, 2007 - 16:50 ET by Cool ArrowThose evil Republicans are questioning the donations of hardworking Asian-American dreamers.
It's not as though there's been anything scandalous about Clinton campaigns and Asian donors up to this point.
~LYDSEXICS UNTIE!~
Same article?
October 19, 2007 - 16:57 ET by Jerry MackThe article that I read was about the possibility of illegal campaign contributions and would the msm investigate. My answer: No!
}}---> Investigate this
October 20, 2007 - 04:44 ET by Cool ArrowAmy Jackson, William Jefferson's defense attorney in his Cold Cash Bribery case says:
"We think using influence is not a bribe,"
I think incarceration could be a liberating experience for Mr. Jefferson. But I'm not a lawyer. I'm Wondering if Ms. Jackson is either.
~LYDSEXICS UNTIE!~
"We think stealing money is
October 20, 2007 - 04:50 ET by Jack Bauer"We think stealing money is more like an involuntary gift."
}}---> Involuntary gift
October 20, 2007 - 04:56 ET by Cool ArrowI like that. Like an involuntary nocturnal emission of seed cash.
~LYDSEXICS UNTIE!~
Years ago I had the
October 20, 2007 - 06:33 ET by danboYears ago I had the "pleasure" of dealing with a burgler who told me it wasn't his fault he stole. It was the fault of the people he stole from. If they didn't want him to take their stuff, they'd make it more difficult for him to get to it.
"There is a clear attempt to establish truth not by scientific methods but by perpetual repetition."
- Richard S. Lindzen, Ph.D. Professor of Meteorology, MIT
Wow...CNN just did a
October 19, 2007 - 16:50 ET by bigtimerWow...CNN just did a whiz-bang job of a investigative report about all this China Town money on Wolfie's show...it was at least maybe two or three minutes and did suggest it will bring up old memories for Hillary....but wait...they had to add on to the report that she did return a lot of money to Hsu...
I love investigative reports don't you?
Just brush it over, say you reported on this...and Moveon.org folks...nothing to see here.
Any investigation will
October 19, 2007 - 17:10 ET by danboAny investigation will likely be like the investigation of vote buying charges in the Landreau/Jenkins election. Where the DA determined there was insufficient evidence as those who stated they sold their votes were drug addicts, criminals and/or prostitutes. Therefore unreliable. We all know only MD's and professionals sell their vote.
"There is a clear attempt to establish truth not by scientific methods but by perpetual repetition."
- Richard S. Lindzen, Ph.D. Professor of Meteorology, MIT
Polling booths
October 19, 2007 - 17:13 ET by Cool ArrowI'm thinking there will be polling booths in San Francisco's proposed shooting galleries.
Shrewd political move.
~LYDSEXICS UNTIE!~
Where are the Republicans
October 19, 2007 - 17:17 ET by jdhawkWhere are the Republicans on this issue?
Are the Republican candidates just slow on the uptake or just slow?
In the "good 'ole Clinton days" any misstep on the part of Republicans was played to the hilt. A phlank of reporters, politicians and Hollyweird types would be interviewed in wall to wall coverage of the transgression.
Here - we get nothing, zip, nada, bumpkus.
When are we going to transition from web sites like this where we tut tut those nasty Democrats and create the news toe to toe when obvious subversions like this are taking place?
No, this isn't a criticsm of this web site. But, there seems to be little counter balance that reaches a truly wide audience of the American people that doesn't just expose the liberals, but has concrete counter proposals to their socialistic views.
"Where are the Republicans
October 19, 2007 - 17:25 ET by danbo"Where are the Republicans on this issue? "
I sincerely hope I'm wrong. But if the past is an indication. AWOL.
"There is a clear attempt to establish truth not by scientific methods but by perpetual repetition."
- Richard S. Lindzen, Ph.D. Professor of Meteorology, MIT
Water Carriers
October 19, 2007 - 17:36 ET by Jerry MackI heard Rush say that Republicans expected him and other conservative talk show host to carry their water in situations like this. Can not remember exact words but my interpretation was that he expected them to start picking up buckets.
They may have given up,
October 19, 2007 - 18:47 ET by pbanks7They may have given up, because they know they won't get a fair shake in the press, or because the media won't report it, or the MSM will twist their concerns into some sort of vicious attack, just like that eeeevvvillll Michelle Malkin attacking a 12 year old. Not a peep about D's telling lies and hiding behind yet another victim - if you question the lie, you're attacking a helpless victim.
Ignorance is bliss. It's easier to repeat a mindless slogan than to do some actual research.
Hillary "Scandal"
October 19, 2007 - 20:17 ET by BlondeAlan Colmes is going ballistic over the "non-scandal"....I never knew he could talk that fast.
Scandals! There's no scandal!
Sheesh...may get good, soon.
David Gregory, do you know which damn network you lie for? ~ Uncle Jimbo, @Blackfive
Dave...as the head Hil hater here...
October 19, 2007 - 23:11 ET by BlondeThis ought to cheer you up.
David Gregory, do you know which damn network you lie for? ~ Uncle Jimbo, @Blackfive
If Hillary gets the
October 20, 2007 - 06:49 ET by danboIf Hillary gets the nomination. And the repubs had balls. They do an ad. Hillary collected so many dollars from this building. Showing the drunk in the doorway. And footage as they start looking for a contributor who doesn't exist.
Then fade in Al Gore telling he didn't know the Buddist nuns were ginving an illegal contribution. And there's no moral authority...
"There is a clear attempt to establish truth not by scientific methods but by perpetual repetition."
- Richard S. Lindzen, Ph.D. Professor of Meteorology, MIT