USS Cole Anniversary Today: Media Silent


On this day in the year 2000, the guided missile destroyer USS Cole was attacked by Islamic terrorists associated with Osama bin Laden's al-Quaeda group. Today is the seventh anniversary of that attack. Seventeen American sailors were killed and thirty-eight injured in the attack which severely damaged the ship. Yet not a single major media organ has reported this so far.

Attacking a warship has been long viewed as an act of war. The most recent example occured in 1968 when North Korea attacked the USS Pueblo. To our national shame, the Pueblo is still in the hands of that country. A rather more forceful response occurred in 1941, when Japan attacked the US Pacific Fleet at anchor in Pearl Harbor.

However, then-President Bill Clinton did not respond to the attack on the Cole, emboldening the Islamists who viewed the United States as a paper tiger. The attack on the Cole was one of a series of attacks on Americans throughout the decade of the 1990s to which the United States failed to respond. This eventually led to al-Quaeda and its allies decided to attack the Twin Towers in 2001. Unfortunately for them, President George W. Bush took a different view, correctly deciding to respond with military force. Since 2001, there have been no further successful atttacks on American soil, though we remain engaged in a military offensive against the Islamic terrorists.

However, despite the significance of today's date, not a single major media organ has chosen to cover it. Why? CNN felt that news about Britney Spears' thoughts on her choldren were important enough to put on their front page, but there is no mention of the attack on the Cole. MSNBC has former Vice-President Al Gore's Nobel Peace Prize plastered all over the front page, but there is no mention of the anniversary of the attack on the Cole. The New York Times similarly has no mention of this attack anywhere on their front page.

What happened to remembering cowardly attacks on Americans and avenging them? The attack on the Maine sparked a war with Spain. The attack on Pearl Harbor sparked US involvement in World War II- a war that ended with the unconditional surrender of our opponents. Yet not a single media organ seems to care that Americans were attacked and killed. Does our media not care? They are assiduous in reporting deaths of Muslims at the hands of Americans- even when those deaths did not occur, or when those killed were actually terrorists (see Haditha). Yet the anniversary of an unprovoked attack on a US warship that resulted in the deaths of American military personnel does not even warrant a mention on the anniversary. I can only gather that to the US media, Muslim terrorist lives are more important than American military lives. Cross-posted on StoneHeads.

 

CORRECTION: Somehow my coffee-deficiency prompted me to incorrectly type North Vietnam instead of North Korea. The USS Pueblo was attacked and captured by North Korea, not North Vietnam. I apologise for my incorrect statement. Thanks to numerous commenters for pointing this out.


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

God bless the men and women

God bless the men and women of the USS Cole.

Jimbo says - "There is a fine line between freedom of speech and treason"

 Amen, brother!  Exactly:

 Amen, brother!  Exactly: the perfect words.

As for that disgusting piece of scuz, BJ Clinton.  Do-nothing, grand-standing, bottom-sucking, soulless, unAmerican, Level 3 sex-offending dirtbag.  The MSM has their lips permanently sewn onto his pimply white behind-they would never mention the USS Cole or the African embassy bombings as they don't help their boy.  Never mind anything else that might tell the truth about that f'er.  OR his 'wife'.  Even scarier.

Rest in Peace, Brave Soldiers of the United States. 

Anyone who says they support the troops but not the mission is a liar. 

I have good friends and

I have good friends and shipmates who were on the Cole that fateful day. Say a prayer for the 17.

Jeff... Consider it

Jeff...

Consider it done.

Thank you for serving, we owe you! 

Get Email updates from Fred http://socialnet.imwithfred.com/email_alert_july_26.html

The MSM say more with their

The MSM say more with their silence on this anniversary than they could with their words.  It is disgusting, although no longer surprising.

The members of our armed forces deserve better.  To them I say thank you for your service and your sacrifice.

Bush's Fault

Just come up with a theory that the Cole was Bush's fault, and you'll get all the TV Time you want.

allan... LOL... Shhhh...

allan...

LOL...

Shhhh...don't give the msm any ideas...after-all they can't think on their own, they get their talkin' points from MediaMatters and the leftist party dontcha' know...hehehee 

The most recent example

The most recent example occured in the Vietnam war when North Vietnam attacked the USS Pueblo. To our national shame, the Pueblo is still in the hands of the Vietnamese.

It's about as shameful as confusing the North Koreans with the Vietnamese.

RE: Pueblo

"It's about as shameful as confusing the North Koreans with the Vietnamese."

Yes, it is. And as a historian I should have known better. I am not sure what I was thinking. I have corrected it. Thanks for pointing that out.

No worries. Frankly, I

No worries. Frankly, I don't feel a whit of shame that the North Koreans have this rusted old "trophy" in their possession. Their empty boasting doesn't change the fact that they have sole ownership of a dysfunctional and disgraceful Stalinist bootlicking regime that can't even figure out how to feed itself when the weather is cooperating.

The Pueblo was not attacked by the Vietnamese

but by North Korea

Probably just a typo 

But I wouldnt call it shameful

North Koreans North Vietnamese...same difference! 

 

 

Communist thugs either way

Communist thugs either way you look at it.

Eh Hem....Uh...

"The USS PUEBLO, which was captured by the North Koreans in 1968, was the first U.S. Navy ship to be hi-jacked on the high seas by a foreign military force in over 150 years. To date, the capture has resulted in no reprisals against the North Koreans; no military action was taken at the time, or at any later date. This lack of military response guarantees the Pueblo’s place in history as a watershed event in our national conscience."

I think you are referring to the "Gulf of Tonkin" incident in which two US Naval Destroyers were attacked by some North Vietnamese patrol boats...

 



The day that "politician" became a career choice is the day we started losing the Republic. Let's get it back!  Fred08.com

The New York Times

The New York Times similarly has no mention of this attack anywhere on their front page.

While I'm sorry for the families of this attack,  I don't think this is really front page material.  A mention of it would be nice, but we're coming up on the anniversary of the bombing of the Marine base in Beirut which killed 241 Americans, and I doubt you'll here much about that either.

Cole

Unfortunatly the last major story I heard about the Cole specifically was when it returned to service following repairs. It was overshadowed by 9-11 as the major terror attack story. Its not a major hitter because it returns to light Slick Billy's lack of actions. This especially after Jimmy's recent comments about how the Clinton Adm. did such a great job protecting us and keeping us admired in the world.

Screw Bill and Jimmy there pathetic Americans.

God Bless the crew of the Cole for the heroic efforts to save that ship. God Rest those who didn't make it. 

"When you can't make them see the light, make them feel the heat"         R. Reagan

So by your same logic, we

So by your same logic, we can then blame Bush for 9/11, can't we?

Uh, no! If hillbilly Bill

Uh, no!

If hillbilly Bill had done something, 911 may never have happened. 

Get Email updates from Fred http://socialnet.imwithfred.com/email_alert_july_26.html

As always the truth hurts.

As always the truth hurts.

Um-hum, blaster....DailyKos...

...no point in bothering to go there.....

And your point is what?

And your point is what? That Al Qaeda was recognized (assuming Kosmonauts didn't just fabricate this piece of poorly scanned, scratched over "letterhead") as a growing threat? Point to one thing in this "memo" that implies a direct attack on us. 

The Closed Mind Erects Strong Barriers

From your favorite news

From your favorite news source.

Nice examples of the

Nice examples of the incompetence of the Clinton built "national security system". Thanks for the link...

"There are two types of people in this country; those who provide freedom and those who enjoy it." MM says...

Among those examples:

Among those examples:

– The Italian government shared "general" information of possible attacks in March 2001 based on bugs in apartments in Milan.

– An Iranian in custody in New York City told local police last May of a plot to attack the World Trade Center.

– German intelligence alerted the Central Intelligence Agency, Britain's MI-6 intelligence service, Israel's Mossad in June 2001 that Middle Eastern terrorists were training for hijackings and targeting American and Israeli interests.

Gee, now I wonder why the Evil Nazi Facist Lying Imperialistic Bush regime didn't have squadrons of F16s flying racetrack patterns aroung New York City and D.C. on Sep 11??? These "clues" are so incredibly specific, anyone would have known the exact date and location of the planned attacks. "General" information of possible attacks, An Iranian man in local police custody, targeting American and Israeli interests". Yup. You're right. Can't get much more specific that that...

What a bastard that Evil Nazi Facist Lying Imperialistic Bush truly is. There is NO WAY he couldn't have known every detail of the plots.

Feel proud blaster. You have, with this one post, converted me into another BDS suffering, fact ignoring moron. I now, with all my being, truly HATE the Evil Nazi Facist Lying Imperialistic Bush regime. [heavy dose of <sarc off>]

The Closed Mind Erects Strong Barriers

Same old song and dance--it

Same old song and dance--it was Clinton's fault Bush didn't act on the intelligence being fed to him.

Show me some credible

Show me some credible intelligence warning of an attack the likes of 9/11 that Bush was "fed".

The Closed Mind Erects Strong Barriers

Blaster President Bush,

Blaster President Bush, after the lessons of 911, acted on clues (well more than in this article) to oust Saddam.  I guess you agree that it was the best thing to do right?

Nuke em til they glow then shoot em in the dark.

The most recent example

The most recent example occured in the Korean War when North Korea attacked the USS Pueblo.

Right country, wrong war.  You're almost there...

Cole legacy

I was involved in the aftermath. Spent time with the familes and with the wounded Sailors. Stood in a hallway and listened to Clinton lie to the families, sat on the pier in Norfolk and listened to him lie to America.

I cannot describe to you my loathing of Clinton and his administration

I spent 22 years in the

I spent 22 years in the uniform of our nation, serving proudly, and with a sense of accomplishment. Not long after I retired (and a driving force on my decision to retire), I watched our military being demeaned and degraded by politicians, predominently Dems. Now I see the media joining arms with these same Dems in further denigrading our military members. Sometimes through lies and misreporting, sometimes through their snide snarky little elitist comments, and more and more through ignoring accomplishments and significant events like this. The military has pretty much always been unappreciated, even feared and hated by many, even though the same military guarantees our freedoms and way of life. I suppose, as what can be considered a rich nation, this attitude shouldn't be totally unexpected. But what really boils my ass is to see the Lefties (MSM and Politicians) teaming up like this. At least, if one or the other was singing from a different sheet of music, the rhetoric would be kept in check.

All I can say to my brothers and sisters in arms is that many do appreciate what you do, and have always done - sacrifice for the greater good even while being slapped in the face for it.

Just remember, always KEEP THE FAITH!!!  

The Closed Mind Erects Strong Barriers

Beowulf... Hear!

Beowulf...

Hear! Hear!

Thank you and all others for your years of service...my gratitude is sent.

Appreciated

BT, I and those still serving sincerely appreciate the sentiment. The few "thank you's" help make the difference for the thousands of "screw you's" from the elitist left. You'll also note, with a very few glaring exceptions (read: Murtha and Kerry), that the VAST majority of those perjorative of the military never served (too busy licking the liberal spew from their silver spoons, I guess).

Things that make you go hmmm... 

The Closed Mind Erects Strong Barriers

I also....

....spent 22 years in the U.S. Army and retired in 1999.  My son is currently in his third year of college and is in Army ROTC.  Because of a medical issue he does not have to sign a contract committing him to military service until spring of next year. 

Last week I actually had the thought of telling him not to sign the contract because his efforts would not by appreciated by the country as a whole or by the so called elite in particular, and that he could better for himself economically if he stayed out of the Army.

This combined with the fact that he is an only child makes it even more difficult for me to recommend that he go into the service.  Why should I encourage him to put himself at risk when all he can expect are sneers and denigrating comments from people who not only think they are so much smarter and better than those who serve but who actually (knowingly or out of pure stupidly) aid and abet our country's enemies??

I cannot believe I would ever think such a thing, but such is the state of the country, the government, and the MSM.

It's a tough situation

But I would recommend you let your son make his own decision.

My son graduated from the USNA and the decision to go was entirely his. We discussed the pros and cons and what his goals were and he made the choice. It's one of those decisions that you have to make by yourself otherwise it can lead to resentment at a later time.

Since his graduation this past May I have not heard him mention anyone belittling his choice to serve or sneer at him. But knowing him he wouldn't give a shit anyway. He did it because it was the best college choice available and for the valuable experiences of being a naval officer and traveling the world.

He is currently on his first tour and absolutely loves it.

He is on the far left: http://s124.photobucket.com/albums/p14/mvfreeman/?action=view&current=Lawson-OGB.jpg

I guess what I am trying to say is that while he is proud to serve his country he is doing it for his future and the benefits gained by doing so. What other people think is of no importance to him.

Wishing you and your son the best.

 

MV,  Great sentiments.

MV,

 Great sentiments. We should always strive to teach our children how to make the best decisions for them. Give your son my best.

 I also hope he is not on "the far left :) !

Prester john: Back when I

Prester john:

Back when I was in ROTC in the early 1980's, most of the NCO's who were training me were old Vietnam vintage SF/infantrymen who were just short of retirement.

They made sure to keep reminding us that based on their own experience, we as young officers should not expect to ever return home to a grateful nation from a battlefield, and should prepare our soldiers mentally for this as a personal challenge. 

They themselves sought to prepare us for this seeming betrayal from our own people because they believed that the defense of the nation was too important to be held hostage to the whims of popular thought.

At first we thought they were simply over reacting to the treatment they had received when they returned home.  Later, based on this mental conditioning, when we did return home to the euphoria surrounding the end of the Desert Storm experience, we were perplexed that the same country that endorsed the abuse of its soldiery in the 1970-80's could treat us so differently only over the course of a decade.

Now I see what those old soldiers knew.  This is a calling and is more important than the requirements of popularity. 

So if everyone knew that

So if everyone knew that Clinton had emboldened the terrorists, why didn't Bush do something about that as soon as he got into office? 

Like Nuke

Like Nuke Afghanistan?

What did you have in mind?

balboa, you should've

balboa, you should've stopped at "everyone knew that Clinton had emboldened the terrorists". That's the whole point if you want to point fingers. If you accept as fact that Clinton was the root cause, and everyone knew it (which I do, BTW), you could play the "why didn't he, she, or it do something" until your finger falls off.

It goes something like, "If {insert congress-critter's or major media talking head name here} knew Clinton had emboldened the terrorists and Bush wasn't doing anything about it, why didn't{insert congress-critter's or major media talking head name here} do anything themselves?" 

Pretty soon, you'd begin to look like Lewis Black getting aggravated and twitching his finger at everyone...

The Closed Mind Erects Strong Barriers

Talk about erecting strong

Talk about erecting strong barriers...

Again, if it was such common knowledge that Clinton had dangerously emboldened the terrorists, why didn't the Bush administration do something?

Bal, Bush in office how long and what did he have to work with?

At the time of the attack, Bush had been office nine months. He had an intelligence system that had been infested with liberal, Clinton-appointed pukes like Valerie Plame who had no real desire to help Bush . You had a system of laws (and where do our laws come from) that prevented or impeded the gathering of decent intelligence. The same system of laws prevented the CIA and the FBI from sharing intelligence. Any intelligence that can be acted upon goes through several people before it gets to the President. With folks like Valerie Plame, what kind of intelligence reports do you think the President was getting? Do I need to go on? Besides, if Clinton had taken up the Sudanese offer to arrest and detain Osama, would we be having this converstation anyhow?

I don't know what he could

I don't know what he could have done, but did he do anything?

I could've sworn I already

I could've sworn I already answered that. "[D]angerously embolden[ing] the terrorists" doesn't equate to specifics of an attack on the US. As you were already asked, what would you have suggested Bush do, with the information you just provided? Did we know the names of the terrorists (who hadn't committed any terrorism yet)? Did we know any details of the plot? Did we know the target? Did we know the method of attack?

General warnings about an attack of some kind against any of a thousand US or Israeli interests (the word interests also covers an awful lot of ground as well) somewhere in the world (or even a narrower 3,537,441 square miles in the US alone) by someone as yet unnamed using unknown methodology really doesn't help anyone plan for or defend against an attack.

It is historical fact that Clinton presided over several actual attacks directly against US interests and did nothing, but instead you throw it once again into Bush's lap for not preventing the reprecussions of Clinton's failures.  

So, kindly explain how this is Bush's fault and how I have erected any barriers? Because I question the BDS rhetoric and postings from Kos? How about opening your mind, just a little, and apply a light dose of common sense?

The Closed Mind Erects Strong Barriers

I'm not saying it's Bush's

I'm not saying it's Bush's fault. I'm saying, OK, if Clinton's emboldening is a given, and everyone knew that, so we were in a bad spot, what could Bush have done and what did he do to help out the situation?

You should just as well ask

You should just as well ask "what did Clinton do after we had, on several occasions, actually been attacked?". Shoulda, woulda, coulda obviously means nothing. If we're going to ask what Bush should've done but didn't, the same applies even more so to Clinton, who was in a position numerous times to "do something" but didn't, including killing or capturing UBL on several occasions. If we're going to apply 20/20 hindsight, then we should say that if Clinton had responded militarily to the embassy attacks or to the Cole attack, or killed or captured UBL, 9/11 would never have happened. Unless applied fairly, such suppositions mean nothing. Applied to one or the other player in this little political drama, they show partisanship of the worst kind. 

The Closed Mind Erects Strong Barriers

We know that, according to

We know that, according to what you said, Clinton did nothing but embolden the terrorists. OK. So what did Bush do in response, since Clinton didn't do anything. That's my question. I'm applying blame to Clinton. Does Bush have any?

The Cole 17

Better men than I.

 

God Bless them.

The MSM doesn't care about the military

The MSM only cares about the Manbearpig winning the Nobel Peace Prize and about what venereal disease Britney Spears acquired this week. The military? Feh!

While it is tragic that

While it is tragic that sailors were killed in the attack on the Cole it just doesn't rise to the same level of significance as either the Maine or the attack on Pearl Harbor. The first reason being that she is still on active duty.

At Pearl Harbor a sovereign country's navy attacked us directly and killed thousands and sunk many of our ships.

The Maine was also sunk and according to the navy's own historical center was not the direct cause of the Spanish-American war:

"The destruction of Maine did not cause the U.S. to declare war on Spain, but it served as a catalyst, accelerating the approach to a diplomatic impasse. In addition, the sinking and deaths of U.S. sailors rallied American opinion more strongly behind armed intervention."

http://www.history.navy.mil/faqs/faq71-1.htm

I agree that the media could at least give mention to the attack on the Cole but its significance is vastlty different than  those of the other attacks on our ships.

I dispute some of your

I dispute some of your points. 

1.)  While it is tragic that sailors were killed in the attack on the Cole it just doesn't rise to the same level of significance as either the Maine or the attack on Pearl Harbor. The first reason being that she is still on active duty.

If the issue solely revolved around the ability to repair ships, then the attack on Pearl Harbor was not as successful as first thought since the US was able to refloat most of the ships sunk in the attack with the exception of the Arizona, Utah, and to my memory the Shaw.  Ships such as the California, Nevada, and others took part in the later campaigns in the pacific providing naval gunfire support to the USMC.

2.)  "The destruction of Maine did not cause the U.S. to declare war on Spain, but it served as a catalyst, accelerating the approach to a diplomatic impasse. In addition, the sinking and deaths of U.S. sailors rallied American opinion more strongly behind armed intervention."

So under this pattern of thought, if the US had subsequenly invaded a portion of the middle east at a later date, the damage to the USS Cole would be considered on par with the USS Maine?  Oooops, we seem to have invaded the region and in fact have US troops operting in Yeman to this day.

The issue isnt the ability

The issue isnt the ability to repair ships its the scope of the damage done and the fact that it was committed by another government knowing that it would commit us to war.

The terrorists who attacked the Cole were not soldiers of any government and we had no proof to show cause for action against a foreign country.

The attack on the Cole was a not a catalyst to our actions in Iraq nor Afghanistan and we are not occupying Yemen.

The quotation I provided is not mine it is from the link I supplied.

Remember the USS Liberty!

"Attacking a warship has been long viewed as an act of war. The most recent example occured in 1968 when North Korea attacked the USS Pueblo. To our national shame, the Pueblo is still in the hands of that country. A rather more forceful response occurred in 1941, when Japan attacked the US Pacific Fleet at anchor in Pearl Harbor."

As a former soldier and retired naval officer, I regret that you left one other shameful incident out of the list:  the unprovoked Israeli air/seaborne attack against the virtually unarmed USS Liberty, which was operating in international waters in June 1967 -- and our government's complicity in attempting to suppress the story.  President Johnson even recalled the carrier-based fighters that were launched to defend her after the attack had begun, and her commanding officer -- CAPT McGonagle --- was awarded the Medal of Honor only after our government asked Tel Aviv for permission.

The clearly marked US Navy intelligence ship -- armed only with a .50 cal machine gun --- was repeatedly straffed, napalmed, and torpedoed.

Over 30 officers and men were killed; many more were wounded, including the captain, who refused to leave the bridge despite grievous burns from the napalm. 

Had we not been losing so many Americans each week in Vietnam that year, the story certainly couldn't have been downplayed like LBJ played it.

Nonetheless, there are many of us who will never forget it.

Never.

Never forget The

Never forget The Cole.

 

And here is another hero ignored by the neoPRAVDA media:

 

Lt. Murphy's mettle

http://powerlineblog.com/

 

In honor of Lt. Michael P. Murphy

http://michellemalkin.com/2007/10/12/in-honor-of-lt-michael-p-murphy/#comment-145162

 

These ignored heroes bring to my mind ...

Is Rome worth one good man’s life? We believed it once. Make us believe it again. He was a soldier of Rome. Honor him … Who will help me carry him?

(- “Gladiator”)