Media Reality Check: By 8-to-1 Margin, Networks Target Conservative Speech after Tucson Shooting
By Rich Noyes | January 18, 2011 | 15:57
Almost immediately after the shooting in Tucson that killed six people and left Democratic Congresswoman Gabrielle Giffords severely wounded, the media establishment linked the attack with a debate about “civility,” suggesting an association between Jared Loughner’s rampage and the words and phrases used in national political debates.
Many of these network news stories offered ambiguous references to, as CBS’s Bob Schieffer put it on the January 9 edition of Sunday Morning, “the mean and hateful tone that now marks our modern politics.” Newsweek’s Jonathan Alter, in a soundbite on NBC’s Today the next morning, pointed his finger at “the left and the right” as contributing to what he termed “the climate of violence.”
There’s certainly no shortage of instances of the Left deploying violent rhetoric, but how evenly did the media divide the blame during the first few days of this national debate about civility? MRC analysts reviewed all 55 broadcast network stories or segments discussing the discourse from just after the shooting (January 8) through the evening of the national memorial service on January 12, reviewing the ABC, CBS and NBC morning, evening and Sunday talk shows.
While many of those stories offered general comments about “harsh rhetoric,” about three-fifths (31) contained specific references to instances of supposedly intemperate speech. Of those specific examples elevated by the media, more than eight out of ten (82%) were about the conduct of conservatives or Republicans, compared with just 11% which talked about liberals or Democrats.

(Please note: a story could have contained more than one specific example of provocative speech. The remaining 7% of specific instances were drawn from the political fringe, not associated with either mainstream conservatives or liberals, including multiple citations on NBC of the “birther” who yelled from the congressional gallery during the reading of the U.S. Constitution, and one reference on ABC to the movie “Zeitgeist,” which supposedly influenced Loughner’s attitudes.)
Of those the media associated with the shooting, former Alaska governor and 2008 GOP vice presidential nominee Sarah Palin was most frequently impugned — mentioned in 24 stories, or more than three-fourths of those containing references to specific actors. Reporters quickly — within hours of the news breaking, when few facts were reliably known — chose to highlight a map of targeted congressional districts Palin’s Web site had drawn up for the 2010 campaign, creating the sinister implication that it was somehow related to the events in Tucson.

“Giffords was one of 20 Democrats whose districts were lit up in cross hairs on a Sarah Palin campaign Web site last spring,” CBS’s Nancy Cordes noted on the January 8 Evening News. “Giffords and many others complained that someone unstable might act on that imagery.”
On ABC’s World News that same night, correspondent Jon Karl made the same connection: “Giffords had just won re-election in a hard-fought campaign, winning despite being one of the top Republican targets for defeat. She was even on Sarah Palin’s target list.”
“Not since Timothy McVeigh attacked the federal building in Oklahoma City has a crime sparked so much attention on anti-government rhetoric,” NBC’s Lee Cowan noted on Today January 10. “That map Sarah Palin put up on Facebook last year, targeting Congresswoman Gifford’s seat, made Gifford nervous, even then."

The following morning on the same program, correspondent Andrea Mitchell suggested Palin was off the hook — at least, for now: “Was her gun image inflammatory? There is no direct link to this suspect, as far as investigators know.”
Another nine stories linked the Tea Party to the tragedy. “Giffords, a conservative Democrat, was concerned about heated rhetoric from the Tea Party,” NBC’s Kelly O’Donnell noted on the January 9 Today, the morning after the shooting. Anchoring ABC’s World News on January 8, David Muir passed along how Giffords father was asked “Did your daughter have any enemies? And his response was, ‘Yes, the whole Tea Party.’”
The networks’ other examples of the right’s supposed vitriol: Florida talk show host and Tea Party activist Joyce Kaufman, former Nevada Senate candidate Sharron Angle, national radio talk show host Rush Limbaugh, South Carolina Representative Joe Wilson, radio host and Fox News personality Glenn Beck, and Dick Morris, branded by CBS as a “conservative pollster.”
As for pointing fingers at liberals or Democrats, both CBS and NBC once highlighted how then-Democratic senate candidate Joe Manchin shot a copy of the cap and trade bill in a TV ad last year (a position that actually puts Manchin to the right of most in his party). NBC’s Andrea Mitchell twice acknowledged (once on Today, once on the Nightly News) how, just days before the shooting, a blogger at the left-wing Daily Kos web site had written a hostile item about Giffords voting against Nancy Pelosi for House Speaker: “He had written that she was, quote, ‘dead to him’” — an anecdote that went unreported on ABC and CBS.
On the January 9 edition of NBC’s Meet the Press, moderator David Gregory cited how then-Representative Alan Grayson “compared Republicans to the Taliban” in his campaign last year. Only ABC’s George Stephanopoulos mentioned (mildly) the existence of harsh left-wing speech on NBC’s cable network, MSNBC, relaying on the January 9 This Week how “on the left, Keith Olbermann last night on MSNBC, apologizing for any statements he might have made in the past that incited violence in any way.” For its part, none of NBC’s “civility” coverage ever talked about the inflammatory rhetoric of their MSNBC colleagues.
If the media want to have an honest debate about civility, then journalists need to confront the real and harsh examples of liberals engaging in the sort of rhetoric they ostensibly deplore. And the first topic for that debate needs to be the highly un-civil way the Left and many in the media suggested mainstream conservatives and the Tea Party were somehow culpable for the horrible acts of January 8.
And if they choose to continue furthering the Left’s baseless allegations designed to smear conservatives, the media’s self-appointed civility cops are themselves contributing to the coarsening of American politics — the very thing they purport to decry.
— Rich Noyes is Research Director of the Media Research Center. You can follow him here on Twitter.
- Rich Noyes's blog
- Login or register to post comments



















Comments
(No subject)
Submitted by Rich Noyes on Tue, 01/18/2011 - 3:58pm.
Rich Noyes is Research Director at the Media Research Center. You can follow him here on Twitter.
Are you just speechless, Rich??? LOL
Submitted by motherbelt on Tue, 01/18/2011 - 4:07pm.
or biting your tongue???
Who was it that said the other day that if it didn't cause this shooting it would cause the next one?
That's liberals for ya...ever optimistic.
(No subject)
Submitted by SickofLibs on Tue, 01/18/2011 - 4:08pm.
And Andrea Mitchell is a mummy from the 5th Dynasty.
JournOlist 2. Appearing NOW in a "news" report near you.
Submitted by Jack Bauer on Tue, 01/18/2011 - 4:03pm.
This was absolutely a production brought to a TV and paper near you by JOURNOLIST 2.
The theme went out barely seconds after people lay dying. -- almost as if it had been prepared long in advance of any violent act. It may have even be a hangover from J1 -- as in.. WHAT TO DO IF THERE IS A MURDER AT A DEMOCRAT POLITICAL EVENT.
There then followed an absolutely COORDINATED respose using the same phrase and targets.
'I wasted time, now doth time waste me.' --- William Shakespeare
Olbermann's apology was preemptive
Submitted by Galvanic on Tue, 01/18/2011 - 4:41pm.
He knows that he's as vitriolic as anyone else, so he absolves himself from anything that pops out of the archives with a mild apology.
Now, MSNBC can say that they've apologized while the Right hasn't, therefore, the Right is continuing the harsh discourse while MSNBC is Obama-compliant.
"On ABC’s World News that same night, correspondent Jon Karl made the same connection: 'Giffords had just won re-election in a hard-fought campaign, winning despite being one of the top Republican targets for defeat. She was even on Sarah Palin’s target list.”
But before that, she was on the Daily Kos Target List of Blue Dog Democrats that needed to be defeated in the primaries.
But..........but..........but
Submitted by killa37 on Tue, 01/18/2011 - 4:20pm.
But..........but..........but I heard that it was just a mere 4% of the MSM that was doing this........
Is there a reason?
Submitted by One on Tue, 01/18/2011 - 4:20pm.
Is there a reason Fox was omitted from the study? I'd be interested to see how their numbers compare. Also, a little clarification...the 82% claim is based on roughly 60% of responses, but the wording makes it appear that 82% of NN reports blamed conservatives for the shooting.
It's not like the old days, is it?
Submitted by SickofLibs on Tue, 01/18/2011 - 9:43pm.
Ah, there was a time not so long ago was when a stinkbait like that would draw dozens of responses.
And the recent comments box would light up with your name.
"It's me, me, they're talking about me!"
But alas, those heady times are gone.
One
Submitted by One on Wed, 01/19/2011 - 12:15pm.
It's a pretty benign name, isn't it?
Is that you deddy?
Submitted by Denny Crane on Tue, 01/18/2011 - 11:54pm.
Media Reality Check: By 8-to-1 Margin, Networks Target Conservative Speech after Tucson Shooting
Fox is cable news, not network.
We Are The 53%
That's simply not true
Submitted by One on Wed, 01/19/2011 - 12:14pm.
it's already been stated 60% of the networks made remarks concerning the rhetoric. The 8:1 margin is of that 60%. So no, it wasn't an 8:1 margin, unless you're only talking about networks inclusiveness of rhetoric in their coverage. Which, as the report states confusingly, we're not.
Stop spinning, you are making me dizzy.
Submitted by Denny Crane on Fri, 01/21/2011 - 3:42am.
The question you asked was why wasn't FOX included.
I copied the title of the article and highlighted the word NETWORK. And explained that FOXnews isn't NETWORK.
So when you respond with "that's simply not true" you look like a moron.
We Are The 53%
Let's play "Guess Who Said This"
Submitted by GrannyGrump42 on Tue, 01/18/2011 - 5:07pm.
“Letter from the Birmingham Jail”
Martin Luther King, April 1963
Excellent Granny
Submitted by Boudin on Tue, 01/18/2011 - 5:24pm.
Thanks for sharing that.
This was pre prepared waiting
Submitted by d1carter on Tue, 01/18/2011 - 5:17pm.
This was pre prepared waiting for an incident to use this. They knew as soon as this incident occurred, they were ready with graphics and a narrative. "Journalism" died a while back.
The White House called very
Submitted by Barack_must_go..... on Tue, 01/18/2011 - 9:11pm.
The White House called very upset that you've put these figures out without first running them by the GAO, like the memo suggested.
Barack_Must_Go.....
Terrific piece, Rich
Submitted by HuffWatcher on Tue, 01/18/2011 - 10:55pm.
It's always good to see the hard numbers, that the Democrat-Media Complex cannot wiggle out of, and instead, must attempt to explain.
FYI, it was the same thing over at HuffPost - the #1 most-read blog in the world, and a top-ten U.S. "news" site. Aside from HuffPost's "jihad" against Sarah Palin and the Tea Party, in terms of subtly pointing the finger of responsibility at them, it also reviewed, approved and decided to publish the predictable unhinged leftist rage agaisnt them --- but also, open threats and urgings of violence.
See HuffPost uses Rep. Giffords as a political prop to falsely accuse conservatives, Sarah Palin of inciting shooter
and Arianna's continuing jihad against the reality of the AZ shootings
GIGO
Submitted by TerryWest on Wed, 01/19/2011 - 12:46am.
They shoved Obama care through using manipulation of numbers and hiding facts makes sense they are using the same MO to keep it , reality is. .