ABC was embarrassed last week by NewsBusters’ exposure of how their new senior medical editor, Dr. Richard Besser of the federal Centers for Disease Control, donated $400 to Barack Obama’s presidential campaign in 2008, presumably an indication of his political sympathies. An ABC News spokeswoman, Cathie Levin, defended Besser to the Associated Press, arguing that he’s a doctor “whose job it is to give impartial and unvarnished advice and he’ll be able to do the same for a television audience.”
Maybe Besser can indeed separate his political views from his reporting on health care, but a review of campaign finance records at OpenSecrets.org finds that CBS’s Dr. Jon LaPook and NBC’s Dr. Nancy Snyderman have also chipped in their own cash to Democratic — but never Republican — candidates. And both correspondents, along with Besser’s future ABC colleague, Dr. Tim Johnson, have showered the liberal Obama health care plan with fawning press. Details:
■ CBS’s Dr. Jon LaPook: Before joining CBS, LaPook gave $4,000 to Democratic presidential candidates Al Gore, John Kerry and Wesley Clark, plus a hefty $20,000 donation to the DNC. LaPook’s wife, liberal TV producer Norman Lear’s daughter Kate, has doled out more than $100,000 to Democrats, including the maximum $4,600 to Obama.
Interviewing Obama for the July 15 Evening News, LaPook opened the door for Obama to pontificate: “Do you believe that each individual American should be required to have health insurance?” Later, LaPook empathetically invited Obama to refute charges his plan is socialistic: “Mr. President, when people hear you talk about a national insurance plan, there are fears of socialized medicine, rationed care, limited choice. How do you handle this?”
■ NBC’s Dr. Nancy Snyderman: The records show two contributions totalling $800 to Democratic congressional candidates when Snyderman worked at the health care giant Johnson & Johnson after her stint at ABC News and before joining NBC. When she worked at ABC, Snyderman was a Lincoln Bedroom guest of Bill and Hillary Clinton (catalogued under "Arkansas Friends"). On the May 1, 2000 Good Morning America, Snyderman revealed that Hillary Clinton was the lawyer who handled her 1988 divorce. “What did she say to you about a philandering husband?” host Charlie Gibson wondered. Snyderman wouldn’t say.
Snyderman pressed Obama from the left in an interview for the July 15 NBC Nightly News, beseeching him to push for higher taxes: “What I haven’t heard anyone ask is for the American public to pony up, too, that this is going to require some give for all the stakeholders involved.” After Obama’s July 22 press conference, Snyderman announced on MSNBC: “I was rooting for the President to hit a home run.”
■ ABC’s Dr. Tim Johnson: No Democratic donations in Johnson’s file (he’s been with ABC News since 1975), but he’s been a steady advocate for universal health care. In 1993, he called the Clintons “heroes” for pushing their health care scheme; a year later, he saluted Hillary on the July 19, 1994 Good Morning America: “At least from the physicians represented here, you get a 100 percent vote, including mine, for universal coverage.”
This year, Johnson has kept arguing for universal coverage. On the March 1 World News, Johnson passionately argued that the lack of such coverage was America’s “national shame.”
There is just one fact I want to let everybody hear: We spend more than twice as much, per person, on health care in this country as the average of all other industrialized countries, yet we’re the only one that doesn’t have universal coverage. That’s a national shame and I think, ultimately, that’s what’s going to unite Democrats and Republicans.
After spending the day as a participant in President Obama’s heavily-hyped health care forum on March 5, Johnson gushed on World News: “I was blown away by President Obama’s grasp of the subject, how he connected the dots, how he answered the questions without any script.”
Network health reporters are supposed to ask the tough questions before ObamaCare becomes the law of the land. Can’t the networks find at least one independent voice to apply a little scrutiny, before it’s too late?
—Rich Noyes is Research Director at the Media Research Center.




















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
I wonder if ABC would call
August 5, 2009 - 09:38 ET by mattmI wonder if ABC would call these paid endorsements "orchestrated."
There you go again
August 5, 2009 - 09:42 ET by locomotivebreath1901With that right wingnut lie of media bias.
Geez. You should start web site or something...
Seriously, though. Facts don't matter to these 'news' people. They are honestly convinced of their own insulation from their own bvllsh1t, and are the very definition of amoral.
~You will be assimilated.
http://locomotivebre...
Amoral
August 5, 2009 - 09:56 ET by iveseenitallRight on, locomotive. So many people are "amoral". It's the secularist message-- no judgments, the end justifies the means. One need only to look at Barry's administration and its cozy connections with the sycohants in the MSM. If freedom fails in America, it will be from lack of seeking the truth, which is the "moral" thing to do. Sadly, however, the secularists are winning, because lying is the easiest thing to do. And it's now "mainstream" in our nation.
NEVER,NEVER trust a "liberal"
That's a revelation
August 5, 2009 - 10:08 ET by mom_roxNo, not at the fact that these TV docs are liberal and most have donated to Dems.
I never knew Hillary was a divorce lawyer (and according the link, she claimed she was the best in town).
~~save your tea, dump congress~~
You look at the quality and
August 5, 2009 - 10:26 ET by buddycYou look at the quality and intelligence of reporters from ABC, CNN, NBC and CBS and it is not surprising to see people who just don't have the qualities you would look for commenting and reporting. One reason would be the complete lack of any integrity. Of course they use only "experts" who say what the want said. They don't seek to inform, report, challenge or encourage debate. Their goal is indoctrination. People of integrity want nothing to do with that kind of attitude. That is why you have a line up of Brian Williams, Katie Couric and Charles Gibson. Those people would pork their children on television for money.
Words cannot express how
August 5, 2009 - 10:28 ET by buddycWords cannot express how wonderful it is that you expose these people as you have done.
Thank you. A great article.
CNN & Fox?
August 5, 2009 - 11:41 ET by slickwillie2001This is a great service you have done, but let's not limit it to the networks. Fox News and CNN have their own medical 'experts' and I suspect that they are all liberals as well.
An ABC News spokeswoman,
August 5, 2009 - 14:29 ET by stratmanThis is spin / propaganda / lie - take your pick.
Besser is a physician but now he is a hired commentator for ABC. In this capacity, Besser is not acting as a physician - his fiduciary duty is to the network and not to a patient.
None of the typical and expected constraints or obligations exist with a patient because there is no physician-patient relationship, but they do exist with his employer ABC in an employer-employee relationship.
It is a critical difference. This does not mean Besser is less of a physician. It means Besser has no duty of care to a patient and can therefore say and do that which he may not do otherwise in a physician-patient relationship, such as say nothing of the negatives of that remedy, inform of alternative remedies, and be paid by an outside source to unquestionably/uncritically promote a special interest.
Help Wanted At ABC
August 5, 2009 - 15:57 ET by deerjerkydaveHelp Wanted At ABC News!
Only liberal lemmings need apply.
File this one under
August 5, 2009 - 19:47 ET by acumenyou get what you pay for.