Flashback: Wacky Network Quotes from 1989 Tiananmen Square Massacre

Photo of Rich Noyes.

Tomorrow, June 4, is the 20th anniversary of the Chinese army massacre of pro-democracy demonstrators in Tiananmen Square. Back in 1989, the big networks provided in-depth coverage of the massive protests that swelled in mid-May, and harsh coverage of the brutal reaction from the communist authorities.

But, as the Media Research Center noted at the time, the networks also used the occasion for some bizarre comparisons. Two that stand out from our archive: CBS’s Eric Engberg comparing the People’s Liberation Army’s planned assault on students with the Ohio National Guard’s panicky shooting into anti-war demonstrators at Kent State University in 1970, killing four; and NBC commentator John Chancellor ruing the heavy focus on the bloodshed in Beijing instead of a then-new Carnegie report found problems with America’s middle schools.

Story Continues Below Ad ↓

First Engberg, who was interviewing William Taylor from the Center for Strategic and International Studies on CBS’s overnight program, Nightwatch, early on the morning of June 7, 1989. Engberg proposed:
“Given the traditions and the history of the PLA [People’s Liberation Army, the Chinese military], what will be the psychological effect on the troops and on the high command as a result of having been through this bloodbath? I mean, there are — I can think back to instances in history, let's say the Third Reich and the Nazi forces under Hitler, when the fact that you marched in and shot a bunch of unarmed civilians would have been considered a cause for celebration — nobody would have been embarrassed by it. Will the military leaders there be embarrassed by this? Will this be something like Kent State was for our military?” — CBS reporter Eric Engberg talking about the Tiananmen Square massacre on Nightwatch, June 7, 1989. (Audio here.)
Then on June 20, Chancellor found a study of middle school students from the Carnegie Council on Adolescent Development even more troubling than the Chinese crackdown:
“Americans are properly outraged by the massacre of students in China. Thousands may have been gunned down in Beijing, but what about the millions of American kids whose lives are being ruined by an enormous failure of the country's educational system...Other countries are turning out better educated kids, and educated kids are the key to the future. We can and we should agonize about the dead students in Beijing, but we’ve got a bigger problem right here at home, which is commentary for this evening, Tom.”
— John Chancellor's commentary on NBC Nightly News, June 20, 1989. (Video above; audio here.)
Now let’s see how the networks cover the 20th anniversary, as the Chinese government moves to shut down public discussion of the blight on their image.

—Rich Noyes is Research Director at the Media Research Center.


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Falling behind in education

Falling behind in education is a bigger problem than 2,000 protesters being murdered?  The education system must have already been in shambles wherever John Chancellor got his degree.

Oh, my God.

Another (literally) jaw-dropping moment courtesy of the brain-dead MSM.

Thousands murdered by their own government takes second place to kids who can't get good grades?

That's got to be the non sequitur of the century.

Don't expect a whole lot of sympathy when Obama's AmeriCops start kicking down doors in search of guns and copies of Mark Levin books.

NOLO PUGNARE ME OCCIDERE

What Obama giveth with one hand he taketh away with both hands.

Pretty typical

Pretty typical stuff.

"<insert bad worldly occurence> is happening in X country, but here in America, just as bad are things like blah blah blah"

With a Republican president.....

"Today, there were gains in jobs, but still there are blabh blah blah blah"

With a Democrat president.....

"Today there were losses in jobs, but on a high note, blah blah blah."