While, like the rest of the media establishment, CBS’s Early Show seemed to conclude that Barack Obama’s “lipstick on a pig” crack from the day before was nothing but a harmless comment, reporter Bill Plante put the swipe in the context of Democrats’ desperation to find some way to undermine the Republican vice presidential nominee Sarah Palin.
Unlike his competitors at ABC and NBC, Plante on Wednesday highlighted how Newsweek’s Howard Fineman quoted an unnamed “top Democratic strategist” as arguing about Palin: “We’ve got to go after her, and fast.” And Plante quoted from the blog WomenCount.org, which vowed to “work to stamp out sexism where we see it on the campaign trail.”
While all of the morning shows led with the “lipstick on a pig” complaint and steered the discussion to the view that the McCain campaign is thin-skinned and/or cynically calculating for raising such a spurious issue, none bothered to mention the far more absurd complaints from top Democrats that Republican references to Barack Obama as a “community organizer” were some sort of racist plot -- instead of quite obvious shots at Obama’s lack of experience.
As for the “lipstick-pig” issue, Plante was dismissive: “John McCain used the same expression, he used it last fall when talking about Democrats’ health care plan, compared it to Hillary-care back from the '90s and said that it was like putting lipstick on a pig. So that'll probably go away this time.”
For good measure, CBS brought aboard the senior editor of the liberal New Republic, Michael Crowley, who made the same point, calling Obama’s remark an “unintentional, pretty harmless comment that I think the McCain campaign wants us to discuss as a gaffe.” But Crowley also saw Democrats as “a little psyched out” by the prospect of running against Palin:
What this illustrates is the trouble that Palin causes for the Democratic ticket, because the Republicans are in a position to say [about] any comment like that, that's sexism, you're talking down to her, you're not showing respect to a woman. It's a really hard thing for Democrats to deal with, and you can tell they're a little psyched out by it.
Here’s how CBS covered the issue, which topped their Early Show broadcast on Wednesday morning:
Show intro, 7am EDT
HARRY SMITH: Lipstick bungle? Democrats look for openings as McCain and Palin surge in the polls, but was this a jab at the Alaskan Governor?
BARACK OBAMA: You can put lipstick on a pig. [cheers] It's still a pig.
7:01am EDT
HARRY SMITH: Let's get right to our top story, though. Sarah Palin has helped John McCain surge in the polls. Democrats are trying to figure out how to take her on, so was Barack Obama's recent 'lipstick comment' a calculated move, or just a political bungle. CBS News seniorWhite House Correspondent Bill Plante joins us with more on that. Good morning, Bill.
BILL PLANTE: Good morning, Harry. Well, maybe neither. But it turns out they didn't nickname her "Sarah Barracuda" for nothing. The new star of the Republican ticket has some has real bite, and that has Democrats in a dilemma: Do they go after her? Or would that backfire?
CLIP OF PALIN AT GOP CONVENTION: I was just your average hockey mom and signed up for the PTA.
PLANTE: McCain and Obama are in a statistical tie, and suddenly there's a lot of concern among Democrats: What to do? Newsweek's Howard Fineman quotes someone he calls a top Democratic strategist who says -- "we've got to go after her, and fast." [On screen graphic: "We've got to go after her, and fast"] But so far, Barack Obama's response is limited to mild sarcasm.
BARACK OBAMA AT CAMPAIGN RALLY: It's an interesting story. [hoots from audience] No, no, it is. I mean that sincerely, I mean, I think, you know, it's, you know, mother, governor, moose-shooter -- I mean, it's cool.
PLANTE: Why not tougher? For starters, almost two-thirds of the women in a CBS News poll say Palin is someone they could relate to. The blog "Women Count," which supported Hillary Clinton, was upset with suggestions that Palin might have difficulty balancing motherhood and the vice presidency. Regardless of the candidate's ideology, they wrote [words shown on screen]: "We will work to stamp out sexism where we see it on the campaign trail." And Tuesday night in Virginia, the McCain campaign thought it saw sexism when Obama charged that McCain talks change, but would continue President Bush's agenda.
OBAMA: You know, you can put lipstick on a pig. [cheers] It's still a pig.
PLANTE: McCain's newly formed Palin truth squad quickly accused Obama of comparing Palin to a pig and demanded an apology. Obama's staff called the charge pathetic. But Mike Feldman, a former Al Gore advisor, says the Democrats have to know where to draw the line.
MIKE FELDMAN, FORMER AL GORE ADVISOR: I think the Obama campaign and its surrogates have to be careful not to attack her personally. She's a very compelling and sympathetic figure.
PLANTE: Now, it's true that John McCain used the same expression, he used it last fall when talking about Democrats' health care plan, compared it to Hillary-care back from the '90s and said that it was like putting lipstick on a pig. So that'll probably go away this time, but they'll be vigilant out there. But they really don't like taking it away from their main message, Harry, which, is for Obama, that McCain means four more years of George Bush.
HARRY SMITH: There you go. Alright, thanks very much, Bill Plante.
Interview with Michael Crowley, 7:06am EDT:
HARRY SMITH: First things first, want to talk about the lipstick on a pig comment. Gaffe? Intentional? Somewhere in between? What do you think?
MICHAEL CROWLEY, THE NEW REPUBLIC: Unintentional, pretty harmless comment that I think the McCain campaign wants us to discuss as a gaffe. I really think that Obama was not talking or thinking about Palin, but what this illustrates is the trouble that Palin causes for the Democratic ticket, because the Republicans are in a position to say [about] any comment like that, that's sexism, you're talking down to her, you're not showing respect to a woman. It's a really hard thing for Democrats to deal with, and you can tell they're a little psyched out by it. We'll see whether or not it works in the short term. I actually think it is working a little bit for the Republicans, to to Obama's dismay.
SMITH: There you go. She literally is the proverbial third rail. You touch it, you're going to get shocked.
CROWLEY: I think that's one reason they picked her. They knew they were going to be able to do that.
Also, I think Smith meant that Palin was “figuratively” the third rail, not “literally,” although that’s what he said. If she were an actual rail, she would presumably have somewhat less appeal to white working class women voters.
—Rich Noyes is Research Director at the Media Research Center.





PLANTE: Now, it's true that John McCain used the same expression, he used it last fall when talking about Democrats' health care plan, compared it to Hillary-care back from the '90s and said that it was like putting lipstick on a pig. So that'll probably go away this time, but they'll be vigilant out there. But they really don't like taking it away from their main message, Harry, which, is for Obama, that McCain means four more years of George Bush.














Editor at Large
Comments Policy
"It's a really hard thing
September 10, 2008 - 11:06 ET by Chris Norman"It's a really hard thing for Democrats to deal with, and you can tell they're a little psyched out by it."
How does that shoe fit, now it's on the other foot? Hmmmm?
McNotObama '08
It's a really hard thing
September 10, 2008 - 11:10 ET by mbuelTo lose to the ideals they've been pushing since the 60's.
LMAO.
Palin has accomplished great things, while Obama has continued to make empty promises that the world owes you a living.
"...while Obama has
September 10, 2008 - 11:15 ET by Chris Norman"...while Obama has continued to make empty promises that the world owes you a living"
Albeit with "soaring" rhetoric - talk about putting lipstick on a pig. He should talk.
McNotObama '08
you know
September 10, 2008 - 13:55 ET by mbuelI've never thought his rhetoric to be soaring. Listen to him speak. He's ALWAYS been stilted, stumbly and slow... even with a teleprompter.
http://www.youtube.c...
http://www.youtube.c...
He's _always_ been a bad speaker, it's only recently become more noticeable that he has had longer pauses, and become even more stilted.
Palin has accomplished great things, while Obama has continued to make empty promises that the world owes you a living.
The "liberal" hypocrites
September 10, 2008 - 11:06 ET by iveseenitallIt's always the same with the "liberal" hypocrites. They feel that anything, ANY nasty, vindictive, pathetic comment they make is perfectly acceptable. But do it back to them and the feigned outrage and victimhood starts flying. The best example is what they've done to President Bush, all because they lost two elections to him. And they will continue their personal attacks on him forever, and deny it each time it occurs."Liberal"??? What a misnomer! "Liberals" make me sick.
NEVER,NEVER trust a "liberal"
I used to think this was a nutroots lead effort
September 10, 2008 - 11:08 ET by c5thenNow I am sure that it's a concerted top-down attack on Sarah Palin because the liberal democrats are scared to death that they don't have the minority sympathy vote all sewn up anymore. This is turning into a personal lynching of someone lead by the democratic 'leadership' and funded and distributed by their allies, the main stream media. The media is now part and parcel to the Obama campaign with absolutely no attempt at objectivity anymore.
I'll tell you that this is not going unnoticed in 'middle America'. There is a lot of disgust and anger at the MSM for their brazzen and partisan attacks on Sarah Palin and the best way to express that is at the polls in November.
The day that "politician" became a career choice is the day we started losing the Republic. Let's get it back! Alan Keyes '08.
Maybe it wasn't directed at
September 10, 2008 - 11:12 ET by Chris NormanMaybe it wasn't directed at Palin, but the Demo/Media started this whole thing of using innocuous words to destroy carreers. This is the same bunch of people who drove Trent Lott out of the Senate leadership, turning his throwaway line at Strom Thurmond's two hundredth birthday party into an endorsement of racism. They have reaped what they have sown. I don't like to see the use of thin skin as a political weapon, but the Demo/Media have designed the political landscape.
McNotObama '08
Brushing it off
September 10, 2008 - 11:19 ET by KC MulvilleMy own opinion is that Obama just didn't realize how his words would sound. He was without his teleprompter, and dropped a minor gaffe. But again, it's how threatened their response was, like how they responded to Michelle's equally harmless foot-in-mouth. They can't take it. They can't withstand the smallest suggestion that they're not perfect.
The most disingenuous spin is the one Plante actually reported: "Yeah, John McCain used the same phrase last fall." But that glosses over the obvious fact that when McCain said it, it hadn't become a catchphrase for Sarah Palin yet, whom the Obama campaign is furiously trying to discredit, often through common schoolyard insults.
Why can't he just apologize for having his foot in his mouth? Hell, ask Biden for advice. Why else do they keep Biden around? No one is buying that "foreign policy expertise" BS ...
Not McCain that is cynically calculating here - it's Obama
September 10, 2008 - 11:24 ET by Gary HallRich:
No - the "cynically calculating" charge goes to the Obama camp. I find it difficult to imagine that they did not carefully script this - keeping the context of the words on McCain issues, etc. But Obama lets the cat out of the bag - he's stammering, stalling, and grinning ear to ear - and the crowd sees that it's coming as well. They know that the McCain camp will jump all over it - that Fox will jump on it. They know that the context is straight, and that the MSM will protect them - and not call the bluff.
It was bait. The Obama needs to be challenged on it. This is their way? Baiting the country with a skit, to promote anger and cynicism. (;~> gary
Obama's experience with pigs
September 10, 2008 - 11:30 ET by mustangsallyObama should know what a pig with lipstick looks like. He has experience with them as a "community organizer". Also, he gets to watch Michelle get dressed in the morning ...
IT WAS NOT DIRECTED AT
September 10, 2008 - 11:32 ET by docbMccains running mate...But anything to take up clintons whinning sexist banner suits the mccain group just fine!!!
let us ask mccain about his 'WET START' THAT RESULTED IN THE DEATH OF 100 on the USS Forrestal
OR
KEATING 5 -KEATING 5 -KEATING 5
Lets ask his 'running mate' about her 'for it before she was against it' BRIDGE, stem cells, banning books, shooting animals from a airplane, creationism and her GODS War comment!
Let us ask mccain why he does not support VETERANS?
Oh Boy
September 10, 2008 - 11:56 ET by Tom PaineQueue the Twilight Zone theme song
do-do-DO-do do-do-DO-do
docb
September 10, 2008 - 12:10 ET by larry on LIwhat is it that you want to hear or said about the uss forestal and the keating 5 that hasn't been said?
docb is lying again....and spamming
September 10, 2008 - 12:15 ET by BlondeI posted a reply to her Forrestal SLANDER over on the Matt Damon thread, which I won't repeat here because I consider duplicate posts to be spamming.
docb....if it's possible....go try to buy a clue, or an original thought. Your DKos kool-aid talking points are getting old.
David Gregory, do you know which damn network you lie for? ~ Uncle Jimbo, @Blackfive
No wet start for
September 10, 2008 - 12:30 ET by mastersofdeceitNo wet start for you.
"We have seen some baseless claims that McCain was somehow responsible for the Forrestal disaster. One incorrect but widely quoted theory has him triggering the Zuni missile with the exhaust of his own plane by "wet-starting"
http://www.factcheck.org/askfactcheck/did_mccain_crash_five_planes.html
LMAO You guys need to get some new "talking points". All the poo flinging is getting debunked as quickly as it's being flung.
More propaganda against Palin - somebody must be panicking
September 10, 2008 - 13:04 ET by bpjam'Doc', you need to update your smears. The ones you are using are already old and debunked. The latests ones are that she had an affair and she is the member of a religious cult which worships aliens who are coming back to take them to the Home Planet.
Seriously dude, Keating 5? The guy who prosecuted it for the Senate himself said that McCain was completely innocent and just the token Republican to get named so it wouldn't appear that only Dems were on the take (which was the ACTUAL problem). Keating himself doesn't like McCain because John wouldn't play ball.
And if you want to blame him for Forrestal you would need to refute the Navy findings somehow. And anybody who opposed the Webb 'GI Bill' is a patriot in my view because they care not only about the servicemen but also have servicemen remain IN the service. It's incredible sad that Democrat senators have to try to pimp our servicemen in order to appear to support the troops.
You crazies must be pretty panicked at this point to be throwing out so many bizarre claims. Maybe you'll get lucky and the media will help you make some of the nonsense 'news'. And if they do, we'll see it right here on NewsBusters. So keep checking in!
The dems saying they have
September 10, 2008 - 11:51 ET by bigtimerThe dems saying they have to do something...and do something fast...
Well so far the community organizer is doing just that...'I knew all three networks would cover this today...I also knew they would come to his defense and cover for him, down-playing anything he does...
I love watching the desperation from all of them...
Looking forward to the 4th of Nov...now that is going to be a real blast!
"America isn't the problem...America is the solution." ~ Rush Limbaugh
The real pigs are Obama and Biden according to Swineline on Pork
September 10, 2008 - 12:06 ET by Dee BunkBiden had the worst rating of 0% and Obama had a low one of 10% while McCain's record was perfect (100%) in not requesting Pork.
Swineline
"O" Dumby
September 10, 2008 - 12:11 ET by rick007Bidem under the buss and the Hildabeast in. LOL
considering the amount of hatred and insaity on the Left..
September 10, 2008 - 12:33 ET by UndercoverConservative...anyone want to take bets that there will be an attempt made on her life before the election?
It's becoming very easy to know what the Hard Left is doing and will do-just look to what they accuse the Right of doing or of having done-it's what they're planning or desiring to do. Look to the "draft' controversy started by Kennedy when it was the Dem's Rangel who was firing up the system. Look at the Clinton dodge of "Attack Politics" but see who's really faking eBay ads, making up charges that even factcheck disproves. Look whose campaing calls "swiftboating" whenever the Right catches him on a sexist slur but screams "racist' at every term the Right uses (community organizer is racist? WTF?)
The leftist blogs are awash with more literal desires and wishes that Palin be "gone after" with extreme prejudice.
"to call an illegal immigrant an "undocumented alien" is the same as calling a streetcorner drug dealer an "unlicensed pharmacist".
"You spend your money anyway you want and respect other's rights to do the same"
UC.... That thought has
September 10, 2008 - 12:46 ET by bigtimerUC....
That thought has crossed my mind too regarding Palin and the crazy hate filled leftists in this country.
Wished I didn't worry about attmepts on her life...but I have thought this since her popularity is soaring.
Fear and desperation, winning at all costs can lead to such.
I pray not.
"America isn't the problem...America is the solution." ~ Rush Limbaugh
What Issues Does Obama Have?
September 10, 2008 - 13:57 ET by JDWIf there are no issues to argue, besides appealing to feelings and attacking character, what are his options?
Enquirer: Palin Alaska report
JDW
DAILY WAVE
Oink oink!
September 10, 2008 - 12:40 ET by DontFeedTheTrollsC'mon, that wasn't a reference to Palin! After all that was the first mainstream pig who is articulate and bright and clean-cut and a nice-looking pig he was talking about.
D
Keep the ILLEGALS out, join NumbersUSA to send free faxes to your reps.
Vs. The World
September 10, 2008 - 12:59 ET by oilcanIt's McCain/Palin versus the whole world! The MSM are down on him and doing all they can to marginalize McCain/Palin while propping up their candidates of choice. They're pulling out all the stops. I think this will be the first election in history where all the MSM support and liberal bias behind it will be so well documented. But I do know they will throw out their revisionist history making to whitewash their involvement. Little do they know, they are crumbling at the seams and soon will be dust and blown away.
Taste of their own medicine
September 10, 2008 - 13:41 ET by nkviking75For the sake of discussion, let's say that McCain is thin skinned and making up a controversy here. It still doesn't approach the ginned-up controversy Obama started about how the Republicans were going to be racist, nor the relentless firehose flow of garbage at Sarah Palin and her kids.
As for McCain trying to appeal to Hillary supporters, I can tell you that a family member has received three glossy mailings on heavy paper slightly larger than standard letter size. All three are from the Iowa Democratic Party, and all three are about abortion and how McCain will deny women control over their health care. All three have arrived within a single week. They're scared poopless (how's that for a euphamism?) that Hillary voters will defect.
When you put the clowns in charge, don't be surprised when a circus breaks out.