As anyone aware of the concept of supply and demand could have foreseen, Americans are driving less now that gasoline prices have passed $4.00 per gallon. So on this morning’s Today show, NBC’s Tom Costello dutifully noted that Americans have driven 20 billion fewer miles so far this year, but then declared a “bad news” side effect of drivers buying less gasoline:
“We use federal tax money that comes from gasoline sales to maintain the nation’s roads and bridges. We’re looking at a billion-plus-dollar short fall right now, and the National Governors Association wants Congress to come in and fill the gap.”
I guess “filling the gap” could either mean hiking the tax on gasoline, or supplementing the highway fund with other tax dollars. Maybe the real “bad news” for consumers is that some politicians seem determined to collect all of the gasoline taxes they desire, whether drivers actually buy the gas or not.
Costello filed his report at about 7:15am from an overpass over what looked to be the Beltway in Rockville, Maryland. He began by noting how he just paid $4.50 per gallon for his own fill-up, although Friday’s average price in Maryland is $4.046 per gallon, according to AAA’s “Fuel Gauge Report.”
I was on empty when I drove here this morning in my own car and so I filled up. [Holds up receipt] The price tag: 65 bucks at $4.50 a gallon. It is no surprise with prices like that that there are now two percent fewer cars on the road -- two percent fewer -- than a year ago. Somewhere between $3.50 and $4.50 a gallon, a lot of Americans are crying uncle....Americans drove 1.4 billion fewer highway miles in April than they did a year earlier; so far this year, 20 billion fewer miles traveled. Total vehicle miles down nearly two percent. That's the first pull back since the oil crisis of the '70s and '80s. Meanwhile, demand for gas appears to have peaked last year. So far this year, deliveries down two and a half percent, the first drop in 17 years. At $4.20 a gallon, many Americans have reached a pain point....
There's a little bit of bad news associated with fewer cars on the road and that is that we use federal tax money that comes from gasoline sales to maintain the nation's roads and bridges. We're looking at a billion-plus-dollar short fall right now, and the National Governors Association wants Congress to come in and fill the gap.















Editor at Large

Comments Policy
But wait...
June 20, 2008 - 10:16 ET by c5thenFewer miles driven on the roads and bridges means less maintenance and repairs needed so it should be a self-regulating system.
The day that "politician" became a career choice is the day we started losing the Republic. Let's get it back! Alan Keyes '08.
You beat me to that comment.
June 20, 2008 - 11:38 ET by ThatDudeYou beat me to that comment. From what I've noticed, the tax dollars aren't really being used for repair and maitenance. All too often unnecessary maitenance is done on roads not requiring it(to the commuters' woes) and the projects take far longer than required. Since when has the government ever been frugal with OUR money? When exactly did the government turn from being the people's bodyguard to our common bully?
unnecessary maintenance
June 20, 2008 - 13:29 ET by goldbough"All too often unnecessary maitenance is done on roads not requiring it(to the commuters' woes) and the projects take far longer than required. Since when has the government ever been frugal with OUR money?"
I completely agree. A city here just repaved a road that needs no repairing. There were absolutely no potholes or anything wrong with it. A few years ago in Houston, they repaved a major artery and it was a mess to drive on for several weeks.
Subsidized Car-Pooling,
June 20, 2008 - 14:43 ET by Eileen RightHOV Lanes, double long buses with eight passengers, etc. I know a major amount is wasted on programs such as these in SoCal.
Uh huh...they use the
June 20, 2008 - 10:21 ET by taterUh huh...they use the federal gas tax to maintain roads and bridges. Maybe so but there's been a bridge collapse in Minnesota and millions of potholes on some main United States highways (even parts of the interstate) where I live. I'd like to see how much of those taxes actually go into fixing roads and bridges.
www.theholyrosary.org
"There is no problem, I tell you, no matter how difficult it is, that we can not resolve by the prayer of the Holy Rosary." -Sister Lucia
Congrats are in order for
June 20, 2008 - 10:25 ET by dvdaughtryCongrats are in order for those 2% that are doing their civic duty (or is it dooty) to slow global warming by cutting down on their driving!
Also, would someone please tell the MSM to stop playing both sides of the coin?
You trying to say Jesus Christ can't hit a curveball?
My first thought exactly!
June 20, 2008 - 10:34 ET by WhoIsJohnGaltLess global warming should make them happy, right?
It amazes me that these clowns, no matter how many times that they see the free market work (higher prices leads to less consumption), they can never apply the same theories to plans to raise taxes or regulatory increases...buffoons.
The Way
June 20, 2008 - 10:57 ET by JDWThere is only one way, the right way. These pinheads are so perverted, attempting to spin every aspect of positive and forward thinking, eventually they corner themselves, we do not have to.
And on the subject of less driving, consider food. How much longer will it be profitable for the farming community to transport their product to market? Who will still be around after this summer? What are the consequences?
We can drive less but we must eat.
JDW
Will Ted Kennedy help write the universal health care bill?
Higher food prices, buy
June 20, 2008 - 12:53 ET by dvdaughtryHigher food prices, buy less food, eat less food--obesity in America solved!
Man, I didn't know how easy this is.
Daughtry/Limbaugh '08
You trying to say Jesus Christ can't hit a curveball?
There's One Near You
June 20, 2008 - 16:47 ET by JDWMan loses 80lbs eating at McDonalds
JDW
Will Ted Kennedy help write the universal health care bill?
Congrats are in order for
June 20, 2008 - 10:26 ET by dvdaughtryDouble
Your tagline sounded
June 20, 2008 - 10:26 ET by motherbeltYour tagline sounded familiar; it took me a while to figure out where it came from....Major League, right? LOL
Yes, you are correct. I
June 20, 2008 - 10:30 ET by dvdaughtryYes, you are correct. I thought it was fitting being Jesus Christo is often attacked (may be a little sac religous, but I think God has a sense of humor).
You trying to say Jesus Christ can't hit a curveball?
“We use federal tax money
June 20, 2008 - 10:25 ET by motherbelt“We use federal tax money that comes from gasoline sales to maintain the nation’s roads and bridges.
HAHAHAHA!
That's rich!
When the bridge in Minneapolis collapsed, they said they would have to raise the gas tax to have money to repair infrastructure. Just proves that they have not been using that money for the purpose it was intended. And even now, every tax hike on gas will get dumped into the general fund and probably get used on more entitlement programs instead of road repairs.
Exactly! The Star and
June 20, 2008 - 11:53 ET by mattmExactly! The Star and Sickle just published a "letter of the day" from a professional leftist activist suggesting that the Pawlenty administration is responsible for the bridge collapse, even though it has been decades of Democrat malfeasance which has diverted anywhere from 40% to 70% of transportation tax revenue to general fund expenditures (i.e. welfare and other Lib initiatives).
Just another sad example of Liberals causing problems and then blaming republicans and conservatives for them.
Windfall tax?
June 20, 2008 - 10:36 ET by Hero SquadSince I'm apparently seeing a little more money in my bank account by driving less, perhaps Obama should propose a "windfall tax" on people like me who are draining our federal coffers.
*****
"People only insist that a debate stop when they are afraid of what might be learned if it continues." - George Will
hero -- how about
June 20, 2008 - 11:04 ET by Jack Bauerhero -- how about "wind-fall" taxes on BIG HOLLYWOOD?
Brad Pitt earns $30 million a movie, and his wife earns $20 million.
I've decided that's an "obscene" income that no one deserves. Tax 'em.
Dem Contributors are Exempt!
June 20, 2008 - 13:37 ET by Chasvsof course you know that Democratic Contributors are automatically exempt from "Obscene" profit taxes! They send that money that would otherwise be "taxed" to their favorite Marxist/Socialist in the Government.
Just as in any communist society, those in power live well. These fascists bow down to ALGORE who should be SUED for all BOGUS crap he's unleashed on our society over the last few years.
You know three years ago he said we only had five years to fix the planet. So Al must be planning a two year strategy to get his fat ass out of here!
Slippery slope
June 20, 2008 - 16:23 ET by BradzillaI have seriously thought that a government that can impose a "windfall profits tax" could also too easily impose a "windfall income tax". The arguments for it are too similar. How could someone earn so much money while so many others make only minimum wage (presumably at their expense)? Somehow I think actors will be exempt because of some "artist" clause.
They can't do simple math.....
June 20, 2008 - 10:46 ET by SouthJersey1953They can't do simple math.....this is such a non story. The feds collect 15% of cost of gas for taxes. Assume last year the cost was $3.00/gal. The Feds collected $0.45/gal in taxes. Now, gas is $4.00/gal and the Feds are collecting $0.60/gal in taxes. That is a revenue increase of 25% Auto travel is down 2% How does he figure the government is getting LESS money?????
don't they also collect
June 20, 2008 - 11:27 ET by kdizzydazea hefty chunk of the profits as well in taxes? I am not a corporate guy so I could be way off in this mode of thinking. Of course, if I am right, and they do - then it would also mean that with record profits from the oil companies, comes record tax receipts for the gubment.
Not A Percent
June 21, 2008 - 10:50 ET by JoelCTThe Federal Government does not collect a percent. They collect a flat 18 cents per gallon. Less gallons = less tax.
They should be talking about where to "cut the fat", not where to "cover the gap".
These higher gas prices we
June 20, 2008 - 10:54 ET by ForeverOnTheRightThese higher gas prices we are paying, goes to show how much the Dems and their environmentalist obstructionists wackos banning offshore drilling etc. has come back to bite us in the posterior. The other thing that these Enviro-wackos don’t care about the development of new and cleaner technology, they don’t financially support it. I know, I e-mailed The Sierra Club and asked. I think they are off in their own reality thinking that they can block the drilling and it will have no consequences, at least for “Mother Earth”, and who cares about their fellow humans, after all if eliminate the human pestilence “Mother Earth” will be better off. Dam the human vermin!
In their own words
June 20, 2008 - 21:34 ET by ReaverLets let the wackos speak for themselves:
The only real good technology is no technology at all. Technology is taxation without representation by our elitist species [man] upon the rest of the natural world. -- John Shuttleworth, Friends of the Earth
If you ask me, it'd be a little short of disastrous for us to discover a source of clean, cheap, abundant energy because of what we would do with it. We ought to be looking for energy sources that are adequate for our needs, but that won't give us the excesses of concentrated energy with which we could do mischief to the earth or to each other. -- Amory Lovins, Rocky Mountain Institute.
Biologist David Graber (U.S. National Park Service): "They [natural things] have intrinsic value, more value - to me - than another human body, or a billion of them. Human happiness, and certainly human fecundity, are not as important as a wild and healthy planet. Somewhere along the line - about a billion years ago - we quit the contract and became a cancer. We have become a plague upon ourselves and upon the Earth. Until such time as Homo Sapiens should decide to rejoin nature, some of us can only hope for the right virus to come along."
Earth First! Journal editor John Daily: "Human beings, as a species, have no more value than slugs."
Wow Reaver... Wow is all
June 20, 2008 - 21:46 ET by Clear thinkerWow Reaver...
Wow is all I can manage after reading these quotes.
45 Communist Goals for America http://www.nationmakers.com/com_goals.htm
Never fear
June 20, 2008 - 11:23 ET by kdizzydazeObama will bring us alternative energy, and within weeks of taking office. Don't you people know anything? <sarc off>
Same Folks Who Mourned Reduction In Deaths in Iraq!
June 20, 2008 - 13:27 ET by ChasvsAren't these the same fools who ran an article on the negative impact the reduction in Iraqi deaths was having on the grave diggers? There's always someone who can find the Cloud over any silver lining out there!
Why is it?
June 20, 2008 - 14:19 ET by Dave in TexasWhy is it that many liberals are applauding the high gas prices because it's "forcing Americans to use gas more efficiently". Which is just another way of saying it's forcing us to spend our money more wisely.
However, that same argument never applies to taxes. Shouldn't less tax revenue force the government to operate more efficiently and we should be applauding (and even encouraging) lower tax revenue?
Coming soon...a new consensus...
June 20, 2008 - 17:34 ET by Army BratPredictions that we've reached a peak in oil production — once
dismissed as alarmist — are now being called a 'reasonable hypothesis'
by at least one scientist.
This from Fox... if two or three more sign on, there'll be a consensus. Isn't that how it works?
Happy Trails...