In a pointed news release, the White House has punched back at the tendentious “White House Memo” by Sheryl Gay Stolberg that appeared on the front page of Thursday’s News York Times. Headlined “Setting the Record Straight: The New York Times Mistakes Its Own Blindness for Presidential ‘Invisibility’,” the White House press office notes even more factual flaws and omissions than reported yesterday by the NewsBusters contributing editor Clay Waters in his own lengthy TimesWatch critique of the same piece, which portrayed President Bush as detached from the government’s reaction to the current economic slowdown.
Stolberg’s snarky third paragraph cast the President as a neglectful globetrotter while Senators have their sleeves rolled up working on solutions:
Now Mr. Bush is in Eastern Europe, one of eight foreign trips he is taking this year. As he delivered his farewell address to NATO on Wednesday, Senate Democrats and Republicans were holed up in the Capitol, scrambling to produce a bill to help struggling homeowners, the kind of government intervention Mr. Bush had cautioned against.
For a man who came into office as the nation’s first M.B.A. president, Mr. Bush has sometimes seemed invisible during the housing and credit crunch.
The White House fired back:
Since August 2007, President Bush has appeared at public events where he has discussed issues pertaining to the economy or housing at least 28 times. In the meantime, since the start of 2008, Congress has been on recess almost as many days as they have been in session....
President Bush has repeatedly called on Congress to ensure the long-term health of our economy by making the tax relief that is now in place permanent. If Congress allows the 2001 and 2003 tax cuts to expire, 116 million taxpayers will see their taxes go up by $1,800 on average, and we will see an end to many of the measures that have helped our economy grow – including the 10 percent individual income tax bracket, reductions in the marriage penalty, the expansion of the child tax credit, and reduced rates on regular income, capital gains, and dividends.
Towards the end of her story, Stolberg uses typical journalist jujitsu to conflate an editor’s choice of front-page material with the priorities of everyday Americans:
While Mr. Bush may be talking, Americans do not seem to be listening. When the president visited a debt counseling center on Friday in Freehold, N.J., it did not generate major headlines. But the papers were awash with the news that Senator Bob Casey of Pennsylvania had endorsed Senator Barack Obama for the Democratic nomination for president.
Of course, holding the President responsible for the media’s ongoing fixation on Barack Obama is beyond ludicrous. And, as the White House effectively pointed out, even though last week’s event was held in the New York Times’s backyard, the paper failed to send a reporter.
The New York Times criticized President Bush for failing to generate headlines for his visit to Novadebt counseling center in Freehold, N.J. to meet with mortgage counselors and discuss the housing market, asserting “the papers were awash with the news that Senator Bob Casey of Pennsylvania had endorsed Senator Barack Obama for the Democratic nomination for president.” The “newspaper of record” further claims “Mr. Bush has sometimes seemed invisible during the housing and credit crunch.”...The New York Times neglects to mention that it failed to send a reporter to cover the President’s housing event in Freehold, N.J. -- a town inside its own circulation area.
Good comeback. Given the rest of the media’s propensity to adopt stories from the Times as their own, it’s also valuable evidence of the partisan agenda that’s dominating the New York Times this election year.
















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
It only took 7 1/2 years
April 4, 2008 - 15:05 ET by YahooWatcherBut it now looks like the White house isn't taking anymore crap from the MSM. Better late than never.
Yes ...
April 5, 2008 - 20:29 ET by Dave PierreWell said, YW. The White House should have been doing this from day one!
Frankenlies.com: The truth about the lies of Al Franken; Al debunked ...
It's about TIME
April 4, 2008 - 15:09 ET by LionKingBush and his admin finally showing some backbone.
First, they finally got around to building the damn fence. Now, they take the NYT to task about their bias and abject failure to do their job...reporting the NEWS.
Very good news that the WH
April 4, 2008 - 15:25 ET by bigtimerVery good news that the WH is fighting back...then again this is blatant BS coming from the NYT's of course...I have heard endless speeches on television about the economy and other important subjects coming from the President...the msm immediately ignores whatever the President just said...as if he said nothing, they move onto anything that is insignificant instead of at least talking about what the President just said...they may give it a few seconds afterwards now and then but it is usually to pounce on the words and criticize it all...then onto the latest with Spears, Lohan a car chase or such.
Glad they are fighting back though...as if it is going to do any good.
"Never murder your opponent when he is committing suicide." ~ W. Churchill
Bush has been very hands on
April 4, 2008 - 15:58 ET by sajc05Bush has been very hands on with the economy. C'mon, he's increased spending by trillions printed off hundreds of billions from the treasurey like it was monopoly money, even askes china if we could borrow billions to pay for our war and economic stimulous... oh and cut taxes (cause the gov't now has too much money, right?)
HOW CAN YOU NOT LOVE THIS GUY? conservatism at its greatest.
(sarcasm- heavy)
The quick thinkers at the
April 4, 2008 - 18:06 ET by Biff McCainThe quick thinkers at the White House fired back at NYT:
"President Bush has repeatedly called on Congress to ensure the
long-term health of our economy by making the tax relief (70% for the rich) that is now in place permanent."
I agree 100%, if the rich have more money for yachts, the poor have more yachts to wash.
ROTFLMAO
April 5, 2008 - 07:09 ET by Indiana JoeBiff, you're going to have to do better than that. An old charge, debunked long ago and many times.
What, did you just step out of 1983 or something?
Poor sajc05, he was so
April 5, 2008 - 10:42 ET by MikeBPoor sajc05, he was so sleep deprived as a middle school student, he had to sleep through his Civics class.
"...he's [Bush] increased spending by trillions ..."
C'mon sajc05, what is wrong with that statement? You can do it if you think real hard. That's right: tax bills and spending bills originate in the House of Representatives. The President is required to submit a budget to Congress, but they are not required to pass his budget.
"...printed off hundreds of billions from the treasury as if it were monopoly money..." shows your ignorance of the Federal Reserve System. First point, a lot of the currency the Bureau of Engraving and Printing print is printed to replace currency that has become worn and must be replaced. Second point, most of that currency that is printed is held in the various Federal Reserve Banks until needed, and is not just dumped into circulation. Third point, most, if not all, of the inflation that we've experienced over the last forty years can be attributed to one of three sources: increases in the minimum wage mandated by Congress (most of the time those Congesses had a Democrat majority), supply shocks (remember the Arab Oil Embargo?), and cost-push inflation, where the cost of resources (including labor) required for the production of good and services increased.
The only result of an increase in the minimum wage is an immediate devaluation of the currency. It does not help the poor. It does not help the inexperienced. It does not help the uneducated. It does not help, because when the minimum wage increases, all other wages and the corresponding prices also increase. It also does not help because if an employer has a job that is marginally profitable, a minimum wage increase can, and does, make that job unprofitable, and the employer eliminates that job. If it won't make him money, it won't be done.
Now, as for your really stupid claim about the tax cuts being only for the rich, and your strawman example, you need to go to the IRS website and look at who pays the taxes. The top 50% of wage earners pay over 90% of income taxes. The top 5% pay over 30% of income taxes. There are a great number of people who don't pay any income taxes, not because they are rich and weasel out, but because they are poor. As for your snark, who do you think create the jobs in this country? The poor? I've never been gainfully employed by a poor person. They can't afford to pay me. Are you under the impression that "the rich", those evil S.O.Bs, hide their money under a mattress? No. They use that money to invest in new businesses, or to expand established businesses. Sure, some of them buy yachts. It sounds to me like you are jealous of them. But, for the rich to buy yachts, someone has to build those yachts. Someone else has to build the instrumentation for the yachts. Someone else has to manufacture the chemicals for the coatings, dig and refine the metals, manufacture the glass and plexiglass, manufacture the ropes, manufacture the sails or engines and screws (props for non-Navy persons), and yes, I imagine the rich hire people to wash their yachts.
In the meantime, you need to think about what it took for the rich to become rich. America is filled with those who worked and became rich. There are some who inherited their wealth, but for the most part, the rich worked for their wealth. Do you think you are entitled to a penny of it? If so, what makes you think so?
Those who earned their wealth did so by working 14 to 18 hour days for years on end, and/or spending up to 8 years in college learning a profession while the lazy but greedy socialists were out in the job market in low paying jobs bellyaching about the college boys getting ahead of them. Grow up and wise up sajc.
Sorry, sajc, I confuse part of your ignorance with that of Biff. All of the above applies to both of you, none the less. Both of you really need to alleviate your ignorance of economics and government processes.
"A communist is someone who reads Marx. An anti-communist is someone who understands Marx." Ronald Reagan
Asking Too Much
April 5, 2008 - 11:37 ET by acumenBoth of you really need to alleviate your ignorance of economics and government processes.
Certainly Mike you can't be suggesting "progressives" start acting...gasp...progressive? This observer holds no hope for that change.
The old gray nag is still what she used to be...old and in the way. Ironically, that is something leftists can't blame on Bush.
Hello NYT
April 4, 2008 - 16:09 ET by Jerry MackThe thing that I find to be most personal about our present economy is gasoline prices. The lowest grade near my home in California is $3.59. This is what is really slowing down the economy. I would hope that the senators would roll up their sleeves and approve some oil well drilling. It is only going to get worse.
We need more
April 4, 2008 - 16:41 ET by mattmWe need more refineries.
One in Arizona took seven years to get the permit, and it still isn't built yet. Why? Ask Algore and his minions.
Just as so many other
April 5, 2008 - 15:14 ET by Cape Conservative"causes" of the greenies are self-defeating, so is their intent on placing so many obstacles in the way of lessening our dependence on foreign oil. More exploration, more refineries, more nuclear plants...SO many options are available and would go a long way toward independence and yet we face FAR TOO MANY obstacles placed by those highly trained "scientists" such as Al Gore or Sheryl Crowe (or any of the vocal "scientific" celebrities)! Of everyone in the news, I think Ed Begley Jr. is the best spokesman for living "green"- he actually does it! Not do as I say, not as I do!
Just as the ethanol is having a domino effect on everything from human food to pet food to bird seed - and it is not cost effective...it costs more to produce a gallon that what the gallon would give in return???
These are the SAME people who pay many times over for a gallon of water...and then toss all those little plastic bottles where they will remain for the next thousand years!
Oh, yes, you can see I how highly I value the hypocrites of the green earth/global warming movements <sarc off. I care for this earth we live in and our family does more for its good every day of our lives than either AG or Sheryl Crowe - at least we aren't flying here and there in private jets while telling everyone else to walk!
Cape
April 6, 2008 - 00:26 ET by RESTLESS 1And guess where the plastic in the vast majority of the bottles came from.
Has the old gray nag...
April 4, 2008 - 22:15 ET by TheDeuce...ever suggested that the feds suck it up and drop gasoline taxes? You know...for the children?
I mean, women and minorities are hardest hit by these 'regressive' taxes on common household goods. This is the argument the left uses against the fair tax, right?
Of course not, but the leftist birdcage liner has attacked oil companies repeatedly, going so far as to assume evil intent to them making a...gasp...profit.
MSM is the gatekeeper keeping Bush from being heard
April 4, 2008 - 16:33 ET by nkviking75"While Mr. Bush may be talking, Americans do not seem to be listening. When the president visited a debt counseling center on Friday in Freehold, N.J., it did not generate major headlines. But the papers were awash with the news that Senator Bob Casey of Pennsylvania had endorsed Senator Barack Obama for the Democratic nomination for president."
This is not the first time that the media has played this particular strategy. It's as if the MSM has no control over its editorial decisions. As for whether or not Americans are listening, unfortunately we can't all be where the President is when he's speaking. We need the media to pass it along. If the MSM allowed Bush to be heard without spin and without drowning him out with contradictory "experts" or other distractions, maybe more Americans would listen.
When you put the clowns in charge, don't be surprised when a circus breaks out.
Nice To See
April 4, 2008 - 17:51 ET by Del DolemonteAs I recall, the White House "Setting the Record Straight" press releases took off when Tony Snow was Press Secretary.
"Tony, you magnificent bastard!"
Late may be better than
April 5, 2008 - 07:14 ET by Indiana JoeLate may be better than never, but there is such a thing as too late. This administration should have come out swinging from day one, the writing was on the wall.
Let this be a lesson to those who follow the "Mister Rogers" theory of politics.
The Truth Always Takes More Time To Explain
April 5, 2008 - 23:56 ET by Intellectual HonestyPoor sajc05, he was so sleep deprived as a middle school student, he had to sleep through his Civics class.
Great post Mike. It's amazing how simple life is if one embraces pure and unadulterated class envy/warfare via the liberal mindset. Does sajc05 really have any sense of pride in his/her post other than, presumably, "I'm a little guy that's been screwed all my life by fat cat landlords, business owners, corporations" yada yada?
Liberalism is the road of convenience when one doesn't want to deal with facts. As John Adams said (one of my all-time favorite quotes employed during Adams defense of the nine British soldiers involved in the "Boston Massacre"):
"Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence."
Now in his last year he
April 6, 2008 - 14:36 ET by Free StinkerNow in his last year he decides to fight back.
Too little, too late.
Pledge to not support RINOs ever again!