My colleague Brent Baker has painstakingly documented how the big three broadcast networks have gone out of their way to avoid labeling scandal-scarred New York Governor Eliot Spitzer as a “Democrat.” An examination of the fifteen ABC, CBS and NBC morning and evening news shows through Wednesday night finds Spitzer was called a Democrat just 20% of the time — twice on CBS, once on ABC, and never on NBC.
So how do the networks treat Republicans involved in sex scandals? Always, always as Republicans, and as problems for their party.
Last July, Louisiana Senator David Vitter’s name surfaced in the phone records of the “DC Madam,” Deborah Jean Palfrey. Over the next week, ABC talked about Vitter twice on World News and twice on Good Morning America, labeling him as a “Republican” or “conservative Republican” all four times.
The CBS Early Show aired two Vitter stories, and both times called him a Republican. For some reason, the CBS Evening News did not report on Vitter that week. NBC’s Today mentioned Vitter on two different mornings, and called him a Republican both times. The NBC Nightly News reported on Vitter once, and called him a Republican.
ABC’s Jake Tapper began his story on July 10 with Vitter’s party ID: “REPUBLICAN Senator David Vitter is a self-proclaimed defender of family values....” On July 16, NBC’s Brian Williams also stressed Vitter’s conservative credentials: “Now we move to Louisiana, where REPUBLICAN Senator David Vitter made his first public appearance tonight in a week. He went underground after being caught up in what is become known as the DC madam sex scandal. Vitter is one of the Senate's most conservative members.”
As for Craig, the bathroom sex sting was a much bigger story, and unfolded on a schedule uncannily similar to Spitzer’s. The news broke on a Monday afternoon, and was mentioned on Monday’s evening newscasts. Over the next two days, every morning and evening show featured at least one story on Craig — and every one of these broadcasts labeled him a “Republican.”
Here’s Katie Couric opening the August 28 Evening News: “The story exploded on front pages all over America today: another member of Congress caught up in a scandal, a sex scandal. REPUBLICAN Senator Larry Craig caught in a police sting at the Minneapolis airport....”
On ABC’s Good Morning America that same day, Claire Shipman saw the whole GOP “rocked” by Craig’s immorality: “We begin with the latest scandal to rock the REPUBLICAN Party. Idaho Senator Larry Craig is denying any wrongdoing after getting arrested on charges of lewd conduct in a Minneapolis airport men’s room earlier this month....”
Over on NBC, Matt Lauer began the Today show: “Good morning. Politician in peril. Idaho Senator Larry Craig, an opponent of gay rights, admits pleading guilty to disorderly conduct after a police officer accused him of soliciting sex in an airport men’s room. Can the right wing withstand yet another scandal involving one of its own?...On Monday word leaked out that the conservative REPUBLICAN was arrested and pleaded guilty to a disorderly conduct...”
The list of examples goes on, but the bottom line is that in the early days of their scandals, Vitter and Craig were labeled as Republicans on every broadcast news program — 100% — that mentioned their wrongdoing. For Democrat Spitzer, four out of five news programs (80%) have skipped his label. On NBC’s Today and Nightly News through Wednesday night, reporters never once acknowledged that Spitzer was a Democrat.
The media’s message: Republicans enmeshed in personal scandal are a moral stain on their entire party; Democrats in similar circumstances are just individuals, not “Democrats” — and certainly not representatives of the liberal cause.
—Rich Noyes is Research Director at the Media Research Center.





















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
Numbers don't lie
March 13, 2008 - 16:57 ET by ArcherBThis is exactly what is needed, NUMBERS! Saying that D's are never mentioned in scandals and R's always are is meaningless without real, undeniable numbers to match them up. Then you can take those numbers to the press and ask them WTF?
I'd like to see this go farther. I'd like to see the Republican party take numbers like this and sue the pants off the big3 for blatent bias while claiming to be fair. It's OK to be unfair or biased, but not when you claim the opposite. And while it is impossible to be 100% fair, this level of skewing the story borders on irresponsibility. I'm all for freedom of the press, but with freedom comes responsibility.
"To send men to the firing squad, judicial proof is unnecessary." Ernesto "Che" Guevara
Media Bias
March 13, 2008 - 17:18 ET by Darwin AkbarEarlier today I saw a link on LGF from a Detroit paper to a story about their scumbag mayor and his legal problems. (I cannot find it now).
The mayor's party affiliation was nowhere to be found, anywhere in the article. However, the party affiliation of the attorney general was duly noted, right before a snarky comment about some irrelevant, old and unproven allegations against the AG.
There's a surprise.
Nothing Will Change
March 13, 2008 - 17:39 ET by allanfNothing will change until the Republicans are as willing to confront press corruption as the Clinton campaign or the Democrats. With John (let's get along) McCain as the Republican nominee I don't think there is much chance of that happening.
The Democrats would use Brents figures as the basis of hearings on a FAIRNESS DOCTRINE if the roles were reversed
I have been thinking about
March 13, 2008 - 17:04 ET by bigtimerI have been thinking about all of the comparisons in my head since this Spitzer thing broke, it was so obvious this time in all the msm.
What the hell can one do out here?
They are accountable to no one, boycotting them does zilch, we cannot get programming that leaves them out of packages you select for your satellite/cable where I live anyway...complaints are ignored.
While their agenda is obvious, what can one do to fight back?
All I can think of is for people in our party to start holding weekly press conferences say on Fox or something to show obvious examples and demand fair and balanced reporting...embarrassment can be a tool....well maybe, we are talking about the power of the msm aren't we?
Half-Hour News Hour
March 13, 2008 - 17:25 ET by ArcherBIf it weren't so serious, it would be humorous. This would definitely be the type of skit you'd see on the Half-Hour News Hour before it was cancelled. I remember they did a skit where they named the group of London bombers (all very Arab names) and said, "nope, I can't see anything that these guys have in common at all". At this point, the only show that could really make fun of this would be SNL, but I don't see that happening this Saturday night as they tend to agree with anything left leaning... or at least NOT leaning to the right.
"To send men to the firing squad, judicial proof is unnecessary." Ernesto "Che" Guevara
bais.. not limited to sex scandals, either.
March 13, 2008 - 18:01 ET by Gary HallGreat work by Mr. Baker, and a smooth pen by Mr. Noyes in their effort. Where's the pie charts? Ha!
And not to forget that the labeling bias so expertly proven here, also holds true for the MSM print media as well, and also extends to coverage of financial scandals, fraud, corruption, pork spending, election fraud, campaign funding, election law violations, and just about anything under the sun.
On your schedule or mine...
March 13, 2008 - 19:03 ET by BacchusI read a comment somewhere recently explaining how network news is losing ground in key demographics; alternatively, the internet and cable news are both gaining. Why? Network news rooms are tied to hard schedules, while cable and the internet aren't. People today are choosing to get their fill of news on their own schedule, not the networks. Network news is becoming less influential than bloggers in their pajamas. Take that, Dan Rather!
Proving the obvious
March 13, 2008 - 19:35 ET by nkviking75I wonder if it aggravates our pals at the MRC to spend time and money to prove the glaringly obvious. It must be like doing a scientific study to prove the sky is blue or the sun rises in the east.
When you put the clowns in charge, don't be surprised when a circus breaks out.
Spitzer could not be hidden
March 13, 2008 - 19:47 ET by planetrepublicanThe real beauty of this one was they could NOT hide Spitzer..everyone knew who he was, at least in the NY area. They HAD to report it, he was going down in such flames.
Lancing the boil
March 13, 2008 - 19:52 ET by nkviking75I'd love to know what went on behind the scenes among the Democrats to lance this boil on their collective butts, trying to put this story behind them as soon as possible. Sometimes all you can do with a scandal is get it out and get it over with.
When you put the clowns in charge, don't be surprised when a circus breaks out.
I guess the me ia oesn't
March 13, 2008 - 20:16 ET by wiwfI guess the me ia oesn't know where their " " button is. Maybe their teleprompters nee new keyboar s?
The Rocky Mountain Collegian: Illustrating Idiocy
Positive stories are important,also
March 13, 2008 - 20:53 ET by mikeinmdI would be interested to see if party affiliation mentioned in positive stories is also biased. We get hung on the negative ones (they're more sensational), but a positive story with party affiliation can be biased, also. Perception is reality for a lot of people. It may not be the case, but then again.....
As upset as this makes me
March 13, 2008 - 22:00 ET by msh1973As upset as this makes me there isn't a darn thing I can do about it. I did however email the Today's Show, it won't matter but as least I got it off my chest.