Former ABC News anchor Carole Simpson suggested she endorsed Hillary Clinton for President of the United States last month because she couldn’t think of anything else to say when the Democratic candidate called on her at a political event. “I kept trying to get her attention,” Simpson told the Boston Globe’s Peter Schworm. "When I did, I realized I didn't have anything to say. I felt like a deer in headlights."
So rather than tolerate a few seconds of uncomfortable silence, Simpson told Clinton: “I want to tell you tonight, because I happen to be here with my students, that I endorse you for president of the United States.”
Schworm contacted several media experts for comment, including Simpson’s former ABC News colleague Bob Zelnick and the Media Research Center Vice President (and NewsBusters Editor) Brent Baker. Both said that Simpson’s endorsement of the liberal Clinton was less than a complete surprise. "People had always assumed she was a liberal when she was at ABC, but this confirms it," said Baker.
"Those familiar with her work probably had very little doubt she stood on the liberal side of the field," Zelnick agreed.
Indeed, back in January 2001 when she still worked as a supposedly objective news anchor, Simpson posted a gushing online tribute headlined "Long Live Hillary." Reacting to Clinton becoming a U.S. Senator, Simpson tingled:
What an exhilarating moment it must have been for her -- the first First Lady in history to be elected to public office. There, for all the nay-sayers to see, was the woman who had finally come into her own, free at last to be smart, outspoken, independent, and provocative, all qualities she had been forced as First Lady, to "hide under a bushel." Still she was voted one of America's most admired woman. Just wait. You ain't seen nothin' yet.
Here’s an excerpt from Schworm’s article, in which Simpson says she will stop teaching her journalism course if she decides to hit the campaign trail on behalf of her heroine:
"I know I made a mistake. It was definitely the wrong venue for my first foray into free speech," Simpson said. "But I'd really like to see her win. After being a reporter for so many years, where you wish you could do more than you can, it would be nice to make a difference."
Simpson described Clinton, whom she covered extensively during President Bill Clinton's administration, as the smartest woman she had ever met.
Simpson took her 14-student journalism class, "Road to the White House," to the rally to show students how to cover a political event, and possibly introduce them to the Democratic front-runner.
Instead, Simpson, who is best known as the first woman to moderate a presidential debate, found herself professing her preference for Clinton as the first female president.
As Clinton was fielding questions from the audience, Simpson tried several times to get her attention, shouting "Senator Clinton!" across the crowded room.
When she finally caught Clinton's eye, she offered an off-the-cuff endorsement that took both parties aback.
"I want to tell you tonight, because I happen to be here with my students, that I endorse you for president of the United States," she said. "It's very freeing now that I'm not a journalist and I can speak my mind, and I wanted you to know I think you are the woman, and I think this is the time."
Simpson said she immediately recognized her actions were unwise, and believes she has lost a measure of respect among her colleagues as a result.
...
Jerry Lanson, an Emerson journalism professor who co-teaches the course with Simpson, said he immediately told Simpson her actions were inappropriate.
"As faculty members if we're teaching journalists, we need to model the behavior we're teaching in the classroom," he said.
Janet Kolodzy, acting chairwoman of Emerson's Department of Journalism, said she was startled by the endorsement, but felt it was within ethical bounds.
"The presence of her students is what raised concerns," she said. "But we are a college that advocates free expression." Kolodzy said the event has sparked discussion on campus on the "gray area between the rights of a private citizen and a journalist's responsibility."
Other media observers saw the issue in starker terms. Brent Baker, vice president of the Media Research Center, a conservative media watchdog group, said Simpson's endorsement shows the liberal dominance of the mainstream media.
"People had always assumed she was a liberal when she was at ABC, but this confirms it," he said.
...
Robert Zelnick, a Boston University journalism professor who also worked at ABC News, said professors are not inhibited from voicing their political opinions, and that Simpson's endorsement of Clinton was fairly predictable.
"Those familiar with her work probably had very little doubt she stood on the liberal side of the field," he said.
Simpson said her endorsement not only was unplanned, it was caused by a lack of planning.
"I'm trying to show them persistence as a reporter, so I kept trying to get her attention," she recalled with a chuckle. "When I did, I realized I didn't have anything to say. I felt like a deer in headlights."
—Rich Noyes is Research Director at the Media Research Center.





















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
Carole Simpson = a liberal;
November 19, 2007 - 15:44 ET by Darth DutchCarole Simpson = a liberal; no surprise there.
But one wonders if the following quote from Janet Kolodzy would have been the same if Simpson had endorsed a Republican:
"The presence of her students is what raised concerns," she said. "But we are a college that advocates free expression."
Darth Dutch
Darth, that was my first
November 19, 2007 - 15:54 ET by DaBirdDarth, that was my first thought also.
Janet Kolodzy, acting chairwoman of Emerson's Department of Journalism, said she was startled by the endorsement, but felt it was within ethical bounds.
How "inbounds" would it have been had it been a Republican she was endorsing? Basically what Kolodzy is saying is: "I was surprised, but I wasn't surprised"
Uncomfortable Silence
November 19, 2007 - 16:49 ET by allanfEnsdorsed a Republican? Not a chance of that happening.
Oh Carole... Get over
November 19, 2007 - 17:24 ET by bigtimerOh Carole...
Get over yourself!
The only thing that irks me about this is she and other people of her ilk have students....that irks me that they are shaping minds of young adults...just like the majority of leftist professors.
Lord I hope that it changes to at least 50/50 someday.
Oh Carole...
November 19, 2007 - 23:13 ET by motherbeltOh Carole...
Get over yourself!
LOL!
Every time I see her, I think of her interview with Bill Clinton in 1999 (emphasis added):
“I have to bask in this moment, for a moment, because I am here talking
to the most powerful man on the planet, who was a poor boy from
Arkansas....I am an African-American woman, grew up working class on
the south side of Chicago, and this is a pretty special moment for me
to be here talking to you. How does it feel talking to me? That I made
it, too, when people said I wouldn't be able to?”
She certainly is full of.......herself, isnt' she?
If it had been up to President Clinton's party...
November 25, 2007 - 18:07 ET by ThalpyIf it had been up to President Clinton's party Carole would have remained in a subservient role. How soon they forget or did thet ever know! After Carole "teaches" her students journalism( since she has made it) can the White Privilege Conferences be far behind?
"Oh, silly me, I should've
November 19, 2007 - 18:04 ET by Chris Norman"Oh, silly me, I should've endorsed Hillary using my alias, Diahann Carroll, like that anchor on Channel 1 in New York..."
There's a channel 1 in New
November 19, 2007 - 18:06 ET by MightyMouthThere's a channel 1 in New York? I thought channel 1 was reserved for static.
"There are two types of people in this country; those who provide freedom and those who enjoy it." MM says...
MM, well the two things
November 19, 2007 - 18:26 ET by Chris NormanMM, well the two things aren't mutually exclusive, you know... :)
We only need the rest of
November 19, 2007 - 18:22 ET by ConservativeRexWe only need the rest of the "unbiased" anchors to do the same. For most of them it would be the only honest words they have ever spoken on air.
It's like they ought to give the camara a wink every time they say anything semi good about a conservative, which I doubt has ever happened, even by mistake.
I would require proof to believe otherwise. But that's just me I guess.
Question...
November 19, 2007 - 20:12 ET by heldmyw...Exactly what is the value of the unsolicited endorsement of an ex-TV-newsreader and ditz-about-town?
QUOTE "...I realized I didn't have anything to say. I felt like a deer in headlights." Duuuuuuhhhh.
Stop the Presses!!!
November 19, 2007 - 21:10 ET by BarkerBut, but Carole Simpson endorsed Hillary!!! That changes everything, doesn't it??? ;^)
Peter Schworm
November 20, 2007 - 10:48 ET by fosstenPardon me for this, but what the heck kind of name is 'Peter Schworm?' Did his parents not like him or something?
Forget 911, I dial 10MM.
}}---> Peter Schworm
November 20, 2007 - 10:55 ET by Cool ArrowThat is a funny name.
Watching the Titans game last night I noticed one of the Tennessee players had the perfect football name: Justin Gage.
I like that lots better than Just Do It.
shining example
November 20, 2007 - 13:02 ET by CatherwoodIn carole Simpson we can see the tru manifestation of the bigoted racist at work. She hates white people, looks down on those who think differently from her and would be quick to eviscerate any white person who disagrees with her. if you ever watched one of her interviews or newscast, her contempt for all that wasn't liberal was Dan Ratherish in its obviousness. The only reason she held the anchor's job was because she was black and had an attitude. She was a stick in the eye of white conservatives everywhere and ABC knew it. Simpson was just another way of sticking it to the white folks. Maybe this is one of the reasons for the continuing decline in ratings for ABC news over the years. The one-two punch of punch of the liberal Canadian Jennings and liberal black, Simpson, sure alienated a lot of folk. Of course, her apology for endorsing Billary is an outright lie. 'They do it with such ease', you know.