A Pew Research Center poll released late last month found that while four out of five American adults (81%) could name one of the Democratic presidential candidates, far fewer (just 59%) could recall any of the GOP candidates. Even among self-described Republican voters, Pew found “Clinton and Obama are much more visible than Giuliani or any other GOP presidential candidate.”
One reason may be that the big broadcast networks have treated the Democratic frontrunners like celebrities worthy of intense coverage, while the Republican candidates have received far less TV time. A new Media Research Center study of the ABC, CBS and NBC morning news shows has found that in the first 10 months of 2007, the networks spent more time covering the Democratic race and spent far more time interviewing the Democratic candidates than the Republicans. And those interviews were much friendlier to the Democrats, with the morning show anchors emphasizing a predominantly liberal agenda.
These results echo those presented back in August in MRC’s Special Report, “Rise and Shine on Democrats,” in which the MRC’s Geoff Dickens, Scott Whitlock, Justin McCarthy and I examined how TV’s morning shows covered the presidential campaign from January 1 through July 31. For this new report, we studied all 797 campaign stories that aired on NBC’s Today, ABC’s Good Morning America and CBS’s The Early Show from January 1 through October 31.
Once again, we found that all three networks have spent more time covering the Democrats’ nomination race than the contest for the GOP nomination. Overall, 431 out of the total 797 campaign segments (54%) focused on the Democrats, compared to 247 (31%) devoted to the Republicans. The remaining 119 stories (15%) either dealt with both parties about equally, or dealt with a nonpartisan campaign topic, such as the growing use of YouTube by all candidates.
Of the three morning shows, ABC’s Good Morning America was the most tilted, airing 167 Democratic stories (59%), vs. 83 about the Republicans (29%). CBS’s Early Show and NBC’s Today were nearly identical in emphasizing Democrats in just over half of all campaign stories (51% on NBC, 52% on CBS), with the GOP featured in less than one-third of stories (32%) on each show. (See chart.)
The reason for the disparity: ABC, CBS and NBC have chosen to cover the top Democrats as celebrities, elevating them above the ranks of ordinary candidates. Back in January, the networks excitedly jumped on Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama’s official announcements with heavier coverage than any Republican received. Since then, the morning shows have covered the Democratic duo as “rock stars,” providing national TV coverage for otherwise trivial campaign events.
In August, for example, NBC’s Lee Cowan chronicled the day Obama spent posing as a home health care worker as demanded by the SEIU labor union. “Mr. Mom, he’s not. But on a day after some big rallies and high-priced fundraisers, Barack Obama seemed geniunely at home,” Cowan warmly reported. A few weeks later, NBC’s Andrea Mitchell similarly touted Clinton’s day spent shadowing a nurse. Back at the nurse’s home for dinner, Mitchell recounted, “[Hillary] pitched right in. She was clearing the table, washing the dishes....She got her hands wet.”
In October, all three networks covered Clinton’s 60th birthday fundraiser, with ABC’s Kate Snow swooning the hardest: “On the eve of this birthday, Hillary is trumpeting the strength of their marriage....Clinton says she never doubted her decision to stay in her marriage, and she says Bill is romantic, buying impromptu gifts like a gift of a wooden giraffe from this shop in Africa over the summer.”
Beyond the day-to-day coverage, TV’s morning shows offer candidates a generally friendly forum to speak to millions of viewers. Once again, the networks have given the Democrats an advantage. Since January 1, MRC analysts counted 102 morning show appearances by an announced or prospective presidential candidate or one of their representatives. Of these, nearly two-thirds (64) featured Democrats, compared to just 36 for the Republicans and two for potential independent candidate Michael Bloomberg.
When it came to airtime, the Democratic advantage was even more pronounced. Interviews with the various Democratic campaigns totalled 6 hours 24 minutes, compared to just over three hours (184 minutes) for the GOP, a greater than two-to-one disparity. Top Democrats Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama and John Edwards all received more interview airtime than any Republican candidate. For the GOP, John McCain was granted the most airtime, but his 62 minutes amounted to less than half of the 2 hours 12 minutes received by Clinton’s campaign
In addition to tallying the airtime each campaign received, MRC analysts also analyzed the questions posed by the network hosts. While most of the questions were about campaign strategy or the candidates’ personal attributes, 191 were policy-oriented questions that could be categorized as reflecting a liberal or conservative view.
An even-handed approach would be to confront candidates of both parties with the best arguments of their opponents. But regardless of whether their guests were Democrats or Republicans, network reporters proposed questions reflecting largely liberal agenda. Of the 137 agenda questions posed to Democrats, 72 percent reflected liberal priorities, as were 80 percent of the 54 agenda questions posed to Republicans. (See chart.)
For example, NBC’s Matt Lauer interviewed Hillary Clinton on September 18 and hit her from the left, suggesting her health care plan was too pro-industry and not aggressive enough. “Critics are saying that this in some ways is the kind of plan you would have rejected back in 1993,” Lauer scolded. “Have you watered down reform?”
Ten days later, ABC’s Good Morning America framed a segment on government-mandated family leave in liberal terms. “There are paid leave proposals in Congress right now. So, what’s stopping the government from making the law truly family friendly?” co-host Robin Roberts urged. She cued up Democratic candidate Chris Dodd. “I know you have been very passionate about this in recent years,” Roberts told Dodd. “So why isn’t Congress moving a little faster on this issue?”
While such liberal questions were a frequent gift to Democratic candidates, Republican candidates were seldom treated to friendly conservative questions. On September 25, after liberal PBS host Tavis Smiley claimed that GOP candidates who skipped his debate were insensitive, ABC’s Robin Roberts adopted Smiley’s outrage as her premise. “Why are Republicans so reluctant to talk to minorities?” she demanded of Newt Gingrich. On October 15, ABC’s Diane Sawyer confronted Iraq war supporter John McCain with the criticisms of retired General Ricardo Sanchez: “America is living in a nightmare with no end in sight.”
As for the rare conservative-oriented questions, back on August 13 NBC’s Meredith Vieira hit Mitt Romney with the charge that Romney’s pro-life position was inauthentic. And as Clinton made the rounds to tout her health care plan on September 18, ABC’s Diane Sawyer confronted her with the notion that her plan could be far more expensive than advertised. “Medicare is already $16 trillion over what has been funded,” Sawyer told Clinton, asking of her new program, “can you realistically keep it at $110 billion?”
The broadcast networks have a responsibility to cover both parties in a fair and even-handed manner. These early returns suggest that ABC, CBS and NBC are instead using their airwaves to boost the Democrats in 2008.
—Rich Noyes is Research Director at the Media Research Center.




















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
Liberal bias?
November 8, 2007 - 10:43 ET by iveseenitallYou mean there actually is liberal bias in the news room. I never knew. I'm shocked!
NEVER,NEVER trust a "liberal"
ON GUARD!
November 8, 2007 - 10:56 ET by JimboIf you are a Republican (like me!) we really need to be more in tune with these morning shows and “comedy shows” like Bill Maher, Colbert, et. Al.
I think there is a tendency to dismiss them as being on the fringe and an assumption that people take them at face value and not put much stock in them.
These types of studies as well as others indicate a very different reality. Many people get their only news from Colbert, are educated on current events by Bill Mahr, get a factually inaccurate understanding of things from The View, and buy Matt Lauer’s version of the world hook line and sinker, without an ounce of alternative viewpoints to balance their understanding.
We need to keep pressing our cause. The problem is more widespread than many of us may think.
Leon says "By the way, I'm not afraid of fat people, I'm repulsed"
Truth Monger Says - "Both are religions [Christianity & Islam], yes - with the same percentage of terrorists."
The Alphabet Gnatworks and Liberals : Like Flies on ...
November 8, 2007 - 11:06 ET by gideonmjames... a stick.
The alphabet networks have been giving Democrats the reach around for DECADES now ... what else is new?
ABC - Always Bull Cr_p
NBC - Nothing but Bull Cr_p
CBS - Complete Bull Sh_t
" The alphabet networks
November 8, 2007 - 14:43 ET by mbuel"
The alphabet networks have been giving Democrats the reach around for DECADES now ... what else is new?"
You're comment needs corrected:
The Alphabet networks have been giving Republicans the reach around for DECADES now.
Really, they've been screwing conservatives over, not democrats.
A Call To Conservatives To Boycott
November 8, 2007 - 12:05 ET by deerjerkydaveWhy watch pro democrat, pro liberal, anti republican, anti conservative programming? We need to vote with our dollars. Stop watching these three networks. Stop spending money on products sold in their commercials. Send letters to their advertisers telling them that you are not going to purchase their products as long as they advertise on these liberally biased programs. It's time to wake up these networks to reality, that serious change is needed in big media news.
Is there a group out there that organizes this sort of activism?
Already doing just that
November 8, 2007 - 12:19 ET by IgnatzJFahrquarHad the pleasure of being a Neilsen rater for a week earlier this year (got a whopping 5 bucks ... woohoo). The only time one of the three networks was on was to watch a Cavs BBall game. Other than that ... notta. B O'R and H&C got their fair share, though.
"All generalizations are false, including this one.” Mark Twain
News bias
November 8, 2007 - 12:12 ET by ScrapironOld, Retired and glad of it.
I'll have to admit I know nothing of the bias in the former MSM broadcast media since I haven't had one of their programs on in several months. I keep ignoring them in hope they'll go away. It seems to be working 'Rather' well with the biased print media. as they go down, down, and down in a pool of blood (red ink).
Would love to see Hannity
November 8, 2007 - 12:21 ET by IgnatzJFahrquardo a segment on this.
It'd be interesting to see FOX News' breakdown.
"All generalizations are false, including this one.” Mark Twain
Good to be the King
November 8, 2007 - 12:21 ET by acumenFor the GOP, John McCain was granted the most airtime...
The alphabets way of saying thank you to McCain for his McCain-Feingold gift. If McCain had distanced himself from Bush on Iraq and offered to dance with Ellen, the alphabets could have made him a contender.
I'm left wondering if turning election campaigns into 'America's hottest new Reality Show' was part of a developed plan to get Dems elected or if it just happened to turn out that way.
The MSM=The Dem Ministry of
November 8, 2007 - 13:26 ET by robert108The MSM=The Dem Ministry of Propaganda.
The networks shill for the
November 8, 2007 - 14:18 ET by motherbeltThe networks shill for the Democrat candidates over and over, building them up, cooing over them and making them into "rock stars." They ignore the Republicans because they are not interested in them. Then they start telling us how the Democrats are "rock stars" and the Republicans "can't get any traction."
Talk about a self-fulfilling prophecy.
Regarding questions for Democrats.
November 8, 2007 - 16:03 ET by RMRSomeone should ask Hilary Clinton what does Mark J. Penn mean by saying women will vote for Hilary "because they have an emotional connection with her". Is he saying that women will ignore Hilary's policies, her experience ( or lack of ) plus everything else that goes into making such an important decision, and vote solely on "emotion"? And if that's the case, then can we expect Hilary to do the same when making important decisions? After all, she is a woman.
Hillary's perceived
November 8, 2007 - 16:11 ET by fitzfongHillary's perceived popularity among women is largely a myth. Sure, she's popular among the socialist mob and the self-absorbed Sex in the City/Friends crowd...but a very large percentage of women also detest that lousy excuse for a Presidential candidate. They're going to vote in large numbers, too.
In the course of the next
November 8, 2007 - 18:28 ET by KevroyIn the course of the next year, you can expect the media to tell us over and over how much we love Hillary.
There's nothing wrong with
November 8, 2007 - 16:05 ET by fitzfongThere's nothing wrong with ABC, NBC and CBS putting blatant Democrat hacks (Cuomo, Curry, Roberts, Smith, Chen, Vieira, Coffee boy Lauer, Champion, erstwhile Couric) on their morning programs. What is wrong is that they then lie by claiming that they are objective.
No foresight
November 8, 2007 - 18:44 ET by general companyWhat is wrong is that they then lie by claiming that they are objective.
That keeps them from being counted as campaign contributions. I quit watching these chumps a long time ago, The sad thing is they also bash Fox so much that the knuckleheads that do watch them seemed to have embraced a vow to never watch Fox. I personally know folks that absolutely hate Fox but also admit they have never watched it. I often suggest they also hate folks/things they have never met or tried. Suggesting to them, that their thinking is bigoted. Drives them nuts, I just laugh. Best thing is, I am armed with NB data and never without ammo. I have changed minds too.
Wonder what they will tell the masses after a Dem is CiC and we get attacked again, and the economy plunges from their taking of profits, and unemployment rises because of their flawed policies. I wonder if they will continue to blame Bush?
"Always do right. This will gratify some people, and astonish the rest". Mark Twain
GOP FCC SUE
November 8, 2007 - 18:33 ET by Lame CherryThe FCC has a mandate for all licenses for public broadcast to do so for the public good. This relates from content to as well as FEC, elections, equal time in networks broadcasts.
The GOP is in a position to file a suit with the FCC questioning the outlandish time being invested and "friendly" interviews given to the Democrats akin to what one sees in Putin and Pravda.
ABC, CBS, NBC and FOX are all under this license and unless a fair rendering of time is issued they can be shut down.
Now no one wants a to the minute accounting, but when Bill Clinton gets a half hour on nightline for his Africa shopping spree which is nothing but a Hillary Campaign commercial then EVERY GOP and DNC candidate should expect the same amount of time.
This is the leverage the GOP has in simply demanding a same accounting and questioning. If Hillary gets statements about how evil the religious right is, then Rudy should get statements how evil Sharpton is.
If the GOP has no ball busters in their ranks, then they can hire me for half what they are paying people and I can think of at least 5 Newsbuster types here who would just love to get sic'ed on the media in FCC and FEC leveraged hearings.
GOP now stands for Get On your Posterior........get off it boys and girls and start playing this game to win as too many millions are flowing in from trusting people expecting bang for their buck.
*HIC IACET ARTORIVS REX QVONDAM REXQVE FVTVRVS
I hear ya,
November 8, 2007 - 18:58 ET by general companyI hear ya, I am always overwhelmed by the GOP apathy. What is wrong with these folks, there is so much to do battle with these days.
"Always do right. This will gratify some people, and astonish the rest". Mark Twain
"A Pew Research Center poll
November 8, 2007 - 21:35 ET by Sonny Lykos"A Pew Research Center poll released late last month found that while four out of five American adults (81%) could name one of the Democratic presidential candidates, far fewer (just 59%) could recall any of the GOP candidates. Even among self-described Republican voters, Pew found “Clinton and Obama are much more visible than Giuliani or any other GOP presidential candidate.”
Amd why Republicans, and the rest of the country for that matter, deserve exactly what happens in Nov, 2008.
59% of Republicans can name a candidate means 41% can't. American's ignorance continues to astound me, even at 65.
Sonny... Americas
November 8, 2007 - 21:39 ET by Clear thinkerSonny...
Americas ignorance is not an accident. The socialist/commie/libs are hard at work at dumbing down our citizens.
Get Email updates from Fred http://socialnet.imwithfred.com/email_alert_july_26.html
CT
November 8, 2007 - 21:58 ET bywell as long as you feel good about your ignorance
GoHunter08
botg... Yeah, what do
November 8, 2007 - 22:06 ET by Clear thinkerbotg...
Yeah, what do they care. Take another hit, cheat on your spouse, deny God, have another drink, have sex with your kids, etc. As long as it makes me feel good, screw the rest of ya!
Get Email updates from Fred http://socialnet.imwithfred.com/email_alert_july_26.html
and then CT
November 8, 2007 - 22:12 ET bywe can vote on the correct answer to line 20 of our tax return.
I vote for 0 !! unless of course you are a lib who feels the tax cuts need to be repealed then the answer is $40,000
GoHunter08
CT....
November 8, 2007 - 22:27 ET by MrShy"Americas ignorance is not an accident. The socialist/commie/libs are hard at work at dumbing down our citizens."
You got THAT right!
They and the MSM are dumbing the masses down with one-sided news and an emphasis on only their chosen brand of culture, while also enabling a vicious cycle of dependency, ignorance and victimhood of the poor and minorities.
"MY end justifies THAT mean." - Shakespeare (not really)
Sonny, I am only 43, and American ignorance...
November 8, 2007 - 21:39 ET by Dave R...has been astounding me for nearly thirty years.
:-(