Laid-Off Worker in Anti-Romney Ad Now Says He Won't Vote for Obama; Will Media Report?
Donnie Box, a steelworker in Missouri who lost his job and is the focus of an anti-Mitt Romney advertisement being run by a Super PAC that supports President Barack Obama, now says he will not vote to re-elect the president in November.
"I could really care less about Obama," the lifelong Democrat says in an article written by Mike Elk on the In These Times website before criticizing the president as "a jerk, a pantywaist, a lightweight, a blowhard. He hasn’t done a goddamn thing that he said he would do," he complained, adding:
When he had a Democratic Senate and Democratic Congress, he didn’t do a damn thing. He doesn’t have the guts to say what’s on his mind.
The 33-second spot is being run by the Priorities USA Action Super PAC in the battleground states of Colorado, Florida, Ohio, Pennsylvania and Virginia, and it's entitled "Meet Donnie Box."
The pro-Obama Super PAC describes Box as someone "who lost his job of 32 years at Kansas City's GST Steel after Romney's firm took it over."
"Romney and Bain Capital shut this place down," Box says at the start of the commercial while standing outside the empty factory where he used to work. “They shut down entire livelihoods.”
They promised us a health-care package. They promised to maintain our retirement program. And those were the first two things that disappeared.
This was a booming place, and Mitt Romney and Bain Capital turned it into a junkyard, just making money and leaving. They don't live in this neighborhood. They don't live in this part of the world.
The final text of the ad claims: "If Mitt Romney wins, the Middle Class loses."
The ad debuted in mid-June and was quickly noticed by the liberal media: It was highlighted on the June 10 edition of ABC's This Week, the June 11 edition of MSNBC's The Last Word, and in a Maddow Blog post by Steve Benen on June 11 at MSNBC.com.
In Elk's article, Box states that he and his fellow employees didn't know who Romney was "when all this stuff started. We just knew he was just another guy with money. It wasn't until his boys came and started gutting the place that we found out he was an a**hole."
Lately, the media has given much attention to the question of whether the former Massachusetts governor was in charge of Bain Capital from 1999 to 2002, in some small part because Bain closed the steel plant where Box worked in 2001.
During the past year, the United Steelworkers union has been attacking the GOP presidential candidate's record at Bain Capital, citing the experience of their former members who were negatively affected during Romney’s tenure there.
In response, the GOP candidate has stated that he left Bain Capital to run the Olympics in 1999, years before the plant closed. Romney also described his role in the company during that time as “merely as a figurehead.”
For Box, it doesn’t matter whether Romney had a direct day-to-day managerial role when Bain Capital closed the plant. He feels that Romney was still in a position to change things and that he had no problem profiting from other people's suffering:
There is no doubt in my mind when he came in with Bain Capital, he was the president and CEO of that corporation. He was responsible for the people who came in there and started loading up on debt. They knew with that much debt that there was no way that the place could survive.
Box’s refusal to cast a ballot for Obama shows the challenges organized labor faces in convincing its members to vote for Democrats. Many union members like Box feel the party hasn’t pushed hard enough for jobs bills or labor law reform while making sure to pass trade pacts, like the South Korea Free Trade Agreement, which the AFL-CIO and United Steelworkers opposed. On top of that, the Democrats chose to hold their convention in North Carolina, a right-to-work state that Obama narrowly carried in 2008, adding insult to injury.
In a somewhat similar situation during the 2010 midterm election, Chris Matthews, host of MSNBC's Hardball program, learned that the three men in a campaign ad playing West Virginians at a diner while attacking Democratic Senate candidate Joe Manchin were really actors hired by a Philadelphia talent agency.
While interviewing Damian Muziani, one of the men in the ad, Matthews noted that the agency told the actors to dress in a "hicky blue collar look" and fixated on the fact that Muziani actually would vote for Manchin in the election were he eligible to vote in West Virginia.
It's interesting that Muziani, an actor who appeared in a GOP ad, received media play in part because he actually supported the Democratic candidate, while Box, a real voter who is the focus of an attack ad produced by a Democratic Super PAC, is receiving scant media coverage because in reality, he says he will not vote for the incumbent president.
This is the first time Box will not cast a ballot since 1971, saying he has "lost his faith in politicians."
- Randy Hall's blog
- Login to post comments















Comments
business decisions -
Submitted by Agnostic on Wed, 07/18/2012 - 3:53pm.
I know actually dealing with whole truths does not fit into campain slogans but when the media is doing a story that should at least make the old lame attempt of non-partisanship. The media has actually covered this attack ad (free air time) without discussing the economy at the time, the steel business at the time, the union deals, the willingness of the unions to reduce their demands to a marketable level or options at the time.
No - the whole story is about the effectiveness of the ad with the exception of the fact checkers who apparently are not completely on board.
Not a Romney Pick Up
Submitted by Chris Norman on Wed, 07/18/2012 - 4:01pm.
Interesting as it applies to the media's deliberate disinterest in the story (they love to point out when a former Republican supporter turns on the GOP candidate). However, even more interesting (and disheartening), is the realization that, for this old radical unionist - Box - Obama isn't liberal/socialist enough...good grief.
I worked for a company Bain bought
Submitted by bolivar on Wed, 07/18/2012 - 4:02pm.
Some there blamed Bain but, the company that sent our jobs to Mexico long before Bain came along. Bain bought what was left and then took it public recently. I retired early out of there and have no regrets. Romney had nothing to do with the jobs going to Mexico - he gets the blame however unfair it may be.
I have no great love for Mitt but, I have an intense hate for socialism and the Obamunists who push it on us in the name of "fairness".
This Box guy should look in the mirror if he wants to see an a$$#@!&. He spews the union line and that is just wrong every time.
Steel worker?
Submitted by Jersey Girl on Wed, 07/18/2012 - 4:03pm.
Since he so willingly lied through his teeth in the ad he can go straight to heck for all I care.
Well, except for ---
Submitted by matthewdean on Wed, 07/18/2012 - 5:54pm.
attempting to "transform this country", which Obama has made a damned good start on, and not in ANY way for the good, the following is quite accurate:
"-- criticizing the president as "a jerk, a pantywaist, a lightweight, a blowhard. --"
That ain't criticism; it is the truth.
MD
Yeah, MD, he has his own
Submitted by killa37 on Thu, 07/19/2012 - 12:29am.
Yeah, MD, he has his own reasons for saying that - and they aren't coming from the same place as OUR reasons.............but it IS the TROOF, right???
And here I was, thinkin' (Obamaspeak) that I was one of a small minority who thought Boy Baraka was a 'lightweight'!!! This guy is kiddie-end-of-the-pool shallow, there's no other way to describe him. And I heard his White House mouthpiece today on the radio - you know, Lt. Fuzz Li'l Opie Jaybird Carney - trying to sound like he was actualy sayin' sumpin' about the Syrai problem.............kind of like...........uhhhhh, it's serious..............emmm, it's out of control...........well, they need to do something.
Jeeeeeeeeeeeeez!!! Lightweights all!!!
The whole premise is insane...
Submitted by Stan T on Thu, 07/19/2012 - 12:28am.
The whole premise that Bain Capital had the intention of piecemealing companies to make money from them is lunacy. here is how it really works. They buy failing companies, possibly for less than it is worth. But they can't get it for too much less, because if the business was valueable at the time, the old owners would have sold it off piecemeal themselves, rather than to take less, and let Bain sell it off for the profit. the purpose of a Bain Capital is to take a failing company, turn it around, and sell it as a viable company, which is not only valued at what the pieces of the company are worth, but also the company has a reputation, and reputation can be worth a great deal of money...plus, if Bain Capital bought businesses to sell it piecemeal like they are accused, they wouldn't have so many success stories.
And I dont even have to go into the environment before, during, or after a failure...if Bain hadn't bought that business, it would still be gone and sold off. plain and simple...atleast Bain Capital was giving those failed companies a chance to be one of thier successes.