‘Newsroom’ Renewed by HBO Despite Few Viewers, Many Critics
Despite the fact that few people are watching "The Newsroom," premimum cable channel HBO aseriesnnounced on Tuesday that it has renewed the left-leaning new series for a second season even though only two episodes have been broadcast.
The premiere of the show, which aired on Sunday, June 24, drew a mediocre total of 2.14 million viewers, which included a second airing, as it chronicled the behind-the-scenes events at the fictional Atlantis Cable News (ACN) series.
Created and primarily written by liberal TV producer Aaron Sorkin (who was also the driving force behind “The West Wing”), “Newsroom” features an ensemble cast that “sets out on a patriotic and quixotic mission to do the news well in the face of corporate and commercial obstacles and their own personal relationships.”
The comedy-drama stars Jeff Daniels as jaded cable news anchor Will McAvoy, who attempts to change things after losing his temper while moderating a discussion between a conservative on one side and a liberal on the other.
At that point, McAvoy declares that “America isn't great anymore” and rattles off a series of statistics showing that the U.S. isn't the leader of the world in such areas as infant mortality and science education.
Despite the series' cliche-ridden concept, the early renewal is seen as a sign of support from the executives at HBO, who ordered a 10-episode first season of the program.
As NewsBusters reported, the show was widely criticized even before its debut since a preview showed one of the characters stating that Dan Rather “got it right” in his 2004 story about President George W. Bush’s avoidance of National Guard duty, a hit piece discredited because of Rather’s reliance on forged documents,
Just before the premiere was broadcast, National Public Radio TV critic John Powers “trashed” the show for being “smugly against conservatives.”
“In fact, the show's so riddled with disapproval toward those who watch Fox News, read the tabloids or enjoy reality TV that it feeds the cliche of liberals as smug elitists who reflexively look down on anyone who doesn't agree,” he stated.
Once the first episode debuted, criticism intensified from all sides, with Entertainment Magazine writer Darren Franich stating that two of the signs you're watching an Aaron Sorkin show are the inclusion of an “Evil Corporate Person” and “Conservative Characters Who Aren't Actually Very Conservative.”
An example of the second item is McAvoy, who's a registered Republican but a “hyper-moderate” who “explicitly disagrees with the vast majority of contemporary right-wing causes.”
In addition, the Huffington Post blasted the series over its unflattering portrayal of women, and Sorkin has been slammed for “his rose-colored view of modern journalism and willingness to talk down to his audience.”
Some of the strongest criticism of the series came from Brent Bozell, founder and president of the Media Research Center and publisher of NewsBusters, who wrote that the series was “arrogant” and said it's preposterous to think “The Newsroom” is realistic, is idealistic and isn't liberal activism.
Bozell also declared that HBO should use a new slogan for its original programming:"Speaking Truth to Stupid."
“Sorkin, talking through his characters, thinks that what America desperately needs are journalistic truth tellers to make democracy work,” he stated. “The people cannot rule by their own dim wits. They need the guidance of all-knowing anchorman-prophets.”
Another interesting aspect of Tuesday's announcement was that HBO also renewed its vampire series, “True Blood,” for a sixth season. One reason for the renewal was the fact that the show's fifth-season premiere on June 10 drew an audience of 6.3 million viewers across its two plays, more than twice the ratings of “The Newsroom.”
Maybe Sorkin should try to boost ratings by adding a vampire to the cast. He'd probably be the most realistic character in the show.
- Randy Hall's blog
- Login to post comments















Comments
They don't need no stinking ratings!
Submitted by motherbelt on Thu, 07/05/2012 - 7:31am.
They're going for "quality" of viewers rather than quantity.
IOW, the "right" people are watching.
It's nice that Sorkin can afford to blow his money to make a point.
Fake News
Submitted by Scott Trent on Thu, 07/05/2012 - 7:34am.
HBO`s "The Newsroom." Why would I pay HBO to see a fake newsroom broadcast fake news when I can watch ABC, NBC, CBS, CNN and msnbc broadcast fake news for FREE?
Or better yet, watch a Joe Biden speech
Submitted by Blonde on Thu, 07/05/2012 - 9:05am.
Seriously. Earlier I saw an RNC commercial which featured Plugs giving an impassioned speech. It was shockingly funny and he's such a bad actor. I remarked at the time that even the most talented Hollywood writers and actors couldn't create such a buffoonish caricature of a sublimely inept politician.
Biden ought to wear a t-shirt with "Idiots R Us" on the front of it, while holding hands with The Won in his "BFD" tee.
Handy Reference Guide to Obama's Gaffes and Goofs ~ Currently Numbering 200 (and Counting)
I agree. The man is
Submitted by motherbelt on Thu, 07/05/2012 - 9:33am.
I agree. The man is impossible to parody.
mb
Submitted by Blonde on Thu, 07/05/2012 - 10:55am.
We were howling with laughter. There are no words for the stupidity that is Joe Biden, or for the *ahem* person who selected him as Vice President.
Handy Reference Guide to Obama's Gaffes and Goofs ~ Currently Numbering 200 (and Counting)
Well,, Blonde, Plugs could wear the "Stupid" t-shirt,
Submitted by UpNorth on Thu, 07/05/2012 - 11:08am.
and Baracka could wear the "I'm with Stupid" ---> t-shirt. It would seem to describe the two of them, perfectly.
That's GOOD, Up
Submitted by Blonde on Thu, 07/05/2012 - 11:12am.
Years ago, I saw a pair of t's at the Fort Lauderdale Boat Show, his and hers for wear on the boat.
Don't Yell At Me
and
I'M NOT YELLING
Handy Reference Guide to Obama's Gaffes and Goofs ~ Currently Numbering 200 (and Counting)
Good morning Blonde and Upnorth
Submitted by cocodrie on Thu, 07/05/2012 - 11:20am.
I hope y'all know that you're making fun of one of the few surviving brain transplant donors.
Jesus Loves You so much He died for you
I cancelled HBO years ago.
Submitted by johnsonl on Thu, 07/05/2012 - 8:53am.
I can't/won't pay good money to watch liberal bullshit.
+1
Submitted by almostacowboy on Thu, 07/05/2012 - 10:59am.
+1
It's their money . . .
Submitted by Galvanic on Thu, 07/05/2012 - 9:04am.
. . . let 'em blow it anyway they want.
It won't be the first time a network or cable enterprise has stuck with a product they deem so wonderful in the face of small viewer interest.
They may be puzzled by the fact that their program draws a smaller audience than the History Channel's Pawn Stars, but that won't stop them.
My guess is that in order to attract viewers, they'll up the ante with more sex, which will further piss off the feminists.
Calling Orson ...
Submitted by metaphorsbwithu on Thu, 07/05/2012 - 9:36am.
Why don't they just create some up-to-date visuals and rebroadcast The Mercury Theatre "War of the Worlds" Halloween special with Orson Welles?
They'd get more viewers and it'd serve the same purpose.
Or Wag the Dog for Obama . . .
Submitted by Galvanic on Thu, 07/05/2012 - 10:16am.
. . . with a series about Obama saving the world from nuclear holocaust, hopping from capital to capital with his Nobel Peace Prize around his neck.
So this is what it has come to.
Submitted by almostacowboy on Thu, 07/05/2012 - 11:15am.
Entire networks solely dedicated to the extinguishing of any opposing viewpoint.
Ahhhh, Liberals. Isn't is ironic that everything progressives do, beginning with naming themselves, whether it be "liberal" or "progressive", through their implied goal of "a society where everyone is free and equal" is based on a lie and is in truth the exact opposite.
Or maybe "ironic" isn't the right word.
Next, it will receive
Submitted by richflanj on Thu, 07/05/2012 - 2:20pm.
Next, it will receive "Critical Acclaim" (liberal approval) for its "edginess" (liberal slant and frequent insults to conservatives) and "realism" (portrayal of conservatives as stupid and liberal arguments as intelligent and well though out).
Then there will be the "awards" (more liberal approval) for its "cutting edge realism" (more insults to conservatism and depiction of liberalism as intelligent, enlightened and workable).
Then HBO will put all of those "awards" and "acclaim" into its advertising.
All the while capturing fewer viewers than Ed Shultz on a bad night.....
Sad, so sad. I used to respect Jeff Daniels.