Jake Tapper Skewers Sorkin's 'The Newsroom'
The most entertaining thing about Aaron Sorkin's upcoming HBO series, "The Newsroom," could well be the scathing review of the show by ABC News senior White House correspondent, Jake Tapper, which appeared in The New Republic. As a bonus, Tapper also provides an hilarious takedown of the increasingly annoying SorkinSpeak, the bizzare shorthand manner in which his characters communicate with each other. So take it away, Jake:
“The Newsroom,” which debuts June 24 on HBO, is sadly disappointing. There’s much to criticize in the media—and TV news in particular. But though “The Newsroom” intends to lecture its viewers on the higher virtues of capital-J journalism, Professor Sorkin soon reveals he isn’t much of an expert on the subject.
SORKIN HAS a well-known penchant for projecting his political fantasies onto his protagonists...
And perhaps the greatest of Sorkin's political fantasies is that he somehow has a "bias towards fairness" which Tapper exposes as completely ridiculous:
[Anchorman Will] McAvoy sanctimoniously laments the deterioration of public discourse and the news media’s complicity in it. But if that is the problem, his subsequent actions reveal a commitment to a uniformly partisan solution. McAvoy—and, by extension, Sorkin—preach political selflessness, but they practice pure partisanship; they extol the Fourth Estate’s democratic duty, but they believe that responsibility consists mostly of criticizing Republicans. This is done through the oldest trick in the book for a Hollywood liberal: by having McAvoy be a “sane Republican” who looks at his party with sadness and anger.
Tapper also addresses Sorkin's obsession with the Tea Party which he apparently thinks is more dangerous than terrorists judging by what Sorkin/McAvoy focuses upon:
And what are the important issues “News Night” covers instead of the piffle of Faisal Shahzad, a homegrown terrorist funded and trained by the Pakistani Taliban? McAvoy instead devotes at least a week of his broadcast to showcasing what a horribly inept and dangerous bunch Tea Party Republicans are as they—gasp!—defeat establishment Republicans in free and fair primaries and elections. It’s all well and good to follow the Koch brothers’ money, but at a time when Democrats controlled the White House and both houses of Congress, it’s telling that McAvoy and Sorkin aim their sights at conservatives seeking power—not moderates and liberals wielding it.
Here is the highlight of Tapper's review. An hilarious takedown of the really annoying SorkinSpeak:
SCENE: INTERIOR. TNR Office, Washington, D.C.
EDITOR: Butwhatabout the thing?
TAPPER: Thething?
EDITOR: ThatSORKINthing whentwo charactersarewalkingdownahallway oronthestreet and thedialogue EXPLODESlikePOPCORN fastandsalty and-it’s ... stylizedandfun.
TAPPER: Oh. THATthing.
EDITOR: Yes. Thething.
Finally, Tapper leaves no doubt as to where Aaron Sorkin is coming from since he did research for the show by embedding himself with...Keith Olbermann:
It’s telling that one of the ways that Sorkin prepared himself for “The Newsroom” was by embedding himself with Keith Olbermann’s (since-canceled) “Countdown” on MSNBC. McAvoy shares many weaknesses of other cable news stars—most notably, a blindness to his own ideology. This is the disconnect that allows them to proclaim a commitment to Truth and Beauty right before launching a ten-minute broadside against an opponent’s petty foibles or to make a plea for civility right before releasing a sneering explosion of disdain. For members of the media who watch the show, McAvoy will be entirely recognizable, if not for his idealistic naïveté, then for his childish egoism.
ThanksforaGREATreviewJAKE.
- P.J. Gladnick's blog
- Login to post comments















Comments
10 Reasons I won’t watch “Newsroom”
Submitted by Grumpy in Arizona on Fri, 06/22/2012 - 12:45pm.
1 - It sounds like the show will be pure liberal claptrap.
2 - My TV is in storage...
3 - My TV doesn’t work (hence being in storage)...
4 - If my TV was not in storage and actually worked - I wouldn’t plug it in...
5 - If my TV was not in storage, and worked, and was plugged- in - I still don’t know how to program it to work with the remote...
6 - If my TV was not in storage, and worked, and was plugged in, and I knew how to program it - I still wouldn’t pay for cable or satellite…
7 - If my TV was not in storage, and worked, and was plugged in, and I knew how to program it, and I did have cable or satellite – I wouldn’t pay extra for HBO…
8 - If my TV was not in storage, and worked, and was plugged in, and I knew how to program it, and I did have cable or satellite, and I had HBO - It sounds like the show will be pure liberal claptrap and I wouldn’t watch it anyway.
-------
9. I’m thinking about buying a new TV with preprogrammed remote….
10. I’ll probably put that one in storage as well – (Rather than watch a bunch of liberal claptrap).
- Grump :o)
Wonderful post
Submitted by GW on Fri, 06/22/2012 - 1:32pm.
Made me laugh. Thanks for this!
And there it is, the perfect summary of every Sorkin dialogue
Submitted by lsudolemite on Fri, 06/22/2012 - 1:08pm.
delivered by Jake Tapper. Back when Sports Night was on Comedy Central I had a friend that just raved about the show. I gave it multiple chances and came away with the same observation: rapid-fire dialogue designed to sound witty and clever, but really isn't. Intended for the audience to think it's funny and insightful, when it's neither.
For the benefit of the ladies, basically a carbon copy of the Gilmore Girls formula, just applied to ESPN.
Not surprised, but I have
Submitted by balboa on Fri, 06/22/2012 - 1:14pm.
Not surprised, but I have hope that this turns out to be a good show. I love Sorkin's writing, though the circular nature of dialog can get annoying (see early Sports Night). Keeping fingers crossed.
Huh?
Submitted by Unsane on Fri, 06/22/2012 - 1:21pm.
Early Sports Night as opposed to late Sports Night? Didn't that confused show not last a season?
Andrew Ross Sorkin (no relation) gave Newsroom a thumbs up on Squawk Box. Me, not impressed, especially after catching some previews.
"CONSUMED DEMOCRACY RETURNS A SOCIALIST REGIME" - Slayer, "Fictional Reality", from Divine Intervention (1994)
No Relation Sorkin
Submitted by Kingfish17 on Fri, 06/22/2012 - 3:04pm.
Don't get me started on that nitwit. No relation Sorkin is so dense, that he doesn't get it that he's the butt of a joke when they run the "Sorkin Fair Value" graphic, that adds up the futures price and the fair value price. Whoever hired this clown, who knows virtually nothing about business, has come close to destroying what was left of Squawk Box's reputation.
"You can’t go take a trip to Las Vegas...on the taxpayer’s dime." Barack Obama
Kingfish
Submitted by Unsane on Fri, 06/22/2012 - 5:26pm.
I TOTALLY agree with your views on Andrew Ross Sorkin. He is nothing more than another whiny little weasel Leftist who, if I may slightly disagree with you, should be kept on Squawk Box. Although the next time he starts whining about "income inequality", I will send in more nasty e-mails demanding that he sign a contract that pays him minimum wage, if his guilt is just too much to bear. Anyways...
I'd like to see him kept there as a sideshow and for entertainment value. Joe Kernan, IMHO, makes Andrew Ross Sorkin look and sound like the whiner that he is. Kernan can and does make Sorkin look like a fool. It's along the same lines as to why I like seeing CNBC keep Steve Liesman around. Whenever Steve Liesman and Rick Santelli begin arguing, see, a simple truth emerges: if anyone on CNBC is anyone else's b****, Steve Liesman is Rick Santelli's, hands down. And it is fun to watch.
"CONSUMED DEMOCRACY RETURNS A SOCIALIST REGIME" - Slayer, "Fictional Reality", from Divine Intervention (1994)
Lasted two seasons.
Submitted by balboa on Fri, 06/22/2012 - 4:49pm.
Lasted two seasons.
Really, now?
Submitted by Unsane on Fri, 06/22/2012 - 5:18pm.
Surprised it lasted two shows. And the cult following around it is a bit strange to me.
"CONSUMED DEMOCRACY RETURNS A SOCIALIST REGIME" - Slayer, "Fictional Reality", from Divine Intervention (1994)
It was a good show that
Submitted by balboa on Fri, 06/22/2012 - 5:22pm.
It was a good show that started shaky, but really started to hum in the second season. Anything that shows promise and then disappears is a good candidate for cult followings. I didn't think Firefly was anything special, but those fans are crazy loyal.
Meh
Submitted by Unsane on Fri, 06/22/2012 - 5:33pm.
I will admit I caught a smidge of Sports Night to see what the fuss was about. What I think ended it was the fact that no one could decide what it was, and it especially showed in advertising for it: was it a comedy ot a drama? (Hence my calling it a confused show.)
Firefly. Sheesh, it amazes me how many friends I have who are absolute sponges and will watch anything on TV that shows in 30 frames/sec. I heard about that too and one of my sponge friends would not shut up about that show. (He also happens to be a huge, obsessed fan of Sports Night and can't understand why I don't see the utter genius of either show.) Same thing: never could see the fuss over that either.
"CONSUMED DEMOCRACY RETURNS A SOCIALIST REGIME" - Slayer, "Fictional Reality", from Divine Intervention (1994)
Unsane, absolutely right that
Submitted by balboa on Fri, 06/22/2012 - 11:39pm.
Unsane, absolutely right that this show didn't know what it was, especially in the first season. Sometimes there was a laugh track, sometimes not.
Today, it wouldn't have one. So many more comedies do that.
Let's look closer...
Submitted by Unsane on Sat, 06/23/2012 - 8:25pm.
Laugh track aside, just the advertising was unconvincing. At some points it depicted the show as a comedy, but mostly they depicted it as a drama. This gave me a sense that the people who put the show together didn't have any idea how to sell it to the viewing public. And that, i think, proved its undoing. Whether it was strictly the advertising aspect or the failure of the writers/producers to settle on a central vision of what Sports Night was supposed to be that led to its demise I will leave to others' speculation.
"CONSUMED DEMOCRACY RETURNS A SOCIALIST REGIME" - Slayer, "Fictional Reality", from Divine Intervention (1994)
Here's the "thing"
Submitted by Sean211 on Fri, 06/22/2012 - 3:31pm.
I am a staunch conservative. I drive myself crazy by watching MSDNC and pointing out the bias on NBC products (Today Show; Nightly News) to my family and friends and facebook friends. And Aaron Sorkin is a gigantic hypocrite when he denounces the "viciousness" on the right and then demonstrates his outrage by trashing Sarah Palin.
...that said...
If Aaron Sorkin wrote on a bathroom wall I would drive 8 hours to seek it out and read it. I'm a huge fan of his writing style - from Sports Night to The West Wing to Studio 60 to the little "Sorkinese" you can pick up in "Enemy of the State" (which he did a polish rewrite on). I love his use of "the thing" to the "walk-n-talks" to the rapid-fire dialog. Heck, I even subscribed to the channel which houses the hate Bill Maher dishes out, another liberal hypocrite.
But...come Sunday night...my eyes will be rolling...I will be holding my nose...all to feed my Sorkin addiction.
Welcome back Aaron, you big hypocrite!
Don't they have treatment
Submitted by Saint Zero on Fri, 06/22/2012 - 3:36pm.
Don't they have treatment programs for problems like yours? :)
The problem is...
Submitted by Gothampc on Fri, 06/22/2012 - 3:49pm.
...the more you listen to them, the more you begin to think like them. Don't believe me, look at Charles over at Little Green Footballs. The man has totally lost his mind. I'd stop now!
Just the opposite
Submitted by Sean211 on Fri, 06/22/2012 - 5:39pm.
"...the more you listen to them, the more you begin to think like them..."
I like to think it's just the opposite: the more I listen to them, the more it solidifies my positions. I watch Chris Matthews from time to time. The more I do, the more secure I am in who I am politically.
Step #1
Submitted by Unsane on Fri, 06/22/2012 - 5:36pm.
Well, the first step to recovery is admitting you have a problem.
I can't be the only one who, early on in life, became jaded by popular culture and found that it in no way "spoke to me" and began rejecting it. Can I?
"CONSUMED DEMOCRACY RETURNS A SOCIALIST REGIME" - Slayer, "Fictional Reality", from Divine Intervention (1994)
Sorkin's Newsroom
Submitted by filioscotia on Sat, 06/23/2012 - 12:47am.
Just once --- JUST ONCE -- I would like to see a TV program about broadcast journalism produced and written by people who actually know something about broadcast journalism.
If Sorkin prepared for this travesty by hanging out with Keith Olbermann, he clearly doesn't know anything about the subject, because KO doesn't know anything either. That's why he's unemployed and unemployable.