Harvard Law Prof to Justices Ginsburg & Breyer: Retire Now Before You Drop Dead During Republican Administration
Didn't Harvard Law Professor Randall Kennedy get the word? Barack Obama's re-election is all but guaranteed if you believe the liberal mainstream media. Just today the CNBC head of news reported the belief that Obama's re-election would be guaranteed by the actions of the Fed. So why the concern about the health of Supreme Court Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Stephen Breyer? Could it be that Kennedy doesn't quite (GASP!) believe in the political invincibility of the Lightworker?
Apparently such "heretical" thoughts must have occurred to Professor Kennedy judging by his New Republic article in which he urges the two aging justices to retire now because of the inference that they could die during a Republican administration elected next year and be replaced by (EEK!) conservatives. Of course, Kennedy tries, not too successfully, to be delicate in his suggestion:
Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Stephen Breyer should soon retire. That would be the responsible thing for them to do. Both have served with distinction on the Supreme Court for a substantial period of time; Ginsburg for almost 18 years, Breyer for 17. Both are unlikely to be able to outlast a two-term Republican presidential administration, should one supersede the Obama administration following the 2012 election. What’s more, both are, well, old: Ginsburg is now 78, the senior sitting justice. Breyer is 72.
Kennedy wonders aloud if such a bold suggestion could seen as being improperly political:
Is such a suggestion an illicit politicization of the Court?
Kennedy answers his own question with this comedy punchline:
No. It is simply a plea for realism, which is often difficult to muster in the face of the idolatry that suffuses popular thinking about the justices and their role in American democracy.
Me make a suggestion that is blatantly political? Of course not. But Kennedy does proceed to undermine his own laughable case about his suggestion not contributing to an illicit politicization of the Court:
If Ginsburg or Breyer (or both) announced retirement at the end of this Supreme Court term (pending the confirmation of successors), they could virtually guarantee that President Obama would get to select their replacements.
...That is why Ginsburg and Breyer need to act soon. If they wait much beyond the end of this Supreme Court term, the Republicans will delay confirmation, praying for an upset in the presidential election.
Kennedy then relays the liberal "cautionary tale" of exiting the Supreme Court at the "wrong" time:
The career of Justice Thurgood Marshall is a cautionary tale. When asked about the prospect of retiring, he remarked on several occasions that his appointment was for life and that he intended to serve out his term fully. We now know, of course, that the end of Marshall’s time at the Court was less dramatic than that but deeply saddening nonetheless. Plagued by failing health, he retired on June 27, 1991, setting the stage for President George H. W. Bush to replace “Mr. Civil Rights” with Clarence Thomas, who has become, ideologically, the most retrograde justice since World War II. It must have been agonizing for Marshall to witness his seat pass to the ministrations of a man whose views on the most pressing issues of our time were so balefully hostile to his own.
So what does Randall Kennedy suggest Marshall should have done? Retire in good health during the Democrat Carter administration or hold out in poor health, unable to perform his duties, until he passed away just four days after Bill Clinton was inaugurated as president in 1993?
Kennedy bizarrely follows a somewhat ghoulish observation about Justice Ginsburg passing away in office during a Republican administration only to be replaced by a Clarence Thomas in drag:
Now, if Justice Ginsburg departs the Supreme Court with a Republican in the White House, it is probable that the female Thurgood Marshall will be replaced by a female Clarence Thomas.
Finally, Kennedy does not shy away from providing his timeline for the retirement of the two justices:
They should announce their retirements this spring, effective upon the confirmation of successors.
One can only imagine Kennedy's anxiety attacks if Ginsburg and Breyer don't take his unsubtle suggestion and remain on the court, especially if the liberal pundits are proven wrong about the 2012 election. In case that happens, I wouldn't recommend sending Professor Kennedy a copy of "Weekend at Bernie's" as a gift item. It might give him ideas.
- P.J. Gladnick's blog
- Login to post comments















Comments
Another educated, but not
Submitted by Edhenry on Thu, 04/28/2011 - 12:54pm.
Another educated, but not smart law prof.
He doesn't even realize the idiocy of his macabre musings, much less the naked political angle.
Thomas is a constitution lawyer, more interested in the long term health of the country than the transient liberal culture that will reverse itself once its failings are completely exposed.
That time is
Submitted by johnsonl on Thu, 04/28/2011 - 2:41pm.
now.
Message from the Left:
Submitted by Comrade Jim on Thu, 04/28/2011 - 1:08pm.
Fall on your sword for the cause.
"That would be the
Submitted by redfish on Thu, 04/28/2011 - 1:48pm.
"That would be the responsible thing for them to do."
The responsible thing to do would be to create a judicial culture thats based around an objective reading of the Constitution instead of political jockeying to defend poorly supported decisions like Roe v. Wade.
Liberal culture has already failed, repeatedly.
Submitted by IdahoJim on Thu, 04/28/2011 - 2:21pm.
Liberals are blind to failure. Their motto might as well be "Don't judge us by our results. Instead judge us by our intentions".
IdahoJim
http://idahoandy.net
They are, after all,
Submitted by johnsonl on Thu, 04/28/2011 - 2:40pm.
"enlightened".
GInsberg has been brain dead
Submitted by buddyc on Thu, 04/28/2011 - 2:27pm.
GInsberg has been brain dead for 10 years. I will never ever forgive Orin Hatch for supporting her nomination. Bryer is a strong liberal and a pretty good justice. He is not as radical as Ginsberg.
Intelligent liberals (unlike MSNBCer's)
Submitted by johnsonl on Thu, 04/28/2011 - 2:39pm.
can read the tea leaves. Kennedy knows that the backlash has already started with the mid term elections and will continue right through the next elections. He even predicts that the next two administrations will be conservative. I think it will continue on for a generation. I think that the unions are done, "right to work" will will be the law of the land and the liberal/socialist engineered educational system that they employed to reach this era will be unraveled. America is entering a renaissance age with the ideals that made us the shining light of the world. Life, liberty and the PURSUIT of happiness, all guaranteed by the rule of law. Unlike other countries, we expect the best from our citizens, and we get it.
Judicial Activists Unite!!
Submitted by Djinn1975 on Thu, 04/28/2011 - 2:47pm.
What a blatant, desperate cry for two travesties to sacrifice themselves to ensure the activist plague endures. If I were Breyer or Ginsburg *shutter* I would fax over a nice big photocopy of my middle finger to Prof. Kennedy. It amazes me the things that people say. It's becoming a more common phrase of mine...'Who the eff do you think you are?!'
Johnsonl
Submitted by Djinn1975 on Thu, 04/28/2011 - 2:52pm.
Amen! Couldn't have said it, or dreamed it better myself. You can see and feel that tide building and hopefully 2012 will bring it crashing to reality. Wresting this country from liberalism and returning her to glory! Key point of your post, the PURSUIT of happiness, I've noticed that libs like to leave that out, that and god, creator, my bad, etc.
The next "intelligent
Submitted by guinsPen on Thu, 04/28/2011 - 5:25pm.
The next "intelligent liberal" I meet will be the first.
The perfect combo
Submitted by deadeyedan on Thu, 04/28/2011 - 9:56pm.
This underscores the reason why I have been saying this:
Climategate - the revelation that the pseudo-scientists at East Anglia University know just as much about the atmosphere as Harvard law professors know about the Constitution.
The leaked e-mails reveal that the BS artists who pose as climate know-it-alls actually understood that natural processes could account for any and all thermal variation (or lack thereof) yet they kept foisting their crazy global warming superstition on politicians, the media and the gullible in industry and grant foundations. In the same vein, at Harvard they know what the Constitution actually states but the shysters there keep pushing their revisionist variations on the document as if that's what the Framers had in mind or what they should have meant. In both cases they know better, but they won't admit it.
Climategate - the revelation that the pseudo-scientists at East Anglia University know just as much about the atmosphere as Harvard law professors know about the Constitution - deadeyedan