Skip to main content
  • CNSNews.com
  • MRC TV
  • Biz & Media
  • Culture & Media
  • TimesWatch
  • Take Action!

Join Us @:
Facebook
Twitter
Amazon Kindle

Free email alerts!

NewsBusters logo
May 24, 2013
  • Home
  • Blogs
  • About
  • Forum
  • Take Action
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Search
  • RSS

Hot Topics

  • Obama Targets Fox News
  • IRS Targets Tea Party
  • Censoring the News
Home » Blogs » P.J. Gladnick's blog
  • Only CBS Notes IRS Official’s Leave, Yet ABC and NBC Have Time to Show Obama’s Prom Photo with ‘Foxy’ Friend
  • Hearing on IRS With Lerner Taking the Fifth? Newspapers Had No Front Page Story Thursday
  • Chris Matthews Trashes 'Morning Joe' for Being 'Open to All People's Points of View'
  • Thursday Morning: Fox Gives 15 Minutes to Latest IRS Scandal Details; NBC and ABC Ignore
  • On Taxpayer-subsidized PBS, Liberal Reporters Lament Benghazi Won't Go Away
  • No Mention of IRS Scandal on NBC's 'Today,' But Plenty of Time for Obama Prom Photo
  • MSNBC’s Chris Hayes Hypes ‘LGBT Injustice’ During Interview With 18-year Old Woman Charged With Sex With Minor
  • Lisa Myers: 'For a Year the IRS Essentially Knowingly Lied to Congress and No One Came Forward'

Harvard Law Prof to Justices Ginsburg & Breyer: Retire Now Before You Drop Dead During Republican Administration

By P.J. Gladnick | April 28, 2011 | 12:36

A  A

Didn't Harvard Law Professor Randall Kennedy get the word? Barack Obama's re-election is all but guaranteed if you believe the liberal mainstream media. Just today the CNBC head of news reported the belief that Obama's re-election would be guaranteed by the actions of the Fed. So why the concern about the health of Supreme Court Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Stephen Breyer? Could it be that Kennedy doesn't quite (GASP!) believe in the political invincibility of the Lightworker?

Apparently such "heretical" thoughts must have occurred to Professor Kennedy judging by his New Republic article in which he urges the two aging justices to retire now because of the inference that they could die during a Republican administration elected next year and be replaced by (EEK!) conservatives. Of course, Kennedy tries, not too successfully, to be delicate in his suggestion:

Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Stephen Breyer should soon retire. That would be the responsible thing for them to do. Both have served with distinction on the Supreme Court for a substantial period of time; Ginsburg for almost 18 years, Breyer for 17. Both are unlikely to be able to outlast a two-term Republican presidential administration, should one supersede the Obama administration following the 2012 election. What’s more, both are, well, old: Ginsburg is now 78, the senior sitting justice. Breyer is 72.

Kennedy wonders aloud if such a bold suggestion could seen as being improperly political:

Is such a suggestion an illicit politicization of the Court?

Kennedy answers his own question with this comedy punchline:

No. It is simply a plea for realism, which is often difficult to muster in the face of the idolatry that suffuses popular thinking about the justices and their role in American democracy.

Me make a suggestion that is blatantly political? Of course not. But Kennedy does proceed to undermine his own laughable case about his suggestion not contributing to an illicit politicization of the Court:

If Ginsburg or Breyer (or both) announced retirement at the end of this Supreme Court term (pending the confirmation of successors), they could virtually guarantee that President Obama would get to select their replacements.

...That is why Ginsburg and Breyer need to act soon. If they wait much beyond the end of this Supreme Court term, the Republicans will delay confirmation, praying for an upset in the presidential election.

Kennedy then relays the liberal "cautionary tale" of exiting the Supreme Court at the "wrong" time:

The career of Justice Thurgood Marshall is a cautionary tale. When asked about the prospect of retiring, he remarked on several occasions that his appointment was for life and that he intended to serve out his term fully. We now know, of course, that the end of Marshall’s time at the Court was less dramatic than that but deeply saddening nonetheless. Plagued by failing health, he retired on June 27, 1991, setting the stage for President George H. W. Bush to replace “Mr. Civil Rights” with Clarence Thomas, who has become, ideologically, the most retrograde justice since World War II. It must have been agonizing for Marshall to witness his seat pass to the ministrations of a man whose views on the most pressing issues of our time were so balefully hostile to his own.

So what does Randall Kennedy suggest Marshall should have done? Retire in good health during the Democrat Carter administration or hold out in poor health, unable to perform his duties, until he passed away just four days after Bill Clinton was inaugurated as president in 1993? 

Kennedy bizarrely follows a somewhat ghoulish observation about Justice Ginsburg passing away in office during a Republican administration only to be replaced by a Clarence Thomas in drag:

Now, if Justice Ginsburg departs the Supreme Court with a Republican in the White House, it is probable that the female Thurgood Marshall will be replaced by a female Clarence Thomas.

Finally, Kennedy does not shy away from providing his timeline for the retirement of the two justices:

They should announce their retirements this spring, effective upon the confirmation of successors.

One can only imagine Kennedy's anxiety attacks if Ginsburg and Breyer don't take his unsubtle suggestion and remain on the court, especially if the liberal pundits are proven wrong about the 2012 election. In case that happens, I wouldn't recommend sending Professor Kennedy a copy of "Weekend at Bernie's" as a gift item. It might give him ideas.

  • Judiciary
  • Randall Kennedy
  • Ruth Bader Ginsburg
  • Stephen Breyer
  • New Republic
  • P.J. Gladnick's blog
  • Login to post comments
  • Printer-friendly version
Stop Censoring The Gosnell Trial!

Comments

Another educated, but not

Submitted by Edhenry on Thu, 04/28/2011 - 12:54pm.

Another educated, but not smart law prof.

He doesn't even realize the idiocy of his macabre musings, much less the naked political angle.

Thomas is a constitution lawyer, more interested in the long term health of the country than the transient liberal culture that will reverse itself once its failings are completely exposed.

edhenry
  • Login to post comments

That time is

Submitted by johnsonl on Thu, 04/28/2011 - 2:41pm.

now.

  • Login to post comments

Message from the Left:

Submitted by Comrade Jim on Thu, 04/28/2011 - 1:08pm.

Fall on your sword for the cause.

  • Login to post comments

"That would be the

Submitted by redfish on Thu, 04/28/2011 - 1:48pm.

"That would be the responsible thing for them to do."

The responsible thing to do would be to create a judicial culture thats based around an objective reading of the Constitution instead of political jockeying to defend poorly supported decisions like Roe v. Wade.

  • Login to post comments

Liberal culture has already failed, repeatedly.

Submitted by IdahoJim on Thu, 04/28/2011 - 2:21pm.

Liberals are blind to failure. Their motto might as well be "Don't judge us by our results. Instead judge us by our intentions".

"I find that I am deeply offended by political correctness." IdahoAndy

IdahoJim

http://idahoandy.net

  • Login to post comments

They are, after all,

Submitted by johnsonl on Thu, 04/28/2011 - 2:40pm.

"enlightened".

  • Login to post comments

GInsberg has been brain dead

Submitted by buddyc on Thu, 04/28/2011 - 2:27pm.

GInsberg has been brain dead for 10 years. I will never ever forgive Orin Hatch for supporting her nomination. Bryer is a strong liberal and a pretty good justice. He is not as radical as Ginsberg.

  • Login to post comments

Intelligent liberals (unlike MSNBCer's)

Submitted by johnsonl on Thu, 04/28/2011 - 2:39pm.

can read the tea leaves. Kennedy knows that the backlash has already started with the mid term elections and will continue right through the next elections. He even predicts that the next two administrations will be conservative. I think it will continue on for a generation. I think that the unions are done, "right to work" will will be the law of the land and the liberal/socialist engineered educational system that they employed to reach this era will be unraveled. America is entering a renaissance age with the ideals that made us the shining light of the world. Life, liberty and the PURSUIT of happiness, all guaranteed by the rule of law. Unlike other countries, we expect the best from our citizens, and we get it.

  • Login to post comments

Judicial Activists Unite!!

Submitted by Djinn1975 on Thu, 04/28/2011 - 2:47pm.

What a blatant, desperate cry for two travesties to sacrifice themselves to ensure the activist plague endures. If I were Breyer or Ginsburg *shutter* I would fax over a nice big photocopy of my middle finger to Prof. Kennedy. It amazes me the things that people say. It's becoming a more common phrase of mine...'Who the eff do you think you are?!'

Add to Øbama's legacy in 2012: The first MULATTO, one term, worst U.S. President ever. Your vote ensures the trifecta.
  • Login to post comments

Johnsonl

Submitted by Djinn1975 on Thu, 04/28/2011 - 2:52pm.

Amen! Couldn't have said it, or dreamed it better myself. You can see and feel that tide building and hopefully 2012 will bring it crashing to reality. Wresting this country from liberalism and returning her to glory! Key point of your post, the PURSUIT of happiness, I've noticed that libs like to leave that out, that and god, creator, my bad, etc.

Add to Øbama's legacy in 2012: The first MULATTO, one term, worst U.S. President ever. Your vote ensures the trifecta.
  • Login to post comments

The next "intelligent

Submitted by guinsPen on Thu, 04/28/2011 - 5:25pm.

The next "intelligent liberal" I meet will be the first.

  • Login to post comments

The perfect combo

Submitted by deadeyedan on Thu, 04/28/2011 - 9:56pm.

This underscores the reason why I have been saying this:

Climategate - the revelation that the pseudo-scientists at East Anglia University know just as much about the atmosphere as Harvard law professors know about the Constitution.

The leaked e-mails reveal that the BS artists who pose as climate know-it-alls actually understood that natural processes could account for any and all thermal variation (or lack thereof) yet they kept foisting their crazy global warming superstition on politicians, the media and the gullible in industry and grant foundations. In the same vein, at Harvard they know what the Constitution actually states but the shysters there keep pushing their revisionist variations on the document as if that's what the Framers had in mind or what they should have meant. In both cases they know better, but they won't admit it.

Climategate - the revelation that the pseudo-scientists at East Anglia University know just as much about the atmosphere as Harvard law professors know about the Constitution - deadeyedan

  • Login to post comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Stop Censoring The Gosnell Trial!

Editors' Picks

  • Oops: Obama fails to salute Marine, went back to shake hand (Weekly Standard)
  • Deputy kills PBS NewsHour staffer (Washington Examiner)
  • Oklahoma disaster was tragic, but larger ones have occurred (USA Today)
  • Mainstream Media Scream: Today’s Savannah Guthrie questions GOP ‘overreach’ (Paul Bedard, Washington Examiner)
  • Desperate Carney complains asking about scandals like asking about birth certificate (RCP)
  • Look at NYT's partisan-hack rewrite of the IRS hearing (Draw and STRIKE!)
  • Study: Christians who tithe have better finances than those who don't (TGC)
  • The media are willing accomplices to Obama (PolitiChicks)
  • FBI has suspects in mind in Benghazi; Obama prefers to try them in court (AP)
Ann Coulter's picture
Ann Coulter
Ann Coulter Column: When Did We Vote to Become Mexico?
Chuck Norris's picture
Chuck Norris
Chuck Norris Column: Why Tim Tebow Is an Ultimate Clutch Player
Walter E. Williams's picture
Walter E. Williams
Walter E. Williams Column: Hating America
Michelle Malkin's picture
Michelle Malkin
Malkin Column: Obama's Emptiest Benghazi Talking Point
Ann Coulter's picture
Ann Coulter
Coulter Column: Sorry, Sen. Rubio, But Your Immigration Plan Is Still Problematic
More >

RSS FeedAmazon KindleFacebookTwitter

Stop Censoring The News!

Gosnell's Just the Tip of the Iceberg
more cartoons
  • Leno: ‘Not Looking Good for Obama - Today His Teleprompter Took the Fifth’
  • Robert Redford Blasts America's Belief System, Tech Advancements
  • Dennis Miller: 'Nixonian' Obama Will Need Teleprompter to Say 'I Am Not a Crook'
  • Leno: Obama Knows Nothing Because They Moved ‘Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell’ to the White House
  • IRS Charged With Unfair Scrutiny of Pro-Life Groups' Prayer Events, Protest Signs
More >
NewsBusters

Executive Editor
Matthew Sheffield

Editor at Large
Brent Baker

Senior Editors
Tim Graham
Rich Noyes

Managing Editor
Ken Shepherd

Associate Editor
Noel Sheppard

Contributing Editors
Tom Blumer
Geoffrey Dickens
Dan Gainor
David Limbaugh
Mithridate Ombud
Clay Waters
Scott Whitlock

Senior Contributor
Mark Finkelstein

Contributing Writers
Matthew Balan
Michael M. Bates
Erin R. Brown
Jack Coleman
Kyle Drennen
Douglas Ernst
P. J. Gladnick
Stephen Gutowski
Matt Hadro
D. S. Hube
Kathleen McKinley
Dave Pierre
Amy Ridenour
Julia A. Seymour
Terry Trippany
Rusty Weiss
Brad Wilmouth

Publisher
Brent Bozell

Site Design
Dialog New Media

 

  • Home
  • Blogs
  • About
  • Forum
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Search
  • Account
  • rss
  • CNSNews
  • MRC TV
  • Biz & Media
  • Culture & Media
  • Take Action!
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Amazon Kindle
  • Advertise
  • Jobs

Copyright © 2005-2013 NewsBusters.
Privacy Policy | Terms of Use