'Glee' Set to Feature 'First Time' Gay Sexual Experience
From its inception, popular TV musical comedy Glee has waged a relentless campaign of liberal propaganda and pushing the boundaries of what's acceptable on broadcast TV. The show is now stepping up its campaign of homosexual promotion. The latest episode of Glee (airing on Nov. 8) titled "The First Time," will feature a gay couple having sex on TV.
Tim Stack of Entertainment Weekly calls the episode a "game-changer," declaring "I can't think of another network series that's taken a teenage gay relationship so far or been so progressive."
Indeed, the show has consistently advocated a liberal tilt on homosexuality, portraying the behavior as completely normal and uncontroversial.
Glee is notorious for its obsessive promotion of racy and controversial sexual behavior. A previous episode featured two lesbian cheerleaders kissing in bed and discussing "scissoring." Another episode featured a gay kiss among two males. A November 2010 GQ issue featured Glee cast members posed in various states of undress. "The First Time" will merely be the latest in a long line of Glee episodes pushing the sexual envelope.
Creator Ryan Murphy (who is also the creator of the aptly-named American Horror Story) is outspoken in his desire to push the envelope regarding sexual matters. In an interview with Bravo's "Sex in the Box," Murphy declared: "It's tough to get that sexual point of view across on television. Hopefully I have made it possible for somebody on broadcast television to do a rear-entry scene in three years. Maybe that will be my legacy."
With this latest episode of Glee, Murphy is well on his way towards achieving that goal of hyper-sexualizing television.
- Paul Wilson's blog
- Login to post comments
Comments
By deviants, for deviants, but they haul in regular folks...
Submitted by Mike Bratton on Tue, 11/08/2011 - 2:21pm.
...with, honestly, top-notch musical numbers. You know, sprinkled in amidst the deviancy.
Still amazing to me that FOX can air this subversion (one program of many) at the same time FOX News is supposed to be "fair and balanced."
Make up your mind, Rupert.
--Mike
Don't knock Rupert
Submitted by Agnostic on Tue, 11/08/2011 - 2:27pm.
Fox News does not equal Fox Entertainment
Also, remember Rupert supported Hillary Clinton for President.
I'll knock him all day and into the night.
Submitted by Mike Bratton on Tue, 11/08/2011 - 2:31pm.
He owns them.
The buck stops with him.
At the end of the day, he allows that bile to be broadcast, along with the rest of the junk that passes for "entertainment" on FOX.
--Mike
Mike Bratton,
Submitted by Agnostic on Tue, 11/08/2011 - 2:44pm.
You are right but it is incorrect to assume that he supports Conservative causes because of his personal beliefs. FOX News is a reflection of the available market for Conservative thought and the saturation of the market by Liberal thought - nothing more, nothing less.
I've never suggested Rupert was particularly conservative.
Submitted by Mike Bratton on Tue, 11/08/2011 - 3:03pm.
He is, however, particularly irresponsible.
FOX News is the anomaly, and even then not the lead-pipe-cinch conservative bastion it's often taken to be.
--Mike
sorry Mike,
Submitted by Agnostic on Tue, 11/08/2011 - 3:11pm.
didn't mean to imply that you did suggest Rupert was conservative. I was just pointing out that since Rupert makes his decision based on business models that he doesn't need to make up his mind. He has been consistent in attempting to put out a product that people watch.
Not a problem, Ag. But Rupert has a responsibility.
Submitted by Mike Bratton on Tue, 11/08/2011 - 9:48pm.
And he aggressively avoids it.
--Mike
He can have it both ways
Submitted by shawn. on Tue, 11/08/2011 - 11:12pm.
He pi$$es off liberals with Fox News and he pi$$es off conservatives with Glee. He is a smart businessman and makes a lot of money with both shows
Eh. Nobody is being forced
Submitted by Nutjob on Tue, 11/08/2011 - 2:25pm.
Eh. Nobody is being forced to watch TV, and I couldn't care less what they show. It's the parent's jobs to monitor what kids watch and do.
No, they're not being forced. They're being lured.
Submitted by Mike Bratton on Tue, 11/08/2011 - 2:38pm.
And the social contamination is getting worse, so you might want to start caring a little bit about the bait being used.
Oh, and that fellow down on the corner passing out candy to the kids? You know, the one wearing the trench coat? Yeah, don't worry about him, either. Nobody's forced to take that candy, and parents need to monitor their children constantly.
No reason for you to be concerned. Hey, if a kid gets victimized, it's all on the parents, right?
Wrong.
--Mike
Cripes
Submitted by Pizza Dude on Tue, 11/08/2011 - 8:49pm.
There's no victimization in watching a TV show with gay characters. You should be more concerned with your children jumping off the roof with a broom whilst imitating Harry Potter.
Thanks for that conclusion, "Dude."
Submitted by Mike Bratton on Tue, 11/08/2011 - 9:46pm.
Do you mistakenly leap to them often?
My children know that the Harry Potter subculture is just so much stuff and nonsense, thanks, and they're not interested in anything it has to offer. The same goes for shows like "Glee," that overtly attempt to normalize the abnormal.
And any time you lure the unsuspecting into a situation where you can corrupt them, where you can make them think that deviancy of any stripe is "just another lifestyle choice" or "just the way I was born," you've made victims of the unsuspecting. It's bad enough that they're one more show that wants to validate heterosexual sex outside of marriage as a "rite of passage"--adding homosexual activity to the mix just emphasizes the debauchery of the show.
Kid yourself all you like.
--Mike
Stop proselytizing, Zippers.
Submitted by SickofLibs on Wed, 11/09/2011 - 3:23pm.
Try to keep your emotions in check.
Ken?
Submitted by Pizza Dude on Wed, 11/09/2011 - 3:34pm.
Is that you?
Why is this troll allowed to continue on his now 31st account?
Submitted by The Vet on Thu, 11/10/2011 - 1:38pm.
Beuke?
Submitted by Mister Orange on Mon, 10/17/2011 - 6:49pm.
Is that you?
+++
Agreed - it is the parents'
Submitted by Darth Dutch on Tue, 11/08/2011 - 2:43pm.
Agreed - it is the parents' job to monitor what their children watch on TV. But, what we as a society allow to go on in business, entertainment, politics, etc., makes a statement on what we value. Ultimately what we allow we also value (on a macro level) so it is imperative for individuals to speak out when they feel society is valuing things that they are against.
Yeah, I say since putting
Submitted by ant on Tue, 11/08/2011 - 2:50pm.
Yeah, I say since putting FDR's D-day prayer on a WW II memorial would "dilute the message" or whatever their assinine excuse is, we simply put an engraving of a 'rear entry' on it. That would 'legitimize' it, it, apparently, legitimizes everything and adds fairness and balance to every subject. Homosexuality is,apparently, the seasoning to every recipe in society.
Will Barney Fwank be making a guest appeawonce?
Submitted by Newsbubba on Tue, 11/08/2011 - 2:52pm.
Pwease say he is!
It could be a scene from
Submitted by Dan Diego on Tue, 11/08/2011 - 8:38pm.
It could be a scene from Duh's childhood with Uncle Frankie (Davis) or the man-child's exploits with Larry.
This is OK
Submitted by Ashrak on Tue, 11/08/2011 - 3:18pm.
But dog gone it - there can be NO cigarette commercials.......
This seems really an odd time to mention this ....
Submitted by Fredy on Tue, 11/08/2011 - 3:22pm.
How is it that there is a 'scandal' at Penn State when nothing more than 2 adult men are deciding to engage in a gay activity?
Here we have the media producing exactly what the media is condemning at the same time?
Fredy
Submitted by 26CX on Tue, 11/08/2011 - 3:24pm.
It wasn't two adult men deciding to engage in a gay activity. It was molesting 8 year old boys.
Penn State
Submitted by Agnostic on Tue, 11/08/2011 - 3:29pm.
That is 'molesting 8 boys' not 'molesting 8 year old boys'.
A ninth victim has come forward.
There is a lot of documentation on this case and a lot of personal account given to the authorities.
Agnostic
Submitted by 26CX on Tue, 11/08/2011 - 3:34pm.
You're right. Thank you for the correction.
Actually, the report said 10 year old
Submitted by Blonde on Wed, 11/09/2011 - 3:50pm.
....the one in the incident the graduate assistant witnessed.
Disgusting. The entire PSU staff in the chain of command who knew about this need to go. Now.
Handy Reference Guide to Obama's Gaffes and Goofs ~ Currently Numbering 200 (and Counting)
And to be precise, it's not
Submitted by motherbelt on Tue, 11/08/2011 - 3:34pm.
And to be precise, it's not 8-year-old boys, it's alleged molestation charged by eight boys.
MB
Submitted by 26CX on Tue, 11/08/2011 - 3:36pm.
Thanks to you also for the correction.
What? He 'ate' boys? That's
Submitted by ant on Tue, 11/08/2011 - 3:41pm.
What? He 'ate' boys? That's sick.
Jerry Sandusky is accused of
Submitted by motherbelt on Tue, 11/08/2011 - 3:47pm.
Jerry Sandusky is accused of the crimes, with a couple of other people being charged with perjury in the case.
A couple of other people are charged with failing to take action in the cases, and Joe Paterno may have to go too, as a result of this.
My bad ...
Submitted by Fredy on Tue, 11/08/2011 - 4:08pm.
Sorry for an incomplete reading on my part.
Good thing I am NOT a journalist or on TV!!!
Well, now that we have "gay sex" codified ...
Submitted by Newsbubba on Tue, 11/08/2011 - 5:44pm.
... as normal and mainstream, I'm waiting to see what "disenfranchised" group will step up to the table next.
I'm kind of betting that it will be either pedophiles or polygamy advocates, or maybe a mixture of the two. You know, someone who wants to be able to marry men and women AND little kids all at the same time.
Hey, it's just like the civil rights movement, right? I mean what is society to tell someone that they can't marry a cow if they feel like it?
My only question is, if you marry a goat or a cow, and then decide later to slaughter it and barbeque it, would that be murder, divorce, or "choice?"
This could get very confusing.
Newsbubba
Submitted by Radical1979 on Tue, 11/08/2011 - 5:48pm.
Ding Ding Ding You've hit the nail on the head! Cajun has been informing us that yes, pedophiles are attempting to have their despicable behavior "normalized" by being removed from the DSM.
It's interesting... I don't
Submitted by SCwg on Tue, 11/08/2011 - 8:05pm.
It's interesting... I don't know why homosexuality was removed from the DSM but not things like pedophilia. I mean, I understand how one can make a political argument to differentiate the two, but I don't know how medically they are different.
Because...
Submitted by DumbCanuck on Wed, 11/09/2011 - 9:32am.
...one is seen as predatorial (pedophilia -- as the thinking is that kids are not sufficiently mature to consent freely, thus needing the protection of society), and the other is seen as simply the act of consenting adults.
When one realizes that both activities deviates from the norm, the legality issue becomes a matter of mere semantics.
It won't be long now. Kids are getting prept in school with the latest sex-ed curriculum, so expect a change within the next -- I would say 5 to 10 years.)
"There... Are... Four... Lights!"
Let's not forget the consanguineous crowd
Submitted by jpwcpa on Tue, 11/08/2011 - 10:57pm.
Before long, we may see the day where, if a guy wants to marry his own mother (hey, it happened to Oedipus, and look how well things turned out for him, becoming king and all), but society frowns upon it, then he would declare himself to be part of a disenfranchised group and view all of the anti-incest folks as "haters". Advocates for incestuous rights may already have an ally in Hollywood: Angelina Jolie mentioned in an Oscar acceptance speech about being in love with her brother.
Just how disgusting is this?
Submitted by motherbelt on Tue, 11/08/2011 - 3:52pm.
Hopefully I have made it possible for somebody on broadcast television to do a rear-entry scene in three years. Maybe that will be my legacy."
Way to go, moron....aim high.
And don't forget: unless they move it, GLEE is broadcast during the supposed "Family Hour" of broadcast TV.
mb,
Submitted by Agnostic on Tue, 11/08/2011 - 3:56pm.
I thought they probably came closer to that accomplishment on the short lived show Dirt a few years back.
Wouldn't that be...
Submitted by DumbCanuck on Wed, 11/09/2011 - 9:34am.
... "aim low?"
Sorry... Lost my mind there for a second....
"There... Are... Four... Lights!"
Finally...
Submitted by bkeyser on Tue, 11/08/2011 - 4:57pm.
the question of "why?" is answered.
Hey Bk*
Submitted by cajun2 on Tue, 11/08/2011 - 5:54pm.
Now look what you have done! Mamabear will be here in 3...2...1....
if you watch the show with friends
Submitted by MidAmerica on Tue, 11/08/2011 - 7:01pm.
Do you serve Twinkies and Fruit Loops as snacks?
I stopped watching this show
Submitted by goldbough on Tue, 11/08/2011 - 9:23pm.
I stopped watching this show after a few episodes because I saw the heavy liberal slant. It's apparently gotten much worse.
Glee has sucked this year
Submitted by shawn. on Tue, 11/08/2011 - 11:10pm.
No matter how controversial the content, the story has got to be interesting. Pretty boring this year.
"Glee" America's Homosexual Orgy Show
Submitted by Avitar on Wed, 11/09/2011 - 3:35am.
That show seems to have an all homosexual cast. I never watch it but even the promotional advertisements are startling
Are gerbils involved?
Submitted by Galvanic on Wed, 11/09/2011 - 6:02pm.
Leave it to Fox.