Networks Blame FAA, Not Airlines for Runway Problems

Photo of Paul Detrick.
By Paul Detrick | August 16, 2007 - 14:20 ET

For a change, the media gave the government a hard time about air travel, instead of bashing the airlines. The media reported on new Federal Aviation Administration guidelines for better runway safety and on ABC's "World News with Charles Gibson" and CNN's "American Morning."

Lisa Stark said, "The FAA commission admits that runway collisions are an increasing threat," and cautioned that new rules could "lead to some more delays," but the report did not indicate that the airlines were a part of the problem.

This is in contrast to CBS's Randall Pinkston, who said August 12 that it would cost airlines more money to provide more services to passengers but charged: "airline analysts say [the airlines] can afford it," pointing to Northwest Airlines' $2 billion profit and neglecting to point out their bankruptcy status only a few months prior.

Story Continues Below Ad ↓

Likewise, on August 15 NBC's Meredith Vieira asked Northwest Airlines CEO to guarantee no more flights would be cancelled.

But Jessica Yellin at "American Morning" focused on FAA's problems, explaining that the agency is understaffed and isn't able to handle the "62 million takeoffs and landings every year." She also noted the agency said being overworked leaves FAA employees "fatigued and more likely to make mistakes."

The "American Morning" report also hit at improving air traffic control technology:

KIRAN CHETRY (HOST): What about updating technology? Any discussion about improving new tools that are available to pilots during their takeoff and landing?

JESSICA YELLIN: Yeah, the FAA did talk about some new technologies. But their really more focused first on the short term fixes and then when they get to the new technology they said their going to look at new technology that helps air traffic controllers determine where all the planes are in their taxiing and landing patterns. So really for the air traffic controllers, that's where they'll update the technology.

The ABC and CNN reports said the Federal Aviation Administration is recommending new pilot training on taxiing, repainting runways with brighter paint, reviews of airports, and new taxiing procedures to minimize pilot distractions.

The Wall Street Journal August 13 said the air traffic control system "approached gridlock early this summer, with more than 30% of June flights late, by an average of 62 minutes."

—Paul Detrick is a Research Analyst at the Business and Media Institute.

Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Airports need a new design system

America's largets airports need a total revamp of their arrival and departure methods if air transportation is how America is going to move around.

Yes it once again will cost a great deal of money, but there have to be arrival and departure airports just like interstates only have one way traffic.

The skies they have handled in different altitude settings east and west, but on the ground the congestion is a nightmare.

Simple amtracks could be used to move people around in departure and take off terminals. It would require building an additional airport at such places like LAX, Chicago, New York and DC, but that would end the problems which are growing.

 

*HIC IACET ARTORIVS REX QVONDAM REXQVE FVTVRVS

You really can't build new

You really can't build new airports at the cities you mention-no room left. A much better solution is like what we have here in New England. Manchester NH airport has greatly expanded in the past 10 years and now even calls itself Manchester-Boston (they're located about 40 miles north of Beantown.)

They handle a lot of traffic by United, Southwest and US Airways. Unless you're getting on an overseas flight, such smaller regional airports are the way to go. I took a US Airways flight from Manchester to LAX in 2003, and had one stop at the US Air hub in Philly, but never had to get out of my seat as they used the same plane for the entire trip.

The media's not covering this, either, but...

John Ross has a short but very good article about the future of private aviation. Not all flying must be done by giant corporations and governments -- at least, that's how some of us see it -- but rules & incentives in a free society need to reflect that. Mr. Ross says so in his usual politically-incorrect way.
JMR

Rally online with fans of Dr. Ron Paul.

Yea give it a good dose of paint.

 .."repainting runways with brighter paint"..

How about longer runways wider taxi ways.

Landing on the 6,700 ft runway on Maui, has been described as, the t-word.

Flying to Maui is 20 minutes of climb out ;followed by 4 hours of boredom, followed by, 30 seconds of terror. 

Entitlement over infrastructure every SINGLE time.

 

Flying from Oahu to Maui is

Flying from Oahu to Maui is a steep climb out to avoid Diamond Head and a trip that includes a coke if you're lucky.  The runway there is very short, agreed but Honolulu for inter-island flights are not much better.  Luckily they use the Hickham runway for trans-Pacific flights. 
Aloha!

Actually, the longest runway

Actually, the longest runway at HNL is the "reef runway", which isn't even on Hickam property. It's long enough to accomodate the Space Shuttle. The reason the other runways haven't been lengthened is because many trans-Pacific flights now use longer-range aircraft and so they don't even have to stop at HNL like they did in the past.

That climb out when you take off commonly-used runway 8L (which is the runway shared with Hickam), is not only to avoid Diamond Head, but to avoid the city itself, as well as reduce noise. The pilots have to immediately turn right after takeoff, no matter where they're headed. As I recall, prior to 9/11 planes could use one landing pattern that took them over the city, but of course that's long gone. The two shorter parallel runways, 4L and 4R, require even sharper turns to get to the same heading.

By the way, try flying Aloha Airlines' First Class service sometime! Yes, they have such service for interisland flights. I took it to Kauai and back 4 years ago. The climb-out on the Kauai flights is similar to Maui's, but since you're headed west, if you're lucky enough to be on the right side of the 737 you'll see a superb view of Pearl Harbor.

LOL, you forgot to mention

LOL, you forgot to mention how sometimes the Maui approach takes you almost directly over the sugar cane plantation smokestack. What a rush that was! That's a real tricky landing because the airport is basically located in a wind tunnel. And many days their average wind speeds are 20 to 30 knots.

Aloha airlines still operate stage 2 aircraft ; turbojet engines

 The only planes you hear in Waikiki are the 40 year old Aloha 737 turbojet planes. The only airports (stage 2) in the USA  where these old noisy aircraft operate.

Maui landings are  an adventure to say the least.  It's really great when it's so windy the planes don't touch down till 1/2 way down the runway, 3,500 feet to stop, eek

 

 

Entitlement over infrastructure every SINGLE time.

 

There is an outfit called

There is an outfit called "Just Planes" that used to market a DVD showing landings and takeoffs at Maui and also at HNL. It's now out of print, but you may find a copy on eBay. Such videos fell out of favor after 9/11, of course, but the old ones are still floating around.

At least from watching the DVD, the Aloha pilots seem to be much better at landing at OGG than their Hawaiian and (mainland airline) counterparts.

As for me, give me that landing approach at Lihue on Kauai anytime. Wonderful scenery...