Global Warming Skepticism Grows as MSM Finally Notes Climatologist's 'Inconvenient' Findings

  • Bookmark and Share

Mark down the week of September 20, 2009 as the period when global warming skepticism kicked into high gear. Yes, there had been a lot of skepticism earlier but this was the week when doubt about the "inevitability" of global warming broke into the mainstream media in a significant way.

In the not so humble opinion of your humble correspondent it began last Sunday when I took the American MSM to task here in NewsBusters for failing to report on the observation by a noted climatologist, Professor Mojib Latif, of Germany's Leibniz Institute, that the planet is in for a cooling period that could last from 10 to 20 years. The very next day, by an amazing "coincidence," the findings of Professor Latif were reported by Andrew Revkin of the New York Times. Although Revkin couldn't quite bring himself to renounce the global warming faith in which he invested a couple of decades of his life, the mere mention of Latif's findings caused him to be charged with heresy from the usual leftwing suspects including the Daily Kos. Here are a couple of  examples of Kossack invective  hurled at Revkin for daring to question in even a small way the sacred global warming dogma:

Story Continues Below Ad ↓

The lede of Revkin's article is shocking. It's wrong. And, given the UN meeting this week on climate change such nonsense should not have been published by the Times for the policy makers to read.

 another inexcusable blunder from the NYT. 

Unfortunately for the Kossacks and the rest of the left, the cat is now out of the bag about Professor Latif's findings. Kyle Wingfield of the Atlanta Journal-Constitution noted yesterday that the Facts are cooling off global alarmism:

Global temperatures have held steady for several years, contrary to the expectations of statistical models. This month, a leading German user of these climate models predicted temperatures would fall for “one or two decades” to come.

Why the reprieve? The German, Mojib Latif, cited changing currents in the northern Atlantic Ocean. He even went a step further, saying the currents were also responsible for an unknown portion of the warming in the late 20th century.

...The German seriously undercut the idea that global warming will continue unabated as long as emissions of carbon dioxide rise, a cherished claim of climate alarmists. Nature, he acknowledged, can overwhelm or amplify whatever heating effect CO2 has. We’re still learning how.

Sean Hannity also weighed in this week on the impact of Professor Latif on the global warming debate:

The Meltdown segment is brought to you by prominent meteorologist Mojib Latif. Latif is an author of the reports produced by the U.N.'s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, which liberals cite reverently to prove all sorts of theories about global warming.

Latif now predicts that we're in for a long period of steady temperatures and maybe even some global cooling. At a U.N. conference last week, he told over 1,500 scientists, "The strong warming effect that we experienced during the last decades will be interrupted. Temperatures will be more or less steady for some years and thereafter will pick up again and continue to warm."

Now that the expert has spoken, I wonder if the global warming alarmists will change their tune?

Finally, James Delingpole of the UK Telegraph gives such credit to Professor Latif that he thinks that the global warming alarmists might not be able to recover from his observations:

...the science has turned viciously against the warmists. Not that it wasn’t against them before.  But they have their work seriously cut out if they’re ever going to recover from the speech given at the UN world climate conference in Geneva last week by Professor Mojib Latif of Germany’s Leibniz institute.

At the very least let us hope, as the walls of the global warming dogma begin to crumble, that the ManBearPig believers quit making the absurd claim that the scientific community is unanimous in supporting the notion that the planet is heating up to dangerous levels. Are you listening, Al Gore?

—P.J. Gladnick is a freelance writer and creator of the DUmmie FUnnies blog.


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

When can we expect them to

When can we expect them to excoriate Algore and the other Global-liars? Sometime after Hell freezes over, I guess....

Al Gore should be charged

Al Gore should be charged and prosocuted with Fraud. It seems pretty Inconvenient that he has made MILLIONS of dollars by selling worthless Carbon Credits. It is the perfect SCAM with millions of willing participants.

It's all about huge new

It's all about huge new taxes and controlling people.

The left won't go quitely.

Throwing Darts

It's amazing how these climate modelers all of a sudden seem to recognize the significance of ocean circulation patterns now that the world is cooling but they didn't seem to notice their effect when the world was warming. None of the 23 models used by the IPCC showed and stall in warming. Then 2 years ago Latif said that global temperatures "may not increase over the next decade". Now he is saying that global temperatures will actually cool for "one or two decades". The one science they no for sure is the science of covering your butt.

"Nature, he acknowledged,

"Nature, he acknowledged, can overwhelm or amplify whatever heating effect CO2 has. We’re still learning how."

But...but...but...weren't we told - "the science is in!"?

 

Skeptics Unite!

Yes skepticism is on the rise. I had a very interesting conversation a while ago in my doctor’s waiting room. I was seated next to a young man and we struck up a conversation. I learned he was a college student and he wanted to major in environmental studies. Of course this led to him mentioning global warming. I told him I was a skeptic and I didn’t think humans were causing global warming. The student seemed truly shocked and told me I was the first person he had met who was a skeptic. This caused an uproar in the waiting room as most of the people who had been sitting there chimed in and said they were skeptics as well. The most common comment seemed to be, have you noticed how cold its been lately? I just laughed and said you really need to get off campus more often.

 

I wouldn't recommend sex, drugs or insanity for everyone, but they've always worked for me. - Hunter S. Thompson

He said in his own statement

The Proffesor said in his own statement:"Nature, he acknowledged, can overwhelm or amplify whatever heating effect CO2 has. We’re still learning how."

In that statement we see the problem and the solution. He admits that Nature plays a bigger part and it is not understood. This is the real crux of the matter. The Global Warming Alarmists seem to think they know how it all works when anyone with any common sense knows that they don't. We are only beginning to understand some of the mechanisms that drive our weather and eventually our climate. It is pure Hubris to think that you can understand the climate system and how one trace gas can cause all the predicted disastors that have yet to come to true, anywhere.

 

Sorry, this is tangential...

...but wasn't there a big splash the other day about China committing to planting trees in an area the size of Norway?

Nothing like fostering the growth of all those pollution-gas-generating gizmos, eh? Or is there no fuss because they're organic?

Anyway, I'm sure the global warming crowd is not going to stop their efforts. We'll be fighting them till the next ice age.

Despite our differences, I do find it possible to cope with them when I acknowledge that they are handicapped - or should I say, "factually challenged."

Can't help myself

It has been reported that wind velocities are declining making Wind Power less useable. One of the possible causes is the increase in the numbers of trees. Trees add resistance to winds. The solution is also the problem. I can't help but laugh.

Quote says it all.

The lede of Revkin's article is shocking. It's wrong.
And, given the UN meeting this week on climate change such nonsense
should not have been published by the Times for the policy makers to
read.

This quote says it all. The NYT is expected to inform policy makers, as such it must not contain any facts that disagree with a leftist agenda. 

The old print media realy does need to die. If the NYT were really concerend about global warming wouldn't they stop print immediately to save trees?

Funny

In case you missed it. A reported was tossed out for asking a tough but embarassing question.

Video here.

Thought you might enjoy.

HAHAHAHAHA. HEHEHE. I didn’t even know about it. Um. So, you’ve got me at a loss. I don’t know. (Charles Gibson of the dead media.)

Thats great Dan

We need more of them, thanks

 

My Gov. thinks I am dangerous, so be careful

"Television is a freak show" Bernie Goldberg

Sunspots are back, whip out the hockey stick

Sun is never mentioned by the Solar energy dieners.

No hurricanes on earth at the moment.

Ice ages, are very dry, and dusty..

Less heat to rise, so less wind blowing around.

Drill here now

The oil industry has been on a hot streak this year, thanks to a
series of major discoveries that have rekindled a sense of excitement
across the petroleum sector, despite falling prices and a tough economy.



These discoveries, spanning
five continents, are the result of hefty investments that began earlier
in the decade when oil prices rose, and of new technologies that allow
explorers to drill at greater depths and break tougher rocks.

 

 

State controlled health care is Tort Reform.

...

You know what this means.

Obviously, Mother Nature is a global warming denier.  Didn't anyone mention to her that the science is settled?

-Ghostbuster