Susan Estrich Writes Surprisingly Frank Remembrance of Ted Kennedy

  • Bookmark and Share

Susan Estrich worked for a number of years on the staff of Senator Ted Kennedy. Of course, she has some warm memories about working for him. However, in contrast to the almost uncritical lionization of Kennedy by such outlets as the Associated Press and the Los Angeles Times as well as by Evan Thomas of Newsweek, Estrich was able to look at her former boss, warts and all,  in a surprisingly frank remembrance in her column. She did not attempt to bury his faults as you can see in this critique of his speaking style:

The first time I wrote "talking points" for him, for a floor statement on something 30 years ago next week, I hid in the back of the Senate gallery as he mumbled his way through it, adding "uhs" instead of verbs. I saw what America did in November of that year, in that famous Roger Mudd interview, which sounded like my floor speech.

Story Continues Below Ad ↓

Estrich was also critical of Kennedy's to absorb information:

He was not what you would call a great "student," the way Mike Dukakis was and Hillary Clinton is, someone who could consume information, demand more, the smartest kid in the class who actually enjoys reading policy tomes. He enjoyed wine, women and song until he met and married the woman he loved.

I learned to write short memos working for the Senator. Say it in a page, now-Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer used to say to me when we were putting things in the briefcase that the Senator took home every night of his life, as far as I know.

As to Kennedy's greatest flaw in his career, Estrich also dealt with that:

I've been to the bridge at Chappaquiddick. He was flawed. He knew that. The world knew that. Whether you forgive him or not doesn't matter anymore.

...People made fun of him when he became a senator. He gave them ammunition. Both of his brothers died. He was responsible for the death of Mary Jo Kopechne, and then he failed to alert authorities and take responsibility.

Although Estrich overlooked Kennedy's vicious assault on Robert Bork which came to be known as "borking," her column contrasts with the mostly uncritical lionization of Kennedy in the media. Of course, Estrich also has fond memories of her former boss:

Most of the people who had worked on the campaign drifted away. He was never going to be president.

He worked.

Rock stars generally don't last in the Senate, starting with John Kennedy. Too much work, too slow, too little juice. Getting something accomplished takes a remarkable amount of tedious work. Rock stars who become senators either run for something else or retire on the job. They certainly don't make a mark.

The Senator took a few of us out sailing with his mother in the summer of 1980, before the convention. He introduced me to her. She looked right through me, absolutely uninterested in whether I was the first woman whatever, and treated him like he was about 13 years old.

He shook his head, and we went back to talking about what he cared about. We were fighting to put a plank favoring national health insurance on the Democratic platform.

However, in case you think Estrich is one of those currently urging the passage of the ObamaCare bill in Congress as some sort of tribute to Ted Kennedy, you can count her not among their ranks. Here is what Estrich wrote recently about the proposed health care bill:

The idea that somehow you're going to tax the "rich" enough to pay for quality health care for every American who doesn't have it, can't afford it or stands to lose it, not to mention for all of the undocumented aliens who receive it for free now and presumably will continue to in Obama health land, is almost laughable. It's one of those things candidates say in campaigns, ignoring the fact that it doesn't add up. But in a bill that might pass? Add a 5 percent surtax on every small business in the country that makes $250,000 or more? This is going to create jobs? What am I missing? 

—P.J. Gladnick is a freelance writer and creator of the DUmmie FUnnies blog.


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Wow

Susan has surprised me on more than one occasion .I may disagree with her a lot but she does have principles. That was pretty frank on TK.

Can't say her principles are

Can't say her principles are too sound or strong if she still worked for him after acknowledging his utter moral failure at Chappaquiddick.

G.May

Didnt think about that.You have a point.

Susan Estrich

Estrich has always been A-OK in my book once I accept she works for the other side.  The slam she gave the LA Times, when she worked for the LA Times, IN A COLUMN in the LA Times, when they used last minute dirty tactics against Arnold, was very memorable.  As I recall, it was a flimsy Anita Hill type charge and as Susan pointed out in her "Have you no shame, LA Times?" column, she is a former rape victim and has every right to use that card when she speaks.

Susan Estrich

I have to admire Susan Estrich and Camille Paglia.. As liberals at least they think outside of their own mind and will tell it as they see it...

The good liberals

Conservatives don't mind a fair fight with liberals. There are plenty of liberals we respect, and not just because we think they'll cave. If a liberal presents an honest argument and fights for the details, we respect that.

It's funny, though, that she's basically saying the same things about Teddy that they used to say about Reagan, but they used it against Reagan to accuse him of stupidity. "Keep it to a page" is exactly what they laughed about with Reagan. Maybe, just maybe, Ronnie and Teddy were the smart ones.

Susan is one of those

Susan is one of those liberals who starts noticing that her "friends" aren't as numerous as they used to be and she's starting to like Country music and watch NASCAR. Any day now she'll be applying for a gun permit. Welcome Susan. Welcome to the sunny side of the street.

I apologize for all the bad things I screamed at my...

TV set when Susan Estrich was a guest on Fox.  Jim Webster

Re Estrich

Yes, Estrich is capable of moments of intellectual honesty and for that reason we should give her thoughts on any topic a little more weight and consideration than we do with a typical liberal. There has to be a payoff for folks like Estrich, otherwise no liberal will stick their neck out as she does.

Others that do the same are Kirsten Powers, Juan Williams, sometimes even Bob Beckel and Lanny Davis. They are the rare liberals.

slick

I would add Pat Cadell to that list.Anyone that is hated by Underground Dummies is ok in my book.I used to respect Kirsten but she really has been drinking the Kool Aid lately.

I like Susan...

I'm one who likes Susan Estrich and listens to her opinions even though I know I'll disagree with her much of the time.  I think it comes down to the fact that she's rational--willing to give as well as take, and not make it personal in the process.  She'll champion her side but is not afraid to call out her side when they're wrong or when she thinks their tactics (such as with the health care debate) are off-base.  She doesn't scream at you or try to shout you down, she wants to have a good, honest discussion, and when the dicussion is over there are no hard feelings.  Good on her.

"The words of a President have an enormous weight and ought not to be used indiscriminately." - Calvin Coolidge

RIP MJK

you go, girl.