WOO! HOO!
Your humble correspondent has just beaten Ruslan Chagaev in the ring to become the World Heavyweight Champion! Okay, so maybe Chagaev wasn't even in the ring with me because I was only shadow boxing. However, I can count on Peter Nicholas of the Los Angles Times to report my victory despite my lack of an opponent in the ring.
That is pretty much how Nicholas reported the "victory" by Linda Douglass in his story, White House rebuts Drudge Report link. Instead of the non-existent Chagaev in the ring, there were the missing Drudge videos which appear neither via link nor quote in the Nicholas story. In fact if you watch the Linda Douglass video on the White House blog, she never once shows the videos from the Drudge Report. Instead that White House page shows recent videos of President Obama proclaiming himself to be in favor of allowing people to keep their private health insurance. Of course, no link from either Linda Douglass nor Peter Nicholas to the actual Drudge videos or what was said in them.
Here is Nicholas' glowing report on how the White House "rebuts" the Drudge Report link videos which they never show:
Reporting from Washington -- In another display of adapting campaign tactics to governing, the White House posted a video on its official website Tuesday to rebut accusations that President Obama's healthcare proposals would do away with private health insurance.
The video shows White House spokeswoman Linda Douglass sitting in front of a computer monitor displaying the Drudge Report website.
Douglass points to a link featured by Drudge and proceeds to discount it, assuring viewers that patients who are satisfied with their private health coverage would be able to keep it.
Yeah, Linda "discounts" Drudge by neither presenting the videos nor quoting from them. All she did was present what Obama has recently stated for political purposes about private health insurance:
Looking into the camera, Douglass says: "The people who always try to scare people whenever you try to bring them health insurance reform are at it again. And they're taking sentences and phrases out of context and cobbling them together to leave a very false impression."
It's unusual for the White House to give such prominence to a conservative-leaning website -- one Democrats often deride. But in the battle to pass a healthcare bill, the administration has concluded that accusations cannot go unanswered and that campaign-style tools and technology are needed to prevail. The Obama political operation has enlisted its array of campaign supporters to press the president's policy goals.
Introducing herself in the three-minute video, Douglass says part of her job is to "keep track of all the disinformation that's out there about health insurance reform." Because the president has talked so much about healthcare, Douglass says, he is at risk of having his words distorted by people with "a computer and a lot of free time" who might "take a phrase here and there, they simply cherry pick and put it together and make it sound like he's saying something that he didn't really say."
You mean Obama never said what he said in this video? Here is what he supposedly never said:
I don't think we're going to be able to eliminate employer coverage immediately. There's going to be potentially some transition process...
And here is what Obama said with greater specificity about his support for single payer in a 2003 speech to the AFL-CIO in another uncut, not cherry-picked, video which was left on both the Linda Douglass and Peter Nicholas cutting room floor:
I happen to be a proponent of a single payer universal health care program. I see no reason why the United States of America, the wealthiest country in the history of the world, spending 14 percent of its Gross National Product on health care cannot provide basic health insurance to everybody. And that’s what Jim is talking about when he says everybody in, nobody out. A single payer health care plan, a universal health care plan. And that’s what I’d like to see. But as all of you know, we may not get there immediately. Because first we have to take back the White House, we have to take back the Senate, and we have to take back the House.
Somehow Nicholas couldn't be bothered to report on what was actually said in these two videos in question although he was able to fit in a quote from a certain somebody trying to worm his way back into favor at the White House again:
Scott McClellan, another Bush press secretary who later broke with the administration, wrote in an e-mail: "The Obama team cannot afford to let such charges go unanswered when they are given such prominent play on a prominent conservative website and then, in this day and age, spread around the Internet with the click of a keypad. By posting the video response, the White House arms its countless Web-savvy supporters so they can flood the Internet with it."
Beam me up, Scotty. How do you answer charges when you simply ignore the facts presented in them? Only by pretending that what your lyin' eyes saw didn't happen. And both Douglass and Nicholas conveniently dropped those videos linked from the Drudge Report down the memory hole.
Barack Obama is not for single payer. He has never been for single payer.
We are at war with Eastasia. We have always been at war with Eastasia.
—P.J. Gladnick is a freelance writer and creator of the DUmmie FUnnies blog.



















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
lying linda
August 5, 2009 - 10:03 ET by east tennessee johnAnd he finally admitted, 2+2=5. Who's trying to scare who you BO shill?
"Reset" Czar needed?
August 5, 2009 - 10:03 ET by metaphorsbwithuPres. Obama needs to appoint a "Reset Czar" empowered to scrub and erase from the public record every comment, statement, promise, and opinion of the president that contradicts his current positions on any given issues.
Said czar should apply an appropriate expiration date to all current statements as well ... to guide "shoppers" in their awareness of their expected shelf life.
metaphorsbwithu
They need to get George
August 5, 2009 - 10:22 ET by motherbeltThey need to get George Stephanopolous out there with his famous "That explanation is no longer operable."
They are so blind and stupid that they don't even realize that the fact that what he is saying what now doesn't jibe with his previous stated position is the whole point. they think by repeating what he said a week ago, that settles it.
So, Ms. Douglass, as the trial lawyer would say: Was he lying then, or is he lying now?
If he was lying then, he sold himself as something he wasn't to get elected. If he's lying now, he's decieving the public as to what he intends.
Neither picture is pretty.
It's media malpractice, MB
August 5, 2009 - 10:31 ET by metaphorsbwithuPrecisely!
When your mission is to protect, obfuscate, aid, and abet the obvious is not in your field of vision.
metaphorsbwithu
You Tube
August 5, 2009 - 10:09 ET by iveseenitallAh, the age of the internet. Now you can ask yourself, " Do I believe what they are saying, or do I believe my own eyes and ears".---- Barry Soetoro is a LIAR! ( as well as an incompetent, immature, narcissistic manchild ).
NEVER,NEVER trust a "liberal"
So...What's the big deal?
August 5, 2009 - 10:04 ET by c5thenObama was obviously against private insurance before he was for private insurance. Don't like Obama's stance on a particular issue? Wait a few days.
Maybe he can - a la the joker - just socialize the government employees half of the health care insurance market and leave the rest alone? That has to include Congress too. They should all have to go to VA clinics.
Throw 'da bums out!
no incumbent re-elected, with very few exceptions!
www.loyaltoliberty.com
Townhall, Ron Klein, FL NO SHOW
August 5, 2009 - 10:07 ET by BluegillJust returned from a townhall meeting in Lighthouse Point, FL, Ron Klein failed to show up and the seniors are fuming. The placed was packed and one speaker asked if anyone had come in on a bus. No one raised their hand and the print reporter was looking for a response. No TV but I am sure we will see some You Tube of this as well. Wexler Aug. 20, 1 pm Civic Center Delray Beach,my actual representative.
Seniors
August 5, 2009 - 10:23 ET by iveseenitallAll those seniors in Florida who supported Barry and the Dems are getting it back big time. Yet so many of them still refuse to open their eyes. How many Jews supported or ignored Hitler in the 30's and lived (or didn't) to regret it. Unfortunately, Barry and his pals know that P.T.Barnum's words are still true today--"There's a sucker born every minute". Sad.
NEVER,NEVER trust a "liberal"
We have a senior friend who
August 5, 2009 - 10:27 ET by motherbeltWe have a senior friend who recently sent all his email buddies a copy of the letter he wrote to AARP, excoriating them for their support of this bill in contradiction to the best interest of their members, resigning his membership, and demanding that they stop sending him anything. He had been a member for 25 years!
I don't know why the AARP would support this; what benefit do they expect to reap from these new laws?
Townhall, Seniors
August 5, 2009 - 10:35 ET by BluegillI was surprised how much the seniors knew about this bill. A retired Doctor spoke about AARP, he cancelled his membership and went to the AARP office while in DC to complain that they are NOT representing their members.
I let my membership lapse a
August 5, 2009 - 17:24 ET by danboI let my membership lapse a long time ago. No way in ---- , I'm going to rejoin with the present behavior.
Limited Disclosure: I used to belong to the Sierra Club untill they went crazier. Worse of all, I was bribed by Exxon with free New Orleans Saints glasses with fill ups in the 70's.
AARP leadership
August 5, 2009 - 10:38 ET by metaphorsbwithuThe progressives and left-wingers are everywhere, Motherbelt, even in organizations like AARP which has always been extremely liberal.
metaphorsbwithu
AARP
August 5, 2009 - 10:47 ET by iveseenitallBack in the 80's a fabulous radio guy in N.Y. ( Bob Grant) would excoriate the AARP every chance he got. He said they were a socialist, communist organization. Of course, all he got for telling the truth was to be ignored or excoriated himself. It takes people quite a long time to wake up. And most times it's too late. It's the old story of Pinocchio -- lure you in with all the "goodies", then they've got you. Sad.
NEVER,NEVER trust a "liberal"
Years ago my dear departed mother...
August 6, 2009 - 00:29 ET by jawebster1belonged to AARP. I looked through their magazine in our home when I came home from college. I told her, "Mom, this AARP is a Liberal outfit. You don't want to belong in their membership!" I don't think she listened to me but now that I have become AARP age myself, I have followed my own advice. I do not, nor will I ever belong to AARP. Jim Webster
PJ - exposing censorship...
August 5, 2009 - 11:09 ET by Gary Hallstraight and simple. Well done. (;~> gary
PS - Scott McCellan - They never miss a chance to play an incompetent turncoat, like McCellan, if it helps MSM's agenda. Conversly, the MSM will seldom allow a turncoat from the other side of the isle to present any view.
I'm thinking here - what if (OK, Dan Rather) had come up with an old tape of a then Gov. George Bush, joking around that they should take back the white house, get even with Saddam and do it for the oil? Any questions as to whether or not every person on the face of the earth would see the video hundreds of times - complements of the likes of the LA Times, etc.?
Bill made me laff on this
August 5, 2009 - 11:13 ET by StarAZO'Reilly covered this White House site and then said..."He just said it, he's for single payer" or words to that effect. Hard to derail a true statement.
Speaking of insurance
August 5, 2009 - 11:18 ET by StarAZhttp://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970203674704574330354250207192.html
Will the above be eliminated under the "reform"? Actually, this could be good for self-rationing--which, along with doctor-guided rationing, goes on everyday.
Will the above be
August 5, 2009 - 14:50 ET by stratmanNo and it will be more onerous. One example in the current legislation is Government will have access to your account for instant transfers of funds at point of service. Another example is that Government will have access to everyone's financials to determine ability to pay. Another example is that the IRS will require a separate yearly form concerning healthcare insurance - you will have to prove you have insurance - and they can make your life just as miserable as they do for taxes if they don't like something. More examples available, but you hopefully get the picture.
Not necessarily. Everyone will be forced to either have "approved" coverage or will have to pay 2.5% of income up to the amount of Government Public Policy cost. That's even if you don't want any insurance, so I imagine most who would have no insurance will take the Public Plan because they will be forced to pay for it anyways.
Agreed. Point of service payment is an ANCIENT business practice in Medicine. It is "new" to those primarily younger than Medicare age.
What does this mean?
That's okay, P.J.
August 5, 2009 - 13:53 ET by R D HelmI sent them links to all the related videos, multiple times, just like I sent to the WH yesterday.
I am sure many thousands of others did, too, so they can't claim ignorance.
Er, well, okay, they can't claim they didn't get them.
-Dave
There was another president
August 5, 2009 - 17:21 ET by danboThere was another president who tried to brush asside a report of a "conservative-leaning website".
It didn't work for him either.
History repeats itself.
BTW I'm not sure that Drudge is a " conservative-leaning website". I hope he is; but, I'm but not sure. I think he just reports what others sit on.
I guess if democRATS don't like someone. They're automatically conservative. Which is why they like RINO's.
Limited Disclosure: I used to belong to the Sierra Club untill they went crazier. Worse of all, I was bribed by Exxon with free New Orleans Saints glasses with fill ups in the 70's.
Memo for the LA Times:
August 5, 2009 - 21:57 ET by needleRelease the video tape of 2003 banquet in honor of Rashid Khalidi so we can discuss that.
- Relying upon the State Run Media for your information is like relying upon an embezzler to manage your portfolio.
Times Are Changing Fast For Obama
August 5, 2009 - 22:18 ET by rammingspeedI'm glad the L.A. Times writers ignored the video links. It's one more chink in the mainstream media chain. People everywhere have seen or are aware of Obama's statements about single payer health care, and the Times is lying for him. It's out in the open. It's unbelievable chutzpah, but it's here. The Democrats think they're a repeat of the Bolsheviks from 1917 on. They ain't.
This proves beyond a shadow of a doubt...
August 6, 2009 - 00:19 ET by jawebster1how deceitful the Dims are. Linda Douglass sounds so reasonable in her denounciation of the nasty Republicans and then you learn she leaves out the video proving their point. I will never believe anything this woman has to say...ever!!! Jim Webster
→ Got that right Jim
August 6, 2009 - 00:30 ET by Cool ArrowCan you imagine the fealty oath these people take just to be a jerk in Obama's inner circle?
The "Order of the Inner Circle Jerks" oath includes a vow promising to sell your children and grandchildren into slavery.
LYDSEXICS UNTIE!