WaPo Writer: Caroline Kennedy Appointment as Senator Would Fulfill 'Fairy Tale' Dream

  • Bookmark and Share

With all the attention being focused on the Rod Blagojevich scandal involving the attempted selling of the U.S. senate seat vacancy by the Illinois governor, another senate vacancy seems to have been almost forgotten. That is the New York senate seat to be left vacant by Hillary Clinton who will soon become the Secretary of State.

So who should New York governor David Paterson appoint to that senate seat? Washington Post writer Ruth Marcus provides excellent reasons why it shouldn't be Caroline Kennedy but then, absurdly, decides she needs to become a senator so as to fulfill the "girly" dream of Ms Marcus to make possible the "modern fairy tale to have the little princess grow up to be a senator." I kid you not. First Marcus explains how her head says "no" but her heart says "yes" in her article about the possible appointment of Caroline Kennedy to the senate (emphasis mine):

On the question of Caroline Kennedy for Senate, my head says no, on balance. My heart says yes! Yes! Right now, as you might guess from the hedging on the former and the exclamation points on the latter, my heart is winning.

Story Continues Below Ad ↓

And now Marcus lays out some really good reasons why Caroline Kennedy should not become a senator. But don't worry, her silly little heart still holds the ace card:

As to the head: I always find it a bit creepy when children follow the career paths of their parents. It bespeaks a certain undue eagerness to please, not to mention a decided lack of imagination. In particular, even though politics as family business has a lengthy pedigree in American history, I recoil from political dynasties.

For one, dynasties tend to illustrate the phenomenon of reversion to the mean: It's rare that the second generation outperforms the first. The Kennedy family itself offers a good illustration of this trend -- although Caroline Kennedy, to judge from her impressive résumé, could prove the exception.

More unsettling, political dynasties are fundamentally un-American. This is not -- or is not supposed to be -- a country in which political power is an inherited commodity. The notion that Caroline Kennedy could simply ring up the governor and announce, or even politely suggest, her availability grates against the meritocratic ideal. After all, even the children of politicians generally take the time to climb the usual rungs rather than parachute into top jobs.

From this temporary height of rationality, Marcus suddenly takes a flying leap into the depths of the strictly emotional:

What really draws me to the notion of Caroline as senator, though, is the modern-fairy-tale quality of it all. Like many women my age -- I'm a few months younger than she -- Caroline has always been part of my consciousness: The lucky little girl with a pony and an impossibly handsome father. The stoic little girl holding her mother's hand at her father's funeral. The sheltered girl, whisked away from a still-grieving country by a mother trying to shield her from prying eyes.

In this fairy tale, Caroline is our tragic national princess. She is not locked away in a tower but chooses, for the most part, to closet herself there. Her mother dies, too young. Her impossibly handsome brother crashes his plane, killing himself, his wife and his sister-in-law. She is the last survivor of her immediate family; she reveals herself only in the measured doses of a person who has always been, will always be, in the public eye.

Then, deciding that Obama is the first candidate with the inspirational appeal of her father, she chooses to abandon her previous, above-it-all detachment from the hurly-burly of politics.

I know it's an emotional -- dare I say "girly"? -- reaction. But what a fitting coda to this modern fairy tale to have the little princess grow up to be a senator.

Sheesh! Could someone out there satisfy Ruth's "girly" heart by sending her a DVD of "Camelot?"

It's true! It's true! The crown has made it clear.
The climate must be perfect all the year.

A law was made a distant moon ago here:
July and August cannot be too hot.
And there's a legal limit to the snow here
In Camelot.

The winter is forbidden till December
And exits March the second on the dot.
By order, summer lingers through September
In Camelot.

Camelot! Camelot!
I know it sounds a bit bizarre,
But in Camelot, Camelot
That's how conditions are.
The rain may never fall till after sundown.
By eight, the morning fog must disappear.
In short, there's simply not
A more congenial spot
For happily-ever-aftering than here
In Camelot.

—P.J. Gladnick is a freelance writer and creator of the DUmmie FUnnies blog.


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Oh, for crying out

Oh, for crying out loud!!

Where on earth does Marcus get the idea that it is the dream of Americans to be governed by Kennedys?

And who made her the arbiter of what is "fitting"?  This isn't England.  No one gets a title or an office as a right of inheritance.

Sheesh!  Ruthie, get a grip!!

 

So true

If this was me I would have changed my name long ago and tried to distance myself from the: Drug using, Drunk raping, Friend murdering, Always adultry seeking Kennedy name.  But that's just me.  I guess some people like those things if they help keep abortion legal,

If brain power

Were the requirement, we wouldn't have an environemetal hysteric as President.

So why not, we are living a sitcom anyway.

Palin Not Qualified Kennedy Is

Can anyone explain the liberal calculus that lets New Yorker's believe Sarah Palin is not qualified for vice-President, but Caroline Kennedy is qualified to be a US Senator from New York?

Its the D

Kennedy (D-NY) vs Palin (R-AK) to completely overstate the obvious...

Have kids books and movies

Have kids books and movies changed since I was a lad?  Usually the princess finds prince charming and lives happily ever after...not turn into a Senator (which wouldn't be that great of an ending). 

www.theholyrosary.org

"There is no problem, I tell you, no matter how difficult it is, that we can not resolve by the prayer of the Holy Rosary." -Sister Lucia

What about Babs?

This situation is seeming more like Monty Python's Camelot instead of the one noted above. Caroline Kennedy? Fran Drescher? Please!!! Why not just totally give in to celebrity wackiness and appoint Barbara Streisand? 

Barbara Streisand

She's not a New York State resident. Nuts.

But Alec Baldwin is. Maybe he can be persuaded.

not again...

That's just the silliest bunch of nonsense I've ever heard (outside of a Barack Obama speech).

Should we be reminded Jack wasn't all that great in the first place?  I believe he was struggling in his re-election bid, prior to his tragic (I use that word sincerely) death.  I'm just so weary of this constant blathering and bleeting in the msm about "America's Royalty".  The Kennedy's time has come and gone... let it go!

Typical libtard. "I know it

Typical libtard. "I know it would be bad, but it would make me feel so good..."

That's how Obama got elected.

Yes! Right now, as you

Yes! Right now, as you might guess from the hedging on the former and the exclamation points on the latter, my heart is winning.

No, it tells me your brain is dying!!!!!

Oh -- and it's a CAMEL LOT. 

If you can meet with triumph and disaster
And treat those two imposters just the same...
Yours is the earth and all that's in it...

This is just another

This is just another illustration of how Hollywood and Washington are joined at the hip.  Ever since "All the President's Men", Hollywood screenwriters have dreamed of being reporters and reporters have dreamed of being screenwriters.  Through film, many screenwriters have pretended to be reporters...and through editorial, many reporters have pretended to be screenwriters.  Needless to say each has done the other's job poorly (not to mention how badly they've done their own jobs).  As an Irish-American, I am absolutely ashamed to have even the thinnest of connections to the Kennedy mob...but these aspiring screenwriters in the press are simply glued to the "fairy tale" prospect of one of these goons being appointed to the Senate.  Caroline Kennedy would serve the same role for the New York delegation that Barbara Boxer does for the California delegation (or Bob Casey does for the Pennsylvania delegation)...provide a warm body to make partisan votes, and that's it.  Boxer, Casey and Caroline Kennedy have never and will never be entrusted with any actual authority in the Senate, they're intellectual lightweights who happen to occupy safe seats (Caroline temporarily excluded).  The only thing expected of them will be to continually get reelected...and with the one note drones currently voting in those states, they'll do that job just fine.  Seriously, though.  If we in New York are stuck with a Senator Designate based totally on her status as famous for being famous, why doesn't Patterson just pick Ivanka Trump?  At least she's from New York. 

"Government's view of the economy could be summed up in a few short phrases: If it moves, tax it. If it keeps moving, regulate it. And if it stops moving, subsidize it." -Ronald Reagan

fitzfong.blogspot.com

National Princess?

In this fairy tale, Caroline is our tragic national princess.

That national princess thingy didn't work out so well for Britain, did it?   They now have Prince Dunce & the Bag.  Of course, so do we...Billary.

 

I don't understand...

I am by no means a Kennedy scholar -JFK was assassinated nearly 3 years before I was born- but I'm wondering why the lasting obsession with the guy and his family. Other than the unabashed worship of celebrities (many of whom were the kids tormented in high school for being in the drama club, and thereby "uncool"), what exactly do so many media-types find fascinating about them? JFK was the first catholic president, which by any measure would draw staunch opposition by the media if it was happening in 2008. He was a womanizer, as was his brother Bobby; I would think that wouldn't be celebrated in this day in age (unless your name is Jon Favreau and can write speeches without the 'um' or 'uh' in them.) He nearly bundled the country into nuclear war, and he first put troops in Viet Nam. I know both JFK and RFK are credited with helping to start the civil rights movement, but I believe there is ample evidence that this was with strong reservation, if not completely against their own politcal advice. So, other than two assassinations, what did either of them really accomplish? Labor relations with big unions? Yeah... that worked out really well. And what about Teddy? Name something, anything, that he's done in nearly the 150 years he's been blathering in the Senate that has significantly bettered the country.

So now comes Caroline. Don't know her, don't know about her. But does she have any qualifications for the Senate other than her last name? Then again, we are talking about the Clinton seat...

BKeyser-

I am not a Kennedy scholar either, but I lived in MA during their rise to national prominence. The Kennedy's built an empire quite like the corrupt government structure in the state of Illinois. I remember when JFK was running for president and the crowds in their teens and 20s walking the streets of parts of Boston singing "Camelot" (Of course they picked this up from the MSM  articles and headlines". None of them were truly qualified for their rise to power. Their specialties were whoring and drowning young girls and drinking.

You would have to be there to see the unbridled adulation of the masses. It bothered me so much that when I had the opportunity to leave the state, I did. Hero worship to the extreme. Then Robert with his many years of legal experience (extreme sarcasm here) beame the Attorney General.

In sum, I did not understand the idolatry then, I am even more puzzled that it still exists today, after all the expose's on the kind of people they were and are.

The Kennedy's think they deserve what they want.

Since when have the Kennedy's worked for what they want politically? Caroline is following in her Uncle Bobby's carpetbagging footsteps.

This is but one more time playing on the emotions of those who remember Jack Kennedy's assassination. It's not so dissimilar to white guilt about the blacks. Look how long that's been milked!

As a lifelong resident living in Western New York, I remember when Bobby ran for and became a Senator. Lo and behold, here we are 44 years later. Deja' vu all over again.

Silly lib media--and

Silly lib media--and Caroline--WHY???  What on earth qualifies you to represent people?

Nothing but your name, baby-doll.  Farcical.

 

Liberalism is a convenient lie.

  Come on Carline

 

Come on Carline Kennedy has all Democrat Qualifications to run for high office:

Your grandfather was a bootegger.

Your grandfather was a Nazi Sympathizer.

Your grandfather was an appeaser to tyranny as a diplomat.

Your grandfather rigs a national election by working with Chicago thugs to have the dead vote thus throwing the election to your father.

Your father almost starts world war III.

Your father embarrasses the United States in a half baked attempt to invade Cuba 

Your father is a serial adulterer

Your uncle is a serial adulterer

Your cousin was on trial for rape

Another cousin molested his babysitter

Your uncle with his car kills a woman he had an adulterous affair with.

Your mother takes a bribe from your granfather not to divorce your father because it would damage his political fortunes.

Another cousin is convicted of murder in Connecticut.

Your uncle wiretaps Martin Luther King Jr. (Funny how the libs didn't mind wiretapping then)

 

Yep, the Kennedy's they are America's treasure.

Didn't another

cousin die of a heroin overdose? One of RFK's son's? 

Change: When the winds of change blow hard enough, the most trivial of things can become deadly projectiles. From a Poster

→ That's RACIST!

Fairy Tale?  I remember when Bill Clinton used that same expression and was promptly labeled as a racist.

  • LYDSEXICS UNTIE!

Typical

The Dems nominated (and got elected) a man with little experience, but lots of style points; our soon-to-be Secretary of State has little experience on the world scene, but lots of style points; and, now they're talking about having appointed to the Senate a woman who has little political experience but lots of boffo style points.  Surely, we can now fully see that the modern Democratic Party is all about style over substance, yet they and their willing media sycophants mock Sarah Palin as having not the experience or worldliness necessary to serve as Vice President?  Gotta love the hypocrisy.

And, in light of this whole worship of the Kennedys as their appointed American Royalty and some kind of political dynasty, why do the media ignore or only ridicule the Bush family, who have had three successive generations of the family hold high political office (one Senator and two Presidents)?  I already know the answer but the question is worth asking... 

This Article

was also posted at American Thinker this morning.  I read the summary, got nauseous, but curious, and clicked over to the original full article on WaPo.  If you have the stomach for it, feel free.  But anyway, as of 8:30 a.m., there were 650 comments directly to the article, about 85% mirrored all of yours.  The other 15% were moonbats, still in celebrity worship over a Kennedy. 

Many were very embarassed over reading this childish mush from a full-grown woman, and told her to please be an adult, we aren't playing "My Pretty Pony" here.  I would be so ashamed if I were Ruth Marcus.  Women have worked a long time to be taken seriously in the workplace and the freemarket of ideas.  We've just been taken down a few rungs.    

The liberal experience is based

On Fairy Tales and Pixie Dust. 

Change: When the winds of change blow hard enough, the most trivial of things can become deadly projectiles. From a Poster