Larry King Guests All Conduct Love Fest for Eric Holder Despite Marc Rich Pardon Role


Last night, Larry King had four guests on his show to discuss the nomination of Eric Holder to become Attorney General. Even though Holder's role in the pardon of fugitive Marc Rich by Bill Clinton was highly controversial, not one of the guests had any real problem with that. Somehow Larry King couldn't find a single guest who would offer arguments against the appointment of Eric Holder. To get you up to speed on Holder's role in the Marc Rich pardon, here is an Associated Press story on this subject from last June:

The last time Washington attorney Eric Holder participated in a high-profile vetting, it was for fugitive financier Marc Rich.

The episode in 2001 became the final scandal of the Clinton administration and landed Holder, at the time the No. 2 official at the Justice Department, in the middle of a congressional investigation.

Now Holder, a co-chairman of Barack Obama's campaign, is one of three big names who will lead the search for a potential running mate for the presumed Democratic presidential nominee.

...In the Clinton pardon scandal, Holder was deputy attorney general when his duties intersected with the efforts of Rich's lawyer, Jack Quinn, who had been White House counsel earlier in the Clinton administration.

The entire matter was handled in an unorthodox manner - on a straight line from Rich's lawyer to the White House, with a consulting role for Holder.

Story Continues Below Ad ↓

Later, Holder said he told White House counsel Beth Nolan the day before the pardon was issued that he was "neutral, leaning toward favorable" in regard to the pardon. He said he and Nolan "never had a prolonged conversation about the matter."

To make matters worse, Holder had asked Quinn for his help in becoming attorney general in the event then-Vice President Al Gore won the 2000 election.

Rich did not even qualify for a pardon under Justice Department guidelines, which say no pardons can be requested until five years after completion of a sentence in a criminal case.

Prosecutors on the Rich case testified that no one consulted with them before a recommendation went to the president on the Rich pardon.

Rich has been based in Switzerland since 1983, just before he was indicted in the United States, accused of tax evasion on more than $100 million in income, fraud and participating in illegal oil deals with Iran.

Members of Congress pointed out that Rich's ex-wife, Denise, visited the White House more than a dozen times during Clinton's presidency and contributed an estimated $450,000 to the president's library foundation, $1.1 million to the Democratic Party and at least $109,000 to Hillary Rodham Clinton's bid for the Senate.

"Everything about it seems sleazy," Rep. Christopher Shays, R-Conn., said at the time.

Rep. Henry Waxman, then senior Democrat on the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee and now its chairman, called the Rich pardon an end run around the judicial process.

Okay, so do you get the idea that many had big problems with Holder's role in the Marc Rich pardon? So why did King find it impossible to locate even one such person on his show? Instead, as you can see from the following transcript, none of his guests including Michael Isikoff of Newsweek, Lanny Davis, Jesse Jackson, or David Gergen had any real problems with Eric Holder. Instead of a guest providing some ethical reservations about Holder, the show came close to being a big love fest for him (emphasis mine):

LARRY KING: We start with a panel that includes, in Chicago, Reverend Jesse Jackson, the founder and president of the Rainbow/PUSH Coalition.

In Washington, Lanny Davis, former special counsel to President Clinton. He's known, by the way, Eric Holder for several years.

Also in Washington, Michael Isikoff, the investigative correspondent with "Newsweek" who broke the Eric Holder story today.

And in Boston, our old friend David Gergen, the CNN senior political analyst.

Michael, how did you get this?

MICHAEL ISIKOFF, INVESTIGATIVE CORRESPONDENT, "NEWSWEEK": Well, through reporting, Larry. But, basically, look, I don't think this is a shock to anybody in Washington. Eric Holder has been on the shortest of short lists for attorney general all along. He was deputy attorney general under Janet Reno during the Clinton administration, a former U.S. attorney in the District of Columbia, widely respected in Washington, widely respected within the Justice Department. And he had forged a relationship with Barack Obama, having served as the co-chief of the vice presidential selection process that ended up picking Joe Biden. It was Eric Holder who vetted the candidates for vice president.

KING: All right...

ISIKOFF: So everybody was expecting and looking at Eric Holder to begin with as the obvious choice. There was one question, which I'm sure we will get to. And that was the reservations...

KING: OK...

ISIKOFF: ...that Holder himself had about going through a confirmation process that was going to bring up the Mark Rich pardon. But the Obama people and Holder and his advisers looked at that closely and concluded, especially with the increased Democratic margin in the Senate, that that was not likely to be an obstacle to confirmation.

So because of their numbers, the Democrats can just ram an Eric Holder confirmation through the Senate despite Holder's role in the Rich pardon. 

KING: I'll bring that up with Lanny in a minute.

But, Jesse, as a long time civil rights leader, what does -- how does it feel to have a black attorney general?

REV. JESSE JACKSON, FOUNDER/PRESIDENT, RAINBOW PUSH COALITION: You know, his blackness is really self-evident. What he really is, he has experience in the Department of Justice. He has integrity. He's smart and he's fair.

While he may be concerned that he will be about, say, enforcing, voting rights laws and fair lending laws, coal miners who are trapped without -- without protection in those mines, that's an Eric Holder issue, too. The kind of corporate thievery -- that is an Eric Holder issue, too.

So he brings to this issue a body of experience that makes him fit for the national job.

KING: All right.

Lanny, what about the pardon, the Mark Rich story?

LANNY DAVIS, FRIEND, FORMER ASSOCIATE, ERIC HOLDER: Well, I know, as a matter of fact, that Eric Holder did not have responsibility for that pardon. At the time that he was asked one question, the night before the last day of the Clinton presidency. He gave an answer in the context of knowing that the prime minister of Israel had called the president of the United States to ask for that pardon.

He stepped up to the line at a public hearing and took responsibility for saying I'm neutral to leaning favorable, in the context of knowing about that call from the prime minister of Israel.

But he had nothing do with that pardon. And if that is the only thing that you can hold against a man who is a judge, a prosecutor, a person at the Justice Department, highly respected and one of the nicest people I've known in all my years in this city, then he'll get by without any problems.

And if Larry King had a guest opposed to the Eric Holder nomination for AG, he could have challenged Lanny Davis over his assertion that Holder had "nothing to do with that pardon."

KING: And the Israeli involvement in many things, including Mark Rich -- who I spoke to right after that pardon. He was in Switzerland. He is Orthodox Jew.

David Gergen, is this going to be a problem?

Don't worry about Gergen. He will keep up this love fest atmosphere for Holder as you shall see.

DAVID GERGEN, CNN SENIOR POLITICAL ANALYST, FORMER PRESIDENTIAL ADVISER: I don't think it will be much of a problem, Larry. And I think the point that was made that the Congress being so heavily Democratic is going to really make a difference here in these hearings for everyone. And that is you've got a lot of friendly faces there asking the questions. And it's hard for the Republicans to push an issue when they're not controlling the committee. That's the price you pay when you lose the Senate.

And beyond that, Eric Holder does have this reputation as a very high quality individual. He knows -- he knows Obama, which is very important with an attorney general. They've had a relationship stretching back now some four years. And obviously Obama trusted him or he wouldn't have asked him to be the co-chair of the transition.

But because he's also a -- he knows the Justice Department system so well, he's been trained in it, he's been a prosecutor, he's also not only on the issue of civil rights at home, as Jesse Jackson just suggested, he's also going to be strong on some of these international criminal issues about Guantanamo, about torture, you know, executive orders -- all the kind of questions that go to America's reputation abroad.

The attorney general's office has had an awful lot to do with shaping the culture of the Bush administration on those issues.

KING: Yes.

GERGEN: And Eric Holder will take it in a very different direction.

KING: Michael, we know about the problems that Alberto Gonzales had.

Do you see these as two entirely different people?

ISIKOFF: Oh, they are. I mean, in fact, you couldn't find somebody more different than Alberto Gonzales than Eric Holder. Eric Holder comes out of the Justice Department. He is steeped in the culture of the Justice Department. When he graduated Columbia Law School in 1976, he went into the Justice Department. He served for years in the Public Integrity Section of the criminal division prosecuting -- trying cases against Republicans and Democrats.

He understands and has a feel for how politics isn't -- doesn't play a role in prosecutorial -- decisions. And that's something that the Justice Department, during the last four years, has not fully appreciated.

KING: OK.

ISIKOFF: They didn't understand that culture.

So I think that's a very big difference. And that's one reason why I think he's going to be welcomed by a lot of people at the Justice Department.

Larry, would it have killed you to have just ONE guest on who would have provided a bit of contrast to this Eric Holder love fest atmosphere by questioning Holder's prominent role (sorry Lanny)  in the Marc Rich pardon? 

—P.J. Gladnick is a freelance writer and creator of the DUmmie FUnnies blog.


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

CHANGE

During the campaign the mantra was." Electing McCain would mean another Bush Administration." Now aren't you all glad we elected the CHANGE candidate?"

I guess another Clinton

I guess another Clinton administration is OK....

How's that "change" thing going for ya, Mr. President-elect???

Oh, come on,

Oh, come on, P.J......that's "old news."

That doesn't help my kids to quote Michelle Obama

And as The Obama says (paraphrasing) [Bringing that up is] just more of the old style of politics that the American people are tired of!

Democrat Party Motto (stolen from Florida):  The rules are different here.

Rich Pardon

While the Rich pardon should be explored in hearings it will not derail the nomination.  Holder will persuasively argue that the granting of pardons is a plenary power of the President. He merely provided ministerial functions.

In other words, he will say it was Clinton, not me.  

I think Republicans on the Judiciary Committee should search for an issue with more traction. 

 

He Vas

Only following zee orders of his superior officers.

"...no civilization, no matter how rich, no matter how refined, can long survive once it loses the power to meet force with equal or superior force." - Bernard Knox

His Story and He'll Stick to It

That will be Holder's story and he will stick to it.  I think it will work.  The shenanigans if any were Clintons.

It is worth bringinu up, but it will just not be an effective attack.

Ummm...

WHERE is the CHANGE we saw plastered all over Comrade Obama's podium? Oh right, we're changing back to the Clinton administration!

Boy, Hillary sure got the better deal. She quit in exchange for naming chief of staff, lead counsel, and all the cabinet posts. Can anyone say Eunich instead of Obama?

The messiah actually picks a black person for a cabinet job?

The One's cabinet picks are looking to be about as competent as he himself is.

Fasten your seat belts, folks, because we are in for one hell of a bumpy ride.

-Dave

Did this country just elect Obama/Biden, or was it Soros/Ayers?

wait til they have 60 votes...

then the kind-only words will turn to full orgy and elation. 

 

Welcome Back Joe

That's why the Democrats suddenly changed their mind about Lieberman.   They will find some extra votes for Franken and work hard to turn out Atlantans to crush Chambliss. The Democrats can taste the 60.

It will be a long two years.

"They will find some extra

"They will find some extra votes for Franken"

 And where will they 'find' these extra votes, I wonder?  At the cemetary?

Ooops

Often these lost votes are found in the trunks of the cars of forgetful election supervisors. 

If it is any consolation, if an election supervisor finds some extra Coleman votes, there will be a full criminal investigation. 

Not to worry, that has never

Not to worry, that has never happened.

 Sidenote: They will find no more at the Cemetary, because all of them have cast a Frankin vote already.

The MSM and the democrats

The MSM and the democrats are over their heads in the cesspool taking turns to prop one another to catch a breath.

I know this is going to hurt (and maybe dangerous)

But I do not want any success or competence whatsoever out of this cabinet, or regime (I not using administration any more). I want total ineptitude, incompetence, corruption, tomfoolery, miscues, missteps, scandal, backbiting, contoversy and outright bumbling. I want this regime to be a clown show of the first order and be the laughingstock of the nation and the world. The worse the picks the better. Face it there will not be any bones thrown to our side out of these guys for any reason. All things lefty will be on their table. Their success would be our failure and probable end as a viable entity, if we "reach across the aisle" our hand will be chopped off. I am hoping and looking forward to their failure. 

"...no civilization, no matter how rich, no matter how refined, can long survive once it loses the power to meet force with equal or superior force." - Bernard Knox

bho is saving the best for last!

                    Bill Clinton, Ambassador at large

Al Gore turned down energy czar,

will he be asked to accept the Court Jesters position?

P.J. Larry King, could have had J. Carter on Eric Holder

P.J. Larry King certainly could have invited former President Jimmy Carter on his show. Larry King loves JC's attacks on Republicans.

From a media standpoint - If Obama was a Republican, the following history would be attached to his every move here on the Eric Holder issue. Larry King and Wolf Blitzer would be inviting Carter on their shows to explain to the voting public how disgusting these folks are. The Sunday morning talk shows would spend time ripping the President - elect apart for bringing these people back in, etc. (My bold):

Carter - Rich Pardon 'Disgraceful’ 

The Associated Press

Wednesday, Feb. 21, 2001

AMERICUS, Ga. - Former President Carter said Tuesday that Bill Clinton abused his power and brought disgrace to the White House with his last-minute pardon of fugitive Marc Rich.
 
"I think President Clinton made one of his most serious mistakes in the way he handled the pardon situation the last few hours he was in office," Carter said during a speech at Georgia Southwestern State University.  "A number of them were quite questionable, including about 40 not recommended by the Justice Department."
 
Of the Rich pardon, Carter said: "I don’t think there is any doubt that some of the factors in his pardon were attributable to his large gifts.  In my opinion, that was disgraceful"
 
Clinton has insisted there was nothing wrong with his pardon of Rich, who until then had been wanted by the Justice Department for allegedly evading more than $48 million in taxes, fraud and illegal oil deals with Iran.
 
The pardon is the subject of U. S. congressional hearings and a criminal investigation by federal prosecutors in New York.
 
Carter, who left office in 1981, said he pardoned about 500 people during his four years in the White House, most of those in the first three years, and none during the final weeks of his term.
 
"I never pardoned anyone whose pardon was not recommended to me after a complete investigation by the Justice Department," Carter said.

 

Clinton 2

We are about to experience the second Clinton Administration. Sort of a second coming.(But that's a subject for another day) With the second Clinton administration we of course will experience a repeat of the Clinton economy of the '90's that we've heard so much about.

The Clintonistas

Eight years of Billy boy, et.al. Eight years of ignoring terrorism. 9/11-- Boom! Eight years being protected and fighting those who want to wipe us off the earth. Also eight years of degrading our protector until they could now bring back those who didn't protect us. I guess American "liberals" just love to be kicked in the butt. Probably that self-loathing thing.

BTW,  Did Barry go to the gym today? What is Michelle wearing to the ball? Oh, did you hear what Whoppie said on The View? My goodness. Rosie is back too. WOW!

NEVER,NEVER trust a "liberal"

Obama's recycled cabinet

Obama running a recycled cabinet.  So much for going green when you can't look a Clinton in one eye and all you see is white.  What a dumbaxe.

Orbis non Suffici 

→ Holder loves terrorists

Get used to Obama promoting anarchy for purposes of his Marxist agenda.

In addition to Marc Rich, 16 terrorists were pardoned at the behest of Holder. The Elian Gonzalez deportation also falls at Holder's feet.

In 1999, over the objections of the FBI, the Bureau of Prisons, and
prosecuting attorneys, Holder supported Clinton’s commutation of the
sentences of 16 FALN conspirators. These pardons — of terrorists who
even Holder has conceded had not expressed any remorse — were issued in
the months after al-Qaeda’s 1998 U.S. embassy bombings

  • LYDSEXICS UNTIE!