Hope, change, unity...?

As I predicted, the homosexual activists are raising a ruckus because Proposition 8 in California passed. Similar propositions that ban gay marriage, also passed in Florida and Arizona. Also, Arkansas banned unmarried couples from adopting children. Wherever the issue of homosexual marriage has been put to a vote, it has been defeated. The states where homosexual marriage is legal, is due to courts that have overturned ballot propositions, in opposition to the will of the people. In my opinion, these judges are using convoluted-logic in order to promote a liberal agenda.

There is nothing wrong or discriminatory about encouraging that which is healthy, normal and positive. It is also the obligation of our teachers, political leaders and religious leaders to discourage negative, destructive, amoral behavior. Doing anything less, will lead to the diminishment of our families, communities and our nation as a whole. Encouraging "less than positive behavior", will also adversely affect homosexuals. Homosexuals are also a part of our society, and also benefit from that which keeps our people and nation, free, strong, prosperous and healthy.

 My Views on Homosexuality.

why that 10,000 years of human history of morals should be overwritten by the last few years? What the hell is happening? Sounds like the beginning of a downfall to me. 

"There are two types of people in this country; those who provide freedom and those who enjoy it." MM says...

We talked about this this AM...I wrote an email to the station's news director complaining about the two idiot anchors. It was not only the guy who commented on the "anger on both sides" but before they showed the video, the woman said they would show "what sparked the confrontation" as if the woman had no right to be there, and started it all.

The news director is Steve Minium and his email is SteveM@cbstv2.com

I posted this one the other day where libs stormed the stage at a church service in MI and brought cameras because they hoped to provoke violence

MI pitchfork mob

They also protested outside Saddleback.  

O'reilly pointed out how curious it is that they only protest white churches when the deciding factor came from Black Christians who voted in large numbers (forget but it was 70% or more).  

I regularly threaten to burn down gay bath houses, crash gay parties, and otherwise harrass gay people - all things they've threatened to do to Mormons and Christians.

And not a single celebrity supporter of No on Prop. 8 has condemned the violence.  More than telling, if you ask me.

We all know that a little old lady holding a cross is a huge threat. Liberals are so darned stupid it should be a criminal act.

Soldiers Dissed By Obama Liberals

 Making Fun of AGW http://giovanniworld.wordpress.com/  

This coming from the media that pondered, "Did we favor Obama over McCain too much in this election?"  Hmmm....

These "mea culpas" about the campaign and election race wither when we come upon the media distorting obvious visual facts such as this and preposterously claim that "there is hate on both sides".

We want the truth and nothing but.  However, if wishes were horses, all men would ride. 

Sick, godless bastards.

Obama: A glittering jewel of colossal ignorance. --RL

The little old lady was preaching hate?  How??

There's nothing more attractive than a group of hysterical, over-weight, old queens ganging up on a elderly woman.  Such love!  Such compassion!  They've done so much to advance the gay cause.  Pathetic!

So, I'm a local SoCal resident and on voting day, the day of our lord Obama that is, there was this protest in my own city!

I'm driving one way to a job site and see about 60 people on one side of a 6 lane road/intersection with "yes on 8" signs waving and cheering at traffic while on the direct opposite side at the other corner were about 40 folks waving and cheering for the "no on 8".

About one hour later driving back on the same road I approach that intersection and there are cops and police cars everywhere but it seems that the "no on 8" crowd just couldn't contain themselves and were now on the same side of the street as the "yes" folks and they were intermixed. Cops were man handling several of the ladies and lots of screaming and pushing. What was sad was that there were also a couple dozen of really young children in the crowd getting their first lesson on mob style political protesting.

My only real thought past the disgust I had was...Do these people really think that waving signs or fighting was going to change anyone's vote on that day?

This attack on this woman is deplorable and does *nothing* to aid their case.  However, just because this take is deplorable, it is not justification to just sweep away that the violence *is* indeed on both sides.  

Here's the skinny, flat out.  Marriage as a term, is to describe a union between a man and woman.  I agree.  However, the rights of homosexuals should be *equal* and equally defended when assaulted upon when one attempts to infringe on them as we would defend someone who was straight.

You can say they are the same rights, and sure, its similar, but it harkens to the way they tried to explain segregation in the 50s-60s.  That it was 'for the better good, *technically* everyone is seperate but equal.'  

That my friends, is a steaming load.  Homosexuals, to this day, are barred from adoption in some states and no state I'm aware of protects them from discrimination in attempting to adopt.  That is not equal nor free.

Homosexuals are not give the rights of spouses when it comes to company health care and other tax breaks offered to straight couples.

 Homosexuals are not allowed the same rights as straight couples when it comes to family disclosure and visitation during the time when one spouse is hospitalized.

I agree, the people complaining and whining over the 'term,' PLEASE, get over it, come up with an exclusive term only for homosexuals if it pleases you.

However, we are, nor were we ever, a 'Christian Nation.'  We were a nation of Christians.  The concept of separation of Church and State *clearly* defines that, and lest we not forget...

This nation was created so all had freedom and liberty to pursue happiness and success, and that these freedoms are afforded to all our citizens as all people are created equal.  That includes homosexuals, yet we still like to restrict rights and the strawmen built to counter such rights have all burnt down; all that remains is religion.  

Thats where we reach the impasse.  Marriage is a term of faith and of the church, therefore, it is considered to me part of the private sector, and if one wishes to nit pick in such a way, I totally respect that.  However, this nation is not run by our churches.  You may have your own beliefs, but it is not your place, nor your right to enforce them onto others.  Are homosexuals damned to hell if they live their life?  Perhaps.  Again, not your place to fix it.  If you *are* concerned for them, say your piece, and drop it.

I do think however the actions of some protesters of the bill are horrible and are only harming their case.  However, let's not play stupid and think its ALL them causing crap.  Like they said, its coming from both sides. 

The people should not fear their Government,

The Government should fear the people. 

on the article of the dem peeing on the crowd.....

"Just a tinkling of the things to come."

looked to me that these men were taking their agression out on a mother figure. I wonder if anyone has ever did a study to find out why men turn gay.

I am sure it is just the sex they like anyway.  Before I became a Christian I love to have sex with anyone even men.  it was those men that turned me off to Homosexuality. they became more and more pervertedly aggressive in their form of sex it made me sick.  I had to get away from them.

that poor woman had just as much right to be there as they had.  they should have given her the respect she was showing them.

Time to dust off our constitutional right to impeach judges. I know it would be a Quixotic (?) quest, but the people who voted for the proposition need to put the fire to the feet of their representatives to impeach judges who exceed their constitutional authority. The people need to instigate a power struggle between the legislative and judicial branches in their states. They need to treat the legislators as weak and ineffective and tell the legislators that judges are the ones with the real power. It needs to be a coordinated, deliberate effort. Can you imagine what those power hungry legislators will do if they think they are losing power?

Why hasn't anyone been arrested for this assault?  IT WAS ON TAPE for goodnes sake. I'm sure if someone ripped a giant dildo out of the hands of some gay protester  and then jumped up and down on it, "they" would be reviewing the tape using homeland security to do face recognition to find out who that person was so they could be arrested.

I wonder how "they" would feel if we charged into there house of worship (aka bath houses) with camara's.  I'd wonder if anyone would hide there faces?  At any rate we could probably sell "the tape" back to the porn industry for a profit - kind of telling isnt it?

 Why the 6000 year is historically established natural rights of married couples, an institution who has proved beyond a doubt of it benefit, great purpose and excellence being trampled on by a few hypo sexed gay and lesbian couples.  For over 6000 years  marriage between and man and a woman who have produce millions of human beings, to include the current and next generation of human beings that are presently being attacked by irrationally hypo sexed biologically unproductive same sex activist gay and lesbian couples who are manifesting a complete absurd demand for same sex marriage. 

The measure of anything in human society is done by its benefit or harm done. So what is the benefit of Same Sex Marriage of gay and lesbian couples?  That same sex couples can have a word called marriage attached to sexual activities that does more harm than good.

1. Morally: it is beyond the pale of sanity, orderliness, world religions at large and the findings of cultural anthropology.  Historically social unrest is the primary result of the promotion of morally unacceptable gay and lesbian sexual activity when it becomes common within the boundaries of human cultures.  Religiously, the greater religions of Christianity and Islam show a stern ban on same sex marriages. Judaism however appears to be split in its acceptance.  Many other lesser religions such a Hinduism, Buddhism, and Shintoism appear to be neutral in neither accepting nor rejecting same sex marriages.

2. Scientifically: it sounds impractical, unreasonable, and incoherent. Neither the Biological, Chemical, Medical or Psychological sciences have seen the significant benefits of gay and lesbian marriage.  The principles applied in Biology are that which is sustainable and natural. In the Chemical sciences promotes that which is most beneficial towards human development in technology, medicine and daily life. In the Medical sciences, that which does the least Harm and promotes the most good. Finally in the psychological sciences it promotes that which makes humans most cohesive to providing a behavior that promotes a cohesive social good.

3. Biologically: the behaviors engaged by gay and lesbian couples are not naturally, nor physiologically compatible nor conducive for human productivity and child rearing.  Obviously gay and lesbian married couples cannot among themselves even possible conceive children.  They are not only incapable of the production of children, and they are socially incapable of rearing.  Same sex males cannot nurse children with regular breast milk.  The raising of boys within a lesbian marriage would inhibit the natural development of a non gay male psychologically.  It is difficult for a single mother in a heterosexual marriage on her own to raise boy properly (look at the neglect of boy in single parent non male household.) For example look at the number of records of juveniles who are now ex gang members now serving time in America’s prison system.

4. Medically: gay and lesbian same sex married couples are the cause of an upswing of horrid diseases that are destroying the health and welfare of many humans introducing those disease to children, as a result of the promotion of unhealthy sexual behavior which is tantamount to child abuse.  Furthermore since the testing of human beings on the scale of the excessive harm of Russian psychotherapy, the insane German medical practices in WWII concentration camps, testing how children would develop in such a new form of human development should also be deemed inhuman.  For it is barely proper to use animals for many medical test, are we now going to test babies and children to see if they will develop normally in same sex marriages.  The fact that gay and lesbians same sex marriage would exist would enable those couples to adopt psychologically non-gay/lesbian children and raise them in an environment that would be normally harmful if children were raised in abusive heterosexual marriage couples.

5. Developmentally: gays and lesbians same sex married couples are harmful for the natural physiological and social development of children and adults.  In that gay and lesbian same sex marriage would promote a life style that may be incompatible with the child’s natural sexual orientation.  If the Childs development is abused by the same sex married couple – when would child protective service engage the protection of the child, and would the gay and lesbian married couple be imprisoned for causing harm to the child.  If the number of abused children in same sex marriage were found, and the Child Protection Agency did not protect those children, would the State be open for lawsuits by those children, for allowing the adoptions to occur in the first place.

6. Socially: gay and lesbians same sex married couples do not promote vital relations within the maximums of human social structures, but are isolated because the vast cultural disinterest in gay and lesbian same sex marriage is not tolerated, nor reasonable with the promotion of natural family development.  Since this the fact, legalizing Gay and or Lesbian same sex marriage, will only cause more harm to the cohesive interaction of adults who reside within the limitations of a State. Non cohesive social interaction has already shown it ugly head by the vast amount of gay and lesbian protest marches being launched through out the United States. Observers has seen excessive misdemeanor and even life threatening groups of gay protestors, forcing police action to remove non gay citizens from the protest area.  Stronger opinions, will serve little in the way of social cohesion and law makers who promote the disintegration of social cohesion should be considered responsible for promoting unrest and excessive civil disobedience.  Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger is currently liable for promoting civil unrest, while additionally showing his incapacity of maintaining fiscal balance in the State of California. Such behavior within private organizations demands a removal of such an irresponsible representative.

7. Individually:  gay and lesbian activist do not behave as cohesive adults with the rest of civilization.  Because gay and lesbian activist demonstrate publicly what the rest of the human family does privately their can be no cohesiveness between gay/lesbian (so-called adults) and culturally consistent adult behavior.

8. Politically:  gays are always at the forefront of anti human organizations that cause much harm globally to states, religions, families, children and the human race at large.  Creating harm is scientifically, medically, politically, and economically unreasonable and in the cases of such harm that is caused, in all other avenues of human life, that which creates harm must be isolated and eventually terminated.

9. Economically:  it is unsound for the positive growth of the State of California, or any State or country.  Same sex marriages cannot and will not promote anything but their own self interest, of which is to maximize the activities of unproductive sex.  Same sex marriages are unproductive in that it has little interest in the promotion of human development, moral directives for proper mental development, and socially cohesive development within the human society.

10. In that it Same sex marriage is unscientific, biologically incompatible, medically unhealthy, developmentally harmful to children, socially nonfunctional, individually in cohesive, politically anti-human, and economically unsound demonstrates that it only has it self interest in mind, and is does not function effectively within the world of human adults, families, kin, and organization.  Just what is it that we as a State for that matter a Country talk about when it comes to the legal marriage rights of same sex couples?

It is only ignorance of, or, in some "angry get even" cases that there is this unreasonable demand to promote a political intention to destroy Marriage between a Man and a Woman. 

Gay and Lesbians same sex marriage couples have shown themselves to be NOT: Morally reasonable; scientifically beneficial; biologically consistent with nature; medically directed toward healthiness; developmentally improving the human condition; socially functional within human structures; individually an adjunct to universal adult behavior; politically justified legally in considerations of all the above; and economically sound in principle.  The over abundance of proof religiously, scientifically and socially is against the acceptance of same sex marriage. 

Legalizing same sex marriage will only cause more civil unrest between the two positions pro and con.  The cause of "Civil unrest in California between the two factions" is now is in the hands of the current Governor of California.  It was wrong for the Governor to step beyond his authority and promote the Post Proposition 8 legal challenges. It will be on his head if civil unrest begins, in fact has already begun with the threatening of individual lives by the gay and lesbian communities throughout California.  If the Supreme Court does not identify the significant Harm done, then the Court itself will also be responsible for the very prospects of causing harm.  

The Fourth Estate is the True enemy of the common man.