RICK SANCHEZ: Probably nobody in this campaign has been referred to more by his acronym or slash name than "Joe the Plumber." His real name is Joe Wurzelbacher. And he's good enough to join us now to bring us up to date on what's going on with them -- Joe, are you there?
JOE WURZELBACHER, "JOE THE PLUMBER": Oh, hey, I'm doing good. How about yourself today?
SANCHEZ: Good. Good.
Man, we -- I've got to tell you, just to be completely open about this, so many people have been writing to me today saying why are you talking to this guy, why are you talking to this guy?
So here's your chance to answer a lot of the questions that I've been getting from a lot of them. And I'll start with just probably the most curious question that a lot of people have.
Why would you be so upset about people who clear more than $250,000 a year having to pay taxes when you're nowhere near that category? Is that a fair question? Can you give me answer?Story Continues Below Ad ↓
WURZELBACHER: I mean, you know, they're not going to like the answer. Because it's called principles, you know? I mean that's what it comes down to to me. I don't want someone else's money. You know, let me make my money. And, you know, what if you get the opportunity to make that kind of money and all of a sudden the government is going to take it from you?
You know, I'm not riding on anybody else's back I can't do on my own.
SANCHEZ: But you are not in a situation where you're going to be able to make that money any time soon. You're nowhere near being able to buy a business that clears more than $250,000 a year, because that would take millions and millions of dollars, right?
WURZELBACHER: So it's OK to go out and rob a bank then?
I don't understand the logic. That doesn't make any sense, brother. I mean, it's called principles. And I'm not trying to be, you know, disrespectful toward you, it's just principles. That money belongs to them. It doesn't belong to me. I didn't work for it.
SANCHEZ: No. No disrespect taken. The point is that we do have a system in the United States where somebody has to pay for fixing the roads, for the infrastructure, for the police department, for the firefighters who come out and put out the fire in your house. So who, if not those who make a lot of money should be paying those taxes?
WURZELBACHER: Well, you know, you're getting only one part of that. What's the second part is you're forgetting -- or the person that wants to know the answer to the question is, you know, the people who don't work or don't work very much and, you know, support those fine establishments you're talking about as far as our roads and fire departments, police departments, aren't paying into it at all. And so they're going to actually get more or they're going to get money back from my hard work? That doesn't seem right. I mean, taxes are necessary.
SANCHEZ: So wait.
WURZELBACHER: They're not (INAUDIBLE) --
SANCHEZ: So wait. Am I hearing you correct?
Did you just say you want people who make less than $250 to be taxed more and people who make over $250 to be taxed less? You think it's a little -- it's a skew now and you want to fix it?
WURZELBACHER: No. Nowhere in what I just said did I say anything about people who make less than $250,000 should pay more. I didn't say that at all.
SANCHEZ: So you would -- well, because you just said that they are not taxed. They don't pay their share. So, guys, the money has got to come from somewhere, Joe?
WURZELBACHER: Oh, yes. But does it have to -- you know, take in more from someone else that's worked just -- you know, harder in their lifetime or gotten better breaks is not right. I mean, you can -- you can disagree with it, but the fact is right is right and wrong is wrong. I mean, it's not an opinion here. I mean you don't take money away from someone who's worked more or had, you know, better breaks and give it to other people.
SANCHEZ: Wait. But under --
WURZELBACHER: It's just (INAUDIBLE) --
SANCHEZ: But under this system, you're the one who's going to benefit. Look, I looked it up on CNN.com/money. The average plumber makes --
WURZELBACHER: Oh, yes, but they're (INAUDIBLE) --
SANCHEZ: The average plumber makes $37,000 a year. So I don't know how much you make, but --
WURZELBACHER: I make more than that, but I'm not in the six figures. I work damn hard for my money.
WARNING! WARNING! Stand by for a sleaze attack by Rick Sanchez:
SANCHEZ: Well, it's just kind of hard to figure out. I mean, you don't have a license. You're not registered as a plumber. You owe back taxes of $1,200. A hospital is asking you -- St. Charles Hospital -- Mercy Hospital is asking you for $1,100 --
WURZELBACHER: No, hold it. Hold on. You know, hold on one second, brother. I've got a question for you.
SANCHEZ: Go ahead.
WURZELBACHER: Why are you vetting me out and you haven't done this with Obama? You're sitting here asking me all these insane questions. I asked a question of a public -- an elected public official --
SANCHEZ: Right.
WURZELBACHER: And you're going to ask me these questions?
SANCHEZ: No, no, no, no, no. Joe --
WURZELBACHER: This is kind of ridiculous, man.
SANCHEZ: Hey, Joe. You've gone on the air and endorsed John McCain. You are no longer --
WURZELBACHER: (INAUDIBLE).
SANCHEZ: You are no longer just Joe private person. You have thrust yourself into this campaign...
WURZELBACHER: Wait a minute. Hold on --
SANCHEZ: -- by holding news conferences, talking to reporters and endorsing a candidate.
WURZELBACHER: (INAUDIBLE) myself.
SANCHEZ: You have to be asked the tough questions, my friend. That's the way it works in this country.
WURZELBACHER: Well, you know, ask good questions. Like why don't you ask what I'm going to do for -- you know, what I'm going to do now?And, you know, I have --
SANCHEZ: Well, the good question is this, why is a guy who's not even licensed as a plumber, is nowhere near making $250,000 a year to clear, asking why it is that people who make that kind of money could be taxed? It just --
WURZELBACHER: All right, brother, you know --
SANCHEZ: I can --
(CROSSTALK)
SANCHEZ: I guess that the question is --
WURZELBACHER: I'll answer the question. I'll answer it.
SANCHEZ: Great.
WURZELBACHER: You know, I've answered it once. I'll answer it one more time.
SANCHEZ: Sure.
WURZELBACHER: And you're not going to understand it. Again, it's called principles. Look it up and then you'll figure it out, man.
SANCHEZ: And your principles say that somebody who makes a lot of money should not be taxed?
WURZELBACHER: No. Look up principles and read the definition. Get it right out of "Webster's" and you'll understand it maybe. It's talking about taking someone's money and taxing them at a harder rate because they make more than you, they've worked harder than you? I mean, you know, cry me a river, man.
SANCHEZ: Well, some people would argue that actually the way the system is right now, that those people over $250,000 -- in fact, that seems to be Obama's argument -- aren't paying their fair share like they were, perhaps, in the 1960s and that it's imbalanced. I suppose you would disagree with that?
WURZELBACHER: A flat tax. Well, what about a flat tax? You know, would you be for that? Would that be fairer for you?
SANCHEZ: Yes, as a matter of fact I've done stories on flat taxes. I think it's a remarkable idea.
WURZELBACHER: I'm all about a flat tax. Obama doesn't want to go there. He actually -- if you look at the rest of my interview with that...
SANCHEZ: But --
WURZELBACHER: -- (INAUDIBLE) interview, but as far as he was in my yard, I asked him about a flat tax.
SANCHEZ: But neither does McCain.
WURZELBACHER: (INAUDIBLE).
SANCHEZ: So why are you bringing that up?
WURZELBACHER: Well, because, you're bringing up stuff that's insignificant to the question that I asked. I mean you're -- you want to talk about my license. I've come out on the record and said yes, I don't have a license in this state.
SANCHEZ: All right.
WURZELBACHER: You got me.
SANCHEZ: Joe -- hey, Joe?
WURZELBACHER: Yes.
SANCHEZ: I'll tell you what. It's a good discussion. We're getting some different perspectives that you've shared with our viewers. And I appreciate you taking the time to talk to us today.
WURZELBACHER: See you later.
SANCHEZ: All right, man. God bless.
It looks like Rick Sanchez will air your dirty laundry if he finds he is losing an argument. And I do hope Rick takes Joe the Plumber's advice and look up "principle" in the dictionary.
—P.J. Gladnick is a freelance writer and creator of the DUmmie FUnnies blog.



















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
One definition of stupid is...
November 5, 2008 - 09:30 ET by Red JeepRick Sanchez.
Joe has to say it like this.....
November 5, 2008 - 09:47 ET by political mavenDude, a guy making amillion a year is already paying 400g's in various taxes...That's not enough??
Joe wiped the floor with this moron.....
Joe for congress!
The sound of nascent fascism:
November 5, 2008 - 10:04 ET by ExZonie"You are no longer just Joe private person. You have thrust yourself into this campaign... by holding news conferences, talking to reporters and endorsing a candidate. You have to be asked the tough questions, my friend. That's the way it works in this country."
How brownshirt of you, Sanchez. You have a megaphone and Joe has a wrench.
Except for Obama
November 5, 2008 - 10:37 ET by KC MulvilleWhere were the tough questions for Obama? Obama is asked how he feels about being criticized. No questions about redistributionist philosophy. No one in the mainstream media investigated Ayers or even Wright, until the blogs promoted it.
If you endorse a candidate, you thrust yourself into the campaign. So why aren't newspaper editors who endorse candidates ever grilled? That's the way it's supposed to work in this country.
The lack of self-awareness is stunning.
Palin/Steele 2012
November 5, 2008 - 09:31 ET by StayOnPointNow we have a chance to put REAL conservatives in power in 2012. Sarah Palin and Michael Steele. Let the media spin that one.
Oppose Obamunism-Elect a Conservative Congress in '08
I'm for that
November 5, 2008 - 09:37 ET by sshuffield70I'm voting Palin/Steele or Palin/Jindal in 2012.
Either grouping would
November 5, 2008 - 10:41 ET by NewsbusterbrownEither grouping would easily be A-OK with me.
“There are no easy answers' but there are simple answers. We must have the courage to do what we know is morally right.” - Ronald Reagan (1964 Republican Convention)
When you can't win the argument on the principle,
November 5, 2008 - 10:00 ET by ExZonieThen slam the opponent on personal matters. You stay classy, Sanchez.
Rick Sanchez is (at best)
November 5, 2008 - 09:44 ET by SeashellRick Sanchez is (at best) a mediocre anchor who is just trying to ingratiate himself to all big shot anchors. He tried and failed to debunk Joe. Try as he might, he couldn't do it because Joe is right, and he has the guts to stand up for what's right.
Sanchez WTF! over.
November 5, 2008 - 09:45 ET by expatriotHe was nailed by Joe on his lack of vetting with Obambi so sanchez goes on the attack against Joe. If the nimrod had done his job in the first place we might not be stuck with the ignoramouses we now have heading to the oval office. Glad he can dig up the dirt on Joe, now can he do some investigative reporting and "discover" if Obambi is even a citizen? Is it too much to ask?
sanchez
November 5, 2008 - 09:48 ET by fairtax4everFirst time poster here, been reading for quite some time. I just cannot get over how these media types just love to rail on the guys and gals that have made this great country what it is. Weasels like Ricky just can't seem to grasp what it means for someone to have the principles that J.T.Plumber seems to have a very firm grasp on. Here's hoping the damage can be contained to a four year span and not 40.
Here's hoping the damage
November 5, 2008 - 09:56 ET by SeashellHere's hoping the damage can be contained to a four year span and not 40.
Amen to that Fairtax!
I really like this joe guy,
November 5, 2008 - 09:52 ET by seaniepI really like this joe guy, and I hate what they have done to him, one of my best friends owns a plumbing company - he makes well over 250k, and that is what Joe was talking about, he was not talking about being a plumber, he was talking about owning the company
presentlyI am a veteran of Afghanistan and Iraq, I have a masters degree, I work an extra shift one night a week (all I can get) at the restaurant I work at during the day, I struggle to get by with the work I can find, I constantly seek a better opportunity somewhere, and I am facing a possibly recall into the Marines that I will not know about until sometime this December . . . by all accounts, my life kind of sucks - and my obama fan friends don't get it that I would not like to be bailed out by someone else
principles is right, I think I will make some bumper stickers that say that - and of course, not credit joe the plumber and profit off of his idea
teeheehee
Amazing
November 5, 2008 - 10:15 ET by TheCynicI knew the media lacked principles but I never realized they couldn't even find principles in a dictionary. There's a good joke in there somewhere.
Joe is out of touch
November 5, 2008 - 10:18 ET by Agrarian-Decentralist"It's talking about taking someone's money and taxing them at a
harder rate because they make more than you, they've worked harder than
you?"
"Harder rate"? I thought just like Joe until I was about 19, and someone explained to me about disposable income---that some of us have a lot more of it after paying for the basics--food, shelter, etc.---than others.
And along the way, I observed how that disparity often had nothing to do with virtue. I saw many fine people--folks who lacked special talents or weren't lucky enough to be "born on third base"---working hard at low-paid jobs that nevertheless had to be done.
Maybe Joe should take a look around before wrapping himself in "principles" that are out of synch with the realities of many people's lives.
Why does the government
November 5, 2008 - 10:22 ET by Conservative VoiceWhy does the government fight agaisnt the mob ( organized crime ) ? It doesn't like the competition.
What people do with their disposable income is their business. When it becomes someone elses business, people with princibles call it what it is, robbery.
So, you shouldn't be allowed
November 5, 2008 - 10:48 ET by ThatDudeSo, you shouldn't be allowed to have disposable income? Need I remind you that jobs depend on people having disposable income. Your logic here is flawed. I'm working a 60 hour week. Is the overtime pay for those 20 extra hours obscene? Do I owe someone else the fruits of my labor? Just because you earn more than you need doesn't entitle someone else to it. I can make ends meet through alot less work, but I desire disposable income. Don't try telling me that myself or anyone else is undeserving of the extra they earned. Communism is the system that encourages zero net profit.
Disposable Virtue?
November 5, 2008 - 11:25 ET by CobraMan"And along the way, I observed how that disparity often had nothing to do with virtue."
Some people will ALWAYS make more money than others, will ALWAYS have more "disposable" income. The reasons for this "disparity" are many and varied, from the natural variances in talent (skills and trailing) to the variances in living experiences (housing, food, medical, and various other experiences). It's similar to the "disparity" between a great artist and someone like me who can't even draw stick figures very well.
"Disparity" exists between people. That's just a part of life, part of natural selection. To punish someone simply because they do better than someone else, to take away what that person makes and give it to someone who didn't create it, that's a violation of nature, a violation of natural selection itself.
This attempt to force equality between natural disparity has happened a lot throughout history (just look at the former Soviet Union for a great example) and each and every time this forced equality occurred, it was shown to be detrimental to everyone. I've learn that, in any system which involves humans, it is necessary for "disparity" to exist, both for motivation of the less successful and for innovation and personal expression.
Take a lesson from history and stop trying to force equality in everything. That's an impossible, and detrimental, goal and one which is doomed to failure as the only true equality in life is death.
Obama: My job is above my pay grade
I seem to remember being
November 5, 2008 - 11:28 ET by TexasteacherI seem to remember being taught that life isn't fair. So why is the government pushing a "fairness doctrine" and instituting socialism in the "interest of fairness"?
Absolute Power
November 5, 2008 - 11:43 ET by CobraManThe "government" (not everyone in government are trying to do as you describe) wants absolute power and control. How better to achieve that power and control than distributing wealth? Kings have tried it, Emperors have tried it, Socialist have tried it, an Dictators have tried it. One by one, all who have tried to gain absolute control over the distribution of wealth have failed and all have disappeared, burned by the fires of history into obscurity. If our government tries this, then it too will fail, burn by the fires of history into obscurity, and rightfully so.
Obama: My job is above my pay grade
Um, I'm pretty sure that
November 5, 2008 - 11:54 ET by arkansaszippersUm, I'm pretty sure that natural selection doesn't apply to the amount of money somebody makes. It's a scientific theory that applies to genetics.
Um, I'm pretty sure that I
November 5, 2008 - 12:32 ET by TexasteacherUm, I'm pretty sure that I didn't say DIDDLY SH** about natural selection.
And if you whine about someone having more money than you as not fair, then get off your a** and go work for it. Nobody but yourself is stopping you.
Yeah, I meant that response
November 5, 2008 - 12:45 ET by arkansaszippersYeah, I that response was for another comment, so you can stop freaking out.
I'm all for working for your money. I just don't like the perception that people who are poor are lazy and just don't care, because that's total BS.
I'm pretty sure
November 5, 2008 - 14:01 ET by CobraManI'm pretty sure that natural selection applies to someone's ABILITY to accumulate wealth.
Do you doubt that income, and the accumulation of wealth such income provides, can be, and is, derived from personal abilities and skills?
Obama: My job is above my pay grade
I'm saying that natural
November 5, 2008 - 14:15 ET by arkansaszippersI'm saying that natural selection works on a genetic level.
So do abilities
November 5, 2008 - 14:19 ET by CobraManSo do individual, inherited abilities like intelligence and aptitude, , and even personalty traits like laziness. These are, by far, all affected by natural selection.
Obama: My job is above my pay grade
That's the same argument
November 5, 2008 - 14:26 ET by arkansaszippersThat's the same argument about natural selection that was used to justify Nazi Germany
No, it isn't
November 5, 2008 - 14:32 ET by CobraManNo, it isn't, but I don't expect YOU to admit that. You may not be aware of this, but the Nazi's tried to STOP natural selection through planned breeding (eugenics) and the destruction of "undesirable" genetic lines through the mass murder of different genetic families. They wanted to CONTROL natural selection, they weren't promoting it.
Obama: My job is above my pay grade
Interesting. I went the
November 5, 2008 - 13:12 ET by HockeyKidInteresting. I went the other direction--I was raised a leftist, and realized how the real world worked when I went out on my own at age 19. That made me a die-hard Reagan conservative.
What the heck happened to you at 19 to make you think you don't deserve to decide what to do with the fruits of your own labor? I'm sure it wasn't pretty.
As for "disposable income", well, shouldn't you get to decide now to dispose of it? If you want to give it all to philanthropic endeavors, shouldn't you be able to do so? If you decide to build businesses so people in your community will have jobs, shouldn't you be able to do so? If you want to give it to your children and grandchildren, shouldn't you be able to do so? Hell, if you want to give it all to the federal government, shouldn't you able to do so (and if you don't, why don't you, you selfish hypocrite)?
As for "born on third base", son you need to get out and travel a bit. EVERY SINGLE PERSON born in America IS born on third base. There is more opportunity here than a person can even fathom.
The thing you lefties don't seem to understand is that people should aspire to better stations in life. I've worked the low-paying jobs, and I've paid my way, and I've always looked for something better. And so I've made my life better and better for myself and my family and (hopefully) my community and country. I've served in the military, I've served in civil service, I've worked blue collar jobs, white collar jobs, as labor and as management. My grandfather's workshop had a sign on the wall: "The harder I work, the luckier I get." (That's a principle, by the way--since you don't seem to be able to recognize them.) So you can keep your "lucky enough" crap.
And you need to check the dictionary, too, if you think principles should change as a reflection of "the realities of many people's lives".
Oh, and when 0bama's tax policies cause those low-paid workers to lose jobs in record numbers, don't blame those of us with principles.
Moron.
Well he asked for it...
November 5, 2008 - 10:20 ET by TexasteacherIf he will only seriously consider the opinion of someone who is licensed in their profession, well here goes:
I am a 100% certified teacher in the state of Texas (and not alternative certified either)
I worked my a** off in college to get my education and to get a good job. My wife and I are working our a**es off to keep up on or mortgage. I don't want anyone else's money. And I sure as hell don't want my "wealth" spread to someone who didn't work for or earn anything. We live in the greatest country that has ever existed, where anyone of any gender, race, or faith can have anything they want out of life IF THEY WORK FOR IT.
The American dream is that if you are willing to work for it, you can have or be anything you want. Liberals in this country only read half of that, and they see it as the gubment's job to provide it.
As a side note, it might just be me, but I would think it is bad taste and disrespectful for a student to run up and start screaming "O-bam-a" to a teacher's face. Especially if that teacher is one of the few white teachers in an inner-city school.
I'm sure that you've been in
November 5, 2008 - 10:33 ET by arkansaszippersI'm sure that you've been in a bind before and had SOMEBODY'S help...
Not since I've been out on
November 5, 2008 - 10:44 ET by TexasteacherNot since I've been out on my own. And believe me, I could have used it. I want to make it on my own without any government intervention. I want my successes to be due to MY hard work, not because I took the easy road and looked to lord obama for a handout.
I'm just saying, it seems
November 5, 2008 - 10:52 ET by arkansaszippersI'm just saying, it seems like people who become successful really believe that they just "worked hard," and that everybody who "works hard" should become successful, unless there's something wrong with him. But everybody who becomes successful usually has help at some point along the way. An uncle who helps with an unexpected expense, or a parent who helps out when a car breaks down. And then life goes on. Nobody stops to think what might have happened if the car couldn't get fixed, and the bill couldn't get paid. What kind of snowball effect that could have on the course of your life. But there are people who are poor, and their families are all poor, and everybody they know is poor, and they may never recover from that unpaid bill, no matter how hard they work. That's one of the big problems in this country: people don't take the time to try and see things from somebody else's point of view. It's all just finger-pointing and blaming.
You would see it a little
November 5, 2008 - 11:06 ET by TexasteacherYou would see it a little different if you saw and heard students excited about Obama being president not just because he's "black" but so they won't have to work because "Obama will take care of them."
I have no problem with someone trying and failing (as long as they keep trying). I have a huge problem with someone not trying at all and expecting to be "taken care of"
Aren't you talking about
November 5, 2008 - 11:14 ET by arkansaszippersAren't you talking about kids? Who doesn't know that most kids are ignorant; why would you worry about what some kids say? And no matter how much help you get from the government, you can't get ahead without trying at all.
I'm talking about seniors
November 5, 2008 - 11:22 ET by TexasteacherI'm talking about seniors in high school that have suddenly failed to see the point in college since the message they see is that the government is going to provide everything.
And yes I worry about what kids say and believe just like everyone else worries about what they're being taught. These kids are the future of the country.
And just like adults, some
November 5, 2008 - 11:26 ET by arkansaszippersAnd just like adults, some kids are smart, and the rest are stupid. So the future looks just like the present.
And another thing... Yes
November 5, 2008 - 11:18 ET by TexasteacherAnd another thing...
Yes I had help from my parents, but that's what parents are supposed to do. Like I said before, "since I have been out on my own" I haven't asked for or taken help from ANYONE. And don't even give me that crap about how some poor people are destined to stay poor. When my dad came back from Vietnam (which his family disowned him for volunteering to go) he stared out as a welder for a pecan orchard, living in a 2 bedroom shack with hardly any clothes. He worked his a** off to be able to afford to send himself to school. Now he is a successful civil designer, has a farm to call his own, and was able to help me be the first in my family to graduate from college. I didn't say he paid for me to go, I said he HELPED me go. He made me work for it, and I'm eternally grateful that he did.
I guess you're right then:
November 5, 2008 - 11:22 ET by arkansaszippersI guess you're right then: unsuccessful people must just be lazy.
only when they stop trying
November 5, 2008 - 11:24 ET by Texasteacheronly when they stop trying to succeed on their own accord.
I agree with that. But
November 5, 2008 - 11:29 ET by arkansaszippersI agree with that. But don't make the mistake of believing that everybody who works hard will invariably make it, because that's just not true. So people who don't make it aren't all just lazy individuals sitting around waiting for a break from the government.
Yov'e got it backwards
November 5, 2008 - 11:33 ET by CobraManYou've got it backwards. It's true that all lazy people are unsuccessful.
'Tis a lesson you should heed,
Try, try again.
If at first you don't succeed,
Try, try again.
Obama: My job is above my pay grade
Yes, but all unsuccessful
November 5, 2008 - 11:55 ET by arkansaszippersYes, but all unsuccessful people are not lazy. YOU have it backwards.
And not every rich person
November 5, 2008 - 12:30 ET by Conservative VoiceAnd not every rich person works hard...so? The market dictates your worth. And that is why America is ( was ) free...when you have a socialist dictate prices for goods ( including labor rendered ) the incentive to do better is gone.
If trust fund babies want to spend their inheritance, they are free to do so...lotto winners is what they are. Our economy isn't built on their sweat. But the money is still theirs!
By the same token, working hard on something that no one wants to buy ( PBS? ) means you are either getting a different reward, or you are stupid. For example I use to do social work. I didn't get paid a whole lot per hour, but the rewards was the work itself.
I am more than happy to pay the CEO the 400 million so that he works 100 hours, and doesn't see his kids, so that I can work a reliable 9-5 job for a modest wage. I didn't take the risk. I don't have to deal with the high stress. You seem to think that everyone should be paid the same hourly wage. BS Get out of your union my friend, because its keeping you from being the best person you can be!
I never said people should
November 5, 2008 - 12:38 ET by arkansaszippersI never said people should all work for the same wage. I'm just sick of hearing that poor people are all lazy losers who are waiting for the government to pay their way, because it just isn't true. I think we've learned to hate our neighbor, and gotten away from the values we used to have.
No one is saying that ark!
November 5, 2008 - 12:48 ET by Conservative VoiceNo one is saying that ark! What we are saying is that All people who are lazy end up not being successful. Let me spell it out for you. A trust fund baby who blows his wad of allowance, or any rich person who parties all the time...are losers. Welfare people who are feeling all entitled to money just because, are losers! Now the person who is poor, but working as hard as he can, and doing what they can to get out of their hell hole...that is the person conservatives are the FIRST to help. Lefties on the other hand want to keep that person poor, because that is how they get their votes. Now tell me who is the sicker?
Almost everyone is saying
November 5, 2008 - 12:50 ET by arkansaszippersAlmost everyone is saying that. All I hear is how "I work hard for my money" and "these lazy people need to get jobs." It's just a stereotype in our country.
Projection? Because I
November 5, 2008 - 12:54 ET by Conservative VoiceProjection? Because I don't see it. Joe never even implied it.
I'm not talking about Joe;
November 5, 2008 - 13:01 ET by arkansaszippersI'm not talking about Joe; who cares about Joe? I'm talking about people on this site.
Please quote people saying
November 5, 2008 - 13:11 ET by Conservative VoicePlease quote people saying that all poor people are lazy.
And I will show you they said all lazy people are losers. It isn't the samething
Now you want me to go around
November 5, 2008 - 13:16 ET by arkansaszippersNow you want me to go around the site and quote people? How about you do that.
Look, believe what you want. I'm telling you what I've seen. People are complaining that all these lazy people are trying to get money from hard working people.
"Now you want me to go
November 5, 2008 - 13:33 ET by Conservative Voice"Now you want me to go around the site and quote people? How about you do that."
You are the one making the charge.
"People are complaining that all these lazy people are trying to get money from hard working people."
That isn't the same as saying all poor people are lazy people taking money from hard working people. I haven't seen anyone on this thread make that claim.
I've seen UFOs and aliens,
November 5, 2008 - 13:35 ET by HermanoI've seen UFOs and aliens, too! Oh - and Nessie, too! And I can prove it. I've got the pictures. AZ - your assessment is incorrect. Conservatives help those who help themselves. We don't just throw our money away on someone who is not going to try.
Always look on the bright side of life...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1loyjm4SOa0
As an interested
November 5, 2008 - 14:18 ET by Ruths husband BenAs an interested onlooker, I would say yes, I do want you going around and quoting people. That is far better than unsubstantiated claims. If you can't back it up then don't say it. I have been poor and I have been wealthy (then I got married and kids). Now I am truly wealthy. But I still don't want what I never earned. And what I got is mine, not yours.
And I will bet you a six pack of the beverage of your choice that I give a much higher of my stuff to needy people then you do (and yes, I can prove that). The difference is, it is mine to give, not yours to redistribute. Or at least that was true until last night.
What made this country great was the idea of personal property. It gave people an incentive to achieve, because they knew that what they acquired was their own.
You see, a liberal wants a piece of my pie. A conservative says, "make your own damn pie." One only sees one pie, the other sees unlimited pies. One is a scarcity mentality and the other has an abundance mentality. Guess which one has been shown historically to work and which has been historically to fail? You don't have to look much farther than the unemployment rate in France, Italy, England, etc. to get it. But some people never get it.
"Almost everyone?" Bull
November 5, 2008 - 14:09 ET by CobraManYOU are the one saying this, no one else is.
Show me my post, or anyone else's for that matter, that says unsuccessful people are lazy. PROVE your clam.
Obama: My job is above my pay grade
Joe Biden's dad is a great example for blowing inheritance
November 6, 2008 - 07:19 ET by expatriotHey Ark, the rich can get poor and the poor can get rich in our society now. After 20 Jan it is anyones bet. Socialism does not work and our poor are the richest "poor" in the world. Work hard and you can get places. If you don't want to work to improve, don't come to me for a handout.
Generalize much?
November 5, 2008 - 14:05 ET by CobraManI NEVER said that all unsuccessful people are lazy. YOU are the only one making that insinuation. I DID say that people fail for many reasons, and that failure is not only expected from time to time, but is actually desirable as it helps us learn, correct?
Obama: My job is above my pay grade
No, the insinuation is that
November 5, 2008 - 14:22 ET by arkansaszippersNo, the insinuation is that hard work solves everything, and that people shouldn't complain, they should just work harder. And everybody's story about how they started out with less than they have now, and how they just kept plugging away until they made something of themselves. The insinuation there is that if everybody can't do that then they must just not be trying hard enough. I just think it's too easy to judge if you don't know somebody's specific situation.
You are projecting again.
November 5, 2008 - 14:36 ET by Conservative VoiceYou are projecting again. Conservatives are all about helping people with a hand up, not a hand out, do you not see the difference? In otherwords we are quite charitable to those who are doing their best, but for whatever reason, aren't quite making it. But what we don't agree with is to give indefinately, becauee that robs the person the drive to do better, get it?
You see, a liberal says "we need a minimum wage, because no one can live off of that". And conservatives say, you are right, so lets lower taxes on business and red tape so that they can create opportunities. Because the conservative understands the minimum wage isn't meant to be the wage indefinately...where as the liberal gets power by creating a dependent voter. Its in the liberals best interest to keep them on the plantation. We work with that person to improve their skills, so that they aren't stuck on the plantation. Helping someone reach their potential is a beautiful thing...keeping a person down with lies that the world is against them there is no hope, so stay on welfare forever, is sad and in my mind a terrible terrible thing to do.
Flaw
November 5, 2008 - 11:30 ET by owlpelletsHad my car broken down, I would never have wanted my uncle or parent required by law to pay six times the amount of the repair so all of my cronies could skim their "fair share" off as administrative fees. I gave several times more to charity last year than Biden and Obama combined. I choose to give to those charities with low administrative costs where most of the money goes where I intended. Most liberals are all for charity long as it is someone else's mone. JTP was derided by Sanchez for saying he didn't want to take money he hadn't earned. Called it principal. Imagine that.
Don't blame me....I voted for Palin...
I'm sure that you've been
November 5, 2008 - 10:47 ET by NewsbusterbrownI'm sure that you've been in a bind before and had SOMEBODY'S help...
Maybe, but I doubt that he "persuaded" that person the way the government only can.
“There are no easy answers' but there are simple answers. We must have the courage to do what we know is morally right.” - Ronald Reagan (1964 Republican Convention)
Exactly NBB,12 years ago
November 5, 2008 - 11:44 ET by SemperrightExactly NBB,
12 years ago my wife and I lived in a 25 year old single wide trailer. I worked 65-80 hrs a week and put her through college. After she graduated I worked 40 hours/week at night and went to college during the day. I graduated at 32 years old. My wife and I still work 60+ hrs a week with three children but now have targets on our backs because we make too much money.
I ask you libs this: What part of my or my wifes work do I owe you?
As is sits now, when Bush's tax cuts expire and BO bumps up the highest rate, I will have to quit working because 100% of what I would make would go to taxes. It's not like America need engineers anyway.
"Some people spend an entire lifetime wondering if they made a difference.
The MARINES don't have that problem."
President Ronald Reagan - 1985
Got to love the left's play
November 5, 2008 - 10:45 ET by Conservative VoiceGot to love the left's play of the hypocrisy card. No one is saying we shouldn't help the poor moron...they are just saying those who pay taxes should pay a flatter tax.
No one is saying we
November 5, 2008 - 10:46 ET by NewsbusterbrownNo one is saying we shouldn't help the poor moron...they are just saying those who pay taxes should pay a flatter tax.
Exactly.
“There are no easy answers' but there are simple answers. We must have the courage to do what we know is morally right.” - Ronald Reagan (1964 Republican Convention)
Rick Sanchez is mentally
November 5, 2008 - 10:26 ET by marpelRick Sanchez is mentally ill. I wouldn't bother with this yahoo if I was Joe the Plumber. I would have bigger fish to fry...ya know?
Check your facts Mr. Sanchex...
November 5, 2008 - 10:27 ET by Graig36Obama's plan calls for small businesses grossing over 250... will face an increased payroll, social security, healthcare tax. I don't think Sanchez has even reviewed the tax plan. What a piece of shit this guy is.
The top 1% wage earners pay
November 5, 2008 - 10:36 ET by mattmThe top 1% wage earners pay 5% of the income taxes. The top 5%, pay 25% of them, the top 50% pay 90% and the bottom 40% pay either zero or they get a check from the people in the top 60%.
If that's not progressive enough for you, you're marxist thug.
If there still is a MSM in '12..
November 5, 2008 - 10:38 ET by Paul GI'll vote ... Palin/Wurzelbacher That'll get their (MSM) heads spinning
palin/wurzelbacher
November 5, 2008 - 12:32 ET by 24hourrifle...what a great ticket.im sure they'd do terrific in "real america".
palin,joe the plumber,sean hannity etc...these are the heroes of the right.thats why our country just gave conservatism a great big gloating middle finger.these people,led by bush,have ruined the republican party.unless there are some serious,drastic changes made within the party 2010 and 2012 will be even uglier.
Wrong. Fact low voter turn
November 5, 2008 - 12:41 ET by Conservative VoiceWrong. Fact low voter turn out from Republicans. Fact voter fraud from the left, as well as intimidation from the left. Fact in California we still passed prop 8, a conservative proposition...despite it being in California And despite the negaitve campaign against prop 8.
Fact McCain lost because of McCain running a crappy campaign, and at the end was gaining because of Palin and Joe and Tito etc. Fact conservatism wins, McCain is not a conservative.
intimidation fraud???
November 5, 2008 - 12:59 ET by 24hourrifleits absolutely hysterical to hear republicans boo-hooing about voter fraud.conservatives invented voter supression.there is no logic in democrats supressing the vote.everyone knows that low voter turnout always benefits republicans.and thats because the party appeals to such a limited group of people.please explain to me why republicans typically get appx. 5-8 percent of the black vote.why is that?im sure youll have a very clever,very racist reason.
prove it
November 5, 2008 - 13:06 ET by Conservative Voiceprove it
and after you prove it --- if you can, prove that I am being hypocritical about it.
I thinks its time this troll was banned!
November 5, 2008 - 13:05 ET by R D Helmconservatives invented voter supression
No, it was dems in the 1930's. Read your history, if you are able.
im sure youll have a very clever,very racist reason.
I am sick to death of these mentally-ill trolls constantly accusing us of being racists.
PUT UP OR STFU, TROLL!
-Dave
Resist the Obamatons.
boo hoo boo hoo...
November 5, 2008 - 13:29 ET by 24hourrifleboo hoo...you guys sure whine a lot.just scroll through random postings on this site and tell me there isnt obvious blatant outright racism.either your blind,or youve simply become accustomed to it.
anyway,i proved my point.the racism is there and you know it.maybe those are the people you should be worried about kicking off your super cool site.just look back at the first couple of THESE posts and see who started cursing and hurling insults.it definitely wasnt me.
whatever...i just wanted to prove a point and i did.im kicking myself off.god bless you all.
so 24 when are you going to
November 5, 2008 - 13:36 ET by Conservative Voiceso 24 when are you going to disclose that personal information since you are posting on a public political site? Just your name, age, soc sec number and mothers maiden name. To not give that would make you a hypocrit.
And again, when does the Obama campaign stop paying your hourly wage?
Prove your highly offensive allegation, troll.
November 5, 2008 - 13:43 ET by R D Helm... just scroll through random postings on this site and tell me there isnt obvious blatant outright racism
As I said before, either prove it, or STFU.
-Dave
Resist the Obamatons.
helm<<<<<<
November 5, 2008 - 13:55 ET by 24hourriflego to the top of THIS VERY PAGE!!!
look at what conservativevoice posted and tell me that dude isnt a racist.
whatever.you people have all proved my point for me.the point being that when youre wrong on all the issues you must resort to name calling and "im taking my ball and going home".
anyway,like i said,im kicking MYSELF off.god bless.
I have read every post on this thread, troll...
November 5, 2008 - 14:09 ET by R D Helm...and I have yet to see one that even approaches being racist.
You are clearly here to make baseless, offensive and highly inflammatory allegations against the overwhelming majority of the members here.
This is obviously an effort by you to cause repeated disruption on this site, which is a clear violation of the Terms of Use for the members of NewsBusters.
As I have said now multiple times, either prove your repeated highly offensive and inflammatory charge that most of us here are in fact, racists, or STFU.
It is just that simple.
-Dave
Resist the Obamatons.
24hourdipshit
November 5, 2008 - 13:42 ET by RESTLESS 1You can deny history all you want, but the fact of the matter is democrats are racists. You guys tried to block Civil Rights, you guys formed the KKK, and you guys are to party of "soft bigotry of low expectations". Then, you have the nerve to assassinate the character of any minority that strays from the liberal plantation. You remember the stinging barbs you gave to Condi, Sowell, Powell (at least you forgave him quickly when he came back with his tail between his legs). You guys blocked the nomination of Miguel Estrada to federal court. You liberals should be ashamed of your racism, but you feed it right out in the open. It's a shame that those you hurt the most don't see it, or don't want to.
"This liberal would be all about socialize -- uh, uh, would be about basically taking over and the government running all of your companies."-Maxine Waters 2008
Speaking of Powell
November 5, 2008 - 13:48 ET by LionKingColin Powell, if it mattered, essentially cost his son his job by endorsing Obama.
Hypocrisy of Powell: He felt it necessary to question Palin's experience to be VP, but not Obama's experience to be Prez ... interesting, no?
Racism...
November 5, 2008 - 13:45 ET by LionKingWhich race voted for the candidate of their race?
Which race did the "Black Panthers" represent in Philly?
Point made...it was definitely the conservatives practicing racism. </sarc...
At what point do you stop
November 5, 2008 - 13:08 ET by Conservative VoiceAt what point do you stop getting a pay check from the Obama campaign?
It's accepted by many
November 5, 2008 - 13:56 ET by Jack BauerIt's accepted by many respected historians that President Kennedy only became President following massive voter fraud, delivered by LBJ and Daley.
They were both Democrats, I believe. Though it's doubtful if JFK would be allowed in today's Democratic party. He was anti-abortion, for starters.
Tool Time!!
November 5, 2008 - 10:40 ET by bsmarjDirty Sanchez comes to mind. (sorry)
Oh my head
November 5, 2008 - 10:57 ET by mgindi26is it possible i can send a bill to the MSM for ll of the dentalwork I'm going to need from grinding my teeth.
What is it with them? Can't they understand that the fair share of tax is the same percentage (flat tax) to charge a person a higher percentage would be an unfair share.
Rick brings in all of the services that are paid for with taxes (fire, police, etc...) a few problems. First of all a wealthy person does not get a greater benefit from these services than a poor person so he does not have a higher "share". Secondly all the services he mentioned are paid for with state or local taxes NOT FEDERAL!
Then the way Rick goes straight to the liberal playbook of ignoring the issue at hand and instead go for the politics of personal destruction. He realized that he couldn't beat the fact that charges some a higher percentage for a higher income was unprinipled that he had to go into the dirty laundry. Im agine if every time someone had a conversation with PEO (president elect obama) they were to start playing a tape of Rev. Wright PEO would lose hid eloquence very quickly.
But the topper of all this was that when Joe called him on this on pulling out the laundry Rick goes and says that since he "thrust himself into the campaign" "endorsed McCain"etc... he brought this upon himself..... well how dare Rick say that. First of all PEO came to Joe's home not the other way around. then he was brought up in a debate. the following day all the mud was flying about him he didnt thrust himself into the campaign and the media was tearing him apart. he only endorsed McCain about a week ago so that didn'y cause it. Besides how mant celebrities endorsed PEO? I don't recall see Jessee Jackson's tax return or the Clintons or for that matter the aforementioned Rev. Wright.
No the media came out on this man this citizen who did nothing more than ask a question of a candidate, the media came out with claws bared to slice hime up. Why? Because he was a citizen with conservative values.
The media sickens me. and the lefts policy of personal destruction frightens me. Obama is our President elect I hope my fear of what his presidency may be to this great nation is wrong.
Tax System
November 5, 2008 - 11:16 ET by mgindi26Sometimes i wish I could run for the senate just to thrust this idea into the national spotlight.
The tax burden does not strike a great majority of Americans. What we don't realize is how much we already are being taxed. we don't know it, because we don't feel it. And we don't feel it because we don't see it.
My idea is simple. Eliminate the withholding tax. That's right You actually get your entire paycheck in your hand! can you imagine if suddenly every citizen touched and saw what they earned?
But wait, the country does need to run. We do need revenue. well no problem you see just like our current system everyone will pay their taxed by April 15th. The difference being that instead of people think the government is giving us money (refunds) they will see the reality of the situation that we are giving the gov't our hard earned money. Once we actually have it in out hands we will see how much they take. THEN WE'LL SEE REAL TAX REFORM AND SPENDING REFORM. after all who would want to be a "big spending liberal" when everyone realizes who's money they're spensing
Been sayin' that for
November 5, 2008 - 13:18 ET by HockeyKidBeen sayin' that for years. Income tax withholding is the only thing that allows 'em to get away with the ridiculous size of federal government.
mgindi26, except I disagree with the April 15th due date.
November 6, 2008 - 05:38 ET by OneLoyalAmericanThe check due date should be November 1.
Cheers,
OLA
Joe was correct. Sanchez vetting the wrong guy
November 5, 2008 - 11:30 ET by Gary HallJoe was absolutely correct - Sanchez is vetting the wrong guy.
If we are so damn interested in the truth here, then why did the MSM not vet Senator Obama on his statements to Joe. Obama did not tell the truth:
1.) Right off the top, Obama just out and out lied to Joe the Plumber. Obama said:
Yes "we" did. Lots of them.
The Bush administration, with congress, did in fact give poorer and middle class working folks numerous and significant tax breaks (** Listed below). Obama and Biden were free to argue for them or against them - but should not be allowed to lie straight out to the American public and suggest that they do not exist. Obama/Biden must be vetted on these misrepresentations.
Additionally (and leaving the top end tax cuts off the table here - a separate discussion), the Obama/Biden camp continued to press the view that we should return the middle and lower income class workers to the tax policy of the Clinton years - as if they would be better off then? No, the Bush tax cuts lowered the tax liability of these two classes - from where they were when Clinton left office - a considerable amount more than Senator Obama's new tax cuts will do. If the Bush tax cuts for the middle and lower class are allowed to expire, and Obama delivers the tax cuts to these two groups, as he has proposed, these two groups will be faced with a higher tax liability - hence, will have a tougher time getting ahead - than in the present moment. The Bush tax cuts must remain in place for the lower and middle class workers.
Had my car broken down, I
November 5, 2008 - 11:35 ET by owlpelletsHad my car broken down, I would never have wanted my uncle or parent
required by law to pay six times the amount of the repair so all of my
cronies could skim their "fair share" off as administrative fees. I
gave several times more to charity last year than Biden and Obama
combined. I choose to give to those charities with low administrative
costs where most of the money goes where I intended. Most liberals are
all for charity long as it is someone else's mone. JTP was derided by
Sanchez for saying he didn't want to take money he hadn't earned.
Called it principal. Imagine that.
Don't blame me....I voted for Palin...
Jesus you'd think the media
November 5, 2008 - 11:37 ET by ConservativeRexJesus you'd think the media would want to lay low for awhile and not gloat. I guess they really want to rub Conservatives noses in it.
Do they think they are immune? There are millions of people absolutely insensed with the media right about now. If they had any brains they might figure out now is not the time to be gloating. I guess they'll figure it out after a while then.
Ahhhh yes.....
November 5, 2008 - 11:41 ET by acumen...the day after the annoitment of the chosen one - feeeeeeel the unity from his apostle Sanchez.
Disposable Income?
November 5, 2008 - 11:48 ET by TangoUniformJoe is out of touch November 5, 2008 - 10:18 ET by Agrarian-Decentralist "It's talking about taking someone's money and taxing them at a harder rate because they make more than you, they've worked harder than you?" "Harder rate"? I thought just like Joe until I was about 19, and someone explained to me about disposable income---that some of us have a lot more of it after paying for the basics--food, shelter, etc.---than others. And along the way, I observed how that disparity often had nothing to do with virtue. I saw many fine people--folks who lacked special talents or weren't lucky enough to be "born on third base"---working hard at low-paid jobs that nevertheless had to be done.
Maybe Joe should take a look around before wrapping himself in "principles" that are out of synch with the realities of many people's lives.
YGTBSM. There are four things I can do with my "disposable" income. 1) Give it to charity 2)Invest it, which will help businesses with expansion, recapitalization, etc 3)Spend it, which will help the economy, whether it be on goods or services 4)Give it to the government to "distribute" it.
If you omit the incentive to make more $$ (being taxed because one's disposable income is too high), then why would anyone work hard to make more disposable income. Not everyone finds the right way to make their dreams come true, and many fail. But many do make it. Take it too the ridiculous. I'm an overweight middle aged guy. I would like to be in the next Olympics in let's say the 100 meter dash. But it would only be fair for me to to have a 75 yard head start.
Joe is not saying taxes are not needed and he seems to believe that the progressive tax is a necessary evil, until a better tax code comes along. What JTP is saying, IMHO, is don't take from me because I make over 250K and REDISTRIBUTE it.
@RickSanchezcnn
November 5, 2008 - 11:57 ET by axemanSanchez follows me on Twitter. I wonder how long it would take for him to drop me when I send a reply calling him a douchebag?
I'm learning to deal with
November 5, 2008 - 11:57 ET by ChaitealoverI'm learning to deal with media bias, but I'm still having a hard time with media idiocy like that shown by Sanchez
Chai
“...Bury me on my face,” said Diogenes; and when he was asked why, he replied, “Because in a little while everything will be turned upside down.”
Sanchez once again proves
November 5, 2008 - 11:58 ET by bigtimerSanchez once again proves he is a first class a$$hole...
...that was hard to listen to.
Joe/Palin or Palin/Joe in 2012
"America isn't the problem...America is the solution." ~ Rush Limbaugh
finally...
November 5, 2008 - 12:11 ET by 24hourrifleFINALLY...someone exposes joe the plumber as the enormous phony he is.finally,someone called him on all his outrageous bulls*** and immediately he started whining like a little girl.if you wanna hold press conferences on your lawn,get on tv and endorse a candidate,and say wildly stupid sh** about obama being "death to israel", well then y'gotta be able to answer a couple simple questions."joe" was just one more example of the ridiculous,disgraceful campaign mccain ran.all he had to do was run like the actual john mccain and he'd be our president right now.
24hour you're full of
November 5, 2008 - 12:24 ET by ConservativeRex24hour you're full of shit. That half white Obami offered up his answer of "share the wealth" dumbass. No one put a gun to his head to answer that way, dumbass.
That's OK dumbass...you got it now. Run with it. Except for at least the next two years you babies will be blaming George Bush for every failing that your half white president has. Crying like the little girls YOU are. Good.
Believe me your half white president won't be the death to Israel, he won't get the chance. Israel will take out Iran on it's own accord and Obami won't be able to do a damn thing about it. Hell, dumbass, 90% of the US military HATES your half white president. He'll not have the military on his side for anything. Believe me.
HEY REX...
November 5, 2008 - 12:38 ET by 24hourrifleHEY REX,IT MUST REALLY SUCK TO BE WRONG ON EVERY ISSUE ALONG WITH BEING A LOSER.
CONSERVATIVES LIKE TO BELIEVE THEYRE THE PARTY OF CHRISTIANITY,YET IVE READ AT LEAST 50 RACIST POSTS ON THIS WEBSITE.INCLUDING YOURS,YOU FILTHY,VILE,KNUCKLEDRAGGING SPEWER OF DOUCHEBAGGERY.
AND BTW...CHECK OUT THE NUMBERS:OVERSEAS MILITARY PERSONEL DONATED TO OBAMA SIX TO ONE.YES,SIX TO FU**ING ONE SMART GUY.
Hey dumbass 24hour..wrong
November 5, 2008 - 13:05 ET by ConservativeRexHey dumbass 24hour..wrong again!..At least your consistant. And BTW Obami isn't half-white?..LOL! And there isn't racism in this country anymore correct? You must be trying to spread some more propaganda.
I hope I'm wrong on the issues of Obami screwing with our constitution, but I doubt it. I hope I'm wrong on the issue of him cutting our military 25% minimum, but I doubt it. Those are the issues I hope I'm wrong on dumbass, but I doubt it. Other than that, Ive not been wrong on a single issue.
Now, wipe the spittle of off your monitor and increase your prozac.
okay.your not a racist...
November 5, 2008 - 13:18 ET by 24hourrifleyour not a racist.i agree.only half a racist.
btw...youre so afraid that obama will ruin our country,right???but think about it,the latest poll says that nearly 90 percent of the country thinks were going in the wrong direction.bush's approval ratings are historically low.its damn near impossible to do worse than that.after the last 8 years,why should americans put our country in the hands of a republican any time soon??i just dont get it.oh well.anyway...god bless you and all your evil,slimy conservative buddies.
24hourAhole, that is the last f'ing straw!
November 5, 2008 - 13:11 ET by R D HelmYET IVE READ AT LEAST 50 RACIST POSTS ON THIS WEBSITE.
Produce links to every one of them, or I am going to make it my sole reason for existence in this life to get your lying, ignorant ass banned from this site.
We here are fed-up with being accused of being racists by government-schooled idiots like you WHO COULD NOT CORRECTLY DEFINE THE TERM IF YOUR MISERABLE LITTLE LIVES DEPENDED ON IT!
-Dave
Resist the Obamatons.
boo hoo...
November 5, 2008 - 13:45 ET by 24hourrifleboo hoo...you guys sure do whine a lot.listen.just scroll through random postings on this site,specifically from today and tell me you dont see blatant obvious racism.(not to mention bitterness.lots and lots of bitterness.).either youre blind or youve simply become accustomed to it.maybe these are the people you should be concerned with kicking off your site.just look back at the first few postings from me and see who started cursing and insulting.it definitely wasnt me.
whatever...i just wanted to prove a point and i did.im kicking myself off the site.god bless you all...
"im kicking myself off the
November 5, 2008 - 13:52 ET by Conservative Voice"im kicking myself off the site"
ie the Obama campaign gave you your last paycheck.
Banned for having opposing
November 5, 2008 - 13:51 ET by arkansaszippersBanned for having opposing viewpoints? Sounds very "brown shirt," doesn't it?
note for opposing
November 5, 2008 - 13:56 ET by Conservative Voicenot for opposing viewpoints. I welcome opposing viewpoints. Rather the issue is making baseless accusations ( ie declaring one as racist ) to create a rise.
Like I said an honest debate is welcomed. A troll doesn't debate, he lights fires and runs.
You're right! By golly we
November 5, 2008 - 12:35 ET by Conservative VoiceYou're right! By golly we should be grateful that the government handed over private information to the media because someone dare embarress the One ( if this isn't a clear example of fascism I don't know what is ). ( Isn't this gross abuse of government power something the left accused wire tappings were all about...hmmmm the hypocrisy is stunning ) And nothing like having the full power of the media grill a private citizen, yet a peep of an enquiring on the One who is actually running!
CONSERVATIVE WHINE...
November 5, 2008 - 12:47 ET by 24hourrifleTHE ONLY REASON THIS FRAUD BECAME FAMOUS IS BECAUSE JOHN MCCAIN MENTIONED HIS NAME 21 TIMES DURING THE LAST DEBATE IN A DESPERATE ATTEMPT TO RELATE TO REAL AMERICANS.AND OF COURSE,JOE THE SHEEP WAS LOVIN IT UNTIL SOMEONE CALLED HIM ON HIS BULLS***.BUT NOW JOE HAS AN AGENT,A RECORD CONTRACT,AND A SPOT NEXT TO THE "WHERES THE BEEF" LADY,IN THE HALL OF "WHO GIVES A F***...HAVE FUN GUYS,ONLY 4 MORE YEARS UNTIL SARAH PALIN GETS HER CLOCK CLEANED TOO>
HOW CLEVER, HOW LONG DID IT
November 5, 2008 - 12:52 ET by Conservative VoiceHOW CLEVER, HOW LONG DID IT TAKE TO COME UP WITH THAT INSULT "CONSERVATIVE WHINE"? AND HOW LONG DID IT TAKE FOR YOU TO LEARN HOW TO TYPE LIKE AN ASS?
HERE IS AN IDEA 24 HYPOCRIT. PLEASE BY ALL MEANS SINCE YOU ARE POSTING POLITICAL DISCOURSE ON A PUBLIC FORUM, PLEASE POST YOUR PERSONAL INFORMATION. NAME, BIRTHDATE, SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER, MOTHERS MAIDEN NAME. TO DO ANY LESS MEANS YOU ARE FULL OF IT!
By the way I only typed like that because you are a moron
racism comes so naturally to most conservatives...
November 5, 2008 - 13:09 ET by 24hourrifleyes.i am clever.im clever enough to prove my point without resorting to racism.and i am an actual christian,practicing actual christianity,as opposed to the twisted,hateful manipulated version most conservatives practice.therefore,i can disagree with vile,useless subhumans like you and joe the plumber.i will simply pray for you both.god bless...
If your point was you are a
November 5, 2008 - 13:14 ET by Conservative VoiceIf your point was you are a brainwashed jerk, then we agree, you proved your point quite stunningly well.
"i can disagree with vile,useless subhumans like you and joe the plumber"
How Christian of you.
TO THE ADMINS AT NB: How many more of these baseless lies...
November 5, 2008 - 13:14 ET by R D Helm...do we have to put up with?
racism comes so naturally to most conservatives...
It is time for this idiot to go!
-Dave
Resist the Obamatons.
24h... Your cleverness
November 5, 2008 - 13:17 ET by bigtimer24h...
Your cleverness will get you kicked the hell off this site...the sooner the better in my opinion.
I am sick and tired of your filthy trolls being allowed to stay as long as some of you have, I hope your stay here is very short.
"America isn't the problem...America is the solution." ~ Rush Limbaugh
Dave...24 is another one
November 5, 2008 - 13:20 ET by bigtimerDave...24 is another one week wonder troll...I am sik to death of them....and today isn't to smart of a day for them to be messing here.
"America isn't the problem...America is the solution." ~ Rush Limbaugh
bt, this particular troll has repeatedly accused most everyone..
November 5, 2008 - 13:56 ET by R D Helm...here of being a racist.
I find this to be a highly offensive charge that has no basis in fact.
This person clearly signed up here solely for the purpose of repeatedly disrupting this site, which is a clear violation of the Terms of Use here.
I want this one out of here, and I am not going to let up until he/she/it is gone.
-Dave
Resist the Obamatons.
By getting all worked up,
November 5, 2008 - 13:59 ET by arkansaszippersBy getting all worked up, aren't you just giving them what they want? Who cares what some jackass says?
az... "Who cares what
November 5, 2008 - 14:04 ET by Clear thinkeraz...
"Who cares what some jackass says?"
You talkin bout yourself again I see.
Sad Day For America
Making Fun of AGW http://giovanniworld.wordpress.com/
I never could understand
November 5, 2008 - 14:01 ET by Clear thinkerI never could understand these morons. It's quite the norm for Conservatives to 'judge people by their character, not the color of their skin' (MLK reference). Yet the left never seems to operate that way. Like I said, morons!
Sad Day For America
Making Fun of AGW http://giovanniworld.wordpress.com/
But isn't a debate more
November 5, 2008 - 13:21 ET by arkansaszippersBut isn't a debate more enjoyable when you have somebody to take the counter-point?
An honest debate is
November 5, 2008 - 13:38 ET by Conservative VoiceAn honest debate is certainly more enjoyable, but debating a troll is not an honest debate, by definition a troll is dishonest.
You don't believe that this
November 5, 2008 - 13:56 ET by arkansaszippersYou don't believe that this person honestly feels that way? You know, people have all different opinions about our country...
Oh zip it zipper...you are
November 5, 2008 - 13:39 ET by bigtimerOh zip it zipper...you are nothing but a pain too.
"America isn't the problem...America is the solution." ~ Rush Limbaugh
Ha, wow. Bad day or
November 5, 2008 - 13:49 ET by arkansaszippersHa, wow. Bad day or something?
Now what did I ever do to you? Talk about being outright insulting...
zip... Buzz off...you
November 5, 2008 - 14:53 ET by bigtimerzip...
Buzz off...you bother me little boy.
"America isn't the problem...America is the solution." ~ Rush Limbaugh
"yes.i am clever.im
November 5, 2008 - 15:58 ET by ckc1227"yes.i am clever.im clever enough to prove my point without resorting to racism"
Proved what point, that you were born clueless and still are, lol? You got us there, you proved your point quite well.
Obama's Economic plan: more taxes, more spending, more regulation. Prosperity here we come.
24..boy, you need to settle
November 5, 2008 - 13:35 ET by ConservativeRex24..boy, you need to settle down. If Obami get's through four years, we'll have no problem getting Conservatives back in where we want them We'll wash all the RINOS out in the next two years, then we'll wash the Libs out. We've done it before, we'll do it again.
Every once in a while we have to get reminded of how good we have it, by electing a knucklehead like Obami to see how bad it can be. He's a one termer dude. Fact is, you'll be crying to have George Bush back in two years once the IED's start going off all over our cities. How many attacks have we had here since 9/11? Exactly, dumbass.
Now, troll on back to your Marxist websites where they probably think you're cool and an intellectual. And spout off on how you showed those "evil conservatives" a thing or two. Here partner, your just another troll of no consequence.
CRex... Amen...nobody
November 5, 2008 - 14:55 ET by bigtimerCRex...
Amen...nobody could say it any better than that.
"America isn't the problem...America is the solution." ~ Rush Limbaugh
????
November 5, 2008 - 14:47 ET by kdizzydazeI thought you were kicking yourself off here? After all, we are a bunch of racists that are wrong about everything anyways.
For all you NBer's - get used to this - now that their socialist pal has "won" the white house, they will go even further now to shut you down or wear you down with incessant trolling.
Gird up for the fight. This thing is just beginning.
PS 24 -- don't finish your noxious posts with your version of "peace-out" (God Bless) cause God knows you sure don't mean it.
God made man, but he used a monkey to do it -- DEVO
Personal Income Tax Records
November 5, 2008 - 12:22 ET by JGsezJoe should have asked Sanchez his source of Joe's tax information. Then Joe should have asked him why it didn't concern Sanchez a bit that his (Joe's) personal income tax information became public information. This should be investigated since it is very difficult, if not impossible, for law enforcement to get tax data on drug dealers. But "Joe the Plumber" - no problem!
HA!
November 5, 2008 - 12:36 ET by islero47Dirty Sanchez! I can't believe you did that! Does no one else get it?
Sarah Palin/Jason Lewis 2012
Hey Sanchez, I don't make
November 5, 2008 - 12:56 ET by soulpileHey Sanchez,
I don't make 250k. I make way under that. But guess what? I don't want Obama's handouts. I don't want to take money away from those who worked hard to earn it. That disgusts me.
So you know what? I'm taking the handout and donating it. To conservative causes. Maybe I'll send some to Ann Coulter. Or how about the One's great enemy, Sean Hannity? Or programs supported by them.
Hey - I endorsed McCain this election season. Am I now a target of the media because I am now not a private citizen in their eyes? ... oh, guess I have to get on tv and ask an honest question of the Great Comrade after he steps onto my lawn. And then when HE answers truthfully, but nobody likes the answer, guess who's to blame? The one who asked the question!
The media ****ed us over. The Messiah didn't get vetted. They'd rather spend their time digging into the backgrounds of private citizens instead of the elected official who wouldn't even be able to get security clearance. But, hey! He's The One! No problems, they'll just cover up for him. After all, he's the magical pretty pony that's going to save us all and heeeaaal our relations with the World. The world that salivates at the prospect of America becoming weak.
Sanchez is an idiot, pure
November 5, 2008 - 13:52 ET by Clear thinkerSanchez is an idiot, pure and simple!
Sad Day For America
Making Fun of AGW http://giovanniworld.wordpress.com/
Ahh, yes, the brilliant
November 5, 2008 - 15:47 ET by ckc1227Ahh, yes, the brilliant logic of the media. Seems one ill hasn't been cured simply because the "one" has been elected: ignorance. I guess, according to Sanchez, since I've never been raped, I can't have an opinion on the issue. I guess, since I'm not a journalist, if Obama said journalists now have to pay an 80% tax rate, I shouldn't have an opinion on that. I guess, according to Sanchez, as long as you're not the one getting screwed directly, you should be ok with it.
Obama's Economic plan: more taxes, more spending, more regulation. Prosperity here we come.
Okay, 24
November 5, 2008 - 17:13 ET by panzerakcI'm feeling kind of ornery, so let me offer some comments . . . .
"go to the top of THIS VERY PAGE!!!
look at what conservativevoice posted and tell me that dude isnt a racist. "
And what was posted reads, "One definition of stupid is . . . " (that's the header) "Rick Sanchez." And the reason this is racist is, is, is, um . . . . .
Oooh, ooh, ooh, I know, I know! (Waves hand in air.)
Because . . . (drum roll please) Rick's last name is SANCHEZ. Saying that a person with an obviously ethnic last name is stupid is racist. I got it!
24, if you notice, on this website media dweebs with all kinds of last names (Brown, Matthews, Olbermann - wait, that's ethnic, is that racists? Nah, that group's Caucasian, doesn't count as racist.) are described as stupid. To quote Forrest Gump, "Stupid is as stupid does."
And then there's your take on Joe the Plumber.
I've figured out the problem with Joe. It's not that he owes back taxes, isn't licenced, has overdue bills, or (GASP!) goes by his middle name. It's that Joe has MIND CONTROL. You see, Joe made Obama say those things about sharing the wealth. He really meant to say the sharing was of the unicorns, puppies, flowers, and lollipops that his administration will usher in. (And hey, did the Earth stop warming today? Weren't the glaciers suipposed to stop retreating? Don't live near any glaciers, so I couldn't check) But that awful, evil JTP lured Obama to his yard so he could use his mind control powers on him! (If the man had come to my yard, the clip would have been of him beating a hasty retreat with about 230 pounds of seriously PO'd canines in hot pursuit.)
And if I were Joe, I'd be suing everybody in sight for unauthorized access to my information.
I feel better now that that's all cleared up.
Sanchez is stupid
November 5, 2008 - 17:26 ET by art341I can't believe the stupidity of the guy. All you need to make it in tv news these days is a pretty head, anything inside it is optional.
Tit for Tat
November 5, 2008 - 22:45 ET by Lee BoggsWhy doesn't somebody vet Rick Sanchez?
We need to Start
November 6, 2008 - 00:32 ET by ChattychitoWe need to Start our own Conservative TV Network. one with all conservativve reporters willing to spin the turth and not the fantasy we see on the big 4 (abc, cbs, msnbc, and cnn). we need to unit and then by the next election we will have some means in the media on the TV's of America.
Offer a little less advertizment cost so we can raise the funds to do the Real Stuff. start some prime time drama's and news shows.
Let's invest now and get it going.
Just where do I send my check?
anyone game?