baby murdering, america hating commies...Obama Hussein in the White House...i think i feel sick...

This is really sickening.

This was a GREAT post!
===================

Obama’s 180 on genocideposted at 10:10 am on October 8, 2008 by Ed Morrissey

http://hotair.com/ar...

Jeff Jacoby detected a mighty spin coming from Barack Obama’s attempt to define his doctrine on interventionism in last night’s debate. In Nashville, Obama said that the American military must stand ready to stop genocide whenever and wherever it occurs. However, Obama seemed to have little concern last year to the genocide that would have resulted from a precipitous pre-surge withdrawal from Iraq:

===
Though most of the debate dealt with domestic issues, it was a foreign-policy question that sent me flying to my files. Moderator Tom Brokaw asked the candidates what their “doctrine” would be “in situations where there’s a humanitarian crisis, but it does not affect our national security,” such as “the Congo, where 4.5 million people have died since 1998,” or Rwanda or Somalia.

In such cases, answered Obama, “we have moral issues at stake.” Of course the United States must act to stop genocide, he said. “When genocide is happening, when ethnic cleansing is happening . . . and we stand idly by, that diminishes us.”

But that wasn’t how Obama sounded last year, when he was competing for the Democratic nomination and was unbending in his demand for an American retreat from Iraq. Back then, he dismissed fears that a US’t a good enough reason to keep US forces there,” the AP reported on July 20, 2007 (my italics). withdrawal would unleash a massive Iraqi bloodbath. “Democratic presidential hopeful Barack Obama said Thursday the United States cannot use its military to solve humanitarian problems and that preventing a potential genocide in Iraq isn’t a good enough reason to keep US forces there,” the AP reported on July 20, 2007 (my italics).

What kind of candidate is it whose moral response to genocide - genocide - can reverse itself 180 degrees in a matter of months? Is that the kind of candidate who ought to be the leader of the free world?
===

Obama’s answer also ignored the multiple genocides of the Saddam Hussein regime. We knew well before our entry into Iraq that Saddam had conducted genocides against the Kurds. He used the chemical weapons that people now claim he didn’t have at Halabja, for which he and his henchmen deservedly received the death penalty (although Saddam had already been executed by then). He also conducted a genocidal campaign against the Marsh Arabs, draining their wetlands and leaving them to die for their opposition to his regime. Saddam persecuted the Shi’ites after an uprising in 1991, one that continued in defiance of the no-fly zones — the same tactic Obama recommended as a stop against genocide in Sudan and elsewhere.

Now Obama says that American intervention in Iraq was the wrong move, but in an Obama Doctrine, that would have been an acceptable response. Saddam was a genocidal tyrant, and no one else in the region was going to act to stop him. The only difference here is the political juice Obama gets for opposing the Iraq war.

And, as Jacoby points out, Obama can’t even be consistent. He decries genocide and pledges American intervention to stop it, but earlier said that potential genocide wouldn’t be enough reason to keep American troops in place. Huh? Either Obama is confused, or he only cares about genocides when it doesn’t involve Iraqis.

M-B

"There's a new scent in the air. If you're a Democrat, you haven't felt it tickle your nostrils since October 1996, when everybody knew that Bill Clinton was about to beat Bob Dole. The perfume hasn't been this strong since October 1964, the eve of Lyndon Johnson's landside presidential victory."

Both 1964 and 1996 were incumbent president races.  Bad metaphor because Obama is not an incumbent president.

Before McCain started down the Road to Bailout, I cant figure out whether he is Hope or Cosby, I had all teh confidence in his campaign.  But now I am depressed at teh thought of Obama winning which is an ugly chance of reality.  Well McCain is the only candiate who has true hope so Hope it is.

I do know whatever canditate is chosen for President the American people will have gotten what the richly deserve.

Nuke em til they glow then shoot em in the dark.

the smell of BO. It smells a lot like BS. I worry about people who find such scents pleasant. Smells to me more like it's time to change the diapers-as Reagan warned us about in partial jest years ago.

Coincidence? I think not.  :)

"to call an illegal immigrant an "undocumented alien" is the same as calling a streetcorner drug dealer an "unlicensed pharmacist".

"You spend your money anyway you want and respect other's rights to do the same"

Actually, the MSM crowned Mr. Obama "king" way back in February!  Anyone who dared opposed him was doomed to a crushing loss, in the arrogant eyes of the "news" media. 

The press is doing to Mr. McCain what they did to Mrs. Clinton; frightening, isn't it? 

I for one feel a lot better about McCain's chances than I ever did about Dole.

But if I'm wrong, looking on the bright side, if Carter got us Reagan, just think what Obama could get us.

Camille Paglia, a liberal and Obama supporter, who writes for Slate and is also a Professor at The University of the Arts in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania wrote this in Slate today:

"One of the most idiotic allegations batting around out there among urban media insiders is that Palin is "dumb." Are they kidding? What level of stupidity is now par for the course in those musty circles? (The value of Ivy League degrees, like sub-prime mortgages, has certainly been plummeting. As a Yale Ph.D., I have a perfect right to my scorn.) People who can't see how smart Palin is are trapped in their own narrow parochialism -- the tedious, hackneyed forms of their upper-middle-class syntax and vocabulary."

For the purpose of full disclosure, Camille Pagilia may be a liberal but she is someone who has a important conservative admirer. Rush Limbaugh is a Camille Pagilia admirer and has said of her: 

" Camille Paglia, a big Obamaite, and, as you know, I have tremendous respect for Camille Paglia"

"Now, Camille Paglia is one of the smart liberals, one of the smart Democrats."

-------------------------------------------------------------------

“You’re not going to see me ever be partisan. I’ll never take a position on a candidate or an issue.” ~ CNN ‘s Campbell Brown