The mainstream media are currently excusing Barack Obama's friendship with unrepentant terrorist, Bill Ayers, in a couple of ways. They either claim that Ayers was just a "neighborhood friend" of Obama and/or that Ayers was merely some benign 60s radical while conveniently avoiding mention of his terrorist activities in the Weather Underground.
The first point that Ayers was just some neighborhood friend of Obama is undercut by the working relationship between the two as we saw in yesterday's NewsBusters blog by Clay Waters quoting Ed Morrissey of Hot Air:
...Obama worked as CEO of the project that Ayers helped found, the Chicago Annenberg Challenge, for several years. Ayers served on the board at the same time. In an overlapping period, both men served for a few years on the Woods Fund, which notably granted $75,000 to Yasser Arafat's associate, Rashid Khalidi, during that time.
Their paths didn't cross "sporadically." They worked on two projects together, political projects, for almost a decade in Chicago. That's hardly "sporadic"; that's a well-established working relationship, and certainly much more substantial than Obama's description of Ayers as just another familiar face in the neighborhood.
As to the equally laughable notion that Ayers was just some 60s radical who dabbled in the counterculture and nothing more, that assumption is completely undercut by a fascinating documentary produced in 2002, "The Weather Underground." You can see a video of this documentary, starting with Part 1 of a nine part series on YouTube. Here is a 2003 review of "The Weather Underground" written in 2003 by James Miller for the Boston Globe (emphasis mine):
THIRTY-FOUR YEARS AGO this fall, a small band of well-educated young Americans hell-bent on storming heaven steeled themselves to commit an act of spectacularly gratuitous violence. A militant breakaway faction of Students for a Democratic Society, they called themselves the Weathermen. Their strategy, such as it was, blended theatrical bravado with puritanical zeal -- Bonnie and Clyde meet John Brown. Wearing crash helmets and wielding baseball bats, ululating like the revolutionaries they had studied on screen in "The Battle of Algiers," they would run wild in the streets of Chicago, lashing out at any available symbol of privilege and power: police, parked cars, affluent bystanders.
Now, more than a generation later, the Weathermen are back in the news. This summer, a new documentary, "The Weather Underground," directed by Sam Green and Bill Siegel, brought the group's story into movie theaters...
...The Weathermen's 1969 melee in Chicago, billed "The Days of Rage," was meant to inspire working-class youth to commit similarly gratuitous acts, and to prove the group's revolutionary macho to the Black Panthers. But the Panthers spurned them, and there was no evidence that working-class youth were ready to run wild in the streets. So the group changed its tactics, with deadly results. Early in 1970, a group of Weathermen inadvertently blew up three of their members along with a townhouse on Eleventh Street in New York's Greenwich Village. The group was trying to build an anti-personnel bomb, in order to give Americans a taste of the kind of cruel weaponry their government was using in Vietnam.
Now the object of a national manhunt, and rechristened the Weather Underground, the fugitives -- several dozen militants in a handful of American cities -- established guerilla "focos," secret cells in which members learned how to build bigger and better bombs, to be detonated in acts of "strategic sabotage." Besides issuing a stream of turgid communiques denouncing racism and sexism and proclaiming sympathy for fellow revolutionaries such as Ho Chi Minh, the group succeeded in bombing several symbolic targets, including the Pentagon and the Capitol building. Though the group issued warnings to evacuate their targets, inevitably some bystanders were injured. Against all odds, the most notorious Weathermen -- Bernadine Dohrn, Bill Ayers, Mark Rudd, Kathy Boudin -- all managed to elude the FBI.
Got that? Bill Ayers. Not exactly a some benign 60s radical. So what is Ayers current attitude about his years as a domestic terrorist? The review explains:
The views of other veterans of the Weatherman movement run the gamut. In the new film, Mark Rudd, the leader of the Columbia student revolt in 1968, expresses genuine sorrow. More characteristic is Bill Ayers, currently a professor of education, who is defiantly unapologetic, both on camera and in the pages of his 2001 memoir "Fugitive Days." "I don't regret setting bombs," he told The New York Times In a profile published, unfortunately, on Sept. 11, 2001. "In fact, I don't think we did enough."
The question of guilt clearly irks Ayers -- but it was, and remains, central to the Weatherman phenomenon. For all the neo-Marxist gibberish that larded its communiques, it was a radical movement with Puritan overtones, forged self-consciously out of revulsion at a shameful "white skin privilege" its members hoped to expunge, in part by making a sacrificial offering of their own pure souls.
Got that, MSM? "Defiantly unapologetic." Keep that in mind the next time you try to portray Ayers as a "respected" member of his Chicago community.
I highly recommend you see the rest of this revelatory documentary on YouTube at Part 2, Part 3, Part 4, Part 5, Part 6, Part 7, Part 8, and Part 9. Obama's friend, Bill Ayers, is featured prominently.
—P.J. Gladnick is a freelance writer and creator of the DUmmie FUnnies blog.



















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
Obama's Rapid Response Team, aka MSM, hits back...
October 7, 2008 - 08:14 ET by krendlerThe msm isn't taking these "attacks" on Obama lying down. Check out the headlines in AP/Yahoo's "Politics" section this a.m.:
Out of 5 headlines, we get 4 that are negative against McCain/Palin. Wonderful.
Remarkable that McCain is even in the race considering the subprime mess and the off-the-charts media bias for Obama during this campaign.
CNN's Carol Costello had report this morning on states that are still toss-ups? Why haven't those states "decided" yet (i.e., "Get on board w/ the Obama train already, will ya!"): According to Carol, the answer is Racism.
Expect another round of "racism will decide the campaign" stories this week now that Zogby is showing the race to be within the margin of error again.
Wow, that is yahoo for
October 7, 2008 - 10:26 ET by play21cwWow, that is yahoo for you.
I did some checking, and i looked at the recent polls in key states and then went back and looked at the polls from 2004 and 2000 in the months of september and october. As of right now the trend is the same as it was 4 and 8 years ago. they are almost identical, one week the Republican is up, the next the Democrat. It lines up with the timing of the election and how much time is left.
Hopefully McCain can get the news about Obama out and that will stay in the minds of voters when they enter the booth, and then they will vote the way they are afraid to say they will, on account of looking like a racist. McCain!
"Community Organizing" another name for "communist revolution"
October 7, 2008 - 08:29 ET by geoksterRead this and prepare to get very, very angry.
In 1946 Alinsky wrote Reveille for Radicals…about the principles and tactics of “community organizing,” otherwise known as agitating for revolution…which he and his disciples euphemistically refer to as “change.” Two of his most notable modern-day disciples are Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama.
…a clearly identifiable enemy; …specifically name this foe…who is to blame for the “particular evil” that is the source of the people’s angst…it should be an individual such as a CEO, a mayor, or a president. (Bush, Palin)
…the organizer’s task was to cultivate…a negative, visceral emotional response to the face of the enemy…to avoid the temptation to concede that his opponent was not “100 per cent devil,” or that he possessed certain admirable qualities such as being “a good churchgoing man, generous to charity, and a good husband.” (Bush/Palin Derangement Syndrome)
Men will act when they are convinced their cause is 100 percent on the side of the angels, and that the opposition are 100 percent on the side of the devil.” …the ends (in this case, the transfer of power) justify virtually whatever means are required (in this case, lying)…the enemy was to be portrayed as the very personification of evil, against whom any and all methods were fair game...
If the perceived oppressor surrenders or extends a hand of friendship...(t)his cannot be permitted. Eternal war, by definition, must never end. True revolutionaries do not flaunt their radicalism, Alinsky taught. They cut their hair, put on suits and infiltrate the system from within.” (Barack Obama)
…in order to most effectively cast themselves as defenders of moral principals and human decency, organizers must react with “shock, horror, and moral outrage” whenever their targeted enemy in any way misspeaks or fails to live up to his “book of rules.”
…the organizer must deride his enemy and dismiss him as someone unworthy of being taken seriously because he is either intellectually deficient or morally bankrupt…He advised organizers to “laugh at the enemy” in an effort to provoke “an irrational anger. “Ridicule,” said Alinsky, “is man’s most potent weapon. It is almost impossible to counterattack ridicule.
Does any of this ring a bell? For me it explains EVERYTHING that is going on right now: the hatred, the lies, the smears, the ridicule, the coordinated trolls, even the empty suit, his equally empty mantra of undefined “change”, and his hesitancy to explain what he did as a “community organizer”.
I have winnowed this down from a much more detailed, footnoted explanation of Alinsky and his work. Read the whole page and prepare yourself to be sick.
http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/individualProfile.asp?indid=2314
This profile was written by John Perazzo in April 2008, long before Palin, but it obviously accurately describes what happened to her, and the whole strategy of the Obama campaign, doesn’t it?
Excellent work, geokster.
October 7, 2008 - 18:58 ET by stratmanExcellent work, geokster. Saved and forwarded to friends.
Obama is friends with a known unrepentant terrorist
October 7, 2008 - 08:38 ET by c5thenIn fact, his political career was started in that terrorist's living room in Chicago.
No wonder Obama would talk to Amedinajhad, Kim Jongill and Raul Castro with no conditions, he would offer them positions in his cabinet.
Obama is THE most dangerous candidate for President ever.
What's on the killing room floor?
October 7, 2008 - 09:27 ET by CrashThe weather underground were too stoned to see the truth: LIBERAL DEMOCRTATS ARE THE TRUE FACE OF EVIL
When I see a "documentary" like this I wonder, why is the left so willing to rewrite history and edit out the facts? President Johnson (D) bears responsibility, along with General Westmorland, for escalating the war. Yet, it's the faces of the Republicans, the military, and law enforcement who are made the bear the atrocities of Gollum. Lest we forget Teddy's role in the Killing Fields.
Vietnam troop count:
Kennedy 1963 = 16,300.
Johnson 1968 = 536,100.
Nixon 1972 = 24,200 (Nixon never added more troops).
http://members.aol.com/warlibrary/vwatl.htm
Ayers is a murderer and a terrorist.
October 7, 2008 - 09:07 ET by JWFAt least OJ convince 12 idiots he was not guilty. Ayers walked on a technicality.
He claims he was not part of the more nefarious acts, the killin' and attempted killin'. Yea, his fellow terrorists that could contradict this BLEWED THEMSELVES UP! Not only were they bombmakin' murderin' terrorists, they were INCOMPETENT bombmakin', murderin' terrrorists.
I don't believe him. Am I to take the word of a traitorous bombing terrorist? No.
And yes, Obama had extensive, again extensive contacts with this unrepentent bombin' murderer.
Sincerely,
a Veteran of a 1000 psychic wars.
It's like I wrote in another
October 7, 2008 - 09:20 ET by CrashIt's like I wrote in another post, if they were leftist, "Nichols and McVeigh would be on a book signing tour."
Not to step on your poignant comment sir.
October 7, 2008 - 10:06 ET by JWFIt is a good point.
But who said they were on the right? The liberal MSM told people that. Remember that always.
The right wing, where conservatives reside, believe in the constitution and declaration of independence.
McVeigh wanted to overthrow the government, the government based on the constitution.
He was also a neonazi. Nazi's were socialist. The National SOCIALIST workers party. Socialism is a disease of the left.
Aryan nation, NeoNazi's, other militant groups, advocating the overthrow of the government, either reside on the left, where the constitution is disdained, or are not on the chart. Crazy does not belong on a left/right political chart.
Don't buy into the MSM propaganda. They said he was rightwing.
Sincerely,
a Veteran of a 1000 psychic wars.
Conservatives are willing to change ...
October 7, 2008 - 11:24 ET by Crash... we just go about it with more thought.
You're right to point that out. I've always linked fascism and communism more closely to the left. More so now after reading Jonah Goldberg's book. Remember how the MSM lumped militia groups, Aryan nuts and the second amendment together with "terrorist" ? I don't remember seeing a single story about Black Panther's or the WU during their media attacks.
And.......be referred to as....
October 7, 2008 - 13:55 ET by connman90's Radicals!
No way! No how! Nobama! Keep the change! ...Sen. Clinton
Turn the Tables
October 7, 2008 - 09:34 ET by Copperhead RidgeWhy don't conservatives turn the tables on the left? The right should organize. I'd like to see a "shadow party" on the right like the left shadows the Democrat party.
Why don't we organize?
I know it's tough for conservatives to organize because somebody has to pull the gotdanged welfare cart, but I'd like to see a grassroots movement on the right that brought pressure to bear on Congress.
Neal Boortz did an excellent job of activating people in support of the Fair Tax, but that seems to have fizzle somewhat. I think he successfully convinced conservatives that it's o.k. to take some time off of work and come together to provide a unified forum for their diffused voices.
I think some of Alinsky's tactics could be put back on the left. Obviously, I don't think we should foment revolution -- although it could come to that -- but we could ridicule. In fact, I think conservatives were doing a lot of damage to Obama by ridiculing his trip overseas this summer. He learned a lesson, and it has prevented his campaign from using film footage or touting his summer trip. They spent a ton of money on that trip -- possibly bankrolling a lot of illegal contributions or paying off a lot of the same -- and ou ridicule rendered it useless.
It should be a constant tactic.
The followers of Obama are ripe for ridicule these days. They are mindless and scary.
question
October 7, 2008 - 09:59 ET by SQL_SamI knew Ayers was a teacher, and now I see there is another wacko that is a teacher too. Does this not put the shivers down your spine that these jackasses are teaching the minds of mush out there? Wholy crap - I could imagine what these "professors" teach....
Its all part of the master
October 7, 2008 - 10:40 ET by play21cwIts all part of the master plan to take over.
If we dont do somehting its going to happen, redistribution of wealth, socialism, censorship, brainwashing, making 95% of america dependent on the government & the wealthy unwealthy, and then one day services are going to disappear, and obama is going to claim it is the fault of the government, and he will make a ruling that congress and house of reps no longer exist. There will no longer be any states, everything will be controlled by him. Then he will build up arms in the US and use the military to stop anyone from talking out against him or trying to do anything. Before you know it we live in a communist regime/military state. Then he will continue to pal around with terrorists and connect with Iran, Venn, Russia, Korea etc.. And who do you think they are going to target?
how about the one.....
October 7, 2008 - 13:59 ET by connmanserving the life sentence? I didn't watch every part what was he sent up for?
No way! No how! Nobama! Keep the change! ...Sen. Clinton
Documentary
October 7, 2008 - 15:32 ET by unitaryexecutiveCoincidentally, I watched this documentary last night. It is unbelievable. The guy who went to prison for life joined another radical group after he turned himself in. He participated in an armed robbery with that group that resulted in the death of an armed guard.
If I were McCain I would have a commercial where the Bernadine Dohrn "this is a declaration of a state of war..." speech is playing in the background while the words on the screen say that Obama started his political career in this woman's living room (I assume that Ms. Dohrn and Mr. Ayers lived together at the time). Then I would run another commercial with a list of the Senators who received the largest contributions from Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac with some thrown-in quotes from McCain warning of the impending crisis (these have to exist after 2004 when it was discovered that these companies had "creative" accounting techniques).
I smell a comeback...
We have so many people who can't see a fat man standing beside a thin one without coming to the conclusion that the fat man got that way by taking advantage of the thin one.
-Ronald Reagan