WaPo: 'Nebraska Becomes Unlikely Battleground'; Will Wyoming Be Next?

  • Bookmark and Share

Hey, all you people who planned on voting for McCain/Palin. Give up, now! You have no chance of winning because Barack Obama is going to swamp your ticket so badly that even solidly Republican Nebraska has now become a battleground state. Or at least the split electoral district centered around Omaha. That is the not so hidden message of this Washington Post article written by Peter Slevin:

In early September, even as it was shifting resources out of other traditionally Republican states to key electoral battlegrounds, Sen. Barack Obama's campaign sent 15 paid staffers to Nebraska, a state that has backed a Democrat for president just once since 1936.

Despite Nebraska's consistent preference for a Republican in the Oval Office, Obama and the national mood are forcing Sen. John McCain to focus more on the state's biggest city and most urban congressional district.

Both camps have their eyes on the same reward: a single electoral vote that could prove pivotal in determining the next president.

Nebraska is one of only two states that award electoral votes by congressional district, rather than on a winner-take-all basis. Obama strategists see an opportunity in the 2nd District, where disaffection with Washington and strong Democratic voter-registration efforts are narrowing the Republican advantage.

If Obama pulls an upset in this district, regardless of what happens in the rest of Nebraska, he will pick up one electoral vote toward the 270 needed to win.

And if a meteorite hits the Eiffel tower that will affect tourism in France. Nevertheless, Slevin plows through his highly unlikely Nebraska scenario whose only purpose is to demoralize Republicans everywhere in the hope they just don't even bother to vote:

Among the scenarios that strategists have spun out, both sides see the possibility of an unprecedented tie in the electoral college. If Obama won Iowa, Nevada and New Mexico, for instance, and the rest of the map remained the same as in 2004, the race would be knotted at 269 to 269. The same would be true if Obama won Iowa, New Mexico and Colorado while McCain picked up New Hampshire. 

Or even if McCain loses that Nebraska electoral vote, Obama might still have a shot at winning 3 electoral votes in Wyoming. Ridiculous but no more so than the premise of the article. Most of the rest of this story is really nothing more than Slevin going through the motions of why Obama has a shot at winning an unattainable Nebraska electoral vote. 

This article concludes with a typical MSM technique. First it makes Obama supporters seem thoughtful:

McCain is expected to win those precincts easily, but the young volunteers found a handful of possible supporters.

"I think he's more of the last eight years," said Tim Stastny, 31, a vending machine stocker, explaining why he plans to vote for Obama.

Then an "undecided" voter who sounds exactly like she was planning to vote for Obama in the first place:

Postal worker Cheryl Foss, 48, was undecided. She has doubts about Obama's experience but prefers his middle-class tax cuts to McCain's focus on tax relief for wealthier Americans. McCain's choice of Palin particularly troubles Foss. She said of McCain, a 72-year-old melanoma survivor, "I'm afraid he might not be around and then it would be up to Palin." 

Along with another "undecided" who thinks Obama would be better but has been deluded by evil Republican propaganda:

Electrician Jeremy Miller, 30, thinks Obama would be a better president for the working class but believes the false reports that Obama -- a Christian born in Hawaii -- is actually a Muslim and a foreigner.

"Him not being an actual American, that's got me worried," Miller said. "This might be one of those years when I don't vote."

Finally, hard as it is to believe, someone is found in Nebraska who definitely won't be supporting Obama or his "enlightened" policies but only because she is unreasonably stubborn and narrow-minded, in common with all who oppose Obama in the opinion of the Washington Post and the MSM:

Cromwell, an 18-year-old volunteer, asked a woman whether she would support Obama.

"I doubt it," she answered.

Wolf, 22, an Obama staffer, asked whether she would like some campaign literature.

"No."

Meanwhile you Bush voters might as well stay home. You have no hope since the top secret exit polls that leaked late in the afternoon show John Kerry to be the landslide winner. Give up...NOW!!!

Oops! I just had a flashback to Election Day 2004. The time and the candidates have changed but the tactics have remained the same. Demoralize voters planning to vote for the Republican ticket in the hopes that they just sit on their hands rather than vote.

—P.J. Gladnick is a freelance writer and creator of the DUmmie FUnnies blog.


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Rasmussen has McCain up by 19 in Nebraska.

Also I was on RealClearPolitics and their electoral map was showing Indiana as a toss up state even though Bush took it decisively with 20.7 in 04 and 15.7 in 00.

http://www.realclear...

 

You will notice that all the states they show as toss ups are state that Bush took twice.Some by some very healthy margins.The polls are useless this time around.

Obama might be in for a very sour surprise on Nov.4th.

 

Victory in Iraq.

Liberals suck.

McCain for Preznint. 

They worked hard

The authors of this piece need to play the Powerball.  The odds of them randomly finding two undecided voters leaning toward Obama anywhere in Nebraska is just staggering. 

Talk about bias -- there is some measurable Obama sentiment in urban Omaha, but not much.  It's amazing how they will work so hard to go tease out a theme like this, and fail to report the true context of the political sentiment here.  Idiots.

I'm in Nebraska and the

I'm in Nebraska and the dems are saying Palin came to Omaha because of losing the precious one electoral vote in Omaha.  Then afterwards the fact that the area hasn't voted democrat since 1964.  I doubt it will happen this year. 

www.theholyrosary.org

"There is no problem, I tell you, no matter how difficult it is, that we can not resolve by the prayer of the Holy Rosary." -Sister Lucia

I don't get it

I looked at all of this over the weekend. If everything is equal, McCain will win.  The only place where Obama has made any significant headway is in Iowa, with some inroads in Colorado, New Mexico and Virginia.  On the flip side, McCain is making significant inroads in Minnesota, Wisconsin, Washington state and Pennsylvania.

So let's say it flips and Obama wins those states but McCain wins the others, if I am correct, this election becomes a landslide for McCain.

 

You forgot North Carolina and Michigan and Indiana

McCain announced he is pulling his campaign out of Michigan, an admission that a key state he once hoped to win is now beyond reach.  Michigan was the original home of the so-called "Reagan Democrats."  Without that voting bloc, McCain cannot win on the GOP base alone.

Instead, McCain is now spending time and money defending North Carolina and Indiana, which are usually safe Republican states.  If McCain were doing well, he wouldn't be campaigning there at all.

Those are all signs that the McCain campaign is in real trouble.

BTW, the latest polls have Obama with a big lead in Minnesota.  They also have Al Franken with a big lead over Norm Coleman for the senatorial race, the first time that's happened.

If McCain cannot really turn things around at the debate tomorrow, this race is over--and Obama has won it.