Imagine if a prominent Mitt Romney supporter who was a former Deputy Attorney General of Pennsylvania as well as former Republican Party chair in Montgomery County in that state had filed a lawsuit against John McCain questioning his eligibility to become president. How many milliseconds after the filing of that lawsuit do you think it would take for that news to be prominently featured on the New York Times website as well as the many other MSM websites? Well, something very much like that has happened only instead of a Republican suing McCain it was Democrat Philip J. Berg, a Hillary Clinton supporter and former Deputy Attorney General as well as former Democrat Party chair for Montgomery county, who filed a lawsuit yesterday against Barack Obama to keep the DNC from nominating him because Berg claims he is ineligible to become president. So far there has been a collective yawn from the MSM to this news. The one exception was a very small blurb in the Philadelphia News Clout section:
Barack Obama's presidential campaign has faced so many false rumors about his family history that it has put his birth certificate on the Internet: he was born in Honolulu, nearly two years after Hawaii became a state, making Obama a U.S. citizen by birth.
But that hasn't stopped Montgomery County lawyer Philip J. Berg from challenging Obama's qualifications to be president.
Berg, a Hillary Clinton supporter, announced he's filing a federal lawsuit today, claiming that Obama lost his citizenship when his mother relocated the family to Indonesia when Barack was a boy.
Under the law, however, moving to a foreign country does not negate an American's citizenship.
Berg said that he's acting on his own, not as an agent for the Clinton campaign. Republicans were prepared to file a similar lawsuit after the Democratic convention, he said.
To find out what the real details are of this lawsuit we once again, as with the John Edwards scandal, have to rely on the blogosphere. One of the blogs which provides detailed information about this lawsuit is legal writer Jeff Schreiber's America's Right:
A prominent Philadelphia attorney and Hillary Clinton supporter filed suit this afternoon in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania against Illinois Sen. Barack Obama, the Democratic National Committee and the Federal Election Commission. The action seeks an injunction preventing the senator from continuing his candidacy and a court order enjoining the DNC from nominating him next week, all on grounds that Sen. Obama is constitutionally ineligible to run for and hold the office of President of the United States.
Phillip Berg, the filing attorney, is a former gubernatorial and senatorial candidate, former chair of the Democratic Party in Montgomery (PA) County, former member of the Democratic State Committee, and former Deputy Attorney General of Pennsylvania. According to Berg, he filed the suit--just days before the DNC is to hold its nominating convention in Denver--for the health of the Democratic Party.
"I filed this action at this time," Berg stated, "to avoid the obvious problems that will occur when the Republican Party raises these issues after Obama is nominated.".
Berg cited a number of unanswered questions regarding the Illinois senator's background, and in today's lawsuit maintained that Sen. Obama is not a natural born U.S. citizen or that, if he ever was, he lost his citizenship when he was adopted in Indonesia. Berg also cites what he calls "dual loyalties" due to his citizenship and ties with Kenya and Indonesia.
Even if Sen. Obama can prove his U.S. citizenship, Berg stated, citing the senator's use of a birth certificate from the state of Hawaii verified as a forgery by three independent document forensic experts, the issue of "multi-citizenship with responsibilities owed to and allegiance to other countries" remains on the table.
In the lawsuit, Berg states that Sen. Obama was born in Kenya, and not in Hawaii as the senator maintains. Before giving birth, according to the lawsuit, Obama's mother traveled to Kenya with his father but was prevented from flying back to Hawaii because of the late stage of her pregnancy, "apparently a normal restriction to avoid births during a flight." As Sen. Obama's own paternal grandmother, half-brother and half-sister have also claimed, Berg maintains that Stanley Ann Dunham--Obama's mother--gave birth to little Barack in Kenya and subsequently flew to Hawaii to register the birth.
Berg cites inconsistent accounts of Sen. Obama's birth, including reports that he was born at two separate hospitals--Kapiolani Hospital and Queens Hospital--in Honolulu, as well a profound lack of birthing records for Stanley Ann Dunham, though simple "registry of birth" records for Barack Obama are available in a Hawaiian public records office.
Should Sen. Obama truly have been born in Kenya, Berg writes, the laws on the books at the time of his birth hold that U.S. citizenship may only pass to a child born overseas to a U.S. citizen parent and non-citizen parent if the former was at least 19 years of age. Sen. Obama's mother was only 18 at the time. Therefore, because U.S. citizenship could not legally be passed on to him, Obama could not be registered as a "natural born" citizen and would therefore be ineligible to seek the presidency pursuant to Article II, Section 1 of the United States Constitution.
Moreover, even if Sen. Obama could have somehow been deemed "natural born," that citizenship was lost in or around 1967 when he and his mother took up residency in Indonesia, where Stanley Ann Dunham married Lolo Soetoro, an Indonesian citizen. Berg also states that he possesses copies of Sen. Obama's registration to Fransiskus Assisi School In Jakarta, Indonesia which clearly show that he was registered under the name "Barry Soetoro" and his citizenship listed as Indonesian.
The Hawaiian birth certificate, Berg says, is a forgery. In the suit, the attorney states that the birth certificate on record is a forgery, has been identified as such by three independent document forensic experts, and actually belonged to Maya Kasandra Soetoro, Sen. Obama's half-sister.
"Voters donated money, goods and services to elect a nominee and were defrauded by Sen. Obama's lies and obfuscations," Berg stated. "If the DNC officers ... had performed one ounce of due diligence we would not find ourselves in this emergency predicament, one week away from making a person the nominee who has lost their citizenship as a child and failed to even perform the basic steps of regaining citizenship as prescribed by constitutional laws."
"It is unfair to the country," he continued, "for candidates of either party to become the nominee when there is any question of the ability to serve if elected."
Don't hold your breath waiting for the MSM to cover this lawsuit story but if you want the latest information as it breaks, check out the updates at the America's Right blog.
—P.J. Gladnick is a freelance writer and creator of the DUmmie FUnnies blog.



















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
huh
August 22, 2008 - 15:17 ET by candanceIf this story turns out to be true it could spell a lot of trouble for Obama. Start the countdown on how long it takes the MSM to mention swiftboat.
Barack's Birthplace - Not A New Story
August 22, 2008 - 17:21 ET by zeestephenVarious themes on this story have been discussed regularly for at least six months at Free Republic.
The problem - no one ever seems to come up with really decisive evidence about anything.
One guy will claim forged documents. Another guy, just as convincing, will claim the documents are ok.
One guy will claim they are the wrong documents. Another guy will say they are the right documents. And both guys will be completely convincing.
If this story can't get traction at Freepers, the same place that exposed Dan Rather, then I think Republicans have to be really, really careful what they say about this.
My own cynical guess - Obama has the documents that prove he is a natural born citizen, and he will wait until the Rightside blogs are in a complete frenzy before he hands them out to the MSM.
I'm not sold zee
August 22, 2008 - 17:29 ET by candanceAs the old saying goes, a stubborn rumor is usually a fact that hasn't been proven yet. If a prominent Democrat is taking this up, that's a far cry from Republican blogs, even if he is a Hillary supporter.
This will further widen the gap between Hillary and Obama supporters and *hopefully* give us a final answer on the subject.
No matter how you cut it, this is a good thing for us. :)
Candance
August 22, 2008 - 17:43 ET by zeestephenEveryone is going to slam this guy for being a 911 conspiracy kook.
Also, the comments at Free Republic, including my comments, started off just like the tone of most of the letters here - shock and excitement.
It's not like that anymore.
At least half of the Free Republic comments are now of the "Put Up Or Shut Up" variety.
My bottom line - please be careful with this.
well zee
August 22, 2008 - 17:47 ET by candanceAt least half of the Free Republic comments are now of the "Put Up Or Shut Up" variety.
That's the way it already is here. Doesn't faze me much anymore. As I told my friends on NB back in April I'm pretty much emotionally detached from this election and am watching more for the entertainment value.
If nothing comes from this, oh well. Like I said below even if it turns out to be true they'll keep him on the ballot regardless.
birthplace ?
August 22, 2008 - 17:38 ET by tejanodiabloet tu, hutu ?
never look a gift skunk in the tail ..
"How many milliseconds
August 22, 2008 - 15:19 ET by deerjerkydave"How many milliseconds after the filing of that lawsuit do you think it would take for that news to be prominently featured on the New York Times website as well as the many other MSM websites?"
Except you're forgetting that any negative accusation or scandal surrounding a Democratic candidate is called SWIFT BOATING, which of course means it can't be true.
Well now this is
August 22, 2008 - 15:37 ET by bigtimerWell now this is interesting...this will also be a black-out by the msm...like everything else when it comes to their loser.
Oh the hypocrisy... if the shoe was on the other foot with a republican it would of course be Breaking News...24/7.
"America isn't the problem...America is the solution." ~ Rush Limbaugh
"black-out by the
August 22, 2008 - 16:02 ET by Insane Chipmunk"black-out by the msm"
racist!!!!!
;)
IC... LOL...I thought
August 22, 2008 - 16:12 ET by bigtimerIC...
LOL...I thought about that after I posted it!
You can never be PC enough these days....just ask the late night comedians...
"America isn't the problem...America is the solution." ~ Rush Limbaugh
Well now, could this be why
August 22, 2008 - 18:41 ET by Eileen RightWell now, could this be why Wolfson went to FNS? They have an agent in place to bring it up in case the msm won't. The clintoons will do anything to win and I would not put it past them.
Prediction...
August 22, 2008 - 15:42 ET by c5thenThe case will be trown out either because the "plaintiff does not have standing" or because the court "does not have jurisdiction". The MSM will dutifully ignore it completely.
The day that "politician" became a career choice is the day we started losing the Republic. Let's get it back! Alan Keyes '08.
no zulu, you two
August 22, 2008 - 18:48 ET by tejanodiabloon nbc evening news they had big deal on mccain's houses (without mentioning they belonged to his wife) but nothing on rezko or the birthplace suit .. hutu-suit ?
never look a gift skunk in the tail ..
All I have to say is WOW....
August 22, 2008 - 15:46 ET by BEGRUNTIf this turns out to be true, it will throw the dimowits into implosion on a huge scale. They are imploding now, but this would finish it, and probably be the demise of the dim party as we know it.
"If a man does his best, what else is there"?
General George S. Patton Jr.
True or Not
August 22, 2008 - 16:06 ET by CapedConservativeCapedConservative
Waaaaaaaay out there claim by none other than a Hillary Democrat.... Gee, he's not doing it on behalf of the Clinton campaign, but to "preempt" the Republicans. Yeah, right. Only one word describes this.... yummy!
CC
Hillary is not out of it
August 22, 2008 - 16:03 ET by mattmHillary is not out of it yet.
Quite sure this is one of
August 22, 2008 - 16:09 ET by bigtimerQuite sure this is one of the reasons she keeps referring to Obama as her opponent...
"America isn't the problem...America is the solution." ~ Rush Limbaugh
BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA
August 22, 2008 - 16:04 ET by Insane ChipmunkBARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA a/k/a
BARRY SOETERO a/k/a
BARRY OBAMA a/k/a
BARACK DUNHAM a/k/a
BARRY DUNHAM
how many aliases this guy have? would this be the Presidential Record?
aka/ The Chosen
August 22, 2008 - 16:17 ET by bigtimeraka/ The Chosen One
"America isn't the problem...America is the solution." ~ Rush Limbaugh
Now you can call me Ray.........
August 22, 2008 - 18:32 ET by BarkerAccording to Barry's attorney registration, he has no former names.
Major oversight, or outright lie?
Barker... As Bill Clinton
August 22, 2008 - 18:41 ET by bigtimerBarker...
As Bill Clinton would say...just a little snafu.
"America isn't the problem...America is the solution." ~ Rush Limbaugh
Heck, no, BT!
August 22, 2008 - 18:44 ET by BlondeIt's nuanced.
It will require that we all adjust our misconceptions to understand what that big blank actuallly meant....you know, we didn't comprehend that a blank didn't mean "none"....it meant...B. Hussein's explanation to follow.
David Gregory, do you know which damn network you lie for? ~ Uncle Jimbo, @Blackfive
Yeah...he just needs to
August 22, 2008 - 18:50 ET by bigtimerYeah...he just needs to recalibrate the situation...
"America isn't the problem...America is the solution." ~ Rush Limbaugh
Perfect word!
August 22, 2008 - 18:54 ET by BlondeHowever, as someone who does numbers...I've never quite been able to "recalibrate" nothing, nada, zip, zero.
Says me to bossman...."no profit".
Suppose I'd need to be a democrat to make it more than zero, huh?
David Gregory, do you know which damn network you lie for? ~ Uncle Jimbo, @Blackfive
b & bt
August 22, 2008 - 19:03 ET by MrShyO-Force One.
Thoughtful. Nuanced.
And now a text-messaging wiz.
Also, an empty, ex-community organizer turned hollow politician.
* * * SOCKS THE CAT '08 * * *
For REAL Change
Barry's heritage
August 22, 2008 - 16:16 ET by charlietexasThis is just unreal. This could upset the applecart and verifies Hillaries "plans" to upset the convention. She ain't out of it yet. I remember her telling people in the primaries that he couldn't win. I know now why......this won't go away. I don't care if the MSM doesn't get it now. The timing is just too sweet. This is going to be lots of fun.
Here's why the MSM yawn:
August 22, 2008 - 16:36 ET by JohnMRemember the NJ Senatorial election? When it became clear that Forrester was going to beat Torricelli, Torricelli bowed out. The law required a replacement be named no less than 51 days before the election. Yet Frank Lautenberg was deemed eligible with much less time to go. How could that happen? It was an outright violation of laws on the books!
http://www.law.com/jsp/article.jsp?id=1032128669652
Where's Forrester? Where's Lautenberg?
Don't expect the courts to boot Obama. That's why the MSM is ignoring it.
JohnM... I agree with you
August 22, 2008 - 16:51 ET by bigtimerJohnM...
I agree with you about nothing happening, but Hill's team made sure to get the story out there...maybe not on the t.v. screens but this will buzz on the internet and possibly the radio airwaves with the talk show circuit....
I think Denver is going to be so very interesting with each passing day...to top it off we have the Hill supporters being furious about her not even being vetted by the Obama team...blah blah blah...
By the way...I still see red about what NJ did to Forrester...I mean it...it was outrageous and I still feel fury about it all.
"America isn't the problem...America is the solution." ~ Rush Limbaugh
if it's about the buzz
August 22, 2008 - 17:24 ET by JohnMthen yes, I agree, it will get some airtime. But if it's about a point of law, then no, I think it will just poof away in cloud of dust...
I brought up the NJ situation because I'm also still furious about that whole thing. I wonder if we as voters could have filed a class-action suit? Or if we can still file one, now that he's "in office", so our rights have indeed been violated... I don't know much about such legalities, but I do know that my rights were not only ignored, but deliberately and aggressively shoved down a hole. Violated, in the simplest definition of the word.
John M
August 22, 2008 - 17:28 ET by BlondeThe same thing was done here in Florida with Larry Craig's seat.
Disgusting, I agree. But S.O.P. apparently.
David Gregory, do you know which damn network you lie for? ~ Uncle Jimbo, @Blackfive
October Suprise in August
August 22, 2008 - 16:51 ET by AndyRNoooooo..... Hillary has absolutely nothing to do with this.
I think so too John
August 22, 2008 - 17:11 ET by candanceAssuming this turns out to be true, I see the Democrats either trying to outright break the law or protesting in the streets to change the Constitution before November.
I very much doubt the Messiah's disciples will settle for Hillary at this point.
Either way, I'm buying some popcorn for this.
candance
August 22, 2008 - 17:16 ET by MrShyFor me, it'll be Jiffy Pop (but the plain kind, and I'll add my own real butter...) and Coke with a lot of ice...
WHOOO WHOOOO !!!!
Let the (real) games........... begin!
* * * SOCKS THE CAT '08 * * *
For REAL Change
if true
August 22, 2008 - 17:48 ET by JohnMParphrased, your qualifer >if it turns out to be true< raises another red flag. Think of how dedicated the media is to the authentication of documents... I'm recalling a certain Dan Rather...
Perhaps Obama's birth records, despite having the citations of forgery, will be just fine with libs because they know what the documents were intended to show... (and they want oh so desparately to believe...)
I don't know about the prostesting in the streets...
Let's see how this show might unfold: O-ba-maniacs will try to force the Hill-a-ristas to authenticate that the forgeries are not what they purport to be. In return the H's will demand the O's disprove that the authentications are in fact true. Thus will ensue a tussle over whether there's enough love in the party to make the world a better place, and all will go home hurt and disappointed, but "spitting hopeful". Facts will not be reported, and polls will reveal their most precious value is wishful thinking. In the end, O is too much of a risk, and H tears the nomination from the convention with her teeth. Extra body bags are distributed in all blue states, as they line up at bridges and high buildings to throw themselves off...
Pass the popcorn, please.
"Imagine..."
August 22, 2008 - 17:11 ET by j. frank wilsonNews Busters uses "Imagine" more than John Lennon...Intellectually flabby because it has no limit, no boundry.
Just Imagine...
so frank
August 22, 2008 - 17:14 ET by candanceWhat do you plan on doing if this rumor turns out to be true? And don't retort with some line about McCain because I'm not voting for him regardless. Tell us all what you, as a lib, plan on doing.
candance, again :p
August 22, 2008 - 17:18 ET by MrShyHe should plan on losing, is what he should plan on doing.
And...
"And don't retort with some line about McCain because I'm not voting for him regardless."
Really?
* * * SOCKS THE CAT '08 * * *
For REAL Change
Shy
August 22, 2008 - 17:31 ET by candanceYes my dear. I'm serious as a heart attack. Took a lot of prayer and thought, but it's what I have to do. Hope you understand.
goth girl :p
August 22, 2008 - 17:34 ET by MrShyOkay, ex-goth girl.... :p
So, you're sitting this one out?
* * * SOCKS THE CAT '08 * * *
For REAL Change
disco singer :x
August 22, 2008 - 17:43 ET by candanceNah, I'm not sitting it out. Will still vote for Congress/local stuff and write in someone for the presidential spot. I haven't quite decided who though.
1992
August 22, 2008 - 17:58 ET by tejanodiablojust keep in mind 1992 when ross perot took 19% of the vote and gave the election to clinton .. mccain may be the lesser of two evils but there is a helluva gap .. obama, in my opinion, will ruin this country ..
never look a gift skunk in the tail ..
thanks tejano
August 22, 2008 - 18:03 ET by candanceRemember 76, remember 92, look at SCOTUS, the blood of the dead in Iraq is on your hands if we pull out...I've been attacked, ridiculed, and guilt bombed about my decision since I announced it. There is nothing you can say I haven't heard before.
Feel free to blame me for the next four years or twelve years or hundred years if it makes you feel better. I'd much rather live with that than my own conscience if I vote McCain.
candance...You aren't
August 22, 2008 - 18:08 ET by bigtimercandance...
You aren't alone here...there are others of us who feel the same...and have stated as such.
For me who he picks for VP may make a difference...and that is iffy.
"America isn't the problem...America is the solution." ~ Rush Limbaugh
mccain
August 22, 2008 - 18:40 ET by tejanodiabloa lot of voters won't be voting for mccain as voting against obama .. or whoever he is .. just as a lot of die-hard hillary people may vote for mccain .. but, candace, will you really want to wear a hijab if barry is elected ?
never look a gift skunk in the tail ..
I'm doing the same thing, Candance
August 22, 2008 - 19:01 ET by OldSailor88I can't force myself to vote for McCain. Much thought and anguish has gone into it, but the answer always comes out the same. I can't in good conscience vote for him.
Postatem obscuri lateris nescitis
OldSailor88, welcome to the club!
August 22, 2008 - 21:25 ET by R D HelmYou just may be the fifth member in the group of five who are left here at NB that refuses to be taken in by McCain's "performance" on one appearance in a "church" most have never even heard of.
That one performance does not make up for nearly eight years of conservative back-stabbing by McCain.
Electing him POTUS will only supply him with a fresh set of daggers.
-Dave.
Vote None of the Above in '08!
Imagine that... Wilson
August 22, 2008 - 17:16 ET by bigtimerImagine that...
Wilson shows up with his regular trolling...
Now if only my imaginations of you disappearing .....poof!
Oh well...one can imagine.
"America isn't the problem...America is the solution." ~ Rush Limbaugh
Whether Obama is a born
August 24, 2008 - 18:32 ET by NL207Whether Obama is a born citizen or not can hardly defuse the fact that his upbringing is no less than anti-American.
His mother is one of those hippie clowns from the 60's who did nothing but soil this country with their intellectual feces. She is the one constant in Obama's life.
The man really never knew his father. His earliest father figure is an Indonesian Muslim, whom he was separated from when he returned to Hawaii to school at age 10.
Obama is a fatherless, muslim bastard who was raised by a hippie, counterculture mother. Such a man should be President of the United States?
What to do? what to do?
August 22, 2008 - 17:41 ET by Redrowan2000Let's see should I have a great wine a good ale or a an excellent scotch to watch this baby unfold. Go HILLARY!!!!! You wanted the vote and now we know why. This could be better than Chicago in "68" God I love American politics.
Oh sorry lost my head, this will be the only place I ever see this story posted. And probably the last.
"Don't let the bastards grind you down."
Red
Obama's Security Clearance
August 22, 2008 - 21:02 ET by RonacarThis is all good. However, the real issue is Obama's security clearance eligibility. Anybody that has ever filled out a SF86 for a clearance has seen a question pertaining to relatives and associates. There is no way Obama could honestly answer a question relating to associates committed to over throwing the US Government. (Ayers). I would like to see the Republicans make an issue of this. Maybe Presidential Candidates are exempt?
BO is a citizen
August 22, 2008 - 21:15 ET by nkviking75If my understanding of the law is correct, Barry would be a US citizen regardless of where he was born because his mother was a US citizen. There are lots of reasons that Obama is not qualified to be president, but I don't believe the citizenship issue is one of them.
When you put the clowns in charge, don't be surprised when a circus breaks out.
Papers filed state that when
August 22, 2008 - 22:24 ET by Eileen RightPapers filed state that when BHO was born (if out of country) the mother had to be at least 19 for the child to be a US citizen, she was 18. If true, the laws the law.
Where Is That?
August 22, 2008 - 23:15 ET by JoelCTI've never heard of that 19-years-old thing. Does anyone know where he got that?
Not Really
August 22, 2008 - 23:08 ET by JoelCTNot so fast, ye-with-horns-on-ye-head. Your link states,
"By birth, either within the territory of the United States or to U.S. citizen parents"
and his father is not and never was, a U. S. Citizen. That means that his "parentS" were not, depending how you look at it. I think this guy can tie this up into a big mess if he finds the right judge.
Sorry, I still think BHO is a citizen
August 22, 2008 - 23:26 ET by nkviking75Hold it right there, ye hot-of-head. Check out this excerpt from the US Code, and take note of point G. Obama's mother, Ann Dunham, would appear to satisfy the requirement that one parent should be a US Citizen who has spent a minimum out of time living in the US.
This is a dead end.
When you put the clowns in charge, don't be surprised when a circus breaks out.
OK
August 22, 2008 - 23:45 ET by JoelCTYou have a point, Oh-wearer-of-sheepskin. However, we need a lawyer to figure out what the part after "Provided" means in relationship to the first part. If the two are connected, that is, that the first part is dependent on the second part, then Ann Dunham definitely did not meet that criteria.
"(g) a person born outside the geographical limits of the United States and its outlying possessions of parents one of whom is an alien, and the other a citizen of the United States who, prior to the birth of such person, was physically present in the United States or its outlying possessions for a period or periods totaling not less than five years, at least two of which were after attaining the age of fourteen years: Provided, That any periods of honorable service in the Armed Forces of the United States, or periods of employment with the United States Government or with an international organization as that term is defined in section 288 of title 22 by such citizen parent, or any periods during which such citizen parent is physically present abroad as the dependent unmarried son or daughter and a member of the household of a person
(A) honorably serving with the Armed Forces of the United States, or
(B) employed by the United States Government or an international organization as defined in section 288 of title 22, may be included in order to satisfy the physical-presence requirement of this paragraph. This proviso shall be applicable to persons born on or after December 24, 1952, to the same extent as if it had become effective in its present form on that date; and "
The end may not be as dead as you fervently hope for.