for re-posting in November - I'd be interested in the response then. Will we see such headlines as: "Robbed!", "Race WAS a Factor", "I was just kidding", or maybe "Never mind!".

Suggestions!?

Am wondering - is his "mathmatics" based on what he learned in public school, or at the knees of dead Chicago voters?

There is no sense in being stupid, if you can't prove it! - my dad V

The lefties are still crying about Saddleback and the best they can come up with is the cone of silence thing.

Question #2: "Why weren't you sequestered during Senator
Obama's conversation with Pastor Rick Warren as you were supposed to
have been?"

Maybe he shoulkd get Patrick Fitzgerald to investigate it.

Obama's numbers have been dropping ever since his glorious world tour that he thought would give him foreign policy gravitas.

It made him look like a pompous rookie.

Then McCain smoked him at Saddleback to make it even worse.

Obama has one last chance at his convention next week to shore up his poll numbers. If he doesn't get a significant boost from that then he is toast.

Victory in Iraq.

Liberals suck.

McCain for Preznint.

Who actually reads drivel like that?

0 - 0 = Seth Grahame-Smith.

Why even give this loser a headline?

That 'Reality-based Community' sure is smart.  Apparently, today's education system(s) fail to teach anything about fact gathering, scientific method or cognitive reasoning.  Facts are facts, regardless of whether they fit your idealogy.  The R-bC has installed filters so that any 'non-conformance' data bounces off and is dismissed as non-existent.  This 'feature' basically nulls any chance of 'learning' or acquiring knowledge and/or experience that may be helpful for advancement or even survival.  It is comforting to see evidence that a majority of this nation have adequate 'reasoning' ability.  Perhaps there is hope that Seth can some day actually become 'educated'?   God help us all if Seth and his ilk are unable (or unwilling).  Thank you, PJ, for what I'm sure was very painful research! 

To know and not do, is to not yet know

I love the smell of Dem sweat in the mornings.
 

Save a SeAL, club a liberal!!

They have nothing to do with the issues.

I've got some follow up questions for Obama that the media are afraid to ask not because he can clobber them with a good answer, but because they are afraid of not being invited to the next hip party in Hollywood.

Question 1. - Your only example of crossing party lines and supporting something against your party was The Ethics Bill with McCain and didn't that actually end badly with you backing out from party pressure? Is this the only time you even made a feeble attempt to temporarily go against the far left in your party?

Question 2 - You claim that the abortion question is above your pay grade but isn't it true that picking judges who decide these questions is the Presidents responsibility?

Question 3 - Is there anyone to the left of you on the abortion issue? Isn't yours the most extreme position out there if you support killing babies born alive and making exceptions for any "health" problem of the mother up until the point of birth?

Question 4 - You say you are against gay marriage but for civil unions but isn't that irrelevant when you would appoint judges that would force gay marriage on all the states?

Question 5 - How would you "confront" the terrorists and other evil people that you say exist?

Question 6 - You quoted a bible passage about doing for the least fortunate among us as one of the most important things about Christianity to you, why is it that when you and your wife were "super rich" by your definition of $250,000 you only managed to hover around 1% in charitable donations and even after your huge book sales put you in the millionaire club, you still didn't tithe (10%) which is considered customary in Christianity even for people less fortunate? Do you think Jesus meant to shift personal charitable responsibility of individuals to the Government?

I have lots more but I"m out of time.

Seth Grahame-Smith has consumed the Koolaid. If they had to put a picture next to the phrase, "Liberalism is a mental disorder" it would be Seth's picture.

Credit to Michael Savage on the quote.

Grahame-Smith is probably right in Obama's victory in the Smog-kissed air.  His problem is that Obama will loose everywhere the air is not smog-kissed.  Big cities with their political machines cannot deliver a large enough vote for Obama to win. 

There is the David Dinkins effect where polling white democrats whose grand parents voted for Jim Crow laws and were members of the KKK eighty years ago gives misleading results.  Because they lie and tell you that, they will vote for a black man.  Then there is the Roe effect where the population of Children of Republicans has grown by a million over the population of the children of Democrats since the last Presidential election.  Add in the that the Liberal lock on the media began to crack in 1994 and not even the media super heavy weights can get away with what Walter Cronkite got away with in 1964. 

Grahame-Smith using the term Neo-Con is telling.  How about Paleo-cons as a term for those of us whose conservative ancestors fought against both Andrew Jackson and Jefferson Davis when they were founding the liberal Democratic Party?

This guy is going to have a meltdown. I hope he survives.