Anybody who has spent even a little time reading the left-wing blogs on the Web have probably run across frequent political "conversion" stories. The theme is all too familiar. A friend or relative is an insensitive Republican who just won't listen to the enlightened liberal soul posting the story. However, due to the perceived excesses of the evil Bush administration or the ever wise arguments of the liberal author, the Republican finally sees the light and either ends up supporting the Democrats or becomes a Democrat himself. Of course, the veracity of these "conversion" stories usually crumble after just a bit of analysis.
One big "tell" that the author is somewhat less than truthful is the amazing ability to quote long blocks of dialogue from weeks, months, or even years in the past. Sometimes it is even easier to find out that a political "conversion" story is primarily a work of fiction.
Such was the case with novelist Ann Hood who wrote I Married a Republican: There, I Said It in the Sunday Fashion & Style section of the New York Times. Her story is supposedly about the political conversion of her husband to the "enlightened side" but it comes off as an unwitting self-parody of a smug, self-centered liberal unable to tolerate political diversity. I could also describe Ann Hood as a leftwing loon with a rigid mind but she can do a better job of it herself:
...And I am not just an average Democrat — I lean way, way left. I marched along Fifth Avenue protesting the 1991 Persian Gulf war. I rode a bus to Albany to march against the death penalty. When I enter a voting booth, I choose all the candidates in the same column, without hesitation. My last love, before my husband, Lorne, had grown up in Berkeley, Calif., in the 60s. He was so far left, he made me look centrist.
On my first date with Lorne, over black ink pasta and Chianti, I ranted about union busting.
“Wow,” he said. “You’re pretty passionate about this.”
If he had said, “Wow, you must be a Democrat,” would I have ended the date? Maybe. I had never had an actual relationship with a Republican. Wisely, he did not confess that night. But after I ranted some more, I had a strange feeling that he might disagree with me.
“You’re a Democrat,” I said, “right?”
My husband has a beautiful face, and right then he leaned his beautiful face close to mine and said: “I vote for the best candidate. I read everything I can. I listen to them speak. And I vote for the person who can do the best job.”
“Really?” I said. I didn’t know anyone who did that. Everyone I knew only read about and listened to and voted for Democrats. I remember thinking that he was a good person, a fair person, a better person than I was with my rigid values and unwavering commitment to liberal politics.
Ms. Hood then goes on to assure us of how rock solid of a Republican her husband was...despite the fact he was registered as a Democrat in college and for years afterwards:
Here was how Republican he was: in the early ’90s, he was drafted to run for lieutenant governor of our state on the Republican ticket. But here is how open-minded he has always been: his candidacy was undone when a reporter discovered he had been a registered Democrat since college, and although he had long since stepped to the other side of the aisle, he had never gone to the trouble of undoing that. (He soon did.)
After that less than convincing proof of just how Republican her husband was (just as Lowell Weicker and Lincoln Chafee were "Republicans"), Ann takes solace in the fact that her hubby was pro-choice:
Slowly, my close friends and family met Lorne. And slowly, one by one, they took me aside. “Ann,” they would hiss, “he’s a Republican.”
“But he’s pro-choice,” I would say, hanging on to the one political stance he and I actually shared.
“But he’s a Republican,” they would say.
Despite the fact that Ms Hood's husband was a squishy soft pro-choice Republican, that still wasn't good enough for Ann to keep her intolerance in check:
Angry with him and myself, I began to argue about every political issue that landed on our doorstep with the morning paper. The more I argued, the more I saw how little we agreed. Being in favor of abortion rights was important, necessary even. But was it enough?
Whenever we were with my friends, I would silently tally who was on which side. Inevitably it was my friends, blue; my husband, red. The opposite was also true. Almost without exception, his friends voted red, and I was a minority of one.
Tired of clenching my teeth during their dinner debates about the evils of the Democrats — their flawed policies and lack of morality — I began to fight back. I screamed about partial birth abortion and defended President Clinton over the Monica debacle during an endless dinner at a country club, then cringed at their party-line responses. Lorne at least isn’t as conservative as these people, I told myself. But that offered little solace.
The funniest part of Ms Hood's inadvertent humor occurs when she becomes completely unglued and lets loose with a Republican Derangement Syndrome primal scream:
As luck would have it, we had dinner that night with a group of his old friends. Without politics, these friends always strike me as being warm and caring. But whenever that line is crossed, they seem insane to me, rabid and unreasonable. That night, however, when I heard myself screaming, “Condoleezza Rice is a liar! Rumsfeld is a war criminal!” it became clear that it was not his stridency that was causing this rift in our marriage, but mine.
Gee, Ann. We're sure glad you finally recognized exactly who was being rabid and unreasonable. After that episode, poor Ann found herself wondering if her marriage could survive political diversity:
On the way home, I vowed to stay away from political discussions with this group or any of Lorne’s friends, forever. As we sped through our little blue state, I sneaked a glance at him driving. True, Lorne avoided these arguments. But it didn’t matter. I knew where he stood, and where I stood, and it was not on the same side. Could a marriage survive such a solid barrier of disagreement? How many bipartisan couples did I know? Absolutely none.
Although this sounds like their marriage was about to go over the cliff due to Ann's intolerance for Republicans, even in name only, this soap opera has a nice happy liberal ending:
AND then a few weeks ago I came home from a business trip, pulled my politically correct car into our driveway, and stared hard at the sign in our yard. I blinked. I looked again. It was not a mirage.
The sign said, “Vote Obama.”
I shouted. I actually whooped. I couldn’t believe my eyes. Had one of my children put it there? A neighbor? It couldn’t have been Lorne.
Inside, I approached him cautiously. “There’s a sign in our yard.”
He shrugged and cast a broad smile my way. “He’s the best candidate.”
There's only one little problem with this warm and fuzzy story of a Republican converted over to the side of the liberal enlightment. It wilts under the cold cruel glare of harsh facts. A quick search at opensecrets.org reveals that Hood's husband, Lorne Adrain of Providence RI, contributed $500 to Democrat Chris Dodd on March 24, 2007, long before his supposed conversion to the "enlightened side" so his support for Obama should have been much less of a surprise than was portrayed in the story.
Doesn't the New York Times have fact checkers? Perhaps not but if they do, would it be too strenuous for them to fact check a "conversion" story such as this by simply going to one of several websites that offers information about campaign donors and typing in a couple of words along with a mouse click in order verify its authenticity? As to Ann Hood, the novelist, this story proves she is rather adept at writing fiction.
UPDATE: According to opensecrets.org, a "Lome" Adrain also of Providence, RI and self-employed in insurance sales donated $250 to Sheldon Whitehouse on March 3, 2006. I never heard of anybody with the first name of "Lome" so I am assuming that it was just a misspelling of "Lorne." If so that means that Ann Hood's "Republican" husband donated money to a Democrat senatorial candidate running against the most liberal Republican possible, Lincoln Chafee.
—P.J. Gladnick is a freelance writer and creator of the DUmmie FUnnies blog.














Editor at Large

Comments Policy
It's a typical Liberal Trick
February 18, 2008 - 00:22 ET by pbthinkerI remember Randi Rhodes was on, in WPB, before she went to Air America (she's still on the station here in the same time slot) and she had this guy call in saying he'd turned in this valuable gun to the police, when they had one of these buy-back things. I never really got to the bottom of the story, but there was nothing, in the paper, about a valuable gun being turned in and the whole story just seemed implausible.
She'd also get calls from these people that, "used to be a Republican...." but when y ou heard the issue that "brought them around" again it strained credibility.
A Republican, that's actually a Republican, will have many problems with Obama or Hillary. Then of course we have the "can't we all just get along" Republican.
Anyway, this woman is a typical Liberal, screaming and hollaring about the issues, and not discussing them in a sane manner. They do throw tantrums when their normal liberal lines don't work and the amen chorus doesn't come when they're finished saying it.
Democrats: Stuck on Stupid since 2000.
The Science is in,
February 18, 2008 - 18:56 ET by upcountrywaterMike Savage is right.
Iranian uranium; Iranian ICBM's; Iranian satellites..
Obamby question? Is non-nuk TO NUK? CHANGE?
Keep the change Bob. h/t Sam Peckinpah
No amount of fame or fortune
February 18, 2008 - 00:30 ET by JoggerNotcould persuade me to convert to lib. dem. thinking. and, I am on the low side of the food chain.
I am sure he converted just
February 18, 2008 - 02:19 ET by kgI am sure he converted just to shut her up.
Ms. Hood
February 18, 2008 - 00:42 ET by easygoerNailed her. Nicely done, P.J.
Made for an interesting
February 18, 2008 - 01:44 ET by wiwfMade for an interesting read, I'll give her that. But everything else mentioned (ie all those lib talking points) plus her lack of open-mindedness made me yawn.
Once again, it's the "conservative" that reaches across the aisle, and not the rampaging liberal.
The Rocky Mountain Collegian: Illustrating Idiocy
Silly Rabbit, Democrats are for Kids
February 18, 2008 - 01:53 ET by RickTaLifeDon't they know real Republicans, by nature, can't become Democrats? It only really works the other way around. You see, in order for a real Republican to become a Democrat, they'd have to undergo a full-frontal lobotomy or get kicked in the head by a horse or suffer from serious stockholm syndrome after being kidnapped by code-pink. On the other hand, for a Democrat to become a Republican, all that needs to happen is that the pol comes to terms with reality. :-)
Peace :-)
This is why I use the terms
February 18, 2008 - 09:46 ET by Indiana JoeThis is why I use the terms "conservative" and "liberal." More precise than party affiliation, which shouldn't be set in stone.
"I didn't leave the Democratic party, the party left me."- Ronald Reagan
Non-thinker
February 18, 2008 - 01:55 ET by Chaitealover"I began to fight back. I screamed about partial birth abortion and
defended President Clinton over the Monica debacle during an endless
dinner at a country club, then cringed at their party-line responses."
Their 'party-line responses' to killing an about-to-be-born child and the President of the United States diddling an intern were wrong, but her screaming defense of both were correct??? This woman does not have a functioning brain.
As far as not knowing any couple with opposite political beliefs, how could she not "know" James Carville and Mary Matalin? Their marriage seems to be working without one trying to force the other to change his/her beliefs.
Chai
“...Bury me on my face,” said Diogenes; and when he was asked why, he replied, “Because in a little while everything will be turned upside down.”
Best Condidate Barak Obama
February 18, 2008 - 02:44 ET by Lame CherryI would really like to see Ms. Hood's follow up on this in about 2 months when two things start making the front page for her condidate Barak Obama in the masterful con job he has done on the American public.
It is quickly become evident in what I have revealed here that the cartel picked Obama because he has at least 2 known failsafe switches.
Switch 1: Barak Obama likes money from crooks presented him named Rezko who is talking to Patrick Fitzgerald who has a nice white paper lined up with the words INDICTMENT BARAK HUSSEIN OBAMA on it.
Switch 2: There is a homosexual in Minnesota (yes land of Larry Craig operational outing too) who is on YouTube, been threatened by Obama and the DNC and has now filed in civil court over it stating that Barak Obama and yond Viqueen sodomized each other and snorted various forms of coke in a limo and at a hotel.
Ms. Hood should have realized that the eugenics crowd of her liberal bosses were never going to allow Barak Obama to be a figurehead ruler over them. They loathe minorities and rose young Obama with fake books to show black people they too can believe as long as they vote for Obama.
Problem is for black people is once these liberals are done humiliating Obama a black will never get near the White House again for a generation.
Barak is but an Othello to take out the main squeeze in the play, be pushed on his sword so some Al Gore can swoop in and save the floundering Ms. Hoods and husband Hoodwink once they find out what is about to happen in Act II.
Obama should come clean. Then announce he is through with liberals and will be John McCain's VP and promise he will work to dismantle and imprison the entire cartel which pulls this non stop.
*HIC IACET ARTORIVS REX QVONDAM REXQVE FVTVRVS
LC , Switch 3
February 18, 2008 - 02:55 ET by BarkerObama caught plagiarizing speech.
Obama/Biden '08?
Switch 4
February 18, 2008 - 09:43 ET by Indiana JoeDon't forget this:
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=56559
(forgot how to link to a word in the post. A little help?)
More fakery
February 18, 2008 - 13:02 ET by bmoviesIs Barack Obama Orchestrating Fake Fainting Spells At Campaign Stops?
http://sayanythingblog.com/entry/is_barack_obama_orchestrating_fake_fainting_spells_at_campaign_stops/
"Many of our fellow
February 18, 2008 - 03:30 ET by rbosque"Many of our fellow citizens no longer have the
tolerant souls and morals of free men and women. They have the souls and morals
of busybodies and petty tyrants who want to run their neighbors' lives."
-- Edward L. Hudgins
And it's not a religion?
February 18, 2008 - 07:13 ET by ThisnThatRepeat after me: It's not a religion. It's not a religion.
Yeah, right. Being a democrat is more like a cult. How did all these people become so selfish, self-centered, and intolerant? This person is living proof it's not about President Bush. He's only the most current made-up excuse. It's all about them.
Fanatics. And to think that they want the power to re-define our way of life: Birth, Marriage, Taxes, National Security, Family Values -- they are all on the wrong side of the fence.
___________________________________
If you can read this, thank a teacher. If it is in English, thank a Soldier. - My barber
Bullsh*t
February 18, 2008 - 09:17 ET by surroundednycNo real Republican would have ever dated this loon, much less married her.
Another intolerant liberal exposes herself
February 18, 2008 - 09:28 ET by ArchConservativeYet another fabricated story about us on the right. But it does go to show the one thing that is true among liberals/neoprogs: they have no room for tolerance. They say they are all encompassing and feeling and open but in reality they are more petty, closed-off, and simple-minded than anyone on our side of the aisle.
By the way if this 'story' is real, we need to pitch in and give this 'man' a backbone. Just reading this cloying article makes me want to run away from this loony woman. I cannot imagine what it's like to actually live with her. I would have bought an SUV, put "I love GWB" bumper stickers on her Volvo, and taught our kids that (d)emocrats are what's bringing our nation to ruin.
You support the troops by supporting the mission! If you don't support the mission, have the guts to say you don't support the troops.
Come on, Mr.
February 18, 2008 - 09:46 ET by motherbeltCome on, Mr. Gladnik....don't be so picky. So what if it's made-up??
It's the whole point of the story that counts; not the details.
It's, you know, "fake, but accurate." LOL
Liberals
February 18, 2008 - 11:02 ET by iveseenitallI worked closely with the "liberals" for more years than I wish to remember. This behavior is ingrained in their very being. I witnessed it every day of the week.They have no compunction about embellishing a story (or outright lying) to fit their own agenda. They make it up as they go along and they see nothing at all wrong with it. You would witness something happening with your own eyes, then an hour later would hear them relate their version of the story. Your jaw would drop. It's part of the disease we know as modern liberalism. And it is why you can...
NEVER,NEVER trust a "liberal"
Amen
February 19, 2008 - 09:43 ET by bmovies"This behavior is ingrained in their very being. I witnessed it every day of the week.They have no compunction about embellishing a story (or outright lying) to fit their own agenda. They make it up as they go along and they see nothing at all wrong with it. You would witness something happening with your own eyes, then an hour later would hear them relate their version of the story."
I cant begin to count the number of times I've caught liberals on the internet in their lies. You look into their backgrounds, their profiles, and from what it seems, they are very nice, normal, respectable people with good educations, good jobs, veterans, etc. The kind of people who you think would never fib for fear of destroying their own reputations. Yet you watch them tell an outright lie as if it rolled off their backs.
http://bmovies.blogspot.com/2008/01/and-yet-another-liar-on-internet.html
"Lorne" then proved his
February 18, 2008 - 11:39 ET by SaseboSailor"Lorne" then proved his liberal credentials by swooning into a dead faint when she shrieked the word "Obama".
He who hesitates is last.
Bigotry
February 18, 2008 - 13:49 ET by ArcherBWhat bothers me the most about this story is the obvious bigotry against Republicans. Refusal to associate with someone because of their political affiliation is no different than refusing to associate with someone because of their religion, sexual preference, color, or cultural background. If you read the "but he's a Republican" section of this story to a ACLU card carrying liberal, they will see nothing wrong with it. Replace "Republican" with "wiccan", "hispanic", "homosexual" or even "ex-convict", and they will be screaming "BIGOT" at the top of their lungs. Why the difference? Why do they think it is OK to be biased against someone because of their views, as long as it is views they don't share?
Just once, I would like to see how they respond to the story, "Then they came to silence the Republicans. I said nothing since I'm not a Republican".
"To send men to the firing squad, judicial proof is unnecessary." Ernesto "Che" Guevara
It can't happen
February 18, 2008 - 13:51 ET by In_AweI am a lifelong Ronald Reagan conservative (except for that college youth aberration of voting for Gene McCarthy - hey I was a kid!) married for 33 years to a centrist Democrat from a family of Berkeley Democrats. Holiday gatherings have always been about converting the ignorant, selfish, racist, war loving right winger. Somehow their tolerance and enlightened views have always fallen on sterile soil. My wife however has concluded that her party has left her, and re-registered as a Republican this year.
My brother a college roommate of Dennis Kucinich and his campaign manager on several elections over the past thirty years has had a tough time with me, too. Until a year ago we couldn't get 5 minutes into any political discussion before he hauled out all the expected ad hominem attacks. I do believe that I have been called a fascist more times than Adolph Hilter was in his lifetime. Somewhere around a year ago even he began softening his stance on issues and been asking more about conservative perspectives on issues. Today we can even find points of agreement on formerly off limits topics.
I guess that I believe that it is more likely that a Democrat will convert to being a Republican than the other way around. I expect Ann Hood will align with her husband before the 2012 elections...if she has a brain.
WOW!
February 18, 2008 - 16:11 ET by TeeDeeI've got to tip my hat to you! My family are mostly conservative, with a few "progressives" thrown in. We've all pretty much agreed to keep family gatherings neutral and can the political talk, and for the most part we've succeeded.
I heartily agree that it is more likely that a democrat will convert than that a Republican will. It's easier to go from "feelings" to the rational truth than the other way around.
"It isn't that liberals are ignorant, it's just that they know so much that isn't so" - Ronald Reagan
It takes a liberal
February 18, 2008 - 13:55 ET by MadtecompSadly this strange story does not surprise me...it does however disturb me. Being from Rhode Island I encounter people like Ann Hood quite often. These liberals will not tolerate any political views outside of their own which renders discussion impossible. It is no surprise that Rhode Isand will elect and re-elect the drunk, oxy contin taking waste of life that is Patrick Kennedy. With people like Ann voting Rhode Island should expect to remain the state with the least friendly business climate in the nation, the lowest education scores in New England, and a $400 million deficit.
MC
Priceless.
February 18, 2008 - 19:23 ET by zfPriceless.