You would think a candidate has to worry that a media outlet might find some sort of problem in his background that might harm his campaign. Right? In the case of Mitt Romney, it appears that his "problem" is that he is too perfect according to the Los Angeles Times. Romney's perfection "problem" is described in a Nov. 24 article, "Does perfection have its price for Romney?"
Mitt Romney arrives at his campaign headquarters here 10 minutes early, a knife-blade crease in his khakis, winter tan, lots of hair, all of it in place. He skips the coffee and doughnuts in favor of skim milk and the home-baked granola sent along in a zip-lock baggie by his wife. That's Ann, his high school sweetheart -- the mother of his five handsome sons -- with whom he says he has never had a serious argument in 38 years of marriage.
Story Continues Below Ad ↓By central-casting standards, the former Massachusetts governor is the perfect presidential specimen -- a comforting throwback to the 1950s, when nobody got divorced (they fell in love in high school and that was it), mothers stayed at home (he dubbed Ann the Romney CFO -- chief family officer) and the greatest parental challenge was making the boys practice their piano (Ann used to pinch their necks).
But as his campaign picks up speed in a wide-open GOP field, Romney comes face to handsome face with an unusual challenge: Can a candidate appear too perfect? It's a question that modern American voters, fed a steady diet of infidelity, divorce, pot smoking, high-class call girls and foil-wrapped cash stashed in freezers, have not had to ponder in a long time.
So perhaps the L.A. Times would prefer that Romney "nomalize" himself by smoking pot, picking up call girls, and stuffing bribe money in his freezer? The author of this perfection piece, Faye Fiore, seems to think that a lack of personal problems could be a problem for Romney:
But if his political record is any indication, Romney's storybook personal life could backfire as he tries to broaden his appeal to a general-election audience. That was the case in the 2002 governor's race, when his campaign aired the "Ann" ad -- in which she described him as "very romantic" and he described her as "just good to the core" -- and his poll numbers tanked overnight.
...Romney's life looks like a photo album of the American dream: two homes, one in a posh Boston suburb and the other on a New Hampshire lakeside; four cars (he drives a red Mustang, Ann a Cadillac SUV); a friendly dog, big Christmases, church every Sunday, meaningful family discussions (Web viewers can watch as the Romneys gather on the sofa to ponder his run for president). If he has a vice, it's chocolate malts.
Perhaps to satisfy the Los Angeles Times, Romney could learn to take the edge off his perceived perfection with some cosmetic flaws if that will make them happy. Your humble correspondent would be more than happy to serve as a Romney slobbie consultant. Under my careful guidance, Mitt could learn how to wear his shirts in such a way that they will automatically hang over his belt whenever he stands up. The perfectly combed hair could be redone to appear unruly whenever the slightest breeze hits it. And it is important to leave just the smallest of stains on your sleeve when eating a pizza in public. Yes, with the aid of his slobbie consultant, Mitt Romney could learn to take just the proper amount of edge off his perfection to satisfy the high demands of the L.A. Times.
—P.J. Gladnick is a freelance writer and creator of the DUmmie FUnnies blog.














Comments Policy
Liberals
November 28, 2007 - 10:39 ET by iveseenitallNot only can't you trust a "liberal", if you're a Republican you will never please one. BTW, I too met my wife in high school in the 50's and have been married to this wonderful gal all my life. And it's been great! Although I'm not quite as rich as Mitt is, she says I'm better looking. No accounting for taste.
Romney will have life after politics. Hillary has no life but politics.
NEVER,NEVER trust a "liberal"
"Romney will have life after
November 28, 2007 - 11:42 ET by Sonny Lykos"Romney will have life after politics. Hillary has no life but politics."
I love it. Danced with my wife at a Sat. night party while in high school. Didn't see her again until 3 years later, and married her..... or rather she honored me and married me, 9 months later. That was 44 years ago and am still thrilled today that she kept me. And some of our 4 kid's friends still ask: "Boy! You still have your original parents?"
Sonny
November 28, 2007 - 12:07 ET by iveseenitallIt's a shame that the "liberals" have destroyed many of the real joys in life. For the last four decades they've sent so many young poeple the wrong messages. And they continue to do so. A sociology textbook recently published actually states that the past time in America were "the miseralble old days". I couldn't believe they'd have the nerve to print something like that and "teach" it to our kids. Sad.
P.S. I have an unmarried niece who tells us how she enjoys "recreatioanl sex" with a lot of guys. Then she cries.
NEVER,NEVER trust a "liberal"
In other words, the LAT
November 28, 2007 - 11:21 ET by dscottIn other words, the LAT hasn't found any skeletons in his closet with which to sell newspapers to fuel the typical meme of corrupt or sleazy Repub. He seems to be their perfect moderate Repub candidate, he is liberal, he looks like a male model, he is charming, and he is deceptive. So sad for Hillary.
Given this high praise for Romney from the MSM, it seems they have signaled their 2nd choice for POTUS, 1st choice being Obama. If they can't get the (D) after the name, a RINO will do.
Hanlon's Razor: Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity. dscott's corollary: The line between malice and stupidity is called depraved indifference.
I thought perfection was
November 28, 2007 - 11:27 ET by wiwfI thought perfection was something we all strived for. So what's wrong with that?
They must read "perfect" as "evil" or something...
The Rocky Mountain Collegian: Illustrating Idiocy
WIWF
November 28, 2007 - 12:10 ET by iveseenitallYou've got that right, wiwf. The "liberals" have sucessfully turned "good" into "evil", "success" into "failure", and vice versa. It's in their nature to embrace low expectations; it also keeps them empowered by blaming others for their mistakes.
NEVER,NEVER trust a "liberal"
your post is very vague.
November 29, 2007 - 01:11 ET by professor truthliberals have successfully turned "good" into "evil" really needs much more explanation. When you define liberal, good and evil in an understandable manner, the topic can be discussed further.
Candace told us you vowed
November 29, 2007 - 01:15 ET by Free StinkerCandace told us you vowed to leave and never come back.
I just knew she was teasing us.
Good night.
"George W. Bush simply reminds leftists everyday what they will never be. And they hate him for it." --Tammy Bruce
Way before I even heard of
November 28, 2007 - 14:40 ET by CapitalismRulesWay before I even heard of Mitt Romney, I was hearing these slanderous attacks coming at him and the whole time I was thinking, "okay here we go again, attacking a Republican for the sake of attacking a Republican." Then when I actually heard Romney speak and saw him for the first time and the type of Presidential material that he is, I realized that the MSM is just plain scared to death of this man. He really is the "perfect" presidential candidate in terms of media form. That, combined with his party affiliation have the press ignoring the good things about him, magnifying ANY negatives and just praying every night for him to please go away.
Republican Field
November 28, 2007 - 14:45 ET by JimboI agree. I also think that many of the other Republican candidates bring other very good qualities to the table too. I'm sure glad we have a few legitimate candidates from which to choose as opposed the the Democrats who will find themselves choosing the lesser of a half dozen evils.
Leon says "By the way, I'm not afraid of fat people, I'm repulsed"
Truth Monger Says - "Both are religions [Christianity & Islam], yes - with the same percentage of terrorists."
Bizarro World
November 28, 2007 - 11:56 ET by V the KGoodbye. Me am Mayor of San Francisco. Me have severe drinking problem. Me commit adultery with employee's wife. Me simulate oral secks on microphone. Me perfect family values candidate for LA Times. Hello.
modern American voters:
November 28, 2007 - 21:32 ET by Tachyon99modern American voters: infidelity, divorce, pot smoking, high-class call girls and foil-wrapped cash ...
No wonder these people are crazy, living like that.
Romney is no match for Hillary
November 28, 2007 - 12:03 ET by exLibWhat it really comes down to is who is the best match-up for Hillary. And the answer is Rudy.
Why Rudy? Because with Rudy vs Hill, the entire Moral/family values issue is off the table.
Here in uber-liberal/left Massachusetts we have a couple liberal radio hosts who hate Mitt specifically because he was going around bragging about being married only once, and these were women hosts. I just couldn't believe it, they dislike Mitt because he was FAITHFUL to his wife.
That's a liberal for you.
Green Eyed Monsters
November 28, 2007 - 12:14 ET by V the KSounds like the two female liberal hosts were jealous because they can't find liberal men who'll commit to them.
Can't find something that
November 28, 2007 - 15:19 ET by JimboCan't find something that doesnt exist! lol
Leon says "By the way, I'm not afraid of fat people, I'm repulsed"
Truth Monger Says - "Both are religions [Christianity & Islam], yes - with the same percentage of terrorists."
Let's see now: How to
November 28, 2007 - 12:17 ET by mattmLet's see now: How to decide between a decent guy who just may be 'too perfect,' or a crooked, power-hungry control freak who may be more felonius than her disgraced husband...
Tough choice...
Rome
November 28, 2007 - 12:35 ET by iveseenitallRome and others fell, not because people are imperfect, but because evil became accepted and encourged as commonplace. These nation's lost the will to be "better" and began to mock the whole idea of striving for the "good". In other words, moral relativism and man's false pride took over. Down they went. Sound familiar?
NEVER,NEVER trust a "liberal"
Which is a recurring theme
November 28, 2007 - 12:55 ET by V the KWhich is a recurring theme within the Book of Mormon. Great kingdoms rose because they were obedient to God's law. When they turned away from God, and became arrogant in their own humanism, they fell. I think Mitt Romney gets this. Harry Reid does not.
not a very smart philosophy:
November 28, 2007 - 13:07 ET by professor truthyour tagline:
NEVER,NEVER trust a "liberal"
considering all the liberal doctors, nurses, teachers, lawyers, and many, many other workers that everyone depends on who are liberals.
Unless you are ignorant,
November 28, 2007 - 13:21 ET by iveseenitallUnless you are ignorant, "professor", you know to what I am referring. Nevertheless, I'm so gald it bothers you.
NEVER,NEVER trust a "liberal"
Everyone's tag line seems to offend the Prof.
November 28, 2007 - 13:29 ET by Free StinkerEveryone's tag line seems to offend the Prof.
Here is an old one of mine Professor:
"George W. Bush simply reminds leftists everyday what they will never be. And they hate him for it." --Tammy Bruce
Try this one
November 28, 2007 - 13:32 ET by Airforce_5_O"Life's tough, it's even tougher if you're stupid."
-John Wayne
The only thing you should feel when shooting insurgents is the rifle recoil.
John Wayne
November 28, 2007 - 14:41 ET by Prester JohnOne of the great quotes of all time.
Followed closely by,
"Is there not ONE thing in your life that is worth losing EVERYTHING for?"
Sean Connery as the Rasooly at the end of "The Wind and the Lion".
FS, you misstated what I said
November 28, 2007 - 13:40 ET by professor truthabout the post"never, never trust a liberal". I said it wasn't a very smart philosophy. If you need immediate medical help, I seriously doubt that you are going to ask the doctor what party he belongs to.
I wasn't offended by the post, I just thought it wasn't very thoughtful.
Yes, but is it
November 28, 2007 - 13:49 ET by Airforce_5_OYes, but is it psychotic?
Had to do it!!!!!!
The only thing you should feel when shooting insurgents is the rifle recoil.
"Professor" the tagline is
November 28, 2007 - 13:22 ET by Gary P Jackson"Professor" the tagline is one of the "truest" ideals on this planet. A liberal will lie to you when the truth would work better.
As for doctors, you know how you do it? You screen 'em. If they're a lib, chose someone else. Lawyer? Should you even ask? As for teachers, we know what kind of bang up job they're doing!
Liberals are the absolute personification of pure evil. It really is that simple!
and conservatives don't lie??
November 28, 2007 - 13:28 ET by professor truthPeople lie to others all the time. Nothing astounding here. Do you really think there are NO conservatives who have lied to their spouses at some time? GET REAL!
Wrong doing
November 28, 2007 - 13:46 ET by iveseenitallDo conservative do wrong? Of course.
You must take a course in reading comprehension, "professor". Go back and re-read what has been said about relativism and humanism. I don't want to have to explain it to you again.
NEVER,NEVER trust a "liberal"
iveseenitall, I believe what
November 28, 2007 - 14:22 ET by Karmaiveseenitall, I believe what профессор правда is trying to say, and I think he has a point, is that you may want to change your tag line to: "NEVER,NEVER trust a "known liberal". No big deal. Just a thought.
Classic
November 28, 2007 - 13:46 ET by V the KAh, the "everybody else is doing it" excuse. Gee, and some people think liberals are childish.
so my statement that conservatives lie is not
November 28, 2007 - 13:52 ET by professor truthtrue? Saying liberals lie shows no thinking. Everyone lies. It's a HUMAN trait. Stop listening to the nutcase, Michael savage.
"Aw, c'mon mom, everybody else does it..."
November 28, 2007 - 13:57 ET by V the K1. I don't listen to Michael Savage and 2. I don't think lying is the sort of behavior that ought to be encouraged. Do people lie? Yes. Should lying be excused because people lie? No. Is it typical of juveniles to rationalize inappropriate behavior because "everybody else is doing it?" It is.
I don't listen to Michael Savage
November 28, 2007 - 14:23 ET by Free StinkerI don't listen to Michael Savage
I don't either, Savage is an idiot. And according to Mark Levin, Savage steals ideas from Levin's show.
"George W. Bush simply reminds leftists everyday what they will never be. And they hate him for it." --Tammy Bruce
Savage is opinionated but he is definitely not an idiot
November 29, 2007 - 00:53 ET by PopularTechMichael Savage, B.S. Biology, M.S. Anthropology, M.S. Ethnobotany, Ph.D. Nutritional Ethnomedicine
The Anti "Man-Made" Global Warming Resource
I still say he's an idiot.
November 29, 2007 - 01:18 ET by Free StinkerI didn't say he was ignorant. I said he was an idiot.
Sorry, but I listen to Mark Levin instead of Weiner Nation. Talking about what he ate for dinner, ripping off ideas from Mark Levin's show . . .
Propaganda
November 29, 2007 - 01:44 ET by PopularTechSavage doesn't rip ideas off from Levin, he doesn't even listen to him. Most likely they both think a like on some issues. But he is definitely not an idiot.
What it looks like to me is someone is using Levin as an attack dog on Savage because Savage calls everyone out on their hypocrissy including so called conservatives.
You have to keep in mind I listen to everyone and then make up my mind.
The Anti "Man-Made" Global Warming Resource
I love Lura Ingrham...
November 28, 2007 - 14:35 ET by Airforce_5_OI love Lura Ingrham... great sense of humor and a might easy on the eyes.
The only thing you should feel when shooting insurgents is the rifle recoil.
Laura Ingraham and Glenn Beck
November 28, 2007 - 15:38 ET by V the KDennis Miller is also okay.
Reading comprehension
November 28, 2007 - 14:16 ET by iveseenitallOh please. You two are so ignorant. That is not my argument at all. My argumment is that everyone does wrong, but once we accept it as o.k., we begin down the wrong path.This is what has happened to all great nations throughout history. Please learn to read. You must have gone to public schools.
(No wonder it is so hard to get through to these people. Ignorance is bliss. Sad)
NEVER,NEVER trust a "liberal"
Michael Savage is Smarter than You
November 29, 2007 - 01:02 ET by PopularTechThe reality is you picked the wrong target because Michael Savage is a little more educated than you are. Maybe you have listened to him and fear that others may as well so you attempt to paint him as a nutcase which is propaganda.
Michael Savage, B.S. Biology, M.S. Anthropology, M.S. Ethnobotany, Ph.D. Nutritional Ethnomedicine
The only thing "nutty" about Savage is sometimes he makes too much sense and comes off way too conservative.
The Anti "Man-Made" Global Warming Resource
Savage is an unstable nutcase
November 29, 2007 - 01:16 ET by professor truthand displays his mentally and emotionally unbalanced conditions frequently. Media matters has tapes of this nutcase going off like a lunatic. He's as smart as Hitler, and just as unbalanced mentally.
Media Matters?
November 29, 2007 - 01:48 ET by PopularTechWhy am I not surprised you listen to media matters. Repeating your propaganda does not make it true.
Yes Savage rants and uses plenty of exaggerated metaphors. He says what nobody else does but to hold him to it literally falls to pieces every single time someone challenges him on those points.
You need to think out of the box and stop believing out of context quotes used as propaganda by media matters and actually listen to the show, you may learn something.
The Anti "Man-Made" Global Warming Resource
Prof T
November 29, 2007 - 01:56 ET by MrShyAs long as you're equally going on Daily Kos, HuffPo, etc., and ranting about what an emotionally and mentally unbalanced lunatic-nutcase Keith Olbermann is, then I have no problem w/ your rant on Savage.
"MY end justifies THAT mean." - Shakespeare (not really)
Yeah, Professor
November 29, 2007 - 02:01 ET by Cool ArrowThat "Borders, Culture, Language" stuff is pure nonsense, isn't it.
But it gives you another excuse to fail at teaching.
More moral relativism and
November 28, 2007 - 13:48 ET by dscottMore moral relativism and false moral equivalence, pulling everyone down to your level to claim you are as good as anyone else is the child's version of "everyone else is doing it". How convenient, you don't have to strive or exert the effort to be better or find the objective truth, just make everyone else to be equally as bad. Typical liberal thinking.
Come on PT, those who "practice" lying are liars. There is such a thing as poor judgement and exceptions for "normal" people. Let's face it, liberals have a track record of making assertions (lying) which ultimately turn out to be false. Knowingly making an assertion to which you have no facts to support such an assertion is a lie, a deception. Moral relativism says that truth is just a subjective POV, hence truth is what you assert it to be and a lie only exists when it doesn't fit the PC of the times. The point of all lies is to advance an agenda which people will not buy into unless deceived into it. Justifying lying to advance the agenda is hubris on the part of the liar (making a false assertion). The ends do not justify the means: if the ends are worthy, then the means must reflect that worthiness. This is why we never, never trust a liberal to tell the truth, they simply don't believe it exists.
Hanlon's Razor: Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity. dscott's corollary: The line between malice and stupidity is called depraved indifference.
everyone is a moral relativist and I can PROVE my assertion
November 28, 2007 - 15:04 ET by professor truthOne of the ten commandments says" thou shalt not kill".
Now, in the Bible are examples that state the opposite philosophy.
So, that makes the idea of killing "morally relative" or "based on the context or circumstances" the killing is based on. Therefore, anyone who believes in the Bible is a moral relativist.
Let's face it, liberals have a track record of making assertions
(lying) which ultimately turn out to be false. Knowingly making an
assertion to which you have no facts to support such an assertion is a
lie, a deception.
Posters like RJ continuously post deceptive comments like "plagiarist perfesser", a totally misleading and DELIBERATELY dishonest remark. Most people have committed traffic violations, so to call such a person a criminal is deliberately deceitful and equivalent to lying, although a technical case could be made that this traffic violator is a 'criminal." This happens at NB enough to state that there are deliberate liars from all political views, and to state otherwise is to be a true liar or wilfully ignorant.
Liar
November 28, 2007 - 15:09 ET by JimboLiar.
Leon says "By the way, I'm not afraid of fat people, I'm repulsed"
Truth Monger Says - "Both are religions [Christianity & Islam], yes - with the same percentage of terrorists."
You did not prove anything
November 28, 2007 - 15:10 ET by exLibYou really need to improve your reading comprehesion and also study hermenutics.
It's clear that "Thou shalt not kill" is Murder and there are clear rules spelled out in the Bible that we use today in our legal system including such distinctions as Involuntary Manslaughter.
There are plenty of example in the Bible were GOD himself commands to kill, so this is clearly NOT the issue. Killing someone to defend youself is NOT against the moral law of "do not murder".
It's NOT MORAL relativism, it's a Moral Absolute with varying degrees of consequences/punishment.
Sorry, Prof, wrong again. Keep trying though.
November 28, 2007 - 15:10 ET by DontFeedTheTrollsOne of the ten commandments says" thou shalt not kill".
Actually, translated properly, that commandment says "Thou shalt not murder." Big difference.
D
Keep the ILLEGALS out, join NumbersUSA to send free faxes to your reps.
"Thou shalt not kill" or
November 28, 2007 - 15:13 ET by Karma"Thou shalt not kill" or "Thou shalt not murder"? Which is it? One removes the relativism.
here is a cut and paste
November 28, 2007 - 15:28 ET by professor truthof one of the 10 commandments:
SIX: 'You shall not murder.'
But people accused me of calling AF a "murderer" when I only used the word "killer". So, I guess the accusations that I called AF a murderer were FALSE, and if I'm not mistaken, swomewhere the Bible says"thou shalt not bear false witness."
Also, this commandment would imply that capital punishment is
wrong, because it is murder(by the state). And any soldier who killed anyone who was not threatening that soldier with imminent danger was a murderer. After all, just because someone thinks that someone else is a 'potential' threat would not excuse one from
killing unless self defense could be shown. Everyone lives a life of moral relativism, individually deciding what they can and cannot do. Moral relativism is one of those arguments that morally pious hypocrites like Ted Haggard use to stir up the ignoramuses.
Hold on Prof. What is the
November 28, 2007 - 15:59 ET by bassndudeHold on Prof. What is the diffrence between a "killer" and a "murderer"? Not much in my view. We kill in war, but we are not killers or murderers. To prove that, I have not been to any conflict sence 1979, and have only killed one person sence that time. And he was in my house, in the dark, and dident do like he was told.
Save a SeAL, club a liberal!!
And you're a teacher???
November 28, 2007 - 15:40 ET by dscottAnd you're a teacher??? Dude, the commandment is "You Shall not MURDER". Exodus 20:12-14 http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Exodus%2020:12-14;&version=31; choose any translation.
Only in the King James (1611 - Old English uses kill where the updated New King James uses murder), American Standard (1901) Darby (1890), and Living Bible does it say Kill. Literal translations of the Bible use the word "murder." Adults know the difference between killing and murder and so do you.
http://www.m-w.com/dictionary/murder : 1: the crime of unlawfully killing a person especially with malice aforethought
http://www.m-w.com/dictionary/kill : 1 a: to deprive of life ...
synonyms kill, slay, murder, assassinate, dispatch, execute mean to deprive of life. kill merely states the fact of death caused by an agency in any manner <killed in an accident> <frost killed the plants>....murder specifically implies stealth and motive and premeditation and therefore full moral responsibility
Thanks for making my point on moral relativism and false moral equivalence by misquoting the Bible to make a false assertion to advance your point.
Hanlon's Razor: Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity. dscott's corollary: The line between malice and stupidity is called depraved indifference.
Professor Truth:
November 28, 2007 - 15:54 ET by bassndudeThe "thou shall not kill." is the english translation using the all en-compassing verb, "kill". The Hebrew word translating into the en-compassing verb would be "harag". The original Hebrew text, (the Tora), uses the word, "ratsah" which would closely translate to "murder". The early translations of the Bible into english used kill, more current and literal texts use the translation "murder". I think even you can distinguish between the two.
Save a SeAL, club a liberal!!
Military
November 28, 2007 - 13:38 ET by iveseenitallI noticed the "professor" didn't mention the military in his list of those who do good for society. Was that deliberate, ya think?
NEVER,NEVER trust a "liberal"
Do you honestly think there are no liberals in the military??
November 28, 2007 - 13:48 ET by professor truthGET REAL! All those minorities and not a single liberal??? I think not! Is John Murtha a conservative? My dad was an army captain in WWII. He was more left than me.
My dad was an army captain in WWII
November 28, 2007 - 14:08 ET by MightyMouthDrafted eh?
"There are two types of people in this country; those who provide freedom and those who enjoy it." MM says...
You know Prof, some might say that statement of yours is bigoted
November 28, 2007 - 14:18 ET by Free StinkerAll those minorities and not a single liberal???
You know Prof, some might say that statement of yours is bigoted.
"George W. Bush simply reminds leftists everyday what they will never be. And they hate him for it." --Tammy Bruce
FS, and some might say racial profiling is bigoted.
November 28, 2007 - 15:07 ET by professor truthI teach minorities, most of whom are leftwing based on what they say .
Many students are recruited for the military. My comment was based on probabilities, and the fact that a large number of vets despise the bush administration. Do you honestly think that there isn't a substantial number of liberals in the military?
I guess much depends on
November 28, 2007 - 15:43 ET by BuffNBoneI guess much depends on what you mean by "substantial number."
How many of your former students remain liberal after their military experience? My guess is some do and some don't. Is it possible that while under your tutelage they may be saying things that on the surface agree with your position?
Undoubtedly some vets will disagree with any adminstration. What we really hate is having to take the same ground a second (or third) time. If despising is the measure of merit, I would venture that a far greater number of us (vets and active duty) despise the fourth estate for its continuous drumbeat of negativity. The same goes for politicians who mouth platitudes but lose interest when the chips are down. Read Kipling's "Tommy" for the perspective many of us have.
Military professionals recognize that "War is merely the continuation of politics by other means." C. V. Clausewitz
"Fighters are fun but bombers make policy"
Well said Buff, well
November 28, 2007 - 15:56 ET by Airforce_5_OWell said Buff, well said.
The only thing you should feel when shooting insurgents is the rifle recoil.
Learn to read,"professor"
November 28, 2007 - 14:20 ET by iveseenitallI said YOU didn't mention the military. Please, please learn to read.
NEVER, NEVER trust a "liberal"
Democrats, Yes. Far letf
November 28, 2007 - 14:21 ET by Airforce_5_ODemocrats, Yes. Far letf libs don't last boot camp.
The only thing you should feel when shooting insurgents is the rifle recoil.
You mean like Pat Tillman, a BIG CHOMSKY fan?
November 28, 2007 - 15:10 ET by professor truthYeah, Pat Tillman just couldn't cut it. His family never got justice for the pentagon coverup of the circumstances surrounding his death and subsequent COVERUP!
COVERUP!!!! COVERUP!!!
November 28, 2007 - 15:13 ET by JimboCOVERUP!!!! COVERUP!!! AMERICA IS EVIL!!! AMERICA IS EVIL!!!
Shut up, puke.
Leon says "By the way, I'm not afraid of fat people, I'm repulsed"
Truth Monger Says - "Both are religions [Christianity & Islam], yes - with the same percentage of terrorists."
There you go agian Prof.
November 28, 2007 - 15:53 ET by Airforce_5_OThere you go agian Prof. Pat Tillman was a great hero and not a liberal. What happened to Pat Tillman and his family was a tragady and piss me off and a lot of our soldiers off.
Yet you try to use that to prove a point. Dosen't the smell test.
By the way have you answered my question I left you on the Forum?
The only thing you should feel when shooting insurgents is the rifle recoil.
so why did the pentagon cover up
November 28, 2007 - 15:55 ET by professor truththe circumstances over his death?
Quantum Leap Logic
November 28, 2007 - 16:03 ET by Airforce_5_OHow does that make him a liberal Prof? What does that have anything to do with what we are talking about?
Explain this quantum leap in logic???
There are many people in the military who are Dems or don't like the policies of the current (to include the White House (repub) and Congress (dem) ) government. How in the heck does that get to Pat Tillman?
The only thing you should feel when shooting insurgents is the rifle recoil.
Gary, if you needed emergency medical treatment
November 28, 2007 - 13:43 ET by professor truthI seriously doubt you would start questioning the nurses and surgeons and anesthesiologists about their politics. But, by your own beliefs, you could NEVER know their political affiliations, since you would not know whether a doctor claiming he was a "conservative" was a liar or truthteller. That tagline philosophy is a bad idea, and anyone thinking otherwise should think a second time about it.
Second thought.... nope I
November 28, 2007 - 14:23 ET by Airforce_5_OSecond thought.... nope I like it. It stays.
The only thing you should feel when shooting insurgents is the rifle recoil.
Airforce... I second
November 28, 2007 - 14:29 ET by Clear thinkerAirforce...
I second that.
Get Email updates from Fred http://socialnet.imwithfred.com/email_alert_july_26.html
Screw Them AF
November 28, 2007 - 15:43 ET by JimboYou've defeated a lot worse than this guy. Don't start giving into the pukes now!
Leon says "By the way, I'm not afraid of fat people, I'm repulsed"
Truth Monger Says - "Both are religions [Christianity & Islam], yes - with the same percentage of terrorists."
Never, Never trust a "liberal", "professor"
November 28, 2007 - 14:31 ET by iveseenitall"NEVER,NEVER trust a "liberal" is not a "philosophy"; it's a way of life. From what you've written, "professor", I'm assuming you are a young liberal. Some day, some way you'll have your eyes opened and you will never again trust a "liberal" ( who is really not a "liberal" at all ). Let's hope it happens sooner, rather than later for you. Otherwise, your butt will be pretty sore from kicking yourself. Remember, there's still hope for you---unless you're too far gone already.
NEVER,NEVEr trust a "liberal"
Ives...
November 28, 2007 - 14:36 ET by MightyMouthI think the prof has already admitted to being a refugee from woodstock. He's an "old fart". So yes, too far gone...
"There are two types of people in this country; those who provide freedom and those who enjoy it." MM says...
What a shame.
November 28, 2007 - 14:40 ET by iveseenitallWhat a shame. Woodstock, et. al. really got to him. I've heard "old hippies" are the worst. Is that true?
NEVER,NEVER trust a "liberal"
Yes , there are worse...
November 28, 2007 - 15:25 ET by MightyMouth..old hippies who have been in "Public Indoctrination" for 25 years. There's no talkin to em, truth and common sense bounces off em like rubber bullets at a "peace march".
"There are two types of people in this country; those who provide freedom and those who enjoy it." MM says...
WHAT is a liberal??
November 28, 2007 - 15:12 ET by professor truthPlease be specific.
Take five steps to your
November 28, 2007 - 15:18 ET by KarmaTake five steps to your right then look in the mirror.
another witty reply!
November 28, 2007 - 18:39 ET by professor truthAre you a comedy writer for Leno or Lettermen?
Gary, stop listening to the mentally
November 28, 2007 - 13:45 ET by professor truthunbalanced shock jocks like Michael Savage, a true nutcase.
More lies from Perfesse