With many newspapers in a state of free-fall as far as their readership numbers go, it is interesting as well as entertaining to watch how they attempt to combat that situation. In the case of some such as my hometown newspaper, the Fort Lauderdale Sun-Sentinel, the effort to adjust to the new realities of the Web is both awkward as well as laughable. As I pointed out in an earlier NewsBusters blog, the Sun-Sentinel came up with the idea of a "blob" called "The Slant." Here is a description of this "exciting" new feature by editor Earl Maucker:
To take advantage of the web capabilities, our editorial page editors created "The Slant", a blob [sic] devoted to opinion and commentary that goes well beyond what we offer on our printed editorial and commentary pages.
Well it's been almost two months since that "blob" went into effect and the result has been nothing but ennui. Comments from readers rarely number more than a couple for each item posted. Not yet finished in the boredom department, Mr. Earl has come up with another pearl for The Slant---Dueling Columnists. Maucker proudly made the announcement a few days ago:
Effective next week, we will launch a new feature on this page where two columnists with opposing views will square off on a local topic of public interest.
These two sophisticated and talented writers bring decades of South Florida experience and will offer their views in a format we think will be fun, thought-provoking and informative.
"For the Editorial Board, the Dueling Columnists is an opportunity to draw readers into a much more interactive discussion," said Antonio Fins, our editorial page editor. "After reading the point/counter point, readers will be able to sound off on the Board's blog, The Slant, and post their own viewpoints."
Perhaps my reading skills aren't up to par but to me this sounded like two columnists going (dueling) at each other over various issues. The sad reality turned out to be nothing but two separate articles by the "dueling" columnists on the same topic. They didn't even mix it up with each other at all. Perhaps that debate concept is a bit too daring for a standard MSM newspaper although it is very common on the Web.
Don't hold your breath, Mr. Maucker, over this "Dueling Columnists" shtick inducing much of any reader reaction. It appears to be about as inspiring as the rest of "The Slant" blob. This whole effort by the Sun-Sentinel to adjust to that Internet "thingie" brings to mind a middle aged father trying to act hip for his kids by growing muttonchop sideburns, wearing bellbottom pants, and plugging in a lava lamp.
If the Sun-Sentinel really wants to make waves, they would have one of their columnists duel in a real debate with someone like conservative local talk radio host Steve Kane. Oh, and dump that idea of merely linking to separate columns. Have them actually DEBATE each other. You might also be really daring and post a video of such a debate on the Sun-Sentinel website. You see, online video is another important element of that Internet thingie that you so desperately but awkwardly want to embrace.
—P.J. Gladnick is a freelance writer and creator of the DUmmie FUnnies blog.



















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
-
October 11, 2007 - 21:33 ET by dahliatraversIt's hip! It's fun! It's now!
Don't neg us out, P.J.
The Fort Lauderdale Sun-Sentinel
dashing "D"
October 11, 2007 - 21:35 ET bygives it an A
"Television is where you watch people in your living room that you would not want near your house." Groucho
Thanks for the heads-up
October 11, 2007 - 21:41 ET by FastEdAnd they have to wonder, still, why they have falling readership - too bad the this new blob thing didn't work as they thought.
There is no sense in being stupid, if you can't prove it! - my dad V
I keep telling you folks...
October 11, 2007 - 21:45 ET by ncstevem...that newspapers are living on borrowed time. I sold ink to newspapers from 1986 - 91. We knew back then--even before the internet, that newspapers were going the way of the dinosaur. Readership back then among the under 30 crowd was something like 15%.
Network news, Time & Newsweek are suffering the same fate. Only the Geritol crowd give them a look. All three mediums are toast in 7 - 10 years (I think the network news will last the longest).
Expect to see newspapers to start going under in about 5 years and the majority will be gone in 10 - 12 years. I give Time & Newsweek about a 7 - 10 year lifespan and network news will last about 10 - 15 years. Just follow the demographics. Once the 55 and over crowd disappear--so will these forms of propaganda, err, I mean news.
Couldn't happen to a nicer crowd.
I repeat this so often........
October 12, 2007 - 00:16 ET by Scout FinchI work in a public library. I always put the Time, Newsweek, and USNews covers I hate the most behind all the others. The ones that are the most offensive, I usually hide at the bottom. And no one knows the difference...........
Woo Hoo, Scout!
October 12, 2007 - 00:20 ET by BlondeExcellent!
David Gregory, do you know which damn network you lie for? ~ Uncle Jimbo, @Blackfive
The power..........THE POWER!
October 12, 2007 - 01:00 ET by Scout FinchI place magazines in order to effect change! I'm drenched with power!!!!!!!!!!!!
PJ, Sarc calls it the
October 11, 2007 - 21:48 ET by BlondePJ,
Sarc calls it the Sun-Slantinel.
I gave up my subscription years ago....only buy the Sunday version for the TV section. Very occasionally.
Loved your catch of the "blob" thing though...those editors are so hip and very goooood at their jobs (editing?).
Is editing a blob oxymoronic? Or just moronic?
David Gregory, do you know which damn network you lie for? ~ Uncle Jimbo, @Blackfive
}}---> Duelling columnists
October 11, 2007 - 23:39 ET by Cool ArrowWhat's the name of the column? Fold Arts? Sorry, lydsexic paux fas.
~LYDSEXICS UNTIE!~
Cool Arrow
October 12, 2007 - 12:34 ET by deerjerkydaveCool Arrow, do you live in Massachusetts? I had a friend who too frequently joked about being "lydsexic".
I like the fact that this newspaper is trying to think outside the lemming box for a change. Unfortunately (or fortunately) I think that it is too little too late. It will not save the paper news industry.
Liberal media is quickly moving in the direction of Air Head America.
Blob, dueling columnists ...
October 12, 2007 - 00:14 ET by KC MulvilleFunny when the people who are supposed to deliver "news" are so far behind the curve.
omg! The "blob" must have
October 12, 2007 - 02:29 ET by Britcomomg! The "blob" must have eaten their proof-reader.