CIA Told Obama Case for Bin Laden Being in Abbottabad Was Weaker Than WMD in Iraq
Peter Bergen, CNN's national security analyst, said Sunday that President Obama was informed by CIA Deputy Director Michael Morell in December 2010 "that the circumstantial case that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction was better than the circumstantial case that bin Laden was in Abbottabad."
This astonishing revelation was made on CBS's Face the Nation (video follows with transcript and commentary):
BOB SCHEIFFER, HOST: Peter Bergen, I want to ask you, your book comes out Tuesday. You've been looking at this-- Graham concentrated mostly on the decision making toward the end. You've been looking at this for a long time. What did you find out that you find most significant?
PETER BERGEN, CNN NATIONAL SECURITY ANALYST, AUTHOR "MANHUNT": Well, it's getting to the-- getting to the question of the President's decision for a minute. Michael Morell, the deputy director of the CIA in-- around December, the-- before the May raid, told the President that the circumstantial case that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction was better than the circumstantial case that bin Laden was in Abbottabad. That's a pretty amazing comment.
BOB SCHIEFFER: Really!
PETER BERGEN: And President Obama asked Morell and others, why is it that so many people have different percentages about the possibility that bin Laden is there, and Morell says something along the lines that a lot of this is about your experience. The people hunting bin Laden have a higher degree. The people who spent years doing this, have a highest degree of certitude. The people who are involved in the WMD problem in Iraq tend to have a lower degree of certitude. But as Graham said, you know, when your two most senior advisers and your second-most senior military adviser are both sort of advising you to do something pretty different, it is an amazing decision that he made. I also reported on the ground in-- in Abbottabad was able to get inside bin Laden's compound.
As Abbottabad, Pakistan, was where American forces killed bin Laden roughly five months later, this is a truly remarkable statement by Bergen.
And he's not to be taken lightly.
Beyond his contributions to CNN and Time magazine, Bergen is the director of the National Security Studies Program at the New America Foundation. From 2003 to 2007 he was an adjunct professor at the Paul H. Nitze School of Advanced International Studies at Johns Hopkins University. After that he was an adjunct lecturer at the Kennedy School of Government at Harvard University in 2008.
He is also noted for having interviewed bin Laden in 1997.
As such, it will be very interesting to see how these revelations are greeted in the coming days as the Obama administration and his adoring press take a victory lap on the one year anniversary of bin Laden's assassination.
- Noel Sheppard's blog
- Login to post comments
















Comments
Bambi left himself an out.
Submitted by Newsbubba on Sun, 04/29/2012 - 7:30pm.
It took very little nerve to do what he did.
It was setup to be a Obama wins, Obama wins, regardless of how it turned out.
The best the military executing the mission could do was make Obama the hero, or make themselves the goats.
Exactly
Submitted by tcm14 on Sun, 04/29/2012 - 8:35pm.
If the mission had failed or Bin Laden hadn't been there, then I strongly doubt it would have been widely reported, or blame would have been appropriately shifted away from the Messiah. It was a win-win. Our military will always do the right thing in spite of the fact that Obama is waiting in the wings to take all the credit.
How do you know Osama was there?
Submitted by lrgon on Mon, 04/30/2012 - 11:59pm.
Calling the mission a success does not place Osama Bin Laden there. You may get all wound up over the blue ray team that is supposed to have killed him but that is not evidence, that is wishful thinking.
The media built this up so much that they even got the neocons on board cheering a stupid mission that was a publicity stunt for the Alinski grad more than anything else.
Today's USA Today featured a headline that al-Qaeda was as active as ever. Here was Bin Laden, the one time US ally, pictured in the turban and beard looking like on bad dude on USA Today. But according to USA Today, the war on terrorism must go on! So much so that Russians have arrived at the US Army base at Ft. Collins, Colorado to begin terror training drills to help us fight terrorists. Of course if our troops came home we wouldn't need the Ruskies to fight the Osamaless al--Qaeda.
It is ironic that communist troops have arrived to help us pacify the al-Qaeda savages whose second in command, the notorious Ayman al Zawahari was trained in Moscow.