Gingrich Rips WaPo: Media 'Would Rather Worry About Rumors About Conservatives Than Facts About President'
On Monday, NewsBusters broke a story about Washington Post blogger Aaron Blake using Twitter to dig up dirt on Republican presidential candidate Newt Gingrich.
On Tuesday, the former House Speaker spoke to St. Louis radio host and Big Journalism editor Dana Loesch about this saying, "It’s a little sad to see a paper the quality of the Washington Post stoop to...the National Enquirer approach to life" adding they "would rather worry about rumors about conservatives than facts about the President" (video follows with transcript and commentary):
DANA LOESCH: I’ve noticed that Aaron Blake who writes for the Washington Post’s The Fix, it’s a political blog, has reached out to readers asking them to crowd-source your past to see if they can get some skeletons in your closet. Have you heard of this?
NEWT GINGRICH: I haven’t heard of it. I’m not at all surprised. I think that you have to expect that kind of trash. I’ve been honest about the fact that there are things I did in my past that I’ve had to go to G-d and seek forgiveness for and seek reconciliation. And if this guy manages to find some magic example, I will stipulate it. I have a very good marriage with Callista. We have, we’re very, very close and have been now for well over a decade. I’m very close to my two daughters and my son-in-laws, and I’m very close to my grandchildren. And I’ll let people look at who I am and how I live today and decide whether or not I’m the person they want to have as president.
It’s a little sad to see a paper the quality of the Washington Post stoop to that, which used to be the National Enquirer approach to life. But that’s just the nature of where we are today.
LOESCH: And I wish that they would crowd-source the White House visitor logs the way that they’re going after individuals like you or Sarah Palin.
GINGRICH: I wish they would crowd-source to discover what he did at Columbia University, and I wish they would crowd-source to figure out what he did with Saul Alinsky’s ideas on the South Side of Chicago.
LOESCH: Exactly.
GINGRICH: Nobody’s ever explored exactly, the community organizer did not mean boys and girls clubs. It meant Saul Alinsky radicalism.
LOESCH: Yeah, it absolutely did.
GINGRICH: But the news media’s never quite found itself as excited about the facts about Barack Obama. Would rather worry about rumors about conservatives than facts about the President.
It really is absurd how little Americans know about our President's life after he left Hawaii, in particular what he did in Chicago before running for the highest office in the land.
Instead of doing any such investigative journalism, our so-called press digs into every rumor and unsubstantiated allegation against his political rivals.
Will they only be interested in the truth once Obama leaves office, or will his past continue to be verboten as they try to build up his legacy much as they are currently doing with former President Jimmy Carter?
Loesch's entire interview with the former Speaker is available at Big Journalism.
- Noel Sheppard's blog
- Login to post comments
















Comments
Newt and the Media
Submitted by NewLife56 on Wed, 11/30/2011 - 10:38am.
Media 'Would Rather Worry About Rumors About Conservatives Than Facts About President'
BINGO!!!!!!!!
Bingo Indeed!
Submitted by Kingfish17 on Wed, 11/30/2011 - 3:54pm.
This one never gets old.
"You can’t go take a trip to Las Vegas...on the taxpayer’s dime." Barack Obama
The media hates conservatives
Submitted by ohio granny on Wed, 11/30/2011 - 10:48am.
The media hates conservatives so they must be destroyed. Most people with a brain know that the so-called MSM will do anything to cover for Obama and the democrats, even murder. On the other hand they will do anything to destroy anyone who can challenge Obama, even murder. No low is too low for the MSM to stoop to protect Obama and the democrats.
MSM/democrats/liberals = liars, cheats, crooks and thugs.
The absolute worst nightmare...
Submitted by KyWriter on Wed, 11/30/2011 - 10:58am.
...for Team Obama would be a one-on-one debate with Newt Gingrich. I can already feel the quaking from DC down here in KY.
So that's what that shaking
Submitted by kinijane on Wed, 11/30/2011 - 3:59pm.
So that's what that shaking was, I suspected it but wasn't sure. Can't wait to see those debates.
→ What I want to know
Submitted by Cool Arrow on Wed, 11/30/2011 - 11:00am.
[Media] "would rather worry about rumors about conservatives than facts about the President."'
I want to know how Newt can come up with such logical contrasts so easily. I mean, that's quite a heavy observation for someone who appears to be giving a quick answer to a question.
Because Newt Doesn't Need A Teleprompter
Submitted by Poovey on Wed, 11/30/2011 - 12:23pm.
Because Newt Doesn't Need A Teleprompter to tell him what to say. He is quick witted.
Cool Arrow
Submitted by amyshulk on Wed, 11/30/2011 - 2:16pm.
Newt is grounded enough to recognize what us "peons" are thinking and is (sometimes) able to pithily verbalize it.
If he was like this all the time, he'd sound like Cain, so he has to get wonkish to separate himself from the pack.
If we were looking for a conductor to drive this train off the cliff, but slower than the D's are doing so, he'd be an excellent pick!
But I fear he's too steeped in the wonk to comprehend we need a weed whacker, not snips for the pruning that MUST take place.
Snips will just ensure in 20 - 30 years our kids/grandkids experience their own deja vu!!!
Ronald Reagan
Ever hear of something called intelligence? Wit?
Submitted by drsamherman on Thu, 12/01/2011 - 2:46pm.
You just dove right into the toilet and flushed yourself down on that one, Cool.
Obama does not have a quick wit, nor is he exceptionally intelligent. He is educated, but he is not intelligent. There is a vast difference. Newt has both intelligence and education, having been a history professor possessing a PhD. The most that can be said about Ear Leader is that he somehow managed to gain admission to Columbia and Harvard yet he admits his own academic record was less than stellar.
obamas life is an open book
Submitted by dmacleo on Wed, 11/30/2011 - 11:05am.
its just the pages have all been redacted or follow the desired FOIA changes where its ok to lie.
do we even know much about his Hawaii life?
Newts been good this cycle holding the press accountable (as well as he can) for this stuff.
and Newsbusters has been valuable to this too, kudos.
I know my personal "filter"
Submitted by amyshulk on Wed, 11/30/2011 - 11:09am.
I know my personal "filter" was never very good, but now that I'm 50, it's barely there - the msm seems to have completely misplaced theirs, and are openly showing their bias. This will boomerang and the question i have is will they go back to being sneaky about their bias when 2012 stuns them???
Ronald Reagan
If the Libstream media put in
Submitted by helomech on Wed, 11/30/2011 - 11:09am.
If the Libstream media put in 20% effort to actually do some investigative reporting, I'm sure the dirt on BO would start piling up in record time..
Ahhhh Newt
Submitted by donabernathy on Wed, 11/30/2011 - 11:14am.
so lets elect Newt and continue da old
Democrats = Welfare/Warfare
Republicans = Warfare/Welfare
da good ole 2 party system
roflmao
donabernathy
Submitted by amyshulk on Wed, 11/30/2011 - 11:16am.
Are you the same person with the same exact thoughts as you were 20 years ago? I'm not. Newt says he's not. As does Mitt. Evolving our views is what adults do. Scaring up bogeymen is what the unimaginative do.
Ronald Reagan
Agreed, amy
Submitted by motherbelt on Wed, 11/30/2011 - 11:41am.
Lots of opinions change over time, and with changing circumstances.
But according to the maimstream (not a typo) media, becoming more conservative is a "flip-flop" or "pandering" whereas becoming more liberal is "evolving" (in the best sense).
motherbelt
Submitted by amyshulk on Wed, 11/30/2011 - 4:08pm.
maimstream - good one! I have almost no short term memory, so if you see me using that without crediting you, it will be because I thought I thought it up on my own, lol!
Yep, I'm heartily sick of fighting wars on an uneven field, where we follow rules our enemy delights in breaking - the ROE's that make our soldiers essentially sitting ducks make me physically ill!!!
So it is with *all* things R or D.
The TP is marginalized & mocked, JUST like Rules For Radicals says to do: "Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it" While OWS is pandered to, excused by, and even held up as a paragon! I really feel like Alice on the wrong side of the looking glass when I see this bs!!!
And Clinton vs. Cain? Unreal. I guess we are over "compartmentalizing" huh? Clinton getting away with it is why we have so many who try to - Rep. Weiner comes to mind, yech!
So of *course* they {msm - or is it mmsm?} consider a D act = good & proper, while the same/equivalent act by an R = lack of character/starving the babes/cliffing poor gramma.
When they get trounced in 2012, I expect them to recalibrate themselves, but I doubt it will last long! I'm just glad they are so blatant - if this doesn't snap awake the voters/adults, I fear *nothing* will!
Ronald Reagan
Newt Gingrich is for Newt. Period. The end.
Submitted by donabernathy on Wed, 11/30/2011 - 11:42am.
The consummate Beltway insider and lobbyist will say anything, do anything, and pander to any and all in his lifelong pursuit of...Newt. He is a more facile and intelligent, an older and whiter and chunkier version of Barack Obama, whose single defining trait is overweening narcissism. And just as Barack begins each day with an admiring look in the mirror, Gingrich is second to none in his appreciation of the glory that is Newt.
roflmao
donabernathy
Submitted by amyshulk on Wed, 11/30/2011 - 2:10pm.
I can somewhat agree with your assessment, he sets off my radar even though I can't quite pin it down, but we just can't *know* if anyone means what they say and say what they mean 24/7.
I figured Mitt or Cain was the R version of Pres. Obama, but you think it's Newt?
Perhaps you are correct. Pres. Obama pre election is who Cain reminds me of - says what you want to hear but there are no specifics.
Pres. Obama now is closer to Mitt or Newt - I can drive this bus the *proper* way to fix things.
It's too bad I {we?} want someone closer to Paul on domestic policy and neither one is willing to give up the reins!
Ronald Reagan
Good morning dona
Submitted by cocodrie on Wed, 11/30/2011 - 2:18pm.
You are comparing a professional poltitian to a muslim who is dedicated to the destruction of America - no comparison.
Jesus Loves You so much He died for you
Apples and oranges
Submitted by Dave the mailman on Wed, 11/30/2011 - 2:34pm.
Newt may be a career politician, but at least he respects America and our values. Obama does not.
Can we stop
Submitted by gwalt on Wed, 11/30/2011 - 4:12pm.
Can we please stop calling them "mainstream" media? Even the left wing Nation (if I recall correctly) has Libs at 20%---I think it's less and Conservatives at 42%.
They are not mainstream. The country is nearly 50% Conservative and a fifth, or less, of the country gets to decide "mainstream".
Enough.
Let's get a campaign to call them what they are----Leftists. Let's agree on a term, repeat it on every blog and talk radio and make it stick. Leftstream?
Left Wing Media?
Something, anything but Mainstream.
"A lot of briefing for a 2 hr. special with Dan Rather. Saw the show & wonder why we bothered". Ronald Reagan
Uhm he was giving an
Submitted by Mperiod on Thu, 12/01/2011 - 1:39am.
Uhm he was giving an INTERVIEW....he was talking to a member of the press Dana Loesch has a radio show AND is the editor in chief of a blog, just like that kid is a blogger. What I don't get is, the kid is obviously liberal leaning... yet what is Dana's excuse, what about Glenn Beck, or Hannity or Rush. The idea that they our powerless to do any investigative journalism is crazy. But after all I guess its easier to imply there are all these secrets, than actually research it in case there aren't. (just so you know conservatives, that's why these sorta stories never take hold among any group outside of right wing circles, just yelling "_________ is a radical...maybe" is meaningless. Conservative news folks have billions in combined wealthy, same with political operatives, they also spend millions doing oppositional research....why not present facts instead of innuendo?
So you are suggesting---
Submitted by matthewdean on Thu, 12/01/2011 - 2:21am.
being professional rather than emulating the lib media, eh?
MD
".why not present facts instead of innuendo?"
Submitted by Prisondog1776 on Thu, 12/01/2011 - 2:29am.
You mean like MSNBC and Chrissy Mathews?
The classic conversation on how little Americans know about
Submitted by Rush Fan on Thu, 12/01/2011 - 4:18am.
Barack Obama was between two liberals on the Charlie Rose show prior to the 2008 election.. Here is the AUDIO (compliments of Rush Limbaugh) of Charlie Rose and Tom Brokaw discussing what they know and what they don't know about a guy they no little about, but are going to vote for anyways, Barack Obama.