Skip to main content
  • CNSNews.com
  • MRC TV
  • Biz & Media
  • Culture & Media
  • TimesWatch
  • Take Action!

Join Us @:
Facebook
Twitter
Amazon Kindle

Free email alerts!

NewsBusters logo
May 23, 2013
  • Home
  • Blogs
  • About
  • Forum
  • Take Action
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Search
  • RSS

Hot Topics

  • Obama Targets Fox News
  • IRS Targets Tea Party
  • Censoring the News
Home » Blogs » Noel Sheppard's blog
  • NBC's Lauer Uses Oklahoma Tornado to Bash GOP Over Sandy Relief
  • New York Times: Obama Administration 'Threatening Fundamental Freedoms of the Press'
  • ABC’s Cokie Roberts Acknowledges Obama’s Contempt for the Press, Blasts 'Presidential Propaganda'
  • NYT Lawyer: Obama Worse Than Nixon, 'Worst President Ever' on Press Freedom
  • Chuck Todd: Obama Administration Wants to 'Criminalize Journalism'
  • Al Hunt On Rosen Outrage: Obama 'No Better Than Nixon'; Holder Should Take Hike
  • Bozell Column: Obama And 'Overreach'
  • Three Labor Unions, Including Teamsters, Want ObamaCare Repealed; When Will Media Report?

Gingrich Rips WaPo: Media 'Would Rather Worry About Rumors About Conservatives Than Facts About President'

By Noel Sheppard | November 30, 2011 | 10:34

A  A
Noel Sheppard's picture

On Monday, NewsBusters broke a story about Washington Post blogger Aaron Blake using Twitter to dig up dirt on Republican presidential candidate Newt Gingrich.

On Tuesday, the former House Speaker spoke to St. Louis radio host and Big Journalism editor Dana Loesch about this saying, "It’s a little sad to see a paper the quality of the Washington Post stoop to...the National Enquirer approach to life" adding they "would rather worry about rumors about conservatives than facts about the President" (video follows with transcript and commentary):

DANA LOESCH: I’ve noticed that Aaron Blake who writes for the Washington Post’s The Fix, it’s a political blog, has reached out to readers asking them to crowd-source your past to see if they can get some skeletons in your closet. Have you heard of this?

NEWT GINGRICH: I haven’t heard of it. I’m not at all surprised. I think that you have to expect that kind of trash. I’ve been honest about the fact that there are things I did in my past that I’ve had to go to G-d and seek forgiveness for and seek reconciliation. And if this guy manages to find some magic example, I will stipulate it. I have a very good marriage with Callista. We have, we’re very, very close and have been now for well over a decade. I’m very close to my two daughters and my son-in-laws, and I’m very close to my grandchildren. And I’ll let people look at who I am and how I live today and decide whether or not I’m the person they want to have as president.

It’s a little sad to see a paper the quality of the Washington Post stoop to that, which used to be the National Enquirer approach to life. But that’s just the nature of where we are today.

LOESCH: And I wish that they would crowd-source the White House visitor logs the way that they’re going after individuals like you or Sarah Palin.

GINGRICH: I wish they would crowd-source to discover what he did at Columbia University, and I wish they would crowd-source to figure out what he did with Saul Alinsky’s ideas on the South Side of Chicago.

LOESCH: Exactly.

GINGRICH: Nobody’s ever explored exactly, the community organizer did not mean boys and girls clubs. It meant Saul Alinsky radicalism.

LOESCH: Yeah, it absolutely did.

GINGRICH: But the news media’s never quite found itself as excited about the facts about Barack Obama. Would rather worry about rumors about conservatives than facts about the President.

Story Continues Below Ad ↓

It really is absurd how little Americans know about our President's life after he left Hawaii, in particular what he did in Chicago before running for the highest office in the land.

Instead of doing any such investigative journalism, our so-called press digs into every rumor and unsubstantiated allegation against his political rivals.

Will they only be interested in the truth once Obama leaves office, or will his past continue to be verboten as they try to build up his legacy much as they are currently doing with former President Jimmy Carter?

Loesch's entire interview with the former Speaker is available at Big Journalism.

About the Author

Noel Sheppard is the Associate Editor of NewsBusters. Click here to follow Noel Sheppard on Twitter.
  • 2012 Presidential
  • Aaron Blake
  • Dana Loesch
  • Newt Gingrich
  • Washington Post
  • Video
  • Noel Sheppard's blog
  • Login to post comments
  • Printer-friendly version
Stop Censoring The Gosnell Trial!

Comments

Newt and the Media

Submitted by NewLife56 on Wed, 11/30/2011 - 10:38am.

Media 'Would Rather Worry About Rumors About Conservatives Than Facts About President'

BINGO!!!!!!!!

NewLife56
  • Login to post comments

Bingo Indeed!

Submitted by Kingfish17 on Wed, 11/30/2011 - 3:54pm.

This one never gets old.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

"You can’t go take a trip to Las Vegas...on the taxpayer’s dime." Barack Obama

  • Login to post comments

The media hates conservatives

Submitted by ohio granny on Wed, 11/30/2011 - 10:48am.

The media hates conservatives so they must be destroyed. Most people with a brain know that the so-called MSM will do anything to cover for Obama and the democrats, even murder. On the other hand they will do anything to destroy anyone who can challenge Obama, even murder. No low is too low for the MSM to stoop to protect Obama and the democrats.

MSM/democrats/liberals = liars, cheats, crooks and thugs.

  • Login to post comments

The absolute worst nightmare...

Submitted by KyWriter on Wed, 11/30/2011 - 10:58am.

...for Team Obama would be a one-on-one debate with Newt Gingrich. I can already feel the quaking from DC down here in KY.

  • Login to post comments

So that's what that shaking

Submitted by kinijane on Wed, 11/30/2011 - 3:59pm.

So that's what that shaking was, I suspected it but wasn't sure. Can't wait to see those debates.

kinijane
  • Login to post comments

→ What I want to know

Submitted by Cool Arrow on Wed, 11/30/2011 - 11:00am.

[Media] "would rather worry about rumors about conservatives than facts about the President."'

I want to know how Newt can come up with such logical contrasts so easily. I mean, that's quite a heavy observation for someone who appears to be giving a quick answer to a question.

  • Login to post comments

Because Newt Doesn't Need A Teleprompter

Submitted by Poovey on Wed, 11/30/2011 - 12:23pm.

Because Newt Doesn't Need A Teleprompter to tell him what to say. He is quick witted.

  • Login to post comments

Cool Arrow

Submitted by amyshulk on Wed, 11/30/2011 - 2:16pm.

Newt is grounded enough to recognize what us "peons" are thinking and is (sometimes) able to pithily verbalize it.

If he was like this all the time, he'd sound like Cain, so he has to get wonkish to separate himself from the pack.

If we were looking for a conductor to drive this train off the cliff, but slower than the D's are doing so, he'd be an excellent pick!

But I fear he's too steeped in the wonk to comprehend we need a weed whacker, not snips for the pruning that MUST take place.

Snips will just ensure in 20 - 30 years our kids/grandkids experience their own deja vu!!!

The government's view of the economy could be summed up in a few short phrases: If it moves, tax it. If it keeps moving, regulate it. And if it stops moving, subsidize it.
Ronald Reagan
  • Login to post comments

Ever hear of something called intelligence? Wit?

Submitted by drsamherman on Thu, 12/01/2011 - 2:46pm.

You just dove right into the toilet and flushed yourself down on that one, Cool.

Obama does not have a quick wit, nor is he exceptionally intelligent. He is educated, but he is not intelligent. There is a vast difference. Newt has both intelligence and education, having been a history professor possessing a PhD. The most that can be said about Ear Leader is that he somehow managed to gain admission to Columbia and Harvard yet he admits his own academic record was less than stellar.

  • Login to post comments

obamas life is an open book

Submitted by dmacleo on Wed, 11/30/2011 - 11:05am.

its just the pages have all been redacted or follow the desired FOIA changes where its ok to lie.
do we even know much about his Hawaii life?
Newts been good this cycle holding the press accountable (as well as he can) for this stuff.
and Newsbusters has been valuable to this too, kudos.

dmacleo http://www.theconservativevoices.com
  • Login to post comments

I know my personal "filter"

Submitted by amyshulk on Wed, 11/30/2011 - 11:09am.

I know my personal "filter" was never very good, but now that I'm 50, it's barely there - the msm seems to have completely misplaced theirs, and are openly showing their bias. This will boomerang and the question i have is will they go back to being sneaky about their bias when 2012 stuns them???

The government's view of the economy could be summed up in a few short phrases: If it moves, tax it. If it keeps moving, regulate it. And if it stops moving, subsidize it.
Ronald Reagan
  • Login to post comments

If the Libstream media put in

Submitted by helomech on Wed, 11/30/2011 - 11:09am.

If the Libstream media put in 20% effort to actually do some investigative reporting, I'm sure the dirt on BO would start piling up in record time..

"The bended knee is not a tradition of our Corps..." General Alexander A. Vandergrift, USMC to the Senate Naval Affairs Committee, 5 May 1946
  • Login to post comments

Ahhhh Newt

Submitted by donabernathy on Wed, 11/30/2011 - 11:14am.

so lets elect Newt and continue da old

Democrats = Welfare/Warfare
Republicans = Warfare/Welfare

da good ole 2 party system

roflmao

  • Login to post comments

donabernathy

Submitted by amyshulk on Wed, 11/30/2011 - 11:16am.

Are you the same person with the same exact thoughts as you were 20 years ago? I'm not. Newt says he's not. As does Mitt. Evolving our views is what adults do. Scaring up bogeymen is what the unimaginative do.

The government's view of the economy could be summed up in a few short phrases: If it moves, tax it. If it keeps moving, regulate it. And if it stops moving, subsidize it.
Ronald Reagan
  • Login to post comments

Agreed, amy

Submitted by motherbelt on Wed, 11/30/2011 - 11:41am.

Lots of opinions change over time, and with changing circumstances.

But according to the maimstream (not a typo) media, becoming more conservative is a "flip-flop" or "pandering" whereas becoming more liberal is "evolving" (in the best sense).

  • Login to post comments

motherbelt

Submitted by amyshulk on Wed, 11/30/2011 - 4:08pm.

maimstream - good one! I have almost no short term memory, so if you see me using that without crediting you, it will be because I thought I thought it up on my own, lol!

Yep, I'm heartily sick of fighting wars on an uneven field, where we follow rules our enemy delights in breaking - the ROE's that make our soldiers essentially sitting ducks make me physically ill!!!

So it is with *all* things R or D.

The TP is marginalized & mocked, JUST like Rules For Radicals says to do: "Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it" While OWS is pandered to, excused by, and even held up as a paragon! I really feel like Alice on the wrong side of the looking glass when I see this bs!!!

And Clinton vs. Cain? Unreal. I guess we are over "compartmentalizing" huh? Clinton getting away with it is why we have so many who try to - Rep. Weiner comes to mind, yech!

So of *course* they {msm - or is it mmsm?} consider a D act = good & proper, while the same/equivalent act by an R = lack of character/starving the babes/cliffing poor gramma.

When they get trounced in 2012, I expect them to recalibrate themselves, but I doubt it will last long! I'm just glad they are so blatant - if this doesn't snap awake the voters/adults, I fear *nothing* will!

The government's view of the economy could be summed up in a few short phrases: If it moves, tax it. If it keeps moving, regulate it. And if it stops moving, subsidize it.
Ronald Reagan
  • Login to post comments

Newt Gingrich is for Newt. Period. The end.

Submitted by donabernathy on Wed, 11/30/2011 - 11:42am.

The consummate Beltway insider and lobbyist will say anything, do anything, and pander to any and all in his lifelong pursuit of...Newt. He is a more facile and intelligent, an older and whiter and chunkier version of Barack Obama, whose single defining trait is overweening narcissism. And just as Barack begins each day with an admiring look in the mirror, Gingrich is second to none in his appreciation of the glory that is Newt.

roflmao

  • Login to post comments

donabernathy

Submitted by amyshulk on Wed, 11/30/2011 - 2:10pm.

I can somewhat agree with your assessment, he sets off my radar even though I can't quite pin it down, but we just can't *know* if anyone means what they say and say what they mean 24/7.

I figured Mitt or Cain was the R version of Pres. Obama, but you think it's Newt?

Perhaps you are correct. Pres. Obama pre election is who Cain reminds me of - says what you want to hear but there are no specifics.

Pres. Obama now is closer to Mitt or Newt - I can drive this bus the *proper* way to fix things.

It's too bad I {we?} want someone closer to Paul on domestic policy and neither one is willing to give up the reins!

The government's view of the economy could be summed up in a few short phrases: If it moves, tax it. If it keeps moving, regulate it. And if it stops moving, subsidize it.
Ronald Reagan
  • Login to post comments

Good morning dona

Submitted by cocodrie on Wed, 11/30/2011 - 2:18pm.

You are comparing a professional poltitian to a muslim who is dedicated to the destruction of America - no comparison.

 

Jesus Loves You so much He died for you

  • Login to post comments

Apples and oranges

Submitted by Dave the mailman on Wed, 11/30/2011 - 2:34pm.

Newt may be a career politician, but at least he respects America and our values. Obama does not.

  • Login to post comments

Can we stop

Submitted by gwalt on Wed, 11/30/2011 - 4:12pm.

Can we please stop calling them "mainstream" media? Even the left wing Nation (if I recall correctly) has Libs at 20%---I think it's less and Conservatives at 42%.
They are not mainstream. The country is nearly 50% Conservative and a fifth, or less, of the country gets to decide "mainstream".
Enough.

Let's get a campaign to call them what they are----Leftists. Let's agree on a term, repeat it on every blog and talk radio and make it stick. Leftstream?

Left Wing Media?

Something, anything but Mainstream.

 "A lot of briefing for a 2 hr. special with Dan Rather. Saw the show & wonder why we bothered".             Ronald Reagan                                                           

  • Login to post comments

Uhm he was giving an

Submitted by Mperiod on Thu, 12/01/2011 - 1:39am.

Uhm he was giving an INTERVIEW....he was talking to a member of the press Dana Loesch has a radio show AND is the editor in chief of a blog, just like that kid is a blogger. What I don't get is, the kid is obviously liberal leaning... yet what is Dana's excuse, what about Glenn Beck, or Hannity or Rush. The idea that they our powerless to do any investigative journalism is crazy. But after all I guess its easier to imply there are all these secrets, than actually research it in case there aren't. (just so you know conservatives, that's why these sorta stories never take hold among any group outside of right wing circles, just yelling "_________ is a radical...maybe" is meaningless. Conservative news folks have billions in combined wealthy, same with political operatives, they also spend millions doing oppositional research....why not present facts instead of innuendo?

  • Login to post comments

So you are suggesting---

Submitted by matthewdean on Thu, 12/01/2011 - 2:21am.

 being professional rather than emulating the lib media, eh?

MD

"The credibility of the story is undermined by the selection of sources." - (h/t Jer)
  • Login to post comments

".why not present facts instead of innuendo?"

Submitted by Prisondog1776 on Thu, 12/01/2011 - 2:29am.

You mean like MSNBC and Chrissy Mathews?

Motor City Madman said it best - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EkEbqgbSqs8
  • Login to post comments

The classic conversation on how little Americans know about

Submitted by Rush Fan on Thu, 12/01/2011 - 4:18am.

Barack Obama was between two liberals on the Charlie Rose show prior to the 2008 election.. Here is the AUDIO (compliments of Rush Limbaugh) of Charlie Rose and Tom Brokaw discussing what they know and what they don't know about a guy they no little about, but are going to vote for anyways, Barack Obama.

  • Login to post comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Stop Censoring The Gosnell Trial!

Editors' Picks

  • Deputy kills PBS NewsHour staffer (Washington Examiner)
  • Oklahoma disaster was tragic, but larger ones have occurred (USA Today)
  • Mainstream Media Scream: Today’s Savannah Guthrie questions GOP ‘overreach’ (Paul Bedard, Washington Examiner)
  • Desperate Carney complains asking about scandals like asking about birth certificate (RCP)
  • Look at NYT's partisan-hack rewrite of the IRS hearing (Draw and STRIKE!)
  • Study: Christians who tithe have better finances than those who don't (TGC)
  • The media are willing accomplices to Obama (PolitiChicks)
  • FBI has suspects in mind in Benghazi; Obama prefers to try them in court (AP)
Chuck Norris's picture
Chuck Norris
Chuck Norris Column: Why Tim Tebow Is an Ultimate Clutch Player
Walter E. Williams's picture
Walter E. Williams
Walter E. Williams Column: Hating America
Michelle Malkin's picture
Michelle Malkin
Malkin Column: Obama's Emptiest Benghazi Talking Point
Ann Coulter's picture
Ann Coulter
Coulter Column: Sorry, Sen. Rubio, But Your Immigration Plan Is Still Problematic
David Limbaugh's picture
David Limbaugh
David Limbaugh Column: Partisan Obama Culture Spawned a More Abusive IRS
More >

RSS FeedAmazon KindleFacebookTwitter

Stop Censoring The News!

Gosnell's Just the Tip of the Iceberg
more cartoons
  • IRS Charged With Unfair Scrutiny of Pro-Life Groups' Prayer Events, Protest Signs
  • Ex-AccuWeather's Bastardi Slams 'Ambulance Chasing' by Global Warming Theory Activists
  • Howard Dean Dismisses Benghazi Scandal as ‘Laughable Joke’
  • Letterman: 'Obama's in So Much Trouble Politically He's Thinking of Killing Bin Laden Again'
  • NYT Gets Sen. Cruz's Opposition to Marketplace Fairness Act Dead Wrong
More >
NewsBusters

Executive Editor
Matthew Sheffield

Editor at Large
Brent Baker

Senior Editors
Tim Graham
Rich Noyes

Managing Editor
Ken Shepherd

Associate Editor
Noel Sheppard

Contributing Editors
Tom Blumer
Geoffrey Dickens
Dan Gainor
David Limbaugh
Mithridate Ombud
Clay Waters
Scott Whitlock

Senior Contributor
Mark Finkelstein

Contributing Writers
Matthew Balan
Michael M. Bates
Erin R. Brown
Jack Coleman
Kyle Drennen
Douglas Ernst
P. J. Gladnick
Stephen Gutowski
Matt Hadro
D. S. Hube
Kathleen McKinley
Dave Pierre
Amy Ridenour
Julia A. Seymour
Terry Trippany
Rusty Weiss
Brad Wilmouth

Publisher
Brent Bozell

Site Design
Dialog New Media

 

  • Home
  • Blogs
  • About
  • Forum
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Search
  • Account
  • rss
  • CNSNews
  • MRC TV
  • Biz & Media
  • Culture & Media
  • Take Action!
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Amazon Kindle
  • Advertise
  • Jobs

Copyright © 2005-2013 NewsBusters.
Privacy Policy | Terms of Use