Ron Christie Schools Chris Matthews: 'The Facts Get in the Way of a Good Narrative'
MSNBC's Chris Matthews on Monday perfectly demonstrated that he is willing to contentiously debate issues with conservative guests without regard for the truth.
In the middle of a Hardball segment about the Democrat proposal to extend the payroll tax holiday, Matthews ignorantly accused the far more knowledgeable Ron Christie of "complicating" the discussion leading his guest to marvelously respond, "Of course, the facts get in the way of a good narrative" (video follows with transcript and commentary):
CHRIS MATTHEWS, HOST: Ron Christie is a Republican strategist and a fellow at the John F. Kennedy Institute of Politics at Harvard. Ron, I want to start with you on this for once and I want to give you the honor of explaining this. Republicans believe that we shouldn’t do anything that's onerous on hiring people because that makes it harder to hire people and reduces unemployment. Is that correct?
RON CHRISTIE, REPUBLICAN STRATEGIST: Absolutely.
MATTHEWS: Generally speaking? Generally speaking, for example, Republicans usually oppose any -- or support a differential for youth getting jobs in the summer, a lower minimum wage, for example, because it makes them cheaper, and therefore gets more young people hired in the summer, right? So the general Republican working principle is make it cheaper to hire people per hour, whether it's through minimum wage being lower or lower taxes on hiring them, so more people will get hired. Isn’t that right?
CHRISTIE: Yep. So far, so good.
MATTHEWS: Okay, well what about this time? Why are they opposed to continuing the holiday or the tax cut on the payroll tax?
CHRISTIE: Well, Chris, I think there are two things at play here. First of all, politically speaking, at the end of December or before everyone goes home for the holidays, I think you’re going to have an extension of the payroll tax holiday. So what we're talking about, really, is a matter of politics rather than a matter of substance. The substance of the matter is Republicans are very much against raising taxes, particularly in a weak economy. For all the reasons that you just outlined, you don't want to hurt those who are helping to create jobs in the United States. What we have here, though, is an entirely different issue. You have a payroll tax holiday. Last year, the Congress and the President came out with an agreement that said, “We are going to divert two percent of the money that you would otherwise be putting away for Social Security back into your pockets.” That amounted to about $19.24 in everybody's pocketbook per week.
Now what we have is a Democratic proposal that says, “We're going to take three percent out, and not only are we going to take three percent out of Social Security, but we're also going to tax millionaires, we're going to tax the wealthy people, we’re going to tax the people who are creating the small businesses in this country to pay for it. So if raising taxes is a bad idea in a weak economy…
MATTHEWS: Okay, okay…
CHRISTIE: …then how is it that you can also say you should raise them?
MATTHEWS: David, you take over. He’s your witness, David, because I only heard the President say, “Let's continue the payroll tax cut.” There's no quid pro quo in the way it would be legislated. But Ron's complicating the thing here. Basically what you admitted…
CHRISTIE: Of course, the facts get in the way of a good narrative.
Indeed they do, and those familiar with Christie likely assume he knew what he was talking about.
As CNBC.com reported earlier in the day (emphasis added to highlight Matthews' ignorance):
Senate Democrats are pressing ahead on President Barack Obama's plan to cut in half every worker's payroll taxes next year — paid for by a 3.25 percent tax surcharge on the very wealthy.
The $248 billion plan would trim Social Security payroll taxes from 6.2 percent to 3.1 percent in hopes of propping up the still-weak economy. It also would cut in half the 6.2 percent tax paid by employers on the first $5 million of their payroll.
Once again, here's what Matthews said: "I only heard the President say, 'Let's continue the payroll tax cut.' There's no quid pro quo in the way it would be legislated."
And this man has not one but two nationally televised programs to misinform the public.
Pretty scary, isn't it?
- Noel Sheppard's blog
- Login to post comments
















Comments
Tingles
Submitted by HudsonRiverGirl on Mon, 11/28/2011 - 8:47pm.
Tingles is paid to lie and he does so gladly.
No one could be that ignorant by accident.
or...
Submitted by peteydee on Mon, 11/28/2011 - 9:03pm.
Don't confuse me with the facts,my minds already made up.
Another great example of the Obama Game, Noel
Submitted by Galvanic on Mon, 11/28/2011 - 9:08pm.
Obama utters a few talking points, and the lemmings like Matthews echo them and nothing else.
It is indeed effective, as I've seen in my own 87 year old father-in-law, who watches CNN and MSNBC and sounds a lot like Matthews and Maddow.
And that's what's happening with the Affordable Health Care Act (aka Obamacare). The Dems only told of the goodness it held; we're learning the negative details now.
It's the failure of the MSM to even be curious enough to dig a little deeper that dooms it to either extinction or irrelevence.
Yeah, I saw the headline on Yahoo earlier today
Submitted by bkeyser on Mon, 11/28/2011 - 9:17pm.
with a link to an AP article carried by WaPo (I assume the same one linked by Noel, above) titled: Senate Democrats push Obama plan to cut payroll tax, financed by tax on income over $1M
As I was watching the video I was thinking, "Does Matthews not know this was the plan? Or does he think the Republican guest doesn't know this is the plan? 'Cause he's making an ass of himself by insinuating a tax hike wasn't necessarily in the cards."
It seems Dems are full-bore on the Tax The Rich playbook and I assume that's their message for 2012. They're just looking or any reason now. What I want to know is, why stop at 3.25%? Why not just propose that the rich shouldn't have the right to be rich? Why not confiscate their financial holdings en toto? It seems kind of silly to just surtax the rich for a measly $2000 for the average working stiff over the course of a year. Hell, if the guy smokes, that's only 2-3 packs a week, depending on his locale. Wouldn't it be more useful to:
Kill all the rich people, it solves everything
Submitted by Unsane on Mon, 11/28/2011 - 10:34pm.
As I have been saying for years: since rich people are obviously the locus of the world's evil, why does the Left keep half-assing it? Why don't we just forcibly seize ALL of the assets of everyone who makes or has as much as a single penny above per capita income, and whack those individuals to make damn sure they NEVER become rich again?
"CONSUMED DEMOCRACY RETURNS A SOCIALIST REGIME" - Slayer, "Fictional Reality", from Divine Intervention (1994)
Make em an offer
Submitted by Denny Crane on Mon, 11/28/2011 - 10:59pm.
dat dey can't refuse.
You forgot the exceptions to the rule. Becoming rich through Hollywierd is OK.
We Are The 53%
One Can Only Imagine
Submitted by IrateNate on Mon, 11/28/2011 - 9:43pm.
...the wealth of misinformation contained in Matthews' new book.
Out of curiosity...
Submitted by gopcongress on Mon, 11/28/2011 - 9:59pm.
Out of curiosity, why doesn't Brent and partners see about starting a full-fledged cable network to compete against Fox? They will certainly become No. 2 in a very short term. Otherwise, I can't for the life of me figure out how PMSNBC, CNN, and the alphabets make money with their news divisions, since they will not sell out to Bozell, if the same tenet applies as it did to Newsweek selling out for one dollar to someone to maintain its socialist slant, rejecting a multi-million dollar offer from consersavite-leaning NewsMax.
"The news and truth are not the same thing." -Walter Lippmann (1889-1974) FOLLOW ME ON TWITTER
Geez, tax cuts do not ever need TO BE PAID FOR.
Submitted by acaiguana on Mon, 11/28/2011 - 10:17pm.
Pardon my shout out.
ACA
...
Quoted from: 'Acaiguana notes from the Underground' (Soon to be at theaters near you)
It's frustrating isn't it
Submitted by Scuba Dude on Tue, 11/29/2011 - 11:21am.
It's frustrating isn't it ACA?
We know that but the stupid libturds occupying the airwaves and our government just can't understand that simple fact.
Why oh why the Republicans/Conservatives don't correct them every time they utter that phrase is beyond me.
Typical spin from Chrissy
Submitted by Denny Crane on Mon, 11/28/2011 - 10:55pm.
As soon as the conservative starts telling the other half he gets interrupted and shouted down.
CM: No, you can't say that! It goes against the propaganda that I am trying to spread!
We Are The 53%
Thinking Forward
Submitted by HardRightTurn on Tue, 11/29/2011 - 12:46am.
It will not be enough to defeat Obama at the polls. As a former president, he will become a bigger meddler in America’s business than Carter and Clinton combined. Somehow, he will have to be stopped from undermining his successors.
To more fully comprehend the Left, one must read “Leftism As Psychopathy” by John Ray, M.A., Ph.D. Caution, it might scare you a little bit.
http://jonjayray.tripod.com/psycho.html
The so-called Republican talking heads who appear on
Submitted by Rush Fan on Tue, 11/29/2011 - 3:46am.
Meet the Press and other mainstream news shows don't often represent Republican viewpoints competently. That is why the Leftist media uses these familiar faces over and over again..
However, Ron Christie is definitely not one of the above. Whether he is up against Tingles or Mad Max Ed Schultz, Ron Christie can not only be counted on to argue the Republican position forcefully, but make his adversaries appear weak and foolish.
He is a far left liberal
Submitted by John21 on Tue, 11/29/2011 - 8:30am.
Facts mean nothing to him; he has proven that repeatedly over the last few years. He speaks from the DNC talking points, he has no real knowledge, he has no real insight, the DNC tells him it is a good idea then he accepts it without question.
Mr. Mathew’s man-love of Mr. Obama will allow him to continue the lying and propaganda campaign to ensure his hero to continue to ruin the country. Liberals believe that they are smarter than everyone else and if you do not agree with them you are a racist, homophobe, or stupid, once you understand that basic principal the rest of the lies and corruption is perfectly understandable.
Poor Misguided "Tingles" Matthews Can't Stand The Facts
Submitted by Motormouth KOS on Wed, 11/30/2011 - 10:31am.
First, that is a home run of a response by Mr. Christie, although it washed over PT Barnum-Matthews with nary a response.
What this demonstrates for the 2,868,654,221,504,017th time is that the biased, left-wing media is so used to having the narrative be the center of attention, not the actual facts, that it hardly raises an eyebrow when they get called out.
But here's the thing about Tingles that you should all watch for...
If and when Barry Blunder begins to fall out of favor with the lame-stream media, he will be driving that bandwagon, not just sitting on the back of it. He already ran a test balloon about 2 weeks ago when he openly questioned why Obama even wants the job.
Ironically, when he first started on cable, he was still a pompous blowhard, but he was far more capable of vigorous debate around some semblance of the facts. But his years at MSLSD, hanging out with the likes of Keith Olberfool turned him into the hyperactive, ADHD, Ritalin-starved Village Idiot you see today.
Can't wait for Tingles to say he told us so when he throws Barry under the bus!!!
The Obamination... A crisis leading to a catastrophe..(please donate to MRC)