NH Union Leader Editor on Gingrich: 'We Need a Candidate That is Bold in His Leadership' Not Romney 'Who Plays it Very Safe'
The editorial page editor of the New Hampshire Union Leader said Sunday that his paper endorsed Newt Gingrich for Republican presidential nominee because, "We need a candidate that is bold in his leadership, that has a vision for where he wants to take the country and knows how to get there."
In an interview with Candy Crowley on CNN's State of the Union, Cline contrasted this to former Massachusetts governor Mitt Romney who his paper saw as "somebody who plays it very safe" (video follows with partial transcript):
CANDY CROWLEY, HOST: I want you to read between the lines for me a little bit when you wrote, “We would rather back someone with whom we may sometimes disagree than one who tells us what he thinks we want to hear. Sounds to me like a slam on Mitt Romney.
ANDREW CLINE, EDITORIAL PAGE EDITOR OF THE NEW HAMPSHIRE UNION LEADER: Well, I don’t know that I’d call it a slam, and I don’t know that I would leave it just to Mitt Romney. But, you know, you have to look at all the candidates that are running, and examine them very closely, and listen very carefully to what they’re telling you. And, in our assessment, if you were to balance it between Romney and Gingrich, Romney is a very play it safe candidate. He doesn’t want to offend everybody or anybody. He wants to be liked, he wants to try to reach out and be very safe, reach out to everybody, bring everybody on board. And, that’s “A,” not very realistic. But imagine what that would be like as president, somebody who plays it very safe. I don’t think we’re in the kind of situation right now as a country that that’s necessarily the right kind of president at the moment. Perhaps in the late 19th century, perfect. Right now, we’re in a lot of trouble in this country. We need a candidate that is bold in his leadership, that has a vision for where he wants to take the country and knows how to get there. Those two things are very important.
When Crowley asked about electability, Cline responded, “I don’t think you can look at this particular moment, this little snapshot in polling and conclude therefore that a year from now Mitt Romney will be more electable than Newt Gingrich. I think that’s a very false assumption.”
In response to where Gingrich was in the polls a few months back, Cline said, “We consider the candidate overall. We don’t just look at the poll numbers, and I think this isn’t a game where we’re trying to win the primary so we can have a record of x number of wins. I mean, we don’t look at it that way. We’re not trying to attach our name to a winner. I mean, that’s not really leading. That would do our readers a very big disservice. I mean, we’re looking at who we would like to see as president."
- Noel Sheppard's blog
- Login to post comments
















Comments
extreme irony
Submitted by MidAmerica on Sun, 11/27/2011 - 12:25pm.
The country is really in turmoil and It will be extreme irony that the candidate that has the best chance of beating obama is the candidate who best exemplifies hope and change.
Not to worry..
Submitted by NewHampshire on Sun, 11/27/2011 - 2:46pm.
The tea party in NH is having none of Newt... the UL is no longer the conservative bastion it once was and is not taken seriously.
Last time they endorsed the same liberal as the liberal papers.
THE Tea Party???
Submitted by ThisnThat on Sun, 11/27/2011 - 6:20pm.
The Tea Party had better get its act together and keep its eye on the goal -- defeating liberals and big government advocates everywhere. I'd be voting for Sarah if she was running. She isn't. Therefore, I'm looking at the present GOP candidates, and I can live with either Romney or Newt. Not perfect, by a long shot. But given no other alternatives, I'm going to do what Newt is doing -- holding my powder and not bashing the GOP candidates -- except for Huntsman, of course (I don't even consider Ron Paul a candidate -- he's a loon that would leave our country defenseless).
I like what the Tea Party stands for. But if it's going to start dictating to me, I'm going to ignore it or counterattack it. "IT" doesn't speak for me if it's going around claiming that Newt or Romney are losers, and I'm about as conservative as you can get.
__________
“Didn't win the Medal of Honor? Didn't even serve? Then lie about it. We'll support you." — 9th Circuit Court