O'Reilly Tells Ingraham NBC's Todd Worked for Lib Senator, 'His Wife Makes Living Working for Democratic Party'
The story broken by NewsBusters last week involving Chuck Todd saying NBC's pollsters were "concerned" about President Obama's poll numbers has brought some scrutiny on the Peacock Network's chief White House correspondent.
After radio's Laura Ingraham questioned Todd about this issue Thursday, Fox News's Bill O'Reilly brought her on his program Friday saying, "We did a little research on Mr. Todd...His wife makes a living working for the Democratic Party. There is a report that Chuck Todd actually worked for Senator Tom Harkin, very liberal Senator from Iowa" (video follows with transcript and commentary):
BILL O'REILLY, HOST: Now for the "Top Story" tonight: very interesting back and forth between Laura Ingraham and NBC News White House correspondent Chuck Todd on the radio. It all began with Mr. Todd explaining an NBC poll on the president.
(BEGIN AUDIO CLIP)
CHUCK TODD, NBC: But on one important number that our pollsters say is in there is this idea that this is a long-term set back form or a short-term one, 54 percent said long-term. Our pollsters are concerned. That's the kind of numbers you have when the public starts to give up on a president as a problem solver.
(END AUDIO CLIP)
O'REILLY: The key phrase our pollsters are concerned. And yesterday, Laura Ingraham called Todd on that.
(BEGIN AUDIO CLIP)
LAURA INGRAHAM: I don't remember you saying that pollsters were concerned about Bush's poll numbers dropping though.
(CROSSTALK)
TODD: I -- I but, if you look at the trend line, this is just simply in the data. I -- look, I am aware of -- of how people are trying to interpret that line, and it's like, come on guys, there is not hidden bias all over the place.
(END AUDIO CLIP)
O'REILLY: And joining us now from Washington is Laura Ingraham. Now, maybe it was just a slip of the tongue, Jay Carney made one last night. He said put "party in front of country". He didn't mean that.
(CROSSTALK)
INGRAHAM: That was classic. Yes.
O'REILLY: Yes but I mean, I make mistakes like that. You do too. And we all make mistakes -- verbal mistakes.
INGRAHAM: Yes sure.
O'REILLY: So maybe Todd when he said our pollsters are concerned made a mistake.
INGRAHAM: Or maybe. And look, he comes on my show and a lot of folks won't because they don't want to be subjected to a FACTOR-like questioning so they avoid it. But he comes on and I gave him a chance to explain it he said oh come on you guys you see bias around every corner.
But aren't pollsters just supposed to report the numbers and the facts? To use the word "concerned" that the President is --
(CROSSTALK)
O'REILLY: Well it absolutely looks terrible. It's terrible.
(CROSSTALK)
INGRAHAM: It's a little odd.
(CROSSTALK)
O'REILLY: There's no doubt about it and we did a little research on --
(CROSSTALK)
INGRAHAM: Yes, go ahead.
O'REILLY: -- we did a little research on Mr. Todd. He is a big guy over at NBC News. And he's a Democrat. His wife makes a living working for the Democratic Party. There is a -- a report that Chuck Todd actually worked for Senator Tom Harkin, very liberal Senator from Iowa. We haven't been able to confirm that.
Well, I can. Former Washington Post columnist Howard Kurtz wrote on May 12, 2008, "While in college, Todd worked for the 1992 presidential campaign of Sen. Tom Harkin (D-Iowa) and later started part time at the Hotline."
Fishbowl DC reported in 2007, "Before coming to the world of political reporting and analysis, Todd earned practical political experience on initiative campaigns in Florida and various national campaigns based in Washington, D.C."
As for his wife, this is from her bio at Maverick Strategies and Mail:
Kristian Denny Todd is a seasoned communications professional and a veteran of numerous successful Democratic campaigns. She recently served as Senior Communications Strategist to U.S. Senator Jim Webb’s 2006 victory in Virginia where she directed all earned and paid media strategy on behalf of the candidate. Webb’s victory tipped the control of the U.S. Senate back to the Democrats. She joined Steve Jarding and Jessica Vanden Berg in creating Maverick Strategies and Mail providing direct mail and consulting services for Democratic candidates and progressive causes.
She began her career in 1992 in her home state of Florida as an aide to then-Speaker of the Florida House of Representatives Bo Johnson. In 1993, Denny Todd moved west where for five years she worked first for U.S. Representative Gary Condit (CA-18) and later for the Washington state Democratic Party, as well as, the 1996 Washington state Democratic Coordinated Campaign effort. In 1998, Denny Todd worked as Press Secretary in U.S. Senator Ernest “Fritz” Hollings’ reelection campaign in South Carolina.
In 1999, she moved to Washington DC where she served as Press Secretary in the office of U.S. Senator Patty Murray (WA). [...]
In 2002, Denny Todd returned to politics by accepting a position with U.S. Senator John Edwards’ (NC) leadership PAC, New American Optimists. She spent a year as a Senior Political Aide in Iowa where she was sent to lay the ground work for Senator Edward’s 2004 run for the Democratic nomination for President. In early 2002, Denny Todd was the first 2004 Presidential staffer on the ground in Iowa.
Later in 2003, Denny Todd returned to her Florida roots when U.S. Senator Bob Graham (FL) entered the race for the Democratic nomination for President. Out of respect and admiration for the former Florida Governor, as well as a little home state pride, she went to work for his campaign as National Spokesperson.
This is the wife of NBC's chief White House correspondent. But I digress:
O'REILLY: But there is no doubt Chuck Todd is a liberal guy. Is he in the tank? What do you think?
INGRAHAM: Well, I -- I don't -- I don't know if he's in the tank for Obama. I mean I think he's probably to the left of most of the country. Do I think -- that's my gut? Do I know for a fact? No I don't but I think it's my responsibility when I have these reporters on to dig a little deeper and to find out what's really going on.
And -- and when a pollster is concerned, I think ok, a pollster is concerned that his poll is not accurate or a pollster is concerned that he should be polling most likely voters.
(CROSSTALK)
O'REILLY: Yes, I -- I -- absolutely. Absolutely.
INGRAHAM: Not that a concern that the President is not being considered a problem solver anymore. I thought it was odd then and I still think it's odd.
O'REILLY: All right, and it all goes back to NBC's image as being a promoter of Barack Obama. I mean, that's the Jeffrey Immelt thing, the GE used to own NBC. And it -- and it just swirls and swirls and swirls around.
INGRAHAM: Yes. And obviously it's cable -- cable outlet is totally left-wing.
(CROSSTALK)
O'REILLY: Right. Continues to be a promoter of Barack Obama.
INGRAHAM: -- for anything Obama does. Yes, of course.
O'REILLY: There is a difference between being left-wing like Dennis Kucinich who is coming up behind you and a promoter.
INGRAHAM: Yes.
O'REILLY: If you have a major television network, as you did in 2008, actually promoting a candidate, a single candidate, that's a -- that's a problem for the country.
And said network has a chief White House correspondent that has worked on at least one Democrat campaign while being married to a Democrat strategist.
Bias? What bias?
- Noel Sheppard's blog
- Login to post comments
















Comments
And this is some kind of
Submitted by killa37 on Mon, 09/12/2011 - 12:55am.
And this is some kind of surprise??? Plus............hey F. Chuck.........shave the dumbass facial hair - you look like a college freshman trying to prove that you're a man - something you can only dream about!!!
But..........I'll listen to Laura anytime. O'Reilly allready strapped on the knee-pads for Boy Barry TWICE - so his credibility, in my own humble opinion, is pretty worthless.
What?!? You mean that wasn't
Submitted by Beukeboom on Mon, 09/12/2011 - 9:33am.
What?!? You mean that wasn't Tony Orlando?
Marxist Media hack ...
Submitted by Bodini on Mon, 09/12/2011 - 1:08am.
working for the Marxist Democrat party ... officially or unofficially, there's nothing new about that! His wife is on the payroll also ... wow! I hope they haven't procreated!
Harkin
Submitted by Nosmo on Mon, 09/12/2011 - 1:10am.
Harkin is another lib who lied about his military service to get elected.
I suppose it's similar to the bias of Fox News
Submitted by Jer on Mon, 09/12/2011 - 2:17am.
by having political correspondent [and later Chief White House correspondent] Carl Cameron cover the 2000 Bush campaign while his wife actively campaigned for Bush.
Jer
Multiplied by an expanded
Submitted by killa37 on Mon, 09/12/2011 - 2:53am.
Multiplied by an expanded factor on an expanded roster of 'news' channels.............
"Not Quite Jer"
Submitted by mad53PA on Mon, 09/12/2011 - 9:11am.
Jer,
Point well taken about Cameron, let's agree that no doubt on both the left and the right we have reporters that have spouses that have worked in D.C for a long time on both sides of the aisle.
I do believe however, that you are missing some important distinctions.
First it is clear that you have a strong dislike for Fox News. I've watched Carl Cameron and his reports and I have not seen any strong bias. He plays it fairly down the middle and gives both sides/views on the issue he is reporting.
Secondly regarding Chuck Todd, he is the Chief White House Correspondent but also hosts The Morning Rundown (an opinion show) and has even guest hosted Hardball (another left oriented opinion show).
Carl Cameron has no such role at Fox, he reports period. The opinions are left to O'Reilly, Hannity, etc.
MSNBC blurs the line between reporting and opinion (just look at the snarky comments of Andrea Mitchell) on any given day about Palin, Bachmann, Bush or conservatives in general.
You can take issues with perceived bias at MSNBC, Fox or any other network or news outlet.
Only MSNBC employs reporters and have them double as commentators or hosts for highly political discussions.
mad
Submitted by Tugboat Phil on Mon, 09/12/2011 - 11:10am.
I'll go one further with Cameron, he was not just down the middle on the campaign, but at times I thought he was working for OBarry. I would love it if FNC was decidedly to the right on their news coverage, but I think they usually do a fair job with both sides of a story. What gets the left so mad is that they ask questions about topics that libs would prefer remain unknown.
mad53PA...
Submitted by Jer on Mon, 09/12/2011 - 2:50pm.
How is it clear I have a strong dislike for Fox News? I think it's biased. I think MSNBC is biased. I have often acknowledged a leftward tilt in the MSM and have voiced my approval of Fox filling a niche in broadcast news, and, finally, I have pointedly criticized Obama for waging a public war against Fox.
So, once again, exactly how did you reach the conclusion I have a strong dislike for Fox News? [Full disclosure: I do have a strong dislike for Bill O'Reilly and Dick Morris.]
Jer
Well Jer,once in a while we
Submitted by killa37 on Tue, 09/13/2011 - 12:00am.
Well Jer,once in a while we agree on something.................I think O'Reilly is a sheep in wolf's clothing - he's some kind of a bully/badass with the wrong people, and then queebs out when he should be nailing somone who deserves it. And Morris??
Well, I like him - in some detached way - because he isn't short on opinions or theories............but you KNOW that the guy is the ultimate political prostitute - and he'd probably work for anybody , given the right price and the right amount of power. Hell, he'd probably go to work for Boy Barry, if the conditions were right.
Didn't Carl
Submitted by bkeyser on Mon, 09/12/2011 - 11:06am.
travel with the Democrats during the '08 campaign? Plus watching him, he doesn't evidence any bias for the GOP that I've seen; if anything, the few comments he makes outside of straight reporting seem to be coming more from the left.
Depends on the lens, bk...
Submitted by Jer on Mon, 09/12/2011 - 2:43pm.
Last week I watched an episode of Todd's morning show and he sounded like a paid shill for the RNC.
Jer
I agree bk...
Submitted by USMC8411 on Mon, 09/12/2011 - 3:38pm.
The difference is reporting versus journalism. FOX, and Cameron, report what the facts are and often have opposing views represented in their segments equally. What F Chuck did was journalize, and he put his non-neutral "feelings" into the comment. Why would pollsters be worried about the results? Is that not theirjob to find out what they are?
MSDNC will have 3 to 4 liberals pounding on one moderate republican and that would be most of the "show". They would NEVER have a show like The 5 on the air.
Follow Jer's daily exposés at tifortat.wordpress.com
Submitted by SickofLibs on Mon, 09/12/2011 - 11:15am.
.
It was actually titfortat.wordpress.com
Submitted by Jer on Mon, 09/12/2011 - 2:40pm.
but at the suggestion of Unsane, the domain name has been changed to theydoit2.org
Please visit often. Our currently featured video is Carl Cameron Sucks Up to Bush.
Jer
SoL---
Submitted by matthewdean on Mon, 09/12/2011 - 5:04pm.
It really was 'tifortat' originally.
Stood for " truly i'm favoring only reports that are tainted"; either against conservatives and Republicans; or in support of liberals and Democrats.
The site reportedly crashed because of the sheer volume of traffic from a single poster, one Jer, who habitually listed, with every other post, the entire gamut of his CBJ admonitions aimed at his fellow libs and Dems. (CBJ = certified by Jer)
"Some say" that while poster Jer's assertions may be true, the site actually crashed because in-house computers - in trying to compute the actual number of times that liberals and Democrats should be rightfully excoriated for exhibiting crassness, chicanery, and stupidity - fried their internal wiring.
MD
Todd
Submitted by kiwikit on Mon, 09/12/2011 - 5:19am.
Was always a leftist. . . I remember him well when he was brought in for comments on that other leftist organ (like NBC, CBS, ABC, CNN, PBS etc) C-SPAN. I've not watched it in years but I assume it continues to spout the anti-conservatism that forced me to give up on them.
O'Really????
Submitted by Texndoc on Mon, 09/12/2011 - 5:59am.
Let's not forget this host kissed up to Zero Messiah for interviews on his show, that were granted after all the O'Reilly gushing. Bill-Oh! only started to get critical of Obama when Zero's numbers SERIOUSLY started heading south. In fact, I think and can almost guarantee that when things tighten up that Bill-Oh! will keep his Manhattan cocktail party creed intact and be there for Zero's re-election. Well, unless it's Romney. (shudder)
The silver lining? They just
Submitted by amyshulk on Mon, 09/12/2011 - 7:05am.
The silver lining? They just don't get it. They make noises like they do - bringing up how a Pres. Regan wasn't possible - but they just can't accept the fact that we do mean it.
This bodes well for the D seats flipping to R while they focus on the Presidency. As long as we stay vigilant!
Ronald Reagan