Maddow Scolds McCain for Meeting Gaddafi in 2009, Ignores Obama Meeting Him Month Prior
The hypocrisy of Rachel Maddow knows no bounds.
On Tuesday's "Late Show," the MSNBCer scolded Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) for meeting with Libya's Moammar Gaddafi in August 2009 while completely ignoring the fact that President Obama met him at the G8 summit the month before (video follows with transcript and commentary):
DAVID LETTERMAN, HOST: The United States was able to deal with Moammar? We were comfortable with him as the dictator there? More or less we had interests and so forth that was manageable?
RACHEL MADDOW, MSNBC: We have a creepy level of comfort with dictators all over the world.
LETTERMAN: Right.
MADDOW: I mean, when, there’s, you know, when Mubarak got toppled in Egypt, the American government had to turn from our dear but slightly creepy ally who we criticize but only sotto voce to "We're so glad he’s gone."
LETTERMAN: Yeah.
MADDOW: And some of the same thing with Gaddafi. I mean Gaddafi was public enemy number one for a while, but we’ve got pictures of, you know, senators essentially sitting in his lap from the last few years. So, I'm talking to you, John McCain.
(Laughter)
MADDOW: But, I mean, we have an awkward relationship with dictators around the world, and the people in those countries is calling us on it and telling us to be on the right side of history.
LETTERMAN: Let me ask you about two things I learned I think from watching MSNBC.
Tells you a lot about a person who not only watches MSNBC, but is willing to admit on national television that he actually learned something from this farce of a so-called "news network." But I digress:
LETTERMAN: One, John McCain is saying that criticizing Obama that he stayed out of Libya on the other hand completely ignoring the fact that Americans were not in jeopardy and no American lives that we know of were lost in that conflict, but criticizing him for just that, staying out too long. Do I have that correct?
MADDOW: McCain said it's good Gaddafi seems to be gone but it took too long, if only America had been bombing more and heavier earlier.
LETTERMAN: Right.
MADDOW: So this worked but I'm still mad at you Obama.
LETTERMAN: Yeah, he would rather have seen a third front of war. An active third front.
MADDOW: That seems to be what he was calling for after the fact. But there is, I mean, it's two years ago I think this week that there's these shots of McCain like meeting Gaddafi and giving him a little bow and telling him how much he wants to work with him. So if he wants to be the tough guy on Gaddafi it’s a little creepy.
Yes, McCain did indeed meet with Gaddafi in August 2009. Here's how Agence France-Presse reported it at the time:
A US senate delegation said on Friday that it had told Libyan leaders of Washington's strong opposition to any early release by the Scottish authorities of convicted Lockerbie bomber Abdelbaset Ali Mohmet al-Megrahi.
"We have made clear to the Libyan authorities that we are resolutely opposed to his release," said Senator John McCain, the defeated Republican candidate in last year's presidential election.
Fellow Senator Joseph Lieberman, who sits as an independent, warned of "damage" to US-Libyan relations if Megrahi, who is serving a life sentence with a mininum 27-year tariff for the deadly 1988 bombing of Pan Am flight 103 over the Scottish village, is freed early on compassionate grounds.
"Relationships between Libya and US could be tested in the days ahead if Abdelbasset Ali al-Megrahi is released by Scottish authorities," he told a news conference at the end of the delegation's 24-hour visit.
"If Megrahi is released, there will be a very negative reaction by the American people."
So McCain and Lieberman were part of a Senate delegation - conceivably sent by Obama - to, amongst other things, warn Libya about consequences if Megrahi was released to them by the Scots.
Maddow chose not to share that detail with Letterman, or that Lieberman was there as well.
What she also conveniently ignored was that Obama met with Gaddafi a month before. As reported by the Tripoli Post (h/t NB reader Josh):
The Libya leader Muammar Gaddafi who is also the current President of the African Union met Thursday night with United States President Barack Obama.
Both leaders shook hands and exchanged words of greetings.
This is the first time that the Leader Muammar Gaddafi to meet a US president for the last 39 years. [...]
Later, both sat at the same dining table for dinner hosted by Italian Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi whose country is hosting the annual Group of Eight (G8).
I wonder why Maddow opted not to tell Letterman this, or that on Tuesday, Wikileaks released a November 9, 2008, letter from Gaddafi to Obama congratulating him for his election victory:
SUBJECT: LIBYAN LEADER AL-QADHAFI'S CONGRATULATORY MESSAGE TO THE
PRESIDENT-ELECT
REF: STATE 118192
¶1. (U) Post received on November 9 via telefax a letter from
Leader Muammar al-Qadhafi conveying his congratulations to the
President-elect. We have not yet received the note in hard copy.
¶2. (SBU) Post's informal translation of the Arabic language
letter follows:
Begin text of letter:
Dear Mr. President Obama,
I have the pleasure to send a congratulation note for the first
time to an American president, and on behalf of all Africa, and
of Cen-Sad, the base of the African pyramid, and on behalf of
the Arab Maghreb Union, and in the name of all Arab leaders as I
am their dean.
Since relations are resumed between our two countries, we have
the right to congratulate you from the bottom of our hearts
because you are the son of Africa.
God gives reign to whom He wishes and takes it away from whom He
wishes; he holds dear whom he wants and humiliates whom he wants
as well. He retains all the good in His hands, and He is the
all powerful; and He pledged to confer His favors on those
deemed weak and to bequeath them the Earth.
Blacks were deemed weak and were oppressed, and were taken to
the American continent as slaves and indentured servants.
The main point is that Blacks shall not have an inferiority
complex and imitate the Yankees.
They have to prove that they are partners to the whites and
sharing the same continent; that the Whites themselves are not
indigenous, but that they have come from overseas; that the
black man is not less competent than the white man; and that the
black color shall prevail in the world as predicted by the Green
Book.
I salute the American people who have chosen you in these
historical elections for such a high position, so that you may
lead the change that you have promised them and for which they
have rallied around you.
We hope that you lead the United States of America on the path
of good and respect peoples' sovereignty and observe the policy
of neutrality.
Sincerely,
Muammar al-Qadhafi
So, on November 9, 2008, Gaddafi sent his first ever congratulatory letter to an American president, and eight months later, Obama became the first American president to meet Gaddafi.
Yet Maddow chose not to mention any of this to Letterman.
She's one heck of a journalist, isn't she?
- Noel Sheppard's blog
- Login to post comments
















Comments
We have a creepy level of
Submitted by Dan The Man 2 on Wed, 08/24/2011 - 10:53am.
We have a creepy level of comfort with dictators all over the world
Seems to me someone who comments on politics would understand we want friendly dictators in power rather than chaotic regimes like Chavez or Iran.
What a Hippo Crap
Submitted by Pilgrim1949 on Wed, 08/24/2011 - 10:56am.
Ms. Madcow's picture is next to the word "hypocrite" in the dictionary.
"Ye canne change the laws of physics....." but some politicians believe that with the right legislation you can pretend they don't really apply to your own pet projects...
Well there you have Randy madcow....
Submitted by OldJarhead77 on Wed, 08/24/2011 - 10:58am.
Sticking his foot in his mouth! The only one on old Gadaffys lap might have been her Girl friend Barney "Ride the Chubby" Frank.... McCain went there to tell him to not push for the release of that Terrorist (Which he did anyway.)The fact that old Joe was there was meant to show Gadaffy that BOTH SIDES of the American political machine didn't want this MURDERER released. And of COURSE h/she talks about a "Creepy relationship" with dictators I guess thats why she failed to mention any of her guys EVER meeting with Gadaffy at all!
Rachel Maddow's the creepy
Submitted by marpel on Wed, 08/24/2011 - 11:16am.
Rachel Maddow's the creepy one here...
"Deep within my heart lies a memory. A song of ol' San Antone..."
Facts, we don't need no stinkin' facts on PMSNBC
Submitted by Tomorama on Wed, 08/24/2011 - 11:24am.
This guy is funny.
Too bad they are no longer doing the Harry Potter movies, he will be out of work I suppose...............
the saddest part about any post regarding maddow...
Submitted by mshipwreck on Wed, 08/24/2011 - 11:29am.
is that she's my mom's favorite "journalist."
it makes me weep for their generation...
Yes. Get rid of those dictators.
Submitted by The Vet on Wed, 08/24/2011 - 11:44am.
Maddow: ...people in those countries is calling us on it and telling us to be on the right side of history.
You mean like the ruthless dictator and his ruthless sons in Iraq? To be on the right side of history in getting rid of them?
NewsBusters ---
On MSNBC, an Incensed Maddow Howls Over Obama's Kind Words for George W. Bush
Maddow: To have in this speech, as combat operations are ending, to have...the President not only not addressing the circumstances in which we went to war, but these kind words for President Bush, describing his “commitment to our security” despite the recklessness with which President Bush discarded that national security in favor of this war of choice, which only diminished our security, and is responsible, probably, for the Afghanistan war still going on today, for the deaths of people who have died in Afghanistan after the time after which that war would have ended had we not gone to Iraq -- not to mention all of the people who died in Iraq.
Yay, President Obama kinda did a good thing here. Got rid of a ruthless dictator that has had a history of killing Americans. Got rid of him without losing a single American life in the process. Did it in a relatively small timeframe when it comes to these kinds of things. Insurrections. Civil wars. What have you. Did it in such a way so as the Libyan people themselves can be proud they knocked down the dictator. Instead of having an outside force come in and do it for them. Not too shabby a job. And now it is time to..... hammer Senator John McCain? I iz so confused.
We should scold all Senators that pretend to be ambassadors...
Submitted by Red Jeep on Wed, 08/24/2011 - 11:43am.
...to foreign countries.
The Founders wanted them to be appointed state's ambassadors to the Federal Gov't and they were until 1913, when, by amendment, they became elected not selected, and with another amendment passed in 1913 that allowed the collection of income taxes, Senators became the Panderers.
(1913 was a bad year for our country)
no wonder
Submitted by grammajane on Wed, 08/24/2011 - 11:52am.
It's no wonder these late night "hosts" are loosing viewers when they have the likes of madcow on spewing her bias and bashing. Guess it fits right into their own radical lib agenda and in the mean-time, viewers are watching the re-run of Oreilly at 11pm. She, or what ever, is so pathetic, a continual joke.
Little wonder she`s called
Submitted by Pinetree3 on Wed, 08/24/2011 - 11:55am.
Little wonder she`s called Madcow.
bowing
Submitted by grammajane on Wed, 08/24/2011 - 12:04pm.
She mentioned McCain bowed to Gadaffe. Is there any proof/pictures of that happening? Seems there was a pic of her leader doing just that to some dictator
Another example of
Submitted by buddyc on Wed, 08/24/2011 - 12:15pm.
Another example of progressive "smart".
She has a promo at HooverDam. The progressive environmentalists want to tear it down and restore nature. They would never allow another HooverDam to be built. Someone should ask her if she supports more HooverDam type projects on the Colorado. There is room for at least 2 more!
It use to be that on occasion I would watch MSNBC to get a take on progressive views. It is now so relentlessly negative towards republicans I can't cope with it. How can a "professional" live in that kind of world of hate and negativity.
They can't even relish the few accomplishments of Obama.
Randy Madcow Is Still Angry That ...
Submitted by Motormouth KOS on Wed, 08/24/2011 - 1:03pm.
The Obamination... A crisis leading to a catastrophe..(please donate to MRC)
"Yeah, he would rather have seen a third front of war".
Submitted by UpNorth on Wed, 08/24/2011 - 2:27pm.
Um, Rachel, and David? There already is a third, and fourth front in that war, they're called Yemen and Somalia. If you want to be snarky, at least try to get your facts right before you beclown yourselves.
"Beclown"
Submitted by miss911ninja on Wed, 08/24/2011 - 3:38pm.
That has got to be the best invented word evvah!
Running Her Mouth
Submitted by miss911ninja on Wed, 08/24/2011 - 4:01pm.
Since Maddow stated that McCain was "like, meeting Gaddafi" for the purposes of "telling him how much he wants to work with him," then she was either misinformed about the real mission of the Senate delegation, or she didn't know why they'd been sent, so she made something up. That's assuming she knew about the Senate delegation in the first place. I'm thinking she didn't, so last night on Letterman she was just running her mouth, which is her only real talent!
Bull Dykes Tell No Truths!
Submitted by billwhit1357 on Thu, 08/25/2011 - 3:07am.
What do you expect from this Bull Dyke? The truth? Lol, anything from MSNBC is Pig Feces and all Lies! When not a lie, then they just forget to add the whole truth. That is why their ratings are falling like an avalanche, too many lies and weirdos as so-called "Journalists", like Maddows!
So...basically...
Submitted by snidelywhiplash on Thu, 08/25/2011 - 10:50am.
You don't have any refutation of what she said. You don't have any substantive criticism of her position. All you have is "LOL SHEZ A DYKE?"
Pathetic. Not unexpected, but pathetic.
Few things...
Submitted by snidelywhiplash on Thu, 08/25/2011 - 11:00am.
1. I can't see a reason why Senators should be attempting to conduct diplomacy on behalf of the United States. Can anyone provide a reason why this should be happening?
2. The issue here as I recall was NOT that McCain, along w/ Lindsey Graham and Joe Lieberman, had MET with Gaddafi/Qaddafi/Khadafy.
The problem is that McCain had suggested we would provide him with military parts and equipment, and that McCain would help push it along in the Congress. Doesn't anyone see a problem with that?
3. This just came up now because a diplomatic cable was just released with this discussion in it. When Qaddafi went back to his ways of suppressing opposition, then McCain & Co. got all high and mighty about how the Administration was dragging its feet and making a pig's ear out of our response.
4. Part of the President's job is to meet w/ other heads of state, even if they're nutcases like ol' Moammar. Get over it.
So, Snidely, you were equally upset
Submitted by UpNorth on Thu, 08/25/2011 - 11:31am.
when Pelosi met with Bashar al Assad, correct? When John F'ing Kerry met with Karzai?
And, while we're on the case, how many US presidents have met with Achmadinejad? How many have met with Kim Jong il, or any of the Jong family, and your guy Jimmy Carter doesn't count? How many have met with the "Head of state" of Burma/Myanmar?
Part of the President's responsibility is to represent the citizens of the United States, and not meet with people like I mentioned. Get over it.
A one year sleeper account, with two posts on one thread?