Uygur: Sharpton May Have Gotten MSNBC Show Because He Won't Criticize Obama
When CBS's "60 Minutes" did a puff piece about Al Sharpton in May, Lesley Stahl revealed the Reverend refuses to say anything bad about President Obama.
On Sunday's "Reliable Sources," former MSNBC contributor Cenk Uygur claimed he might have been replaced by Sharpton in the 6PM time slot because of the Reverend's undying devotion to the current White House resident (video follows with transcript and commentary):
HOWARD KURTZ, HOST: But you suggested, when this split came, that perhaps there was some White House pressure on MSNBC because you have taken on the president on various things. But you don't have any evidence of that, do you?
CENK UYGUR: But I didn't say that. I said people in Washington had a concern with my tone, which is what Phil Griffin told me. I didn't say that he said that it was the White House. Now, you know, who is the people in Washington? I think that's a really great question, probably needs some more investigation.
You know, a friend of mine just suggested that I watch the "60 Minutes" piece from a couple of months ago on Al Sharpton. And I found that to be very curious because Leslie Stahl said there, and here I have the quote for you: "Sharpton says he has decided not to criticize the president about anything."
So the guy who was criticizing the president is out, even though he had really good ratings, and the guy who has decided not to criticize the president about anything is in. That's interesting.
This was the relevant section from Stahl's puff piece on the Reverend:
LESLEY STAHL, CBS (OFF CAMERA): Sharpton told us that having a black president is a challenge: if he finds fault with Mr. Obama, he's aiding those who want to destroy him. So he has decided not to criticize the president about anything - even about black unemployment that’s twice the national rate.
STAHL (ON CAMERA): Have you told other blacks not to criticize him publicly?
REV. AL SHARPTON: What I've told them is to be genuine about it. There are some blacks that said, “He needs to go with a black agenda. He needs to do this.” He said when he was running he wasn't gonna do that. Duh. Surprise.
STAHL: But just because he didn't campaign on improving unemployment in black areas, why aren't you out there saying, “We need more done?”
SHARPTON: What I don't want to see is because he is black that we act like he's not the real president. “He ought to be leading the black cause or the labor cause.” He's the president. To minimize who he is, I think is an insult to the achievement of having him there.
STAHL (OFF CAMERA): Given his loyalty and his change from confrontational to accommodating, the administration is rewarding him with access and assignments, like making him a spokesman for their education policy and sending him on the road with Newt Gingrich, of all people, to build support for hiring better teachers.
So, two months ago, it was revealed on "60 Minutes" that Sharpton "decided not to criticize the president about anything - even about black unemployment that’s twice the national rate," and "the administration is rewarding him with access and assignments, like making him a spokesman for their education policy."
Now, MSNBC is rewarding Sharpton with his own 6PM program five nights a week.
Coincidence?
The reality is I don't buy what Uygur's been selling since his departure from MSNBC last week.
As I've written on numerous occasions, he's clearly not ready to be hosting his own program. The one he had for about six months following Keith Olbermann's departure from the network was almost unwatchable.
Since by his own admissions Uygur appeared unmanageable and disinterested in accepting constructive feedback from superiors, MSNBC's side that they were going to use him in a different capacity possibly giving him the grooming he desperately needs seems far more plausible.
I also don't buy that any of this was caused by his criticism of Obama. These were tremendously infrequent, and always punches from the left.
As the most liberal television so-called news outlet in the nation, MSNBC doesn't mind its commentators occasionally taking their beloved President on when it's a position likely shared by the majority of their far-left viewers.
As for Uygur's replacement, was Sharpton's loyalty to Obama part of MSNBC's calculus in giving him the 6PM time slot?
I'm sure it didn't hurt.
(H/T Daily Caller)
- Noel Sheppard's blog
- Login to post comments
















Comments
→ Ya think?
Submitted by Cool Arrow on Sun, 07/24/2011 - 8:26pm.
Uyger, tell us something we don't know.
Sure, Sharpton's going to lobby for his own pity party, but he won't throw his lord and master under the bus. He's already seen what happened to Jessie Jackson.
You beat me to it, Cool!
Submitted by drsamherman on Sun, 07/24/2011 - 8:29pm.
I was about to say the same thing.
Ug-yore sounds a bit miffed that he was booted from the liberal delusional news network of choice. If he is too left even for them, he can always join Algore's Zero network--where even Keefie is falling like a lead sinker.
→ I'll watch it . . . once
Submitted by Cool Arrow on Sun, 07/24/2011 - 8:36pm.
Every once in a while, I like to listen in on how badly Sharpton needs to keep a following to tropt out at his racist bidding.
I hope someday soon hundreds of thousands of African Americans awake to the fact that nobody takes care of self better than self. Nobody should be owned.
For Uygur, stating the
Submitted by mustango on Sun, 07/24/2011 - 8:45pm.
For Uygur, stating the obvious is a step up from his usual level of extraterrestrial delusion.
You know, Ka-chink ...
Submitted by Newsbubba on Sun, 07/24/2011 - 8:34pm.
.... if I was replaced by Sharpton, I'd really consider snuffing my own candle.
I mean, have you even thought about what a loser you must be to be replaced by a moron like that?!?!
Too true, Bubba
Submitted by Blonde on Sun, 07/24/2011 - 10:35pm.
But it is pretty funny listening to the little bit***y whining.
Handy Reference Guide to Obama's Gaffes and Goofs ~ Currently Numbering 200 (and Counting)
None of this Really Matters Much
Submitted by Comrade Jim on Sun, 07/24/2011 - 8:49pm.
Since Olbermann and Uygur had no audience to speak of and probably Sharpton will have no audience either.
Comrade,
Submitted by Chris Norman on Sun, 07/24/2011 - 10:53pm.
It is funny and pathetic - like watching the Bundy's fighting over an old M&M they found behind the refrigerator.
And why won't Al Dull-Ton
Submitted by killa37 on Sun, 07/24/2011 - 8:55pm.
And why won't Al Dull-Ton critisize Boy Barry??? Lemme see..........it begins with an 'R'........and ends in an 'E'.........
Which is more than you can say for the 'Rev.' Jesse Jackson, who said that he'd cut Barry's balls off.................I think he'd have to check with Mooooooooooooooochelle Antoinette on that one.
Hey Skank..............go back to Turkey and get your own damn show over there...........and take along Keef with you, and get him a show, so that a fat whiteboy infidel can tell all of those Turks what's wrong with their country.
maybe
Submitted by Tjexcite on Sun, 07/24/2011 - 9:09pm.
It did not matter if Uygur was ready and had a great show. Sharpton was going to replace someone on MSDNC which is what happens in a crony administration. Having him as he is a known entity and he charges the tone and color of the propaganda network. He is what is needed to show them how to bow to the one.
The election is coming up.
Submitted by kg on Sun, 07/24/2011 - 9:13pm.
The election is coming up. MSNBC is preparing to play their daily race card. Anything they can do to assist Obama's re-election is game.
"DumbAssity of Dope"
boy unger and O' Donnell both
Submitted by jkwtrading on Sun, 07/24/2011 - 10:27pm.
boy Uyger and O' Donnell both with sharp words for the pimp in the White house. the "light" is a shining tonight.
Uygur is in denial
Submitted by Galvanic on Sun, 07/24/2011 - 11:41pm.
His ratings did not please his bosses. They had to dump him to try to salvage the time slot. That they hired Sharton to replace him is personally embarassing to Uygur, but shows just how bad it had gotten.
Just how bad is it, when low
Submitted by Chris Norman on Sun, 07/24/2011 - 11:46pm.
Just how bad is it, when low ratings are a concern at a network where low ratings are an accepted way of existence?
MSNBC
Submitted by Jerry Mack on Mon, 07/25/2011 - 1:41pm.
Messiah Shall Not Be Criticised