Chuck Todd: Limbaugh Couldn't Win GOP Nomination - Doubtful Palin Could Either
David Gregory decided to have a very fair and balanced roundtable discussion at the conclusion of Sunday's "Meet the Press" exclusively with the perilously liberal Washington Post columnist Eugene Robinson and the equally left-leaning Chuck Todd of NBC News.
With the subject being Newsweek's new cover story about former Alaska governor Sarah Palin, Todd mysteriously made the case for how slim her chances of winning the GOP presidential nomination were by claiming, "Rush Limbaugh is an incredibly influential figure in the Republican Party, and he could never win the Republican nomination" (video follows with transcript and commentary):
DAVID GREGORY, HOST: Let me do one other political note because Sarah Palin is being heard from again--cover story in Newsweek. And I want to pullout the portion where she talks about her prospects, which is quite interesting. We'll get that together and put that up on the screen. Again, granting an interview to Newsweek. "I can win." She says, "The people of America are desperate for positive change, and deserving of positive change ... I'm not so egotistical as to believe that it has to be me, or it can only be me, to turn things around. But I to believe that I can win."
What is she up to here, Chuck?
CHUCK TODD, NBC: I'm not going to pretend--we never--to try to crawl inside and see if she's going to do things predictably the way other presidential candidates do is a mistake. It feels like she is simply trying to go out on her own terms. You know, she didn't want the Tucson response that she made when she called blood libel and all those things after the Gabby Giffords shooting to be the most--the lasting impression of Sarah Palin 2011. She wanted to get out--she wanted--if she's not going to run, she wants to be able to have that be the message. "I could win, but I don't need it."
GREGORY: But she has this quality of wanting to very much stay on the margins, be a spoiler if that's, if that's the role. But it, it's just completely unconventional.
EUGENE ROBINSON, WASHINGTON POST: It is completely unconventional. I'm not exactly sure, beyond the influence she has now as a, as a kind of gadfly, as a, as a political presence, I'm not sure how this path that she seems to be on gets her any more influence. I'm not sure where it gets her. She hasn't done any of the stuff that you'd--that you would need to do, traditional or nontraditional, to run for president. I don't think she's running.
TODD: Look, Rush Limbaugh is an incredibly influential figure in the Republican Party, and he could never win the Republican nomination.
ROBINSON: Mm-hmm.
TODD: I think that's where Sarah Palin's coming. She's going to be an incredibly influential figure on a conservative movement in the Republican Party. That's what she wants. And I don't know if she'd get nominated. Look at her numbers among Republicans. She doesn't have the support among Republicans to win this nomination.
To begin with, one has to wonder whether "Meet the Press" has decided to go MSNBC on its viewers.
David Gregory, Eugene Robinson, and Chuck Todd a roundtable doth not make. This is the kind of "roundtable" one would expect on "Countdown with Keith Olbermann."
That said, it's quite a statement for Todd to claim Limbaugh could never win the Republican nomination for president.
As one of the most popular and highly recognizable conservatives on the face of the planet, Limbaugh could be a powerful force in politics if he ever chose to run for office.
If a totally unqualified junior senator from Illinois with absolutely no accomplishments in public or private life outside of academia can get elected president, Rush Limbaugh conceivably could win the Republican nomination.
But whether or not that's the case, exactly what has Limbaugh to do with Palin who has successfully run for office achieving a governorship which is no small feat.
Bringing Limbaugh into the equation seemed more of an opportunity to bash conservatives, which again was what one would expect from MSNBC.
Sadly, this was in keeping with the entire tenor of Sunday's installment which began with a rather softball interview with Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner who was largely allowed to echo White House talking points with little challenge.
Particularly disturbing was the section about the debt ceiling when Gregory chose to not ask specific numbers despite being given a big opening to do so.
The Secretary told his host that following August 2nd, the treasury will only have existing cash on hand and incoming revenues to pay the obligations of the federal government:
TIMOTHY GEITHNER, SECRETARY OF TREASURY: And every week starting the week of August 2, we have to go out and finance roughly $100 billion in maturing obligations of the government. We make 80 million checks a month to Americans, 55 million people on Social Security benefits, millions more Americans on veterans benefits, Medicare, Medicaid, people who supply our troops in combat. Eighty million checks a month. So on August 2, we're left with the cash on hand and the cash we take in. And we have to convince people to come and refinance $500 billion in maturing principal payments that come due in August.
With such an opening, a good interviewer would have asked exactly how much cash is on hand, what are the projected revenues for August as well as the debt obligations so that they can be met.
As NewsBusters has been reporting for days, treasury is projecting $172 billion worth of revenues for the month along with likely no higher than $35 billion in interest payments.
Since this is a key issue concerning the debt ceiling, why wouldn't Gregory have asked the man with the most information about these figures?
Might that have let the cat out of the bag that this really isn't the crisis the White House has ginned up, and that there is indeed no chance America is going to default on its debt in the coming months?
Having let Geithner nicely off the hook for having to answer any indelicate questions, Gregory instead chose to grill Republican presidential candidate Tim Pawlenty like a suspect in a capital crime.
If he would have been this aggressive with his previous guest, maybe America would have actually learned something about the looming debt ceiling beyond what the White House wishes.
I guess that's not as important to Gregory as bashing conservatives.
- Noel Sheppard's blog
- Login to post comments
















Comments
Palin couldn't win
Submitted by lrgon on Sun, 07/10/2011 - 6:55pm.
TRANSLATION: the lib media is afraid she very well might win!
Upchuck Todd is an idiot and so is Eugene Robinson.
Submitted by djwolf12 on Sun, 07/10/2011 - 6:58pm.
Their ignorance is bliss for a network that promotes all things progressive. I think it is fair to say that it you combined their IQ's there just might not be enough intelligence left for them to know how to tie their own shoes.
Hey F. Chuck............I've
Submitted by killa37 on Sun, 07/10/2011 - 7:01pm.
Hey F. Chuck............I've got a statement that makes just as much sense as your's does- Josef Stalin COULD win the Democratic nomination!!
And these three bought-and-paid for MSM Kool-Aid drinkers sitting around discussing this????
By the way, Chuckie Cheese...........has anyone had the gonads to tell you how dumb your little facial thang looks???
Funny that you should say that because facts are facts:
Submitted by djwolf12 on Sun, 07/10/2011 - 8:17pm.
10 times out of 10 a Marxist/Leninist/Trotzkyite/Communist/Socialist will vote for a democrat. Hence, it is fair to say Marxists / Leninists / Trotzkyites / Communists / Socialists are Democrats since they support them.
Oh, and dont forget
Submitted by Boudin on Sun, 07/10/2011 - 8:43pm.
10 out of 10 terrorist vote dimwit too
Yep, and let us not forget
Submitted by killa37 on Sun, 07/10/2011 - 8:58pm.
Yep, and let us not forget that Boy Blah-Blah WAS supported by the Socialist AND the Communist Parties of the USA!!! Funny how that never made the news, huh???
And, yeah, we HAVE heard the various Moooooooooooooooooooooslem (oh, sorry, followers of the 'religion of peace') using Dem/lib talking points in their rants and raves against America.
Hate to correct you killa
Submitted by Radical1979 on Sun, 07/10/2011 - 9:07pm.
But I do believe it's not the "religion of peace", but the religion of "pieces", as in heads, hands, whatever body part the koran has decreed they cut off.
Yeah, we're STILL trying to
Submitted by killa37 on Sun, 07/10/2011 - 9:18pm.
Yeah, we're STILL trying to find that genius who came up with that 'religion of peace' slogan, right??? He sure as hell fooled a few billion people for a long time..............
Maybe it was the 'peace' part of 'rest in peace'?????
What Peace is
Submitted by jon_torlin on Sun, 07/10/2011 - 10:00pm.
It's the Peace through tyranny.
That's what it is.
Keep that in mind. There is no other kind.
-Jon
Another thought
Submitted by zachlind on Sun, 07/10/2011 - 9:10pm.
This is an interesting conversation with equally interesting comments. I’ve often thought if you were to survey the U.S. prison population, and selected only the ones that have voted (you have to assume a large number of these people most likely don’t vote) or are likely to vote, that the overwhelming majority would vote for the Democrat candidate. The reason of course is that they are accustom to obtaining stuff for free, and similar to a Democrat politician, they’re more comfortable with the criminal and sleaze environment.
Tim Russert is turning in his grave
Submitted by chazzy-kc on Sun, 07/10/2011 - 7:02pm.
The last vestige of the once great NBC News brand is being eviscerated by the remarkably shallow and transparently biased Mr Gregrory in his role as moderator of "Meet the Press."
He has ...to my knowledge.....never asked a probative question of anyone in Obama's administration........the show has become virtually unwatchable.
Hey Chuckie, who gives a rets
Submitted by Scuba Dude on Sun, 07/10/2011 - 7:08pm.
Hey Chuckie, who gives a rats a$$ as to what you think? Why are you bringing up Rush Limbaugh? The man has never run for or ever aspired to running for public office as far as I know. Oh, I guess you were attempting a straw man argument there. Pathetic fail there Chuckles.
I actually did not know about
Submitted by tcm14 on Sun, 07/10/2011 - 7:10pm.
I actually did not know about the $172 billion in revenues vs. $35 billion in interest payments before reading about it on Newsbusters. Why isnt this being more widely reported?
Why do you think?
Submitted by Noel Sheppard on Sun, 07/10/2011 - 7:58pm.
Why do you think?
Why?
Submitted by Boudin on Sun, 07/10/2011 - 9:19pm.
Because we spend over 300billion per month
Disheartening that I didn't
Submitted by tcm14 on Sun, 07/10/2011 - 9:39pm.
Disheartening that I didn't see it on at least one network. This is basic information people need to have.
Chuck Todd's Non-sensical Observation
Submitted by Bourbeau on Sun, 07/10/2011 - 7:27pm.
As a country, we should be tired of these self-promoting news types, trying to stir
non-sensical arguments amongst the chattering classes. First up Chuck, no self-respecting Conservative gives a flying hoot what you think. Second, Sarah Palin would eat your lunch, any day of the week and doesn't need your two cents on anything she's contemplating; and Third, Rush Limbaugh is having too much fun in his real life to even think about such stupidity, but hey, that's where your mind is so let it run wild.
Neither One is Running...What Is their Point?
Submitted by gruyere cheese on Sun, 07/10/2011 - 7:31pm.
These talking heads need to stick to the issues and have a serious discussion and challenge their "one and only" Obama on what is going on in this country under his thumb. Rush & Palin are not on the ticket and so, what is their stupid point? Chuck needs to stick to telling us what the White House menu is on a daily basis instead of doing political commentary...what a waste of air time and money for MessNBC.
Obama couldn't get the nomination until
Submitted by Mr. Mike on Sun, 07/10/2011 - 7:38pm.
the useful socialist idiots in the msm got behind him! Why don't you talk about that Chucky?!
Hell, if F. Chuck and the rest of the msm "journalists" (a term lightly used!) would actually report the truth about Dear Leader he'd be in the low 20's in approval!!!
I can't wait to hear Rush's take on this tomorrow!
Will somebody please just...
Submitted by Dan Diego on Sun, 07/10/2011 - 8:16pm.
Shut the Chuck up!!!
I guess the meme is over.
Submitted by Quasi-socialist on Sun, 07/10/2011 - 8:39pm.
It looks like they don't need the Rush Limbaugh is the unassailable leader of the GOP anymore.
WOW!
Submitted by syvyn11 on Sun, 07/10/2011 - 8:39pm.
I didn't know Rush was running for Prez.
Just more liberal demonizing the right.
paraphrasing
Submitted by ant on Sun, 07/10/2011 - 8:50pm.
Chuck Todd, "...she doesn't want the 'blood libel' Giffords reply to a horrendous hoax of an accusation that, we, the pathetic media, invented and carried out,to be her last impression on the American people, because that MUST be the last impression they have of her, because WE are sooo influential and sooo important and sooo many Americans are still lapping up our obvious, biased, self-serving, Obama-protecting bile that we have the nerve to call 'truth' because Americans are so obviously sloping-forehead, rube, idiots."
Keep talkin', Chuck. WE are on to all of you, your time is running out.
The Big Three
Submitted by grammajane on Sun, 07/10/2011 - 8:51pm.
Watching these three is more fun then watching the three stooges. They have zero thoughts on anything, unless it is praising BO and his liberal take down of America. Bashing Rush and Palin only shows their jealousy of two great Americans who gather more people to their gatherings and radio then the three of combined could only hope to gather. I agree, Rush will have some choice words for F Chuck Todd and his constant whinning and hand gestures. Where did that Robinson guy come from??? Wish someone would take him away.
Hope and Change
Submitted by grammajane on Sun, 07/10/2011 - 8:57pm.
Maybe they could change the show to " Meet the Radical Libs" and hope to get an audience
This Just In!
Submitted by Cool Arrow on Sun, 07/10/2011 - 9:32pm.
F. Chuck Todd could not win the DC Mayorship.
There is no way Rush would ever run for POTUS
Submitted by Dave. on Sun, 07/10/2011 - 9:33pm.
LOL - He wouldn't want the drastic cut in income.
-Dave
Vote for the American in November
NBC???
Submitted by pbthinker on Sun, 07/10/2011 - 9:39pm.
I watch, when I get the opportunity, a few of the Sunday shows. I never watch Meet the Press because it's little more than Democrat propaganda. Gregory, and company, are up there in media bias with Bob Schieffer at CBS's Face the Nation. That leaves ABC and This Week, which I watch because they have George Will who will counter the best liberal spin from the 3 liberals they have on there.
I will also listen to Reliable Sources which has good moments and bad moments and Candy Crowley (?) has good and bad moments. Of course Fox News Sunday is good but the Democrats seldom send anyone in there of substance. My guess is they don't because they're going to be spinning in circles on the liberal shows and they don't want to see them tripped up with the truth on Fox.
Rush Limbaugh.
Submitted by pbthinker on Sun, 07/10/2011 - 9:41pm.
I forgot to add this comment. Rush Limbaugh could definitely win the Republican nomination (God I'd love to see the debates) but he couldn't take the pay cut. Of course we could compromise and call his daily 3 hours a "Fireside Chat" and still have the syndicators pay him. Wouldn't that drive the Democrats truly nuts.
Lib-Lib-Lib
Submitted by Texndoc on Sun, 07/10/2011 - 10:01pm.
I watched the panel, only because the Fox Sunday show came on at an earlier time today.
I was mad that the panel consisted of Robinson, UpChuck, and Gregory and then realized they could have sent me through the roof - by including "Conservative" David Brooks.
An empty chair is preferable.
Straw graspers
Submitted by Jerry Mack on Sun, 07/10/2011 - 10:54pm.
3 very scared people grasping for straws. Doing and saying anything that might deflect the truth away from the Messiah. Why they keep supporting this failure is only somethng that they know. Or do they?
Chuck U Toddhack
Submitted by AgentAmerican on Sun, 07/10/2011 - 11:20pm.
To bring the conservative they fear most into the straw man shooting gallery (straw men don't shoot back) is only going to make Rush Limbaugh very interesting tomorrow.
6'-2", boyish good looks, minimalist goatee, chiseled biceps...
Submitted by SickofLibs on Sun, 07/10/2011 - 11:28pm.
ah, how I miss F Chuck's former partner Bananas Guthrie.
Now THAT was a team.
NBC: Nothing But Crap
Submitted by rono on Sun, 07/10/2011 - 11:55pm.
F Chuck is a joke. I quit watching his left-wing propaganda reports a long time ago. Robinson is a fool that doesn't have a thing to say because he's got his mouth full under Obama's desk. NBC has no credibility. David Gregory is a DNC shill that wouldn't know unbiased journalism even if it bit him on the left cheek of his own butt. Turn the channel.
Rono*
Submitted by cajun2 on Mon, 07/11/2011 - 12:04am.
That post is offensive. Time for you to turn the channel and try Yahoo Buzz. More your style.
Chuck you need to shave
Submitted by Rusty Shackleford on Sun, 07/10/2011 - 11:56pm.
Chuck you need to shave because goatees are for men. I'm sure you can find a nice razor the next time you're in Ambercrombe and Finch.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Chris Matthews: The Joy Behar of MSNBC.
Bill Maher: The Joy Behar of HBO.
Paul Krugman: The Joy Behar of The New York Times.
Yes, but Rush has said he
Submitted by wiwf on Mon, 07/11/2011 - 9:10am.
Yes, but Rush has said he will never seek the presidency. So this argument is moot.