Rolling Stone's Taibbi: Michele Bachmann Is 'Bats--t Crazy' 'Psychopath' With 'Terminator Testicles'
If you know anything about Rolling Stone's Matt Taibbi it's that he totally despises conservatives.
In the soon-to-be-released issue of the magazine that actually employs him, Taibbi relentlessly attacked Republican presidential candidate Michele Bachmann as a "bats--t crazy" "political psychopath" with a "gigantic set of burnished titanium Terminator-testicles swinging under her skirt" (illustration by Victor Juhasz):
Close your eyes, take a deep breath, and, as you consider the career and future presidential prospects of an incredible American phenomenon named Michele Bachmann, do one more thing. Don't laugh.
So began "Michele Bachmann's Holy War," Taibbi's 5,200-word hit piece on Bachmann.
And that was just the opening salvo:
Michele Bachmann is almost certainly the funniest thing that has ever happened to American presidential politics. [...]
Bachmann is a religious zealot whose brain is a raging electrical storm of divine visions and paranoid delusions.
Get the picture? Whenever possible, Taibbi eviscerated Bachmann's sanity as well as her religious beliefs:
Michele Bachmann, when she turns her head toward the cameras and brandishes her pearls and her ageless, unblemished neckline and her perfect suburban orthodontics in an attempt to reassure the unbeliever of her non-threateningness, is one of the scariest sights in the entire American cultural tableau. She's trying to look like June Cleaver, but she actually looks like the T2 skeleton posing for a passport photo.
And, since Rolling Stone readers love vulgarity, Taibbi is always willing to provide it:
Bachmann is exactly the right kind of completely batshit crazy. Not medically crazy, not talking-to-herself-on-the-subway crazy, but grandiose crazy, late-stage Kim Jong-Il crazy — crazy in the sense that she's living completely inside her own mind, frenetically pacing the hallways of a vast sand castle she's built in there, unable to meaningfully communicate with the human beings on the other side of the moat, who are all presumed to be enemies.
Imagine that. To Taibbi, this presidential candidate is as crazy as one of America's mortal enemies, North Korea's Kim Jong-Il. And he was just getting warmed up:
[T]his hard-charging challenger for the GOP nomination is a rare breed of political psychopath, equal parts crazed Divine Wind kamikaze-for-Jesus and calculating, six-faced Machiavellian prevaricator. [...]
Bachmann's entire political career has followed this exact same pattern of God-speaks-directly-to-me fundamentalism mixed with pathological, relentless, conscienceless lying. She's not a liar in the traditional way of politicians, who tend to lie dully, usefully and (they hope) believably, often with the aim of courting competing demographics at the same time. That's not what Bachmann's thing is. Bachmann lies because she can't help it, because it's a built-in component of both her genetics and her ideology. She is at once the most entertaining and the most dangerous kind of liar, a turbocharged cross between a born bullshit artist and a religious fanatic, for whom lying to the infidel is a kind of holy duty.
So, Taibbi isn't bothered by politicians lying if they know they're misrepresenting the truth to get votes. He's just offended - or so he claims - if religious people do it.
Of course, that's not what Bachmann is doing, but it is a strange distinction, wouldn't you agree?
Getting past this oddity, Taibbi added his version of vitriolic biographical analysis in a sorry attempt to legitimize his hit piece:
In October 2006, she stepped before a packed house at the Living Word Christian Center in Brooklyn Park, Minnesota, and told her life story. All of history's great madmen have had that one gorgeous moment where the cackling hairy hunchback that has been gestating within for years finally comes out and shows itself, strutting up and down the catwalk for the world to see. This was Michele's catwalk moment.
In almost every paragraph, there was something present to remind readers just how much the author despised Bachmann, and how much they should as well:
The public has become acquainted with some of Bachmann's other excellent qualities as a politician — her TV-ready looks, her easy confidence in public speaking, her quick command of a mountainous database of (frequently bogus) facts — but often overlooked is her greatest quality, the gigantic set of burnished titanium Terminator-testicles swinging under her skirt.
After attacking his subject for well over 5,000 words, Taibbi offered a surprising conclusion:
Even other Republicans, it seems, are making the mistake of laughing at Bachmann. But consider this possibility: She wins Iowa, then swallows the Tea Party and Christian vote whole for the next 30 or 40 primaries while Romney and Pawlenty battle fiercely over who is the more "viable" boring-white-guy candidate. Then Wall Street blows up again — and it's Barack Obama and a soaring unemployment rate versus a white, God-fearing mother of 28 from the heartland.
It could happen. Michele Bachmann has found the flaw in the American Death Star. She is a television camera's dream, a threat to do or say something insane at any time, the ultimate reality-show protagonist. She has brilliantly piloted a media system that is incapable of averting its eyes from a story, riding that attention to an easy conquest of an overeducated cultural elite from both parties that is far too full of itself to understand the price of its contemptuous laughter. All of those people out there aren't voting for Michele Bachmann. They're voting against us. And to them, it turns out, we suck enough to make anyone a contender.
So Bachmann is a bats--t crazy, psychopathic, lying, religious zealot who just might become president because people like Taibbi suck.
I may not agree with his opinion of the Minnesota Congresswoman, but I most certainly have no problem with his self-analysis or his depiction of people that share his views.
- Noel Sheppard's blog
- Login to post comments
















Comments
Badge of honor
Submitted by octavioj on Thu, 06/23/2011 - 10:59am.
I think Mrs. Bachmann should wear this as a badge of honor. Being despised so much means that she indeed makes a difference and that she indeed has the message.
I don't know anything about this guy....
Submitted by Tugboat Phil on Thu, 06/23/2011 - 11:09am.
If you know anything about Rolling Stone's Matt Taibbi it's that he totally despises conservatives.
What I suspect is that he's afraid of women.
I'd like a president with a pair...
Submitted by Radical1979 on Thu, 06/23/2011 - 11:11am.
because our current president doesn't seem to have any.
Fire Starter
Submitted by Diesel on Thu, 06/23/2011 - 11:20am.
These bastards keep sending me their crap magazine, even though I've never (nor would I EVER) subscribed to it.
It goes straight from the mail box to the burn barrel, in order to increase my carbon footprint.
It's the acusation that's important
Submitted by DontFeedTheTrolls on Thu, 06/23/2011 - 11:26am.
Notice, once again, how a liberal accuses someone of lying and using made up 'facts' without ever pointing out a single lie or falsehood.
I was thinking
Submitted by SamC on Thu, 06/23/2011 - 11:47am.
I was thinking the same thing. I can picture the meeting between Taibbi and his editor regarding this story.
Editor: "Jeez Matt, you're pretty stringent here that she's a habitual, conscious liar. You do have actual evidence of this, right?"
Hack Writer: "Uh, yeah. Evidence. Well, Chris Matthews says she lies, is that good enough?"
Editor: "Matthews....yeah, that's good. Print it."
Maybe it was one of those
Submitted by balboa on Thu, 06/23/2011 - 2:35pm.
Maybe it was one of those 'not to be taken as a factual statement' kind of things...
Sure it is, Bal...
Submitted by Phryj1 on Thu, 06/23/2011 - 3:58pm.
Making outrageous, insulting, and hateful accusations and then claiming it was meant as a joke or satire, the go-to strategy of the modern liberal bomb-thrower.
Progressives seem to be completely averse to facts and logic. Apparently, reality has a conservative bias.
This is a reference to that
Submitted by balboa on Thu, 06/23/2011 - 4:02pm.
This is a reference to that Republican politician, the one who made that statement about Planned Parenthood. Is that the "go-to strategy" of the right, then?
Bal,
Submitted by Phryj1 on Thu, 06/23/2011 - 4:17pm.
I'm the last person who's going to tolerate lies from a Republican, because lying always does more harm than good. Not sure which particular incident you're talking about, though.
That said, left-wing editorialists and comedians have made a cottage industry out of spewing some of the most hateful things imaginable and then hiding behind a clown nose when they're called out on it.
Progressives seem to be completely averse to facts and logic. Apparently, reality has a conservative bias.
Double Standard again...
Submitted by Radical1979 on Thu, 06/23/2011 - 4:20pm.
That "I'm only joking" routine only works one way of course. Just ask Tracey Morgan. His statements about a gay son weren't looked at as a joke, although it occurred during a comedy routine. No, he has had to bow down to GLAAD and the other libs.
Funny, because that's what I
Submitted by balboa on Thu, 06/23/2011 - 8:03pm.
Funny, because that's what I hear people say sometimes about Rush and Coulter when they make an outrageous shot at someone.
balboa
Submitted by Phryj1 on Fri, 06/24/2011 - 1:01pm.
I'll acknowledge that Limbaugh and Coulter occasionally cross the line, but compare them to people like Bill Maher, Mike Malloy, and Keith Olbermann who are known primarily because of the venom they spew at conservatives. I'm not saying them doing it makes it okay, it just seems like conservative hosts/pundits/editorialists are held to a stricter standard of decency than their liberal counterparts.
Progressives seem to be completely averse to facts and logic. Apparently, reality has a conservative bias.
"I'll acknowledge that
Submitted by balboa on Fri, 06/24/2011 - 1:33pm.
"I'll acknowledge that Limbaugh and Coulter occasionally cross the line."
You're probably the only one. :-)
But a fair point about being held to a stricter standard, I think.
Even my leftist buds think this is upchucking hate for no reason
Submitted by ozarkian on Fri, 06/24/2011 - 9:05pm.
You really don't see anything wrong with the article, huh? Man, I've read some soulless leftists on the net, but anyone who doesn't think this kind of vitriol is worth even a sentence.... I had the idea from your postings that you were a first amendment guy, someone who used somewhat fallacious, but reasonable arguments (comparing apples to oranges, but who doesn't when they want to make a point?) You kind of get a picture of what people are like when you lurk or post on a site a lot; you know how it is.
But, hafta admit, you surprised me with this one. I don't really have anything else to say; I'm just sitting here shaking my head at the idea that anyone would go along with this kind of viciousness against a woman just because she's a conservative running for president.
Perhaps you should actually
Submitted by classicliberal2 on Thu, 06/23/2011 - 12:03pm.
Perhaps you should actually read the article, instead of just the excerpts above.
cl2,
Submitted by Agnostic on Thu, 06/23/2011 - 12:46pm.
read the article and the excerpts above and have to say that this read like it started as a hit piece and went downhill from there.
The few facts put forth were in one line of reasoning and that had to do with her core Christian ties. While, if true, I would be concerned if the fanatical depiction is correct the article is so prejudiced that it is hard to keep from laughing.
A politician that is hardly known with a charismatic bearing comes out of no where with ties to people and groups that are fanatical. Gee, where have I heard that before. I will say given the choice of those fanatical ties being with a Christian group or Marxist/Weathermen/Black Militant Movement I'll take the Christian group every time.
This article could have been written about Obama, Reid, Biden, Pelosi, any Kennedy or a host of others but we know that the RS nor most media would ever do this kind of hit piece on a Democrat.
There was no proof of lies in the article that I noted - at least not concrete proof, though there was definitely indications that she has changed her story a few times but not necessarily in a manner that indicates a lie.
Yes, I can see where she was
Submitted by classicliberal2 on Thu, 06/23/2011 - 2:24pm.
Yes, I can see where she was being perfectly honest when she said she had to go home and take care of all of those kids who, in reality, had moved out a decade earlier, and when she denied she'd ever made that "anti-American" remark, after making it on national television, and so on. I don't know how familiar you are with Bachmann, but she's one of the stand-out liars in a political culture absolutely stuffed with them--it would probably be easier to count the things she says that have any basis in reality than to count her comments that don't. The article makes painfully plain that this is someone who, most of the time, probably can't even distinguish reality from fantasy. Taibbi gives her credit for being a lot more cagey than I've ever observed her to be.
Took care of 23 TEEN FOSTER kids over the years
Submitted by MaximusBraveheart on Thu, 06/23/2011 - 2:37pm.
Gee she sounds just horrid. Talk about sacrifice & patience!
So where are the facts of what you are even claiming. Where did she lie & about what. What is this "anti-American" remark? So she said "I am anti-American" on TV and then denied it? You don't know her if you think she is anti-American.
"she's one of the stand-out liars in a political culture absolutely stuffed with them--it would probably be easier to count the things she says that have any basis in reality than to count her comments that don't." On what do you base this slander?
Obama is the chronic liar in chief. So Obama is not lying yet Bachmann full of lies?
-- Maximusbraveheart -- Is TRUTH knowable? Moral Relativism is the abandonment of Truth. Truth is knowable. Truth conforms to Reality. Reality is observable by evidence & witness in this day & from history. Relativism is Sesame Street play land.
Read the article. You're just
Submitted by classicliberal2 on Thu, 06/23/2011 - 3:00pm.
Read the article. You're just embarrassing yourself by ranting without having done so.
Professional - So Sorros PAYS you to do this?
Submitted by MaximusBraveheart on Thu, 06/23/2011 - 3:53pm.
Your profile: "Professional rabble-rouser, troublemaker, and defender of unpopular causes, with an ongoing mission to comfort the afflicted and afflict the comfortable"
Sorros, Obama & Wall Street look pretty fat & happy. I suggest you go after them. Or are they your "unpopular cause?"
I'm not paid to read his 5000 word POStulation like you. So no thanks.
-- Maximusbraveheart -- Is TRUTH knowable? Moral Relativism is the abandonment of Truth. Truth is knowable. Truth conforms to Reality. Reality is observable by evidence & witness in this day & from history. Relativism is Sesame Street play land.
It's all about personal destruction with you a**holes.
Submitted by SickofLibs on Thu, 06/23/2011 - 2:53pm.
You don't live in Minnesota and you won't be supporting another Republican in any primary and you sure as hell won't be voting against Obama.
So why do you care about Bachman? Because you think this is a
Holy War, that's why.
ouch
Submitted by SickofLibs on Thu, 06/23/2011 - 2:52pm.
.
ouch
Submitted by SickofLibs on Thu, 06/23/2011 - 2:53pm.
.
runaway wireless keyboard
Submitted by SickofLibs on Thu, 06/23/2011 - 2:53pm.
.
ouch
Submitted by SickofLibs on Thu, 06/23/2011 - 2:51pm.
.
ouch
Submitted by SickofLibs on Thu, 06/23/2011 - 2:51pm.
.
You've approached Sheryl Stutter Syndrome
Submitted by Blonde on Thu, 06/23/2011 - 4:13pm.
Although I do believe the record is 32.
Nice try, though.
Handy Reference Guide to Obama's Gaffes and Goofs ~ Currently Numbering 200 (and Counting)
Meh!
Submitted by Rukus on Thu, 06/23/2011 - 8:13pm.
Amateur!
CL2 is a big Taibbi fan
Submitted by Phryj1 on Thu, 06/23/2011 - 4:08pm.
So, you agree with Taibbi in that it's perfectly a-ok for a Democrat to lie, but lying becomes a serious problem if a conservative ever does it. And that makes you just as much of a hypocrite as Taibbi is.
Progressives seem to be completely averse to facts and logic. Apparently, reality has a conservative bias.
"So, you agree with Taibbi in
Submitted by classicliberal2 on Thu, 06/23/2011 - 9:30pm.
"So, you agree with Taibbi in that it's perfectly a-ok for a Democrat to lie, but lying becomes a serious problem if a conservative ever does it."
To the contrary, I've never said anything of the sort, and neither, I suspect, has Taibbi. What do you think you gain by fabricating that sort of libel?
Nothing like a classicTurd2 troll to fill up the database.
Submitted by The Vet on Thu, 06/23/2011 - 11:49pm.
So, you agree with Taibbi in...
So, you agree with Taibbi in...
So, you agree with Taibbi in...
How many times to we have to read the first part of Phryj1's sentence Retard?
You can't comprehend how to fill out a subject line or respond to a post without extensively quoting the post DIRECTLY ABOVE YOURS yet you want us to believe you have a firm grasp on the big concepts. Wrong Retard. It don't work that way.
Fail. Internet turd fail.
Fabrication? Hmm... let's see...
Submitted by Phryj1 on Fri, 06/24/2011 - 12:19am.
First, there's this part of the article:
"She's not a liar in the traditional way of politicians, who tend to lie dully, usefully and (they hope) believably, often with the aim of courting competing demographics at the same time."
Taibbi is specifically criticizing Bachmann for lying while obviously giving other politicians a pass. Since hit pieces and smears against conservatives are pretty much his specialty, I sincerely doubt he would extend his apparent acceptance of political liars to anyone on the right side of the aisle.
And in one of your ealier posts on here, http://newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-sheppard/2011/06/23/rolling-stones-tai... , you tacitly endorsed his position on politicians who lie.
There you go.
Progressives seem to be completely averse to facts and logic. Apparently, reality has a conservative bias.
No, there YOU go.
Submitted by classicliberal2 on Fri, 06/24/2011 - 2:25am.
Your novel "interpretation"--that pointing out that politicians lie is an endorsement of that lying--isn't, I fear, gong to convince anyone. Taibbi doesn't endorse politicians lying. And neither did I. Not in that post. Not anywhere. Period.
Ignore the classicTurd troll.
Submitted by The Vet on Fri, 06/24/2011 - 2:34am.
This troll specializes in lying, has in fact been busted in several lies, regurgitates long winded posts from his blog on sites all over the net, blatantly plagiarizes others posts, and frankly bores everyone here.
Do not feed this troll.
So...
Submitted by MaximusBraveheart on Fri, 06/24/2011 - 10:54am.
So you and Taibbi don't love & support Obama, Pelosi, Reid et al? Non-stop lies with them, & I don't see Taibbi, yourself, or the DNC saying for their own, to STOP with the lies!!!!!
I do see more and more Dems voters starting however to jump off the sinking ship. They now say they regret voting for "the One" (picture hallow circling head), and they now see that was folly to fall for such empty promises. He has worked hard to deliver our economy into destruction.
-- Maximusbraveheart -- Is TRUTH knowable? Moral Relativism is the abandonment of Truth. Truth is knowable. Truth conforms to Reality. Reality is observable by evidence & witness in this day & from history. Relativism is Sesame Street play land.
Novel interpretation?
Submitted by Phryj1 on Fri, 06/24/2011 - 1:12pm.
You know, when you say something like: "To be fair, he offers up exactly as much civility as the subject warrants.", how is that anything other than supporting Taibbi's vicious and hypocritical hit job? Taibbi himself is a proven liar, he particularly likes lies of omission (as in, leaving out facts and context in order to portray someone in as negative a light as possible), and there are more than a few articles on here proving that. Has he ever at any point called out Democrats for lying? Didn't think so. So, he lies, the politicians he likes lies, but when a conservative lies, it warrants a vitriolic and hate-filled attack, and you very clearly agree that it does. There aren't a whole lot of other ways to interpret either Taibbi's articles OR your comments on this thread.
Progressives seem to be completely averse to facts and logic. Apparently, reality has a conservative bias.
I love how all that civility
Submitted by kareling on Thu, 06/23/2011 - 11:26am.
I love how all that civility shines through in every sentence.
To be fair, he offers up
Submitted by classicliberal2 on Thu, 06/23/2011 - 12:01pm.
To be fair, he offers up exactly as much civility as the subject warrants.
DON'T FEED THIS TROLL
Submitted by ThisnThat on Thu, 06/23/2011 - 12:22pm.
Just let this idiot's comment lay there. I don't want to see yet another thread sidetracked just so that a troll can get his satisfaction.
__________
“Didn't win the Medal of Honor? Didn't even serve? Then lie about it. We'll support you." — 9th Circuit Court
Wow he doesn't like her.
Submitted by balboa on Thu, 06/23/2011 - 11:31am.
Wow he doesn't like her. That's pretty heavy-handed. I mean, I don't care for her, but HOLY COW he really doesn't.
oh stop, balboa
Submitted by Hoosier Conservative on Thu, 06/23/2011 - 11:53am.
Just stop acting shocked that a flaming liberal progressive would write a hateful article in a magazine about rock and roll.
They've been doing this for years, but we're supposed to act surprised every time.
I can be surprised, HC, or is
Submitted by balboa on Thu, 06/23/2011 - 12:01pm.
I can be surprised, HC, or is that not an emotion conservatives recognize?
non sequitor
Submitted by Hoosier Conservative on Thu, 06/23/2011 - 12:04pm.
It has nothing do with conservatives recognizing emotion.
If you're surprised by Taibbi's article, that implies you thought better of him before. I am never surprised by how much hate a liberal progressive displays.
I don't know anything about
Submitted by balboa on Thu, 06/23/2011 - 12:07pm.
I don't know anything about Taibbi. The quote provided surprised me. Is that OK?
Rolling stoned
Submitted by jessieH on Thu, 06/23/2011 - 11:45am.
I guess that fat check from Soros made it in. This ragazine has always been to weird to buy.
You know what's batshit crazy?
Submitted by GONAVY on Thu, 06/23/2011 - 12:24pm.
Plunking down $5 for this rag. Used to read it all the time when I was 12, then I grew up.
And I thought Ed Schultz was demented
Submitted by another_old_veteran on Thu, 06/23/2011 - 11:55am.
This guy must be the main educator of the MSNBC crowd.
“If you take a highly intelligent person and give them the best possible, elite education, then you will most likely wind up with an academic who is completely impervious to reality.” - Halton C. Arp
Now Liberals must be freaking
Submitted by Free Stinker on Thu, 06/23/2011 - 12:02pm.
Now Liberals must be freaking out that they focussed so heavily on attacking Sarah Palin that Michele Bachmann flew in under the RADAR. "Where'd she come from?! Shoot her down! Quick! She's gaining on the RINOs!"
/// Sarah Palin Fan since July 11, 2007 /// خال
Crucaders were taking back THEIR land from "new" Muslims
Submitted by MaximusBraveheart on Thu, 06/23/2011 - 12:03pm.
I think it is COOL that he portrays Bachmann as a crusader! It is a badge of honor. We need to take back our land from the misled socialist invaders, and resulting destruction of our form of government.
My family line includes Fulk V, crusader and King of Jerusalem from 1131 till his death in 1143.
-- Maximusbraveheart -- Is TRUTH knowable? Moral Relativism is the abandonment of Truth. Truth is knowable. Truth conforms to Reality. Reality is observable by evidence & witness in this day & from history. Relativism is Sesame Street play land.
Who is being burned in
Submitted by MaximusBraveheart on Thu, 06/23/2011 - 12:20pm.
Who is being burned in blouses and fairly short skirts? Looks like 1990s clothing! Are those witches in the colonies, or, Europe?
PS: This guy likely thinks it is great that the crusaders lost. Muslim control of the Middle East, and oil, is working out so great!
-- Maximusbraveheart -- Is TRUTH knowable? Moral Relativism is the abandonment of Truth. Truth is knowable. Truth conforms to Reality. Reality is observable by evidence & witness in this day & from history. Relativism is Sesame Street play land.
Why....
Submitted by liberalsarefunny on Thu, 06/23/2011 - 12:06pm.
Why are liberal "men" so afraid of conservative women?
The answer is in the article...
Submitted by Djinn1975 on Thu, 06/23/2011 - 1:22pm.
'...the gigantic set of burnished titanium Terminator-testicles swinging under her skirt.'
They don't like it that the only group that could replace them, repeatedly and when the chips are down, relegates them to the bottom of the masculinity scale.
This creep sounds like
Submitted by killa37 on Thu, 06/23/2011 - 12:12pm.
This creep sounds like another loony lib woman hating faggot............and when I started to read his comments, I thought he was describing Nurse Ratchett , Ms. Botox, or Mooooochelle O'Barry,although I thought he was being a little light on them.
Sounds like Taibbi and Chris
Submitted by motherbelt on Thu, 06/23/2011 - 12:33pm.
Sounds like Taibbi and Chris Matthews both graduated from the same school of chivalry.
What is it with these guys and women?
I expect Taibbi to have his own show on MSNBC any day now.
**Creeper Alert!**
Submitted by malefecent928 on Thu, 06/23/2011 - 12:40pm.
How jealous does he sound about her having a set of "burnished" ones?? What's funny is that libs dislike Conservative women who are usually very feminine. Unlike "Big Sis" Janet Nap-all-a-time-o, Janet Reno (yikes! What is it about the name "Janet"?) And best of all Michelle (Igot bigger ones than my hubby) Obama!
Game On
Submitted by JackandMarilyn on Thu, 06/23/2011 - 1:07pm.
Tie-E-B has been criticizing the republican party and conservatives for what seems like forever. Despite his personal feelings about Representative Bachmann I would like to read the article in its entirety before making judgement. I like the crusades reference. Kind of clever. I'm interested to see how governor Palin responds to this article, if at all.
Priceless liberal projection
Submitted by b-dob on Thu, 06/23/2011 - 1:25pm.
Is it just me, or did Taibbi's baseless description of Bachmann actually describe Obama to perfection? The Stones author is terrified about Obama's re-election chances, so he projects his personality shortcomings onto the Republican he most fears will unseat his political messiah.
Once again liberals engage in
Submitted by eaglewingz08 on Thu, 06/23/2011 - 1:29pm.
Once again liberals engage in vicious sexism and denial of femininity to conservative women who don't labor at the socialist plantations of the democraps. How dare Taibbi claim that Michelle Bachmann has testicles. What if republcans said that Obama had no testicles"? They'd go bananas (well more so than usual). It is the concerted effort of liberals to demonize, defame and ostracize all ethnics and genders who don't agree with the democrap socialist program. Especially if the conservative women are good looking probably due to envy that democrap female politicians are not as good looking and intelligent as our conservative female politicians are.
This guy makes Olbermann look rational...
Submitted by Bill Brasky on Thu, 06/23/2011 - 2:06pm.
Hard to find a more ill informed jackass than Taibbi. It seems like every issue (I don't buy it, I wipe my ass with them at the barbershop) features a hysterical anti-conservative rant by this douche bag. If Rolling Stone wonders why their readership is in the toilet they might consider the fact that most of their readers grew up and now see this kind of "journalism" for what it is... litter box lining.
Taibbi
Submitted by ProudAmerican58 on Thu, 06/23/2011 - 2:27pm.
SUCKS!!!!!!
Theft of an idea
Submitted by Cranky_Curmudgeon on Thu, 06/23/2011 - 4:50pm.
I am wondering- did this clown steal that batsh*t thing from Dennis Miller, or did Miller appropriate it from this fool-with-a-blog?
Doesnt he come across to the Rolling Stoned dorks as,,
Submitted by NJRightWinger12 on Thu, 06/23/2011 - 6:47pm.
some kind of David Brooks "conservative"? I thought he was once trying to portray himself as such? I never liked him, and esp now, after he dissed my gal! Him, and that old 60's relic of a ragsheet, can go to HELL!
The Truth
Submitted by djwolf12 on Thu, 06/23/2011 - 8:04pm.
Rolling Stone Magazine is about as relevent as PBS's endless documentaries every single week about Pete Seeger and Peter, Paul, & Mary (who just so happened to be card-carrying communists). I'd actually prefer to go out and buy a 1958 Ford Edsel than any issue of Rolling Stone.
The "irrelevant" Rolling
Submitted by classicliberal2 on Fri, 06/24/2011 - 2:44am.
The "irrelevant" Rolling Stone has a circulation of just under 1.5 million. To put that in perspective, that's almost 10 times the circulation of National Review, the best-selling conservative magazine in the U.S.. In fact, one can combine the National Review (circulation 155,000) with the Weekly Standard (circulation 65,000), the American Spectator (circulation 50,000), and Human Events (circulation 65,000), and Rolling Stone still outsells this combination by more than 7-to-1.
Ignore the classicTurd Troll.
Submitted by The Vet on Fri, 06/24/2011 - 3:16am.
This troll still can't figure out how or why we fill out the Subject line despite --
He can't show us any respect by forcing us to read the first part of his Stupid twice, we don't have to show the tinest shred of respect in return
How many are comps?
Submitted by MaximusBraveheart on Fri, 06/24/2011 - 11:08am.
Someone here said they get them free & have not paid for it in a long time. Do they publish how many are comps to professionals? And how many are thrown out from the retailers? Likely a huge percentage (50% ?).
NRA's magazines: American Rifleman has a circulation of 1,846,472, American Hunter 1,066,261, and America's 1st Freedom 609,300. That's a total of 3,522,033 subscriptions.
-- Maximusbraveheart -- Is TRUTH knowable? Moral Relativism is the abandonment of Truth. Truth is knowable. Truth conforms to Reality. Reality is observable by evidence & witness in this day & from history. Relativism is Sesame Street play land.
"NRA's magazines: American
Submitted by classicliberal2 on Sun, 06/26/2011 - 10:20pm.
"NRA's magazines: American Rifleman has a circulation of 1,846,472, American Hunter 1,066,261, and America's 1st Freedom 609,300. That's a total of 3,522,033 subscriptions."
Fair enough, but the Rifleman and Hunter can't be compared, in any real way, to Rolling Stone (I've never seen America's 1st Freedom, though). RS isn't primarily concerned with politics, but it does cover them in every issue, and in a broad range of subjects. Unless things have radically changed in the last few years, the NRA publications don't really deal with politics, beyond gun control and hunter's issues, and those aren't really liberal/conservative issues (they're country/city issues). Even if one does want to make some sort of rough comparison, RS still significantly outsells them on an individual basis (which directly touches on the assertion that began this exchange, that RS is of no relevance).
Touche', classicd**chebag
Submitted by djwolf12 on Sun, 06/26/2011 - 8:16pm.
More poeple listen or watch Fox News, Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, AND Mark Levin than read your commie pinko rag. Put that in your crack pipe and smoke it.
and another thing classic d**chebag
Submitted by djwolf12 on Mon, 07/04/2011 - 6:31pm.
name how many times Matt Taibbi actually carried on a conversation with Michelle Bachmann before he whote this scathing, heaping bowl of trash. I will say it was a whopping ZERO.
LOL!
Submitted by Rukus on Mon, 07/04/2011 - 6:58pm.
cl2 got nuked a few days back. You're talking to an ex-account. Been there, done that myself, lol!
Oh Happy Day!
Submitted by Radical1979 on Mon, 07/04/2011 - 9:04pm.
I didn't realize CL2 was finally gone! What a lovely Independence Day surprise!
I Wouldn't Go That Far; She Just Reminds Me Of Nancy Pelosi...
Submitted by TheReal7Sticks on Thu, 06/23/2011 - 10:58pm.
Of course, as far as I'm concerned, the one true nut among the Republican field would have to be Ron Paul, so Bachmann doesn't even come close to being nuts. That's not to say she doesn't carry her own personal baggage; She seems to come off like Nancy Pelosi in conservative clothing. She seems to misrepresent certain truths, like the one I brought up several months ago about how she lied about, I believe, the expense of President Obama's trip to India. Yeah, I just looked it up on Snopes: I believe she was repeating a claim from some rag called the Press Trust of India that it cost $200 million for what was supposed to be a 3,000-person entourage at all 570 rooms of the Taj Mahal palace hotel. Here's the link: http://www.snopes.com/politics/obama/india.asp
As for Taibbi, he is trying way too hard because at this point, the Republican nomination belongs to either Pawlenty or Romney. Of course, I'm more of a John Huntsman fan myself, but that's just me.
Coulter's Rule in Force
Submitted by Quasi-socialist on Fri, 06/24/2011 - 8:46am.
If they can't make the case that you're stupid, they'll call you evil. They tried the stupid thing, but America was not buying it. Now, on to evil and crazy. One of "history's great madmen".
Unfortunately, this will have more penetration than an emotion-spewing screed ever should.
Nobody in my circle of friends reads Rolling Stone anymore
Submitted by Dave. on Sun, 06/26/2011 - 8:41pm.
Not my conservative friends.
Not my lib friends.
Heck, not even my gay friends read that worthless rag of a publication.
LOL - I wouldn't even buy it for fuel for my Weber charcoal chimneys, as that is what Cynthia Tucker's Al Jihadi Urinal/Constipation is for.
-Dave
Vote for the American in November
Weber charcoal chimneys
Submitted by Boudin on Sun, 06/26/2011 - 8:54pm.
Love those things, I find the Charcoal bag works best, also 1 complete bag is just enough for the hole bag.